Tangent height offsets estimated by correlation analysis of ground-based data with O 3 limb profiles J.A.E. van Gijsel Y.J. Meijer.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison SEVIRI-IASI Inter-calibration Uncertainty Evaluation.

Advertisements

Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds

Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.

Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,

Misaligment modelingMean Pitch offset: -23 mdeg, corresponds to about 1.5 – 1.6 km TH offset Subsolar pitch offset value: -19 mdeg, about 1.3 km TRUE vs.

Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.

Chap 8-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 8 Estimation: Single Population Statistics for Business and Economics.

SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational NO 2 product F. Azam, K. Weigel, Ralf Bauer, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN,

SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational BrO product F. Azam, K. Weigel, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN, Frascati,

DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft NDACC H2O workshop, Bern, July 2006 Water vapour profiles by ground-based FTIR Spectroscopy:

Task Group 3 AT2 workshop, 30 Sept – 1 Oct 2008 Task Group 3 Achievements and Prospects Ankie Piters, KNMI.

Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Retrieval of SCIAMACHY limb measurements: First Results A. Rozanov, V. Rozanov,

Introduction This project deals with conversion of Vector based Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) data into Raster based PMP data using different interpolation.

CPI International UV/Vis Limb Workshop Bremen, April Development of Generalized Limb Scattering Retrieval Algorithms Jerry Lumpe & Ed Cólon.

Colour Index Microwindow Position Optimisation Harry Desmond and Anu Dudhia.

THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF SST MEASUREMENTS Validation and evaluation of derived SST products 1.To develop systematic approaches to L4 product intercomparison.

KNMI, The Netherlands * SCIAMACHY validation workshop, Bremen, 6 Dec ‘04 Large scale validation of SCIAMACHY nadir reflectance Gijs van.

Ground-based validation of SCIAMACHY OL 3.0 Ozone Profile Data and Estimation of Altitude Shift.

Quantitative Methods – Week 7: Inductive Statistics II: Hypothesis Testing Roman Studer Nuffield College

Irie et al., Multi-component retrievals for MAX-DOAS, 2 nd CINDI workshop, Brussels, March 10-11, 2010 Multi-component vertical profile retrievals for.

Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.

Water Vapour Intercomparison Effort in the Frame of the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study: Airborne-to-Ground-based and airborne-to-airborne.

ESTIMATES AND SAMPLE SIZES

Chapter 3 Descriptive Measures

Page 1 MIPAS QWG#12 14/16 February 2007 Retrieval of 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio from MIPAS spectra Feasibility of 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio profile retrieval.

Declustering in the Spatial Interpolation of Air Quality Data Stefan R. Falke and Rudolf B. Husar.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Validation of ENVISAT trace gas data products by comparison.

Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, SCIAMACHY scient. prod. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

Correlation and Prediction Error The amount of prediction error is associated with the strength of the correlation between X and Y.

Improved Hybrid Geoid Modeling and the FY 2000 Geoid Models Dr. Daniel R. Roman January 16, : :30 Conference Room 9836.

AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.

Satellite-based inversion of NOx emissions using the adjoint of CMAQ Amir Hakami, John H. Seinfeld (Caltech) Qinbin Li (JPL) Daewon W. Byun, Violeta Coarfa,

HIRDLS Ozone V003 (v ) Characteristics B. Nardi, C. Randall, V.L. Harvey & HIRDLS Team HIRDLS Science Meeting Boulder, Jan 30, 2008.

Sentinel-5 precursor: TROPOMI Cloud slicing retrieval: Program development and testing with SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 WFDOAS data Kai-Uwe Eichmann, Mark Weber,

Validation of SCIAMACHY total ozone: ESA/DLR V5(W) and IUP WFDOAS V2(W) M. Weber, S. Dikty, J. P.Burrows, M. Coldewey-Egbers (1), V. E. Fioletov (2), S.

Estimating SMOS error structure using triple collocation Delphine Leroux, CESBIO, France Yann Kerr, CESBIO, France Philippe Richaume, CESBIO, France 1.

2 Kinds of Statistics: 1.Descriptive: listing and summarizing data in a practical and efficient way 2.Inferential: methods used to determine whether data.

Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.

Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.

Summarizing Risk Analysis Results To quantify the risk of an output variable, 3 properties must be estimated: A measure of central tendency (e.g. µ ) A.

Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.

Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.

Comparisons CH 4 SCIAMACHY / GROUND-BASED FTIR B. Dils, BIRA + HYMN partners Corinne Vigouroux, BIRA, HYMN progress meeting, 7-8 April 2008.

October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.

