The United States Patent and Trademark Office March 15, 2005 BCP Customer Partnership Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Advertisements

Patents e-Filing Update Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership November 15, 2001.
Daphne C. Lainson Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh Overview of USPTO Patent Statistics.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
Technology Center 1600 and Silicon Valley Office USPTO
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
1 TC1600-Quality Assurance Bennett Celsa QAS Joseph Woitach SPE June 4, 2013.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
1 Clearing the Oldest Patent Applications (COPA) John Barlow Subject Matter Expert Technology Center 2800.
Introduction to the USPTO
1 Patent Operations: Updates & Highlights Austin Intellectual Property Law Association Austin, TX March 23, 2010.
Accelerated Examination Bennett Celsa (TC 1600: QAS)
John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program Patents – Past, Present and Future.
Proposed Rule Changes to Focus the Patent Process Involving Continuations, Double Patenting and Claims Connecticut Intellectual Property Law Association.
Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed
THE STATE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND FOR RULE PROPOSALS Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington and the West” Conference January.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office July 19, 2005 The National Association of Patent Practitioners 2005 Patent Practice Update.
John Doll – Commissioner for Patents February 1, 2006.
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Boston Patent Law Association Joseph Rolla – Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
Patent Quality Assurance Program. 2 Office of Patent Quality Assurance (OPQA) Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Office of Patent Quality Assurance.
General Information on Patents and the Patent Process presented to North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries June 24, 2008 Brian Hanlon,
John Doll Commissioner for Patents. 2 USPTO Request for Public Input: Strategic Planning  Agency developing new strategic plan  Part of budget process.
1 Practicing Law Institute Robert Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration March 2-3, 2009.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
Patent Rule and Procedural Changes The Patent Office Comes to California June 4 and 5, 2007 Joni Y. Chang Senior Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
Charles R. Eloshway Patent Attorney Office of International Relations U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Conference on Intellectual Property in the Global.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Tuesday, Februray 3, Patent E-commerce at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Presented by: Edmund Crump, Mary Small and Bill Stryjewski.
A View from Both Worlds: USPTO and the Federal Labs Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes.
1 PPAC Patents Operations Update June 18th, 2009.
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
Customer Partnership Meeting John Doll Commissioner for Patents.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Application Information Retrieval.
Our Divided Patent System John R. Allison University of Texas McCombs School of Business Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School David L. Schwartz Northwestern.
1 Business Method Patents The USPTO Perspective Prepared for the Casualty Actuary Society Annual Meeting November 15, by John J. Love The United.
1 The CREATE Act and Other Interesting IP Tidbits Brian R. Stanton, Ph.D. Director, Division of Policy Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes.
Public Meeting On Data Dissemination Request for Information Office of the Chief Information Officer September 24, 2009.
USPTO Patent Quality Composite presented to Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership September 5, 2012 by Martin Rater Statistician USPTO,
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Patent.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon February Defective Priority Claim Means No Priority Claim Each intermediate application in the chain of priority must.
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010.
Prosecution Lunch October Bits and Pieces from the Patent Side Crowing about reduction in pending cases –From 750K a year ago to about 708K now.
“Welcome to the Table” May 15, 2006 Jay Lucas Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Legal Secretaries & Administrators Conference June 18, 2009.
1. Video Conference Interviews 2 Sean Hagan Director of the Midwest Regional United States Patent and Trademark Office Webinar for Knobbe Martens January.
1 PPAC Patents Operations Update Peggy Focarino Deputy Commissioner for Patents July 8, 2010.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office January 27, 2005.
US Patent Application Drafting Center Presentation ppt Patent Stats That Can Help Your Practice Electronic & Computer Law Committee Manny Schecter.
Patents, Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
Prosecution Luncheon Patent August 2016
Examination Time and the Production System
Boston Patent Law Association
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
TC 1600 Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
First Action Interview Pilot Program
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)
Boston Patent Law Association Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

The United States Patent and Trademark Office March 15, 2005 BCP Customer Partnership Meeting

2 Contact Information John Doll Deputy Commissioner for Patent Planning and Resources

3 Contact Information Peggy Focarino Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Joe Rolla Deputy Commissioner for Patent Policy

4 Commissioner for Patents Nicholas P. Godici To Retire March 29th

5 Commissioner for Patents Star Search Wanted:

6 Jon’s New Initiatives Reexamination É Special Dispatch

7 Jon’s New Initiatives Reexamination É Special Dispatch PCT É Timeliness of Actions

8 Jon’s New Initiatives Reexamination É Special Dispatch PCT É Timeliness of Actions BPAI Appeals É 60% never make it

9 Jon’s New Initiatives Search Quality É Search Grids É Search Recordation É Search QR

10 Jon’s New Initiatives Search Quality É Search Grids É Search Recordation É Search QR Patentability Conferences É Quality & Training

