Research Ethics: Review and Resources 2008 Summer Seminar for Postdocs UNC-Chapel Hill Douglas MacLean and Jamaal Pitt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:
Advertisements

Access to and Use of Traditional Knowledge A view from industry Bo Hammer Jensen.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Responsible Conduct of Research Rod Kelln Dean, Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research University of Regina.
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Research Integrity Graduate Research : Quincy Brown Doctoral Candidate Richard Podemski Dean, Graduate Studies Carla Thompson Faculty, Professional & Community.
Yvonne Lau, MD, PhD, MBHL NIH Extramural Research Integrity Officer OD/OER/OEP National Institutes of Health OER Regional, June 2013.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Ethics in Science CHEM 6691 – Science & Technology in Service to the Community George M. Strain June 27, 2003.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
The Responsible Conduct of Research at UTAS Office of Research Services.
Research Ethics Review and Resources UNC Chapel Hill Douglas MacLean Feb. 27, 2008.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers
Responsible Conduct in Research
Purpose of the Standards
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
The principles used by AUTEC in granting ethical approval for research.
Fundamentals of Trusteeship. Welcome Michael Mizzoni Deputy General Counsel Department and Board of Higher Education.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
The Graduate School Responsible Conduct of Research Initiative 9/10/20151 Responsible Conduct of Research A. G. Rud Head EDST Department College of Education.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Teaching RCR to undergraduate and graduate audiences: college sophomores, seniors and graduate students Julio F. Turrens, Ph.D. Associate Dean College.
Statistical Fundamentals: Using Microsoft Excel for Univariate and Bivariate Analysis Alfred P. Rovai Data Ethics PowerPoint Prepared by Alfred P. Rovai.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
Research Ethics and Research Conduct Karen Moorehead Human Research Ethics Officer Office for Research Photo: Australian HES 11/11/09 Office for Research.
Research Integrity The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research Dr Peter Wigley Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity Flinders University.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Developing Responsible Authorship and Publication Practices Thomas C. Chiles Research and Scholarship Integrity Program March 21, 2015.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Publication ethics Professor Magne Nylenna, M.D., PhD
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
Tuskegee Study Research Ethics Ethics matters in academic and scientific research. Study of ethics is no less and no more important in research than.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
1 Future Research Leaders