A Comprehensive Synthesis of Research into Information Technology in Education Niki Davis International Federation of Information Processing, leader of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
A UNESCO Workshop ICT, Education Transformation, and
Rapporteur’s Report Professor John Coolahan Conference Theme “Better Assessment and Evaluation to Improve Teaching and Learning” How use assessment most.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Connecting Completion and Quality for Student Success Illinois Performance Funding Steering Committee Chicago, IL November 13, 2013 Carol Geary Schneider.
Status of ICT Integration in Education in Southeast Asian Countries
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
NARUC Presentation – July 2008 NARUC Presentation – July 2008 Brenda Kempster, KEMPSTER GROUP ICT Digital Literacy Initiative.
Michael G Fullan Michael Fullan is Professor Emeritus of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. Recognized as a.
ESA Region 2 April st Century Skills: More Than Just Computers.
Structuring e-Leadership Workshops in the APEC Region.
Fylgiskjal H3 Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir Randi Skjelmo Kjell Johansson
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Policy for Transforming Teaching & Learning through ICTs in South Africa Seugnet Blignaut Seugnet Blignaut
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Chapter Twelve - 12 Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
National Art Education Association Museum Division Awards Luncheon March 18, 2011 Marsha Semmel Deputy Director for Museums and Director for Strategic.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Existing Frameworks: UNESCO Integration in stages The introduction and use of ICT in education proceeds in broad stages that may be conceived as a continuum.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
21st Century Skills Initiatives
Technology Leadership
Promoting a New Culture of Learning with EDUsummIT and UNESCO  Niki Davis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. TGW: Smart partnerships – organisational.
ICT Masterplanning for Education: Singapore's Experience Dr. Thiam-Seng KOH Director, Educational Technology Singapore Ministry of Education 20 June 2006.
The International Federation for Information Processing Agora Initiative on Lifelong Learning Seoul seminar Addis Ababa seminar
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Microsoft Corporation Teaching with Technology. Ice Breaker.
Searching the future: impacts of technology on the schools of tomorrow Hindsight, Insight and Foresight on ICT and schooling David Wood EC/EUN funded projects:
Teaching & Learning in the Digital Age Learning to innovate vs. innovative learning Teaching innovation vs. innovative teaching.
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.
European Schoolnet ICT in Europe Insight into European Policies and Scenarios for ICT in Education Becta Research Conference 13 June 2003 Anja Balanskat.
Technology and 21 st century education Adrian Blight CEO, Imagine Education, UK.
The Bridge Method Iasi, Romania 1-7 November 2009.
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
ICT Work Programme Objective 4.2 Technology Enhanced Learning European Commission, DG Information Society and Media Unit E3 – Cultural Heritage.
By Karen Diaz TechKNOW Associates.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
1 Standard setting in education A UNESCO Case Study & Proposal Supporting Human Diversity through Inclusive Design - The Role of e-learning Standards What.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Dr. Shane Renwick, DVM, MSc, A/Director, Animal Health Science Division, Canadian Food Inspection Agency CAHLN, UCVM June 8, 2010 Foresight for Canadian.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
21 st Century Skills for Education Leaders: How do we prepare our students for the new global economy? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Teaching &
A portfolio by Jamie Andrews Created in ELD 325 Instructional Technology Spring 2010.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Building Schools for the Future Transforming the Learning Landscape in Birmingham.
21 st Century Skills Jason McLaughlin Kean University EMSE
New Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Bertram C. Bruce Nicholas C. Burbules Scott D. Johnson James A. Levin.
Knowledge Societies and IFAP 1 Building Knowledge Societies IFAP’s Mandate and Functions Building Knowledge Societies Mandate and Functions of UNESCO's.
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice and would they threaten innovation and diversity? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter:
Education Transform Resources
Framework for Effective Technology Use Presented By Carolyn Walsh and David Schaeffler.
Professional Development Training: Student Centered Learning Beth Parsons Tech 507 June 14, 2013 Melissa Sands All presentation sources are used in accordance.
Assessing 21 st Century Skills Partnership for 21 st Century Skills National School Boards Association Orlando, Florida March 29, 2008.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Digitalization in the classroom: challenges for teachers and students
Education Transform Resources
Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards
NJCU College of Education
Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching
21st Century Skills For Students and Educators Foundations of Teaching and Learning University of Richmond Summer 2011 Christine Mingus.
Presentation transcript:

A Comprehensive Synthesis of Research into Information Technology in Education Niki Davis International Federation of Information Processing, leader of research group for education Iowa State University, Professor & Director, USA Center for Technology in Learning & Teaching; Professor of ICT in Institute of Education, University of London, UK

Comprehensive Synthesis of Research into ICT in Education Synthesis of reviews of research of institutionalized education ( school & university, worldwide, ) ICT as: 1.Necessity for economic competitiveness 2.Means to increase attainment 3.Increase access to education 4.Promotion of change – catalyst Research on policy, learning, organizational change

to extend the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to include Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Draft Plan of Action objectives for the connection of educational and community institutions with ICT and “to adapt all primary and secondary curricula to meet the challenges of the Information Society, taking into account national circumstances’ (p 2) Capacity Building, of ICT literacy and use of ICT to ‘eradicate illiteracies’ and ‘to empower local communities, especially those in rural and underserved areas’ (p 5)

3 rd World Context 4 th World, too?

ICT in Education Complexity now being acknowledged Reviews & projects often unbalanced Calls to improve research in ‘What Works’ Digital inequity growing (3 rd & 4 th world) Semiotic views of ICT in education reveal power relationships that are in flux in the Information Society Boundaries are blurring –Media and communications –Communication and production –Distribution and content –Formal education and leisure

1. Necessity for economic competitiveness UNESCO ICT teacher education planning guide Complexity requires holistic view Not atomized standards & assessment I-Curriculum for Europe (in prep.) specifics 3 dimensions that build on one another: 1.Operational replicating local IT applications 2.Cultural: embedding IT into processes 3.Critical: critically aware re-engineering with ICT Partnership for 21 st Century skills in US (2003, p9) –“More than core subjects … use knowledge and skills – by thinking critically” ICT skills better outside educational institutions? ‘playable tool’ at home; unsatisfying at school (Downes, 2004) concept mapping demonstrates children's mature understanding (Somekh, 2004) Not generally applied to university education

UNESCO ICT Teacher Education Planning Guide Framework

2. ICT to increase attainment – K12 Today’s ‘data is not compelling’ (Wood, in prep) –E.g. IMPACT-2, 2003 UK national study of current practice in schools showed significant (small) gains in science etc. Also identified important alignment of student experience at school, home and teacher expertise. –meta-analysis studies dubious Gains possible from specifically designed studies of IT in education: –CAI, ILS, simulations and other teaching higher order thinking with simulations calculators, collaborative networked IT … –Innovative practices difficult to spread (SITES, 2001) Teachers not using IT in ways recommended by researchers despite: –Significant investment in ICT, e.g. 77% of classrooms connected to Internet in US and 5:1 ratio of students: computers in 2001 Requires clear learning objectives & ICT with 7 dimensions –the learner, learning environment, professional competency, –system capacity, community connections, –technological capacity and accountability.

2. ICT to increase attainment – HE ICT Assisted Teaching & Learning study (Boucher et al, 1997) Noteworthy for range & diversity More impact shown where –Routine or mechanical skills play an important part (graphic calculators in engineering) –Knowledge can be precisely specified with user-base –Well defined professional base Economic measures impossible to isolate in HE became possible with new ‘virtual’ for profit HE

Key to Factors from Raymond Morel To ICT in our complex educational systems

2. ICT to increase access to education Special educational needs, increasingly wide solutions for individuals –Input: voice, switches, touch screen etc. –Output: magnified, Braille, speech etc. –Word processing & other communication tools –Attention management –teacher annotation & integration Access to remote learners, teachers, content –UK Open University started trend followed by many other universities (e.g. UNESCO IITE report, 2000) –Virtual High Schools in USA, net-courses to follow Australia & Scandinavia for those with study skills

3. Promotion of change - catalyst Constructivist approach favored by the US research community intended to support inquiry, collaboration or re- configure relationships continues to be used by only tiny % of teachers in USA (Becker, 2001) Scenarios informed by theory: 1. ICT augments centralized control (current, likely to remain) 2. Control relaxed to engender teachers’ R&D role due to uncertainty with ICT (likely future & major concern) 3. Radical future with schools as key nodes promoting learning in new communities (unlikely) 4.‘Melt down’ when ICT fails to deliver (unlikely) Hindsight, insight & foresight on ICT in schools used scenarios Europe- wide (Wood, in press):

3. Promotion of change K-12 – catalyst contd. Summative assessment poorly aligned with IT (also with new research on learning) Required pedagogic knowledge has been grossly underestimated All educational professionals implicated: teachers, administrators, inspectors, interagency collaboration etc. Public & society remain to be convinced on IT in education Changing actors in content and services with potential economies of scale Emerging ethical, legal & validity issues –Copyright –Right to see –Quality and health of networks Wood analysed educators’ major concerns as follows:

3. Promotion of change HE – ICT catalyst contd. Change is slow not radical ICT widespread as a blend Acceptance of lifelong learning led to biggest change Instructors doing more without reward F2FCMC Control Back to basics Global campus Individualize Stretching the mould New economy Models of IT & Change in Universities (Europe, Australia & USA by Collis & Wende, 2002)

3. Promotion of change – Commercial catalyst ICT content in ICT networked database Tutors localize content and assessment ICT potential for teachers’ community (not learners) Integrated into educational institutions at times Leadership development added value + (Selinger, 2004)

Caution: Research is Missing! 3 rd & 4 th world issues & transferability of research Future technologies: ubiquitous, networked, small, affordable, robust? Cornu’s intelligent communities – hype or future? Digital Equity – voices unheard Anishinabe clan system illustrates one indigenous people’s way of seeing the world where all actions are interconnected in a natural and spiritual ecology that is reflected in the tribal social structure under: Leadership, Learning, Sustenance, Medicine, Defence (Resta et al, 2004)

Towards WSIS Objectives 3 Proven Applications Teacher education & communities of practice Access for special educational needs Access to content, teachers & learners Dammed if you do; Dammed if you don’t Unsure ICT into primary and secondary education – more successful in informal/vocational education Digital equity requires change in power structures with more voices & values

Bibliography Belisle, C., Rawlings, A., & Seventer, C. van (2001) The Educational Multimedia Task Force Integrated research effort on multimedia in education and training. European Commission, Luxembourg. BECTa (2003a) ImpaCT2 Learning at home and school: Case studies. ICT in schools research and evaluation series, No. 8. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency: Coventry, UK. [ BECTa (2003b) What the research says about ICT supporting special educational needs (SEN) and inclusion. ICT in schools research and evaluation series, No. 12. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency: Coventry, UK. [ Boucher, A., Davis, N.E., Dillon, P. Hobbs, P. & Tearle P. (1997) Information Technology Assisted Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. HEFCE Research Series. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol. Brown, A. & Davis, N.E. (eds) (2004) Digital technology, communities and education. World Yearbook in Education Routledge, London. Collis, B. & Wende, M. van (eds) (2002) Models of technology and change in higher education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. EDEN [ IITE UNESCO (2000) Analytical survey of distance education for the Information Society: policies, pedagogy and professional development. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, Moscow. [ Johnson, D.L. & Maddux, C.D. (eds) (2003) Technology in education. A twenty year retrospective. The Hayworth Press, Binghampton, NY. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1999) West Virginia story: Achievement gains for a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Milken Exchange on Educational Technology, Milken Family Foundation, Santa Monica, CA. McMillan Culp, K., Honey, M. & Mandinach, E. (2003) A retrospective on twenty years of education policy. US Department of Education, Washington DC, USA. [ Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2003). Learning for the 21st century. Author, Washington DC. [ Pelgrum, W.J. & Andrson R.E. (2001) ICT and the emerging paradigm for lifelong learning. An IEA educational assessment of infrastructure, goals, and practices in twenty-six countries. Second edition. IEA, Amsterdam. [ Roblyer, M.D. & Marshall, J.C. (2003) Predicting success of virtual high school students: Preliminary results form an educational success prediction instrument. Journal of Research on Technology and Education, 35, 2, Solomon, G., Allen, N.J., & Resta P. (eds) (2003) Toward digital equity: Bridging the divide. Allyn & Bacon, Boston. Ulicsak M. & Owen M. (2003) I-Curriculum. Personal communication. Underwood, J. & Brown, J. (1997) Integrated Learning Systems: Potential into Practice. Heinemann, London. UNESCO (2001) Teacher education through distance learning. Technology, curriculum, cost, evaluation. UNESCO, Paris. UNESCO (2002) ICT in teacher education. A planning guide. UNESCO: Paris, France. [ Waxman, H.C., Connell M., & Gray J (2002) A Quantitative Synthesis of Recent Research on the Effects of Teaching and Learning With Technology on Student Outcomes. NCREL [ Wood, D. (2003) Think again: Insight, insight and foresight on ICT in schools. Draft report for EUN’s ERNIST project. November Personal communication. Zuker, A. & Kozma, R. (2003) The virtual high school. Teaching generation V. Teachers College, New York.