11 Jon’s New Initiatives Search Quality É Search Grids É Search Recordation É Search QR Patentability Conferences É Quality & Training 2 nd Pair of Eyes É Redefine

12 Jon’s New Initiatives e-filing probably in XML tagged format É All follow on papers must be e-filed Limited number of claims É 2 – 3 independent / 20 – 30 dependent Patentability search É With explanation of each reference with respect to claims Mandatory telephone restriction elections Mandatory interview either before or right after first action 2 month shortened statutory time for response É With no extensions Mandatory appeal Accelerated Examination Initiative

13 UPR Applications Filed  FY ,527  6.6% above FY 03  FY 05 plan 375,080 (5.5% above FY 04)  118,235 as of 1/28  Current projection 102.6% over plan

14 FY 04 UPR Applications Filed FY 04 UPR 1 Applications Filed Technology Center FY 04 FY 03 to FY04 Growth Rate Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry38, % Chemical and Materials Engineering 49, % Computer Architecture Software and Information Security 34, % Communications48, % Semiconductor, Electrical, Optical Systems81,1447.6% Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce47, % Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products56,5335.5% UPR Total 355,5276.6% 1 “UPR” = Utility, Plant, and Reissue Applications FY 05 TC filings not yet available. Initial processing imposes a two to four month delay in assignment to a TC.

15 FY 04 Patent Pendency FY 04 Patent Pendency Technology Center Average 1 st Action Pendency 1 (months) Average Total Pendency 2 (months) Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry Chemical and Materials Engineering Computer Architecture Software and Information Security Communications Semiconductor, Electrical, Optical Systems Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products UPR Total “Average 1 st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during 4 th quarter FY “Average total pendency” is the average age from filing to issue or abandonment of a newly filed application, completed during 4 th quarter FY 2004.

16 FY 05 Patent Pendency (as of 12/31/04) FY 05 Patent Pendency (as of 12/31/04) Technology Center Average 1 st Action Pendency (months) 1 Average Total Pendency (months) Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry Chemical and Materials Engineering Computer Architecture Software and Information Security – Communications Semiconductor, Electrical, Optical Systems Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products UPR Total (as of 12/31/2004) FY 05 Target 20.7* “Average 1 st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during 1 st quarter FY “Average total pendency” is the average age from filing to issue or abandonment of a newly filed application, completed during 1 st quarter FY * Assuming current input and output estimates, the agency should achieve first action pendency of 21.3 months by the end of FY 2005.

17 FY 04 Patent Pendency FY 04 Patent Pendency Technology Center Average 1 st Action Pendency 1 (months) Average Total Pendency 2 (months) 1610 – Organic Compounds: Bioaffecting, Body Treating, Drug Delivery, Steroids, Herbicides, Pesticides, Cosmetics and Drugs – Organic Chemistry – Molecular Biology, Bioinformatics, Recombinant DNA/RNA, Gene Regulation, Nucleic Acid Amplification – Immunology, Receptor/Ligands, Cytokines, Recombinant Hormones, Molecular Biology – Fermentation, Microbiology, Proteins/Enzymes Plants UPR Total “Average 1 st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during 4 th quarter FY “Average total pendency” is the average age from filing to issue or abandonment of a newly filed application, completed during 4 th quarter FY 2004.

18 FY 05 Patent Pendency (as of 12/31/04) FY 05 Patent Pendency (as of 12/31/04) 1 “Average 1 st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during 1 st quarter FY “Average total pendency” is the average age from filing to issue or abandonment of a newly filed application, completed during 1 st quarter FY Technology Center Average 1 st Action Pendency 1 (months) Average Total Pendency 2 (months) 1610 – Organic Compounds: Bioaffecting, Body Treating, Drug Delivery, Steroids, Herbicides, Pesticides, Cosmetics and Drugs – Organic Chemistry – Molecular Biology, Bioinformatics, Recombinant DNA/RNA, Gene Regulation, Nucleic Acid Amplification – Immunology, Receptor/Ligands, Cytokines, Recombinant Hormones, Molecular Biology – Fermentation, Microbiology, Proteins/Enzymes Plants UPR Total

Total*Design New Applications 1 9/30/ ,35852,38866,64585,91757,52845,62250,280457,25411,704 New Applications 1 9/30/ ,40263,92371,77897,38077,65156,73865,005508,87818,451 Overall Pending Applications 2 9/30/ ,82792,41288,387121,558118,89987,15391,170737,94422,533 Overall Pending Applications 2 9/30/ ,006105,447102,440138,822137,458101,097108,039809,32327,599 TC Application Inventory 1 “New Application inventory” is the number of new applications designated or assigned to a technology center awaiting a first action. 2 “Overall Pending Application inventory” is the total number of applications designated or assigned to a technology center in an active status. Includes new applications; rejected awaiting response; amended; under appeal or interference; suspended; reexams and allowed applications awaiting grant publication. * Total inventory includes approximately 55,000 applications awaiting processing 9/30/2003, and approximately 22,000 applications awaiting processing 9/30/2004.

