Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS: Health Effects /index.html.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Advertisements

Steve Babb, MPH CDC Office on Smoking and Health National Association of County and City Health Officials webcast January 24, 2007 The Health Consequences.
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment
A Health Hazard to Children Secondhand Smoke:. Children’s Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Millions of children six years old and younger are regularly exposed.
Chapter 3: Prenatal Development and Birth Teratogens: Hazardous to the Baby’s Health By Kati Tumaneng (for Drs. Cook & Cook)
E FFECTS OF S ECONDHAND S MOKE Pat McKone, Director American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest.
Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the Residential Environment Kimberly Yolton, Ph.D. Children’s Environmental Health Center, Cincinnati.
1 ETS exposure of children  Respiratory diseases wheezing diminished pulmonary functions asthma bronchiale chronic bronchitis pneumonia  middle ear infections.
Action on Smoking and Health The evolving fight against tobacco Clive Bates Director Action on Smoking and Health.
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment (3:23)
Donald F. Behan Tobacco Control Network Presentation1 Economic Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke by Donald F. Behan, Michael P. Eriksen and Yijia.
Environmental Tobacco Smoke Margaret Ndetti Cary Oglesby October 12, 2007 EVE 486 Dr. Andre Butler.
Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Created by the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario.
Mortality rates Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed.
Health during Infancy & Childhood Islamic University Nursing college.
Secondhand Smoke.
Infant Safe Sleep Resources North Carolina Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC September 5, 2007 Christine O’Meara, MA, MPH.
Passive smoking and children’s health: New evidence and call for action.
4/20/2017.
Secondhand Smoke A Health Hazard to Children Secondhand Smoke 38 percent of children aged 2 months to 5 years are exposed to secondhand smoke in the.
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment Health Risks of Tobacco Smoke Reducing Your Risks Creating a Smoke-free Society.
Effects of Exposure to Tobacco Smoke on Maternal and Child Health Gayle C. Windham California – China Environmental Health Training Program Shanghai, April.
Smoking Cigarettes Are they worth it to you?. Tobacco use leads to disease and disability. Smoking causes cancer, heart disease, stroke, and lung diseases.
More Than 60 Published Studies In Medical Literature SMOKING & REPRODUCTION.
 2011 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS Director, USC Institute for Global Health Professor and Flora L. Thornton.
1 Treating Tobacco Use During Pregnancy Cecelia A. Gaffney, MEd Dartmouth Medical School May 16, 2005.
Secondhand Smoke. Secondhand smoke (SHS) is a mixture of 2 forms of smoke that come from burning tobacco: Sidestream smoke – smoke from the lighted end.
Health Hazards when Smoking
Impact of Secondhand Smoke Going for the 3 Increases: Increase in Health, Increase in Happiness & Increase in Energy Strategies for Success in Health Management.
ANALYTICAL STUDIES Prospective Studies COHORT Prepared by: Dr. Sahar Sabbour Community Medicine Department.
Carrie Dawson PAS 646 Spring 2007 Advisor: Eileen Van Dyke Negative Effects of Prenatal Smoking on School Aged Children.
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment
Air Pollution and Health: An introduction Ferran Ballester.
Chapter 21 Tobacco Lesson Three Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment Pgs
1 Mansel Nelson, ITEP Environmental Tobacco Smoke.
Secondhand Smoke A Health Hazard to Children Environmental Protection Agency American Academy of Pediatrics.
Section 4- Tobacco No Smoking Allowed!.
Reducing Exposure in the Home. Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Passive smoking Involuntary smoking.
Second Hand Smoke On Infants By Kristy Gutierrez.
Chapter 4. video XJ5md2iwhttps:// XJ5md2iw.
Smoking in pregnancy 전임의 최은정. Introduction  In the US : about 16 % of pregnant women smoke  In Korea : 8-10%  Smoking during pregnancy in.
Tobacco: The Smoker’s Gun A tool for trainers Ministry of Health and Quality of Life, Mauritius (Health Information, Education and Communication Unit)
Chapter 2 Health During Infancy Child Hood Dr. Areefa Albahri.
Smoking and the Movies Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS MPAA, Hollywood, California February 23, 2007 Department of Epidemiology.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Occupational exposure to.
If you don’t want to save your life, save a child's.
Secondhand smoke is harmful, but there are ways to reduce exposure.
Lesson 3 How has public awareness about the harmful effects of tobacco helped? Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment As more and more people become aware.
WHY should we be concerned about smoking during pregnancy? 27% of women are smokers during their childbearing years. In the National Health Interview Survey.
Children and Tobacco Presented by Varsha Patel. Pregnancy and Smoking  Sustained in interventions with all your clients who smoke is important because.
Ch. 20 A. Leslie. The health effects of tobacco smoke affect smokers and nonsmokers alike. Nonsmokers who breathe air containing tobacco smoke are also.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Evaluating Smoke-Free Policies Andrew Hyland, PhD Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
Wheezing Phenotypes In Early Childhood In Two Large Birth Cohorts: ALSPAC and PIAMA Dr Raquel Granell Department of Social Medicine.
MOM IN THE NICU: B ACKGROUND AND S IGNIFICANCE Douglas Hardy May 18, 2016.
1 Cleaning House: Reducing Children’s Involuntary Exposure to Secondhand Smoke National Conference on Tobacco or Health November 19, 2002.
Secondhand smoke (SHS) is environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) that is inhaled involuntarily and passively. SHS is a combination of “sidestream” smoke, which.
Chapter 21, lesson 3 objective:
Secondhand Smoke.
Health Effects of Secondhand Smoke (Environmental Tobacco Smoke)
SECONDHAND SMOKE (SHS)
Secondhand Smoke.
Secondhand smoke is harmful, but there are ways to reduce exposure.
Reducing Exposure in the Home
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment (3:23)
Secondhand Smoke.
Promoting a Smoke-Free Environment
Presentation transcript:

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS: Health Effects /index.html

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Effects Causally Associated with ETS Exposure Developmental Effects –Fetal Growth: LBW and decrease in birthweight –Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) Respiratory Effects –Acute LRTI in children (e.g., pneumonia) –Asthma in children and adults –Chronic respiratory symptoms in children –Eye and nasal irritation in adults –Middle ear infections in children Carcinogenic Effects –Lung, nasal sinus, and breast cancer Cardiovascular Effects – Heart disease morbidity and mortality –Altered vascular properties

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Effects with Suggestive Evidence of a Causal Association with ETS Exposure Developmental Effects –Spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, IUGR –Adverse impact on cognition and behavior –Allergic sensitization Respiratory Effects –Exacerbation of cystic fibrosis –Decreased pulmonary function growth –Chronic respiratory symptoms in adults Carcinogenic Effects –Cervical cancer –Brain cancer and lymphomas in children

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Chemical compounds in tobacco smoke for which IARC found sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals and/or humans

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Calculation of Attributable Risks and Excess Cases Associated with ETS (SIDS example) A = p(R-1)/[p(R-1)+1] (Lilienfeld & Lilienfeld, 1980) p = 11.4% children 1-17 yrs exposed to ETS at home (California Tobacco Survey; DHS 2001) R = SIDS OR = 1.94 (1.55; 2.43) (Anderson and Cook, 1997) A = 0.114(1.94-1)/[0.114(1.94-1)+1] = SIDS deaths in CA in 2000 = 222 (CA DHS, 2001) Excess death attributable to ETS = 21 (222 x = 21)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Conclusion OEHHA 1997 Conclusion OEHHA 1997 Conclusion Update Conclusion Update Outcome Excess # in CAExcess # in USExcess # in CAExcess # in US Pregnancy LBW 1,200 – 2,2009, ,600 1,57724,253 PTD 1,94329,590 Cardiac death 4,200 – 7,44035, ,000 1, ,48322, ,553 Lung cancer: Death Incidence ,5147, ,473 Asthma childrenEpisodes New cases Exacerbation 960 – 3,120 48,000 – 120,000 8, , , ,000,000 29, ,695438, ,295 Lower respiratory illness 18,000 – 36,000150, ,000 N/A Otitis media visits 78,600 – 188,700700, ,600,000 51,690789,712 SIDS 1201, , Attributable Risks Associated with ETS

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Developmental Toxicity 1: Perinatal Manifestions Out come # Studies 1997 # Studies Update Findings: OEHHA 1997 Evidence of causal association Findings: Update Evidence of casual association BW 2415 ConclusiveConclusive (strengthened) LBW 139 ConclusiveConclusive (strengthened) PTD 64 SuggestiveSuggestive (strengthened) IUGR 57 SuggestiveSuggestive (strengthened) SAB 5 2 Inconclusive Malformations 56 Inconclusive

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Effects of ETS on Birth Weight

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS and Risk of Low Birth Weight

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS and Risk of Preterm Delivery

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Prospective study of maternal serum cotinine and birth outcomes. (Kharrazi 2001; n=2815) Central Valley, state of the art laboratory, cotinine measured at weeks Maternal cotinine < 1.0 ng/ml >1.0 ng/ml >0.05 ng/ml Change in birth weight -30 g -100 g OR adverse outcome 1.36 (1.07; 1.72) preterm delivery 1.78 (1.01; 3.13)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS and Risk of Fetal Growth Retardation (IUGR, SGA)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment SIDS and Postnatal Development Outcome# Studies 1997 # Studies Update Findings: OEHHA 1997 Evidence of causal association Findings: Update Evidence of causal association SIDS 109 Conclusive (strengthened) Cognition and Behavior 113 Suggestive Postnatal physical development 50 InconclusiveUnchanged CNS changes 02 Not assessedSuggestive (animal model) Cardiovascular Hematological Immune 06 Not assessedSuggestive

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment What is SIDS? SIDS is the sudden unexplained death of an infant under one year of age. It is the leading cause of death in infants between 1 month and 1 year of age In California in 2000 there were 222 SIDS deaths out of 2,884 infant deaths from all causes. Excess SIDS deaths attributable to ETS = 21