S5P tropical tropospheric ozone product based on convective cloud differential method Klaus-Peter Heue, Pieter Valks, Diego Loyola, Deutsches Zentrum für.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS O 3 (r) 12/12/2002 ACVT-GBMCD subgroup GOMOS ozone profiles, analysis of comparison with GMBCD datasets.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS p&T&H20 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

Validation of OMPS-LP Radiances P. K. Bhartia, Leslie Moy, Zhong Chen, Steve Taylor NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.

Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.

1 Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics K.V. Chance, C.E. Sioris, R.J.D. Spurr, T.P. Kurosu, R.V. Martin, M.J. Newchurch,

Electron density profile retrieval from RO data Xin’an Yue, Bill Schreiner  Abel inversion error of Ne  Data Assimilation test.

Medical Statistics (full English class) Ji-Qian Fang School of Public Health Sun Yat-Sen University.

Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.

UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.

Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Three-way error analysis between AATSR, AMSR-E and in situ sea surface temperature observations

Abstract We intercompare Stratospheric Column Ozone (SCO) and ozone profiles retrieved from GOME data with ozonesonde and SAGE-II data for GOME.

Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS altitude-reg. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

- EQUAL - Envisat Quality Assessment with Lidar a project to support the long-term validation of SCIAMACHY’s ozone and temperature profiles in opbouw.

Definition of SCIAMACHY Diagnostic Data Set

Emma Hopkin University of Reading

Preliminary comparisons of GOMOS and MIPAS ozone products with Odin

Question Explanation Latitude = 45o N Longitude = 75o W

Evaluation of the MERRA-2 Assimilated Ozone Product

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE)

Presentation transcript:

Tangent height offsets estimated by correlation analysis of ground-based data with O 3 limb profiles J.A.E. van Gijsel Y.J. Meijer

Overview Introduction –Data description Methodology –Visual analysis versus statistical analysis –Example of statistical analysis Results –ESA OL 3.0 and IFE 1.63 Limb ozone profiles A-priori profiles

Introduction Validation of SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles with collocated ground-based measurements Detection and analysis of altitude offset Need for objective method to deal with biases

Datasets ESA OL 3.0 O 3 limb profiles IFE 1.63 O 3 limb profiles –Both based on ESA level 1 products Collocated ground-based observations: –Lidar –Sonde –Microwave (used for IFE 1.63 only)

Datasets II ESA OL 3.0: 454 collocated profiles –332 lidar ozone profiles –112 sonde ozone profiles IFE 1.63: 2346 collocated profiles –153 unique lidar ozone profiles –313 unique sonde ozone profiles –151 unique microwave ozone profiles

Methodology Splining of data points to obtain a common altitude grid Iterative shifting of the SCIA retrieved limb profiles for the correlation analysis (-5 to +5 km with steps of 200 m) Calculation of correlation coefficient between SCIA retrieval and collocated observation over altitude range km Optimal altitude shift can be found at maximum correlation after all iterations

Uncertainties in methodology Chosen altitude range can influence results –Reliability of (collocated) instrument varies with altitude: ESA OL 3.0 lower ‘trust’ limit set to 20 km ESA OL 3.0 has a reference height of 40 km where relative error becomes very high Sonde data becomes less reliable over 30 – 35 km Interpolation over large intervals –For instance microwave data Differences in time/space between collocated measurements

Methodology II

Results: ESA OL 3.0 A-priori Mean optimal shift is close to 0. Spread increases towards the poles (as expected).

ESA OL 3.0 Limb Optimal altitude shift = 1.04 km downwards Standard deviation has decreased with respect to a- priori

Mean optimal altitude shift using microwave data strongly deviates from lidar & sonde. Microwave data have a low resolution and the registration of altitude is not very accurate, therefore they will not be further considered IFE 1.63 A-priori LidarSondeMicrowave 160 m-283 m947 m

IFE 1.63 A-priori II AllWestCentral- West Central- East East -178 m-79 m-161 m-212 m-273 m Dependency on state position due to differences in latitude

IFE lidar+sonde limb

IFE 1.63 Limb Mean optimal shift (based on lidar+sonde) = 1.17 km (1.04 km for ESA OL 3.0) Difference between East and West for a-priori was ±200 m AllWestC.-WestC.-EastEast Lidar Sonde Microwave Distances in table in meters

4 profiles within state

Summary The ESA OL 3.0 and the IFE 1.63 O 3 limb profiles have been validated using ground-based O 3 data –Visual analysis Not objective –Statistical analysis Offsets:ESA OL 3.0:1.04 Km IFE 1.63:1.17 Km Ground-based data should be inter-compared to ensure quality

Questions? Thank you for your attention !

IFE Microwave limb