20 Inventory by Art Examples High Inventory Art Areas Months of Inventory* Low Inventory Art Areas Months of Inventory* 1614, 1615, and 1617 – Drugs, Bio-affecting and Body Treatment 47 – – Organic Chemistry – Chemical Analysis – Adhesive Bonding and Coating Apparatus – Computer Task Management – Manufacturing Control Systems and Chemical/ Mechanical/Electrical Control – Interactive Video Distribution , 2653 – Information Storage and Retrieval – Control Circuits – Electrical Conductors – Business Methods34 – – Conveying and 3737 – Medical Instruments, Diagnostic Equipment 46 – – Thermal and Combustion Technology 10 *The number of months it would take to reach a first action on the merits (e.g., an action addressing patentability issues) on a new application filed as of Jan 2005 at today’s production rate. Today’s production rate means that there are no changes in production due to hiring, attrition, changes to examination processing or examination efficiencies, and that applications are taken up in the order of filing in the given art unit/area. Of course, USPTO is taking aggressive steps to ensure changes that will significantly lower the inventory rates in high-inventory art areas.

21 Inventory by Art Examples Art AreasMonths of Inventory* 1614, 1615, and 1617 – Drugs, Bio-affecting and Body Treatment47 – – Steroids, Herbicides, Pesticides – Organic Chemistry – Bioinformatics – Molecular Biology, Nucleic Acids, Recombinant DNA/RNA, Gene Regulation, Gene Therapy, Animals and Recombinant Plants, Combinatorial/Computational Chemistry – Immunology, Receptor/Ligands, Cytokines, Recombinant Hormones, Molecular Biology – Fermentation, Microbiology, Isolated and Recombinant Proteins/Enzymes – Plants9 *The number of months it would take to reach a first action on the merits (e.g., an action addressing patentability issues) on a new application filed as of Jan 2005 at today’s production rate. Today’s production rate means that there are no changes in production due to hiring, attrition, changes to examination processing or examination efficiencies, and that applications are taken up in the order of filing in the given art unit/area. Of course, USPTO is taking aggressive steps to ensure changes that will significantly lower the inventory rates in high-inventory art areas.

Workload Analysis FilingsFAOMs PCT Production FY 0241,64129,7275,938 FY 0338,61327,87510,021 FY 0438,16426,51010,183 “FAOM” = First Action on the Merits – first action count by an examiner after the filing of an application (does not include restrictions or other miscellaneous actions).

23 TC 1600 Rework* Statistics *Rework first actions are those actions that are in a Continuing, CPA or RCE application.

24 Restriction/Divisionals in 1600 Written RestrictionsDivisionals Filed FY 009,2673,326 FY 0111,4353,832 FY 0213,1933,988 FY 0311,8993,918 FY 0411,4153,489

25 Patents Issued in TC 1600

Corps FY 04 % First Action Allowances 13.0%17.8%10.3%13.5%27.1%12.1%17.9%17.4% FY 05 % First Action Allowances Through 1/11/ %15.7%9.7%13.6%28.8%14.1%17.0%17.5% TC 1 st Action Allowances* *TC First Action Allowances are calculated from first action counts received by an examiner. A first action restriction performed by an examiner is not a ‘first action count’ and thus an allowance following a first action restriction is included as a first action allowance count. A first action allowance following the filing of an RCE is included. An examiner receives both a first action count and a disposal count for first action allowances.

27 Quality of Products Fiscal Year Design FY 04 Total FY 05 Target Application In-Process Review Compliance Rate %83.1%88.3%74.2%86.8%79.6%81.7%90.4%82.0%84% Patent Allowance Error Rate %8.03%3.05%2.53%3.39%7.54%9.01%3.28%5.32%4.0% 1 Compliance is the percent of office actions reviewed and found to be free of any in-process examination deficiency (an error that has significant adverse impact on patent prosecution). 2 Patent allowance error rate is the percent of allowed applications reviewed having at least one claim which is considered unpatentable on a basis for which a court would hold a patent invalid. “Allowance” occurs before a patent is issued, so these errors are caught before any patent is actually granted.

28 Hires and Attritions CorpsDesign FY 04 Hires FY 04 Attritions FY 05 BOY Examiner Staff FY 05 Hiring Goal FY 05 Hiring Summary (2/7/05)* New Hire Percentage of Total 24%8%36%23%22%21%28%23%28% *Includes hires on board and confirmed and pending offers

New Examiner Hiring WorkgroupNumber Hiring

30 Patents e-Government Initiatives EFS Web Interface pdf 1 application submission Tri-lateral Dossier Access with EPO Priority Document Exchange Patent’s File Wrapper (PFW) - Moving from electronic image based applications (IFW) to electronic text based applications (PFW) 1 “pdf” is an internationally accepted standard format for electronic documents.