June 2, 20151 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIPR Dundee. © Crown copyright Scottish Flood Forecasting Service Pete Buchanan – Met Office Richard Maxey – SEPA SIPR, Dundee, 21 June 2011.
Advertisements

Evaluating GEM-LAM precipitable water vapour output using the southern Alberta GPS network during UNSTABLE 2008 Craig D. Smith Climate Research Division,
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre Pat McCarthy & Steve Knott Program Supervisors.
UNSTABLE, DRI and Water Cycling Ronald Stewart McGill University.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
HAL and little more. DRAFT – Page 2 – May 19, 2015 Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab Hydrometeorology –Instrumented Study area –MESH model –Some board participation.
Fog Forecasting at Roissy Airport (Paris) with 1D model Thierry Bergot and Joël Noilhan Météo-France 1) Methodology Cobel : 1D model of boundary layer.
UNSTABLE The UNderstanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment Neil Taylor 1, Dave Sills 2, John Hanesiak 3, Jason Milbrandt 4.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE) 2008: Preliminary Results Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2, J. Hanesiak.
EXPLORING LINKAGES BETWEEN PLANT- AVAILABLE SOIL MOISTURE, VEGETATION PHENOLOGY AND CONVECTIVE INITIATION By Julian Brimelow and John Hanesiak.
The 8 th GAME International Science Panel Meeting (Thailand, November, 2003) Dr. C. H. Cho Meteorological Research Institute, KMA
The Foothills Climate Array Manda Adams Shawn Marshall Shannon Fargey.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Outline Taylor Factors important for CI Science Question 1 What do we need to resolve processes? Required.
ELBOW 2001 The Effects of Lake Breezes On Weather Project David Sills, MSC-MRB Peter Taylor, York University Patrick King, MSC-MRB Wayne Hocking, University.
Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot David Sills 1, Neil Taylor 2, Craig Smith 3, Geoff Strong 4 and John Hanesiak 5 1 Cloud Physics and.
The Effect of the Terrain on Monsoon Convection in the Himalayan Region Socorro Medina 1, Robert Houze 1, Anil Kumar 2,3 and Dev Niyogi 3 Conference on.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE) 2008: Operations Overview Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2, J. Hanesiak.
UNSTABLE Instrumentation for the IOP and Data Considerations.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
The Simultaneous Observation of the Near-Dryline Environment (SONDE- 2008/2009?) Experiment Objectives and Hypotheses New Developments Talking Points Dr.
Unstable Science Question 2 John Hanesiak CEOS, U. Manitoba Unstable Workshop, Edmonton, AB April 18-19, 2007.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Science Question 3: Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction Aspects of Forecasting Alberta Thunderstorms.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE): Overview and Preliminary Results Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2,
A Survey of Wyoming King Air and Cloud Radar Observations in the Cumulus Photogrammetric In-Situ and Doppler Observations (CuPIDO) experiment J. Cory Demko.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
 Vision: Typhoon Committee is World’s best intergovernmental, regional organization for improving the quality of life of the Members’ populations through.
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Panel Summaries Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist OFCM.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
TECO-2006 Geneva, Dec. 3-5, Improvements in the Upper-Air Observation Systems in Japan M. Ishihara, M. Chiba, Y. Izumikawa, N. Kinoshita, and N.
GHP and Extremes. GHP SCIENCE ISSUES 1995 How do water and energy processes operate over different land areas? Sub-Issues include: What is the relative.
Rapidly Updating Analysis (The RUA White Paper) Stephen Lord – NWS Affiliate Acknowledgements: Brad Colman NWS SSD Chiefs Stan Benjamin Geoff DiMego Ken.
Data assimilation and observing systems strategies Pierre Gauthier Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Division Meteorological Service of Canada.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
Slide 1 Impact of GPS-Based Water Vapor Fields on Mesoscale Model Forecasts (5th Symposium on Integrated Observing Systems, Albuquerque, NM) Jonathan L.
Using Ground-based Observations at NSSL Dr. David Turner (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma non-radar ⌃ profiling ⌃
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Accounting for Uncertainties in NWPs using the Ensemble Approach for Inputs to ATD Models Dave Stauffer The Pennsylvania State University Office of the.
Part I: Representation of the Effects of Sub- grid Scale Topography and Landuse on the Simulation of Surface Climate and Hydrology Part II: The Effects.
Identification of side-door/back-door cold fronts for fire weather forecasting applications Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station,
Satellite Activities in MSC Ontario and the Satellite Products Working Group (SPWG) Edwina Lopes, Manager Science, WEO Ontario Environment Canada SAAWSO.
NORTH AMERICAN MONSOON EXPERIMENT (NAME) An internationally coordinated, joint US-Mexico process study aimed at improving warm season precipitation prediction.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
Post processing on NWP output and nowcasting on the grid for feeding the forecast system in Canada Donald Talbot Chief of Meteorological System Section,
` Observations of Great Salt Lake Breezes During Salt Lake Valley Persistent Cold Air Pools Erik Crosman, John Horel, Neil Lareau, and Xia Dong University.
WMO AMDAR Programme Overview Bryce Ford - presenting on behalf of WMO and NOAA FPAW Nov 1, 2012.
The Ross Island Meteorology Experiment (RIME): An International Collaborative Investigation of Antarctic Meteorology and Climate David Bromwich Polar Meteorology.
SST and vegetation in modulating the diurnal cycle forcing of convection during the warm season Michael Douglas, NSSL Co-PI’s: Christopher Watts, Univ.
RIME A possible experiment for Advancing Antarctic Weather Prediction David H. Bromwich 1, John J. Cassano 1, Thomas R. Parish 2, Keith M. Hines 1 1 -
 Federal Aviation Administration’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on certification of aircraft for operation in supercooled large drop (SLD) icing conditions.
Potential Use of the NOAA G-IV for East Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Marty Ralph Dave Reynolds, Chris Fairall, Allen White, Mike Dettinger, Ryan Spackman.
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Air Masses and ITCZ. Topic 4: Air Masses and ITCZ Global wind circulation and ocean currents are important in determining climate patterns. These are.
Shuyi S. Chen Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Overview of RAINEX Modeling of 2005 Hurricanes In the eye of Katrina.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
Characterizing urban boundary layer dynamics using
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
Testing of Mesonet Instrumentation
Dave DuBois New Mexico State University
A-J Punkka Weather Warning Service, FMI
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
Neil Taylor Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab
Genesis and Morphology of the Alberta Dryline
UNSTABLE Science Question 1: ABL Processes
Neil Taylor1 and Bill Burrows2
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Julian Brimelow and John Hanesiak
Presentation transcript:

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April

UNSTABLE The UNderstanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment Neil Taylor 1, Dave Sills 2, John Hanesiak 3, Jason Milbrandt 4 1 Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada (EC) 2 Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, EC 3 Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba 4 NWP Research Section, EC Project Overview First UNSTABLE Science Workshop April, 2007

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Outline Overview of UNSTABLE based on draft Science Plan Rationale Goals and Deliverables Introduce Science Questions Experimental Design Budget Requirements Timeline / Milestones

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: Socio-economic Impacts Alberta Foothills experience more lightning days than anywhere else on the Canadian Prairies

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: Socio-economic Impacts Edmonton – Calgary corridor one of most densely populated regions in Canada and contains Canada’s 3 rd (YYC) and 7 th (YEG) busiest airports

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: Socio-economic Impacts Edmonton – Calgary corridor among fastest growing regions in Canada

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: Socio-economic Impacts Frequent and Severe Thunderstorms + People + More People + Busy Airports = Potential Human and Economic Loss Since 1980 > $2B and > 40 lives lost in AB due to severe thunderstorms Improved understanding of processes leading to severe storms  better warnings  mitigate impacts of severe weather on Canadians

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: Severe Wx Challenges Forecasters face uncertainty with respect to: ABL structure and evolution (especially vertical water vapour profiles in ABL) Role and importance of mesoscale boundaries / circulations in foothills Conceptual models for CI Land surface – ABL interactions (sensible / latent heat fluxes) in foothills and upstream Compounded by: Inadequate observation network to resolve the above NWP performance with respect to above

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Rationale: EC Results Management Framework All of EC structured according to Outcome Project Plans (OPPs) – everything we do has an associated OPP UNSTABLE addresses 10 OPPs related to: –Monitoring atmospheric conditions –Weather prediction –Understanding, detection, and prediction of severe and high-impact weather –Understanding the water cycle –Improved weather warnings, forecasts, and warning preparedness –Aviation weather services

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April UNSTABLE Goals To improve understanding of atmospheric processes (especially in ABL) prior to and during CI and severe thunderstorm development To improve accuracy and lead time for severe thunderstorm watches and warnings To assess utility of GEM-LAM-2.5 to resolve physical processes over AB Foothills and ability to provide useful guidance for CI and severe thunderstorm forecasts To refine existing conceptual models describing CI and severe thunderstorm development over AB and the Western Prairies

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April UNSTABLE Deliverables Unique and high-resolution dataset of measurements from various platforms including surface, upper-air, and vertical profiles of atmospheric characteristics Peer-reviewed articles, presentations / posters at conferences and workshops Presentations / reference material targeting forecasters at SPCs with operational application Through RSD direct knowledge transfer to operational meteorologists in real time prior to and during high-impact weather events

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April UNSTABLE Science Questions ABL Processes (Taylor/Sills) 1. What are the contributions of ABL processes to the initiation of deep moist convection and the development of severe thunderstorms in the Alberta Foothills? Land Surface – ABL Interactions (Hanesiak) 2. What are the contributions of surface processes to the initiation of deep moist convection and the development of severe thunderstorms in the Alberta Foothills? Numerical Weather Prediction (Milbrandt) 3. To what extent can high-resolution NWP models contribute to forecasting the initiation and development of severe thunderstorms originating in the Alberta Foothills?

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Science Question 1: ABL Processes What is ABL evolution especially wrt water vapour prior to and during CI? What is role and importance of mesoscale convergence boundaries and circulations associated with CI? How are they influenced by terrain and synoptic-scale processes? How do they affect storms (motion, intensity, morphology)? What is 4D characterization of the dryline and importance for CI? Which storms become severe and why? How related to boundaries associated with CI? Are conceptual models adequate? How improve observational network to aid forecasters?