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment SIDS Risk from Maternal Smoking Pre- and Postnatal; Postnatal Only

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Reproductive Health Effects Outcome # Studies 1997 # Additional Studies in Update Finding OEHHA 1997 Evidence of causal association? Findings Update Evidence of causal association? Fertility or fecundability 85InconclusiveSuggestive Lower age at Menopause 21Inconclusive Menstrual cycle Disorders 03InconclusiveSuggestive Male reproductive dysfunction 01Inconclusive

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Respiratory Health Effects Out come # Studies 1997 # Studies Update Findings: OEHHA 1997 Evidence of causal association Findings: Update Evidence of casual association Asthma (child) exacerbation (adult) Conclusive Suggestive Conclusive Respiratory illness 06 Conclusive Otitis media ± infusion 227 Conclusive Sensory irritation and annoyance 1815 Conclusive Asthma (child) induction (adult) Conclusive SuggestiveConclusive Lung (child) development 86 Suggestive Respiratory (child) symptoms (adult) 64 Conclusive Suggestive Conclusive Suggestive (strengthened)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment FEV 1 Decreased in School Children with ETS Exposure (Cook et al. 1998) Meta-analysis of 21 studies

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Effects of Either or Neither Parent Smoking on Respiratory Illness Meta-analysis of 38 studies (Strachan and Cook, 1997)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Meta-analysis of 13 studies of ETS and lower respiratory tract infections (LRT) in children. Li et al Pre/postnatal Overall 0-2 yrs old 0-6 yrs old 3-6 yrs old Postnatal only LRT 1.93 (1.66; 2.25) 1.71 (1.33; 2.20) 1.57 (1.28; 1.91) 1.25 (0.88; 1.78) 2.13 (1.52; 3.00) ETS associated with LRT mainly in younger kids. Postnatal only data from Chinese studies where mothers didn’t smoke.

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Doctor Consultations for Respiratory Symptoms by Number of Smokers 10,402 children ages 8-13 years in Hong Kong (Data fr. Peters et al., 1998) Household smokers Cough OR (95% CI) Phlegm OR (95% CI) Wheeze OR (95% CI) Any symptom OR (95% CI) None 1111 One 1.15 (1.01; 1.32) 1.26 (1.02; 1.54) 1.04 (0.76; 1.41) 1.15 (1.01; 1.31) Two or more 1.33 (1.08; 1.64) 1.33 (0.97; 1.83) 1.57 (1.02; 2.43) 1.38 (1.14; 1.67) Trend by # smokers P < 0.01P < 0.05NSP <.001 Cost 13% higher Cost 28% higher

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS Carcinogenic Effects

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Outcome# Studies 1997 #Additional Studies in Update Findings OEHHA 1997 Evidence of causal association? Findings Update Evidence of causal association? All cancers Adult 5 0 Suggestive Unchanged* Childhood Mother (smoker) Father (smoker) Inconclusive Inconclusive Suggestive Lung1917ConclusiveConclusive (strengthened) Breast413InconclusiveConclusive Nasal sinus33ConclusiveConclusive (strengthened) Cervical40SuggestiveUnchanged Bladder20InconclusiveUnchanged Stomach12Inconclusive Brain Adult30InconclusiveUnchanged Brain Children1012InconclusiveSuggestive** Leukemia Childhood 8 6 Inconclusive Inconclusive Lymphomas64InconclusiveSuggestive (in children)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Lung Cancer Consistently report elevated and often significant risk estimates (particularly for women married to smokers) Several recent studies provided evidence of positive increasing trends with increased exposure Misclassification of exposure in the “unexposed” populations in some studies by not measuring lifetime exposure results in biasing results to the null

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Lung Cancer Meta-analysis (Based on Data from Taylor et al., 2000)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS and Lung Cancer Risk in Never Smokers Population-based studies that include quantitative adult lifetime residential and occupational assessment of ETS exposure (based on Johnson 2000)

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment OEHHA 1997 Problems Determining Breast Cancer Association with ETS The effect seen in active smokers was comparable to (or weaker than) those noted in passive smoking –Active smokers are also passive smokers No dose response trends were evident in the data There was uncertainty about the suggestion that tobacco smoke may effect the risk of breast cancer only in certain susceptible groups of women

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Hypothesis Examined in Literature That May Help Explain Earlier Finding Causal preventive effects from current active smoking –(eg. anti-estrogenicity) may obscure any overall association between smoking and breast cancer. Risk similar for active/passive exposure –Need unexposed cohort Sensitive subpopulations –Polymorphisms – windows of susceptibility (ie. Before 1 st preg.) Exposure > 30 to 40 yrs. –Difficult to find as women smokers less common earlier in century

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Summary estimates for passive smoking and overall breast cancer risk

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Summary risk estimates for ETS and premenopausal breast cancer

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Cardiovascular Health Effects

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ETS Cardiovascular Effects

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Risk of Myocardial Infarction

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment End of AprilRespond to public comments Early May Revise report June/July SRP meeting SummerARB public Hearing Future Actions