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Science Question 2: Land Surface – ABL Interactions Influence of wet / dry areas on CI and storm evolution via agromet. model? Can we resolve gradients in water vapour and mesoscale circulations across wet / dry areas? If so how do they influence CI and storm evolution? What are heat fluxes over the region wrt wet / dry areas and how influence temperature / humidity stratification? How does background flow modify gradients / circulations associated with wet / dry areas? Can ET contributions to ABL PW be quantified? How can observational network be improved to address the above?

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction What is useful information from the GEM LAM 2.5 for forecasting convection? How can LAM ability to simulate nature of convection be quantified? Can recommendation for LAM to be used to guide a forecast be determined ahead of time? How realistic are ABL and surface processes, storm structures and microphysical processes simulated in the LAM? Can deficiencies in physical parameterizations be quantified? What is the effect of running a nested 1 km simulation within the 2.5 km LAM? Can high-resolution ensembles improve prediction of CI?

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Experimental Design: Domain Study area designed to include existing SFC and radar stations given climatological CI and thunderstorm activity Primary domain defined by supplementary mesonet and FCA stations – main focus for mobile measurements Secondary domain to include FCA and other stations – still deploy mobile measurements for interesting cases

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Supplemental Instrumentation Fixed Mesonet stations (10-20) 2 radiosonde Tethersonde 2 WV radiometers Profiling radiometer (H 2 O profile) GPS PW sensors Eddy Correlation Flux Tower(s)? Additional Profiling Radiometer (T, RH)? Mobile AMMOS / Strong Mobile (T, P, RH) MARS (PW, SFC wx, profile – wind, T, RH) 3 radiosondes Aircraft Photography Locations of fixed radiometers, GPS sensors, tethersonde to be determined 19 Station Configuration

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Experimental Design: Duration and IOP UNSTABLE Study Period 1 June to 31 August Fixed mesonet stations to be deployed prior to June 1st 2008 Mobile instrumentation / communications tests in 15 June to 31 June window Intensive Observation Period Tentatively 9 July to 31 July (23 days) contingent on field participation, expendables,… UNSTABLE Field Plan to be developed this fall / winter

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Budgeting Requirements EC UNSTABLE contributions thus far exceed $50K (not including ATMOS, AMMOS, tethersonde,…) ItemCost ($) Radiosondes / Expendables (350 sondes – 223 stockpiled)25K / 20K Research Aircraft250K ATMOS Station Communications6K Travel 2007 (conferences / meetings)7K Travel 2008 (meetings, field campaign)20K+ (depends on number of field participants and duration of IOP) Students40K (EC) + Other Shipping Equipment (ATMOS, AMMOS, Tethersonde, other) 15K Training (OHS, Tethersonde, First Aid)5K Fencing Hardware for mesonet stations7K Radiometrics coefficients if necessary4K Vehicle rentals / fuel5K Total400K +

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Timeline and Milestones DateEvent Summer 2006Test of ATMOS and AMMOS September 2006Preliminary Mesonet Site Selection March 2007UNSTABLE website and leads for science questions 2 and 3 6 April 2007Draft Science Plan distributed and posted April 2007First UNSTABLE Science Workshop Spring / Summer 2007Finalize Science Plan 2-4 May 2007Mesonet Site Selection 31 May 2007Presentations at 41 st CMOS Congress 18 June – 13 July 2007BAQS-Met: field use of ATMOS, AMMOS, tethersonde 1 Sept – 13 Nov 2007Develop UNSTABLE Field Plan 27 Nov 2007UNSTABLE Field Plan workshop 29 Feb 2008UNSTABLE Field Plan finalized 31 Mar 2008Finalize all land-use agreements May 2008Deploy fixed mesonet stations 1 June – 31 Aug 2008UNSTABLE Study Period 9-31 July 2008UNSTABLE IOP 1-19 Sept 2008Remove mesonet stations, etc. 22 Sept 2008Begin data QC Fall 2008UNSTABLE article for CMOS / BAMS Funding Requests

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Principal Investigators Neil Taylor, HAL, EC Science Question 1 Co-Lead, Project Manager Dave Sills, CPSWRS, EC Science Question 1 Co-Lead John Hanesiak, CEOS, U of Manitoba Science Question 2 Lead Jason Milbrandt, RPN, EC Science Question 3 Lead Pat McCarthy, PASPC, EC PASPC Severe Weather Program Supervisor Geoff Strong, Adjunct Professor, U of Alberta

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April Summary Planning continues for the UNSTABLE field campaign in 2008 –science questions and planning document have been drafted This workshop an opportunity to refine the science plan (science questions, instrumentation and deployment strategies, etc.) – soliciting input from this group to make it better Final version to be submitted for funding within EC and externally for NSERC, other sources Still need to confirm some participation / collaboration –Instrumentation –Field participants –Funding –Data analysis / QC champions Research aircraft requires significant funding Logistics for IOP to be developed in field plan this fall / winter

June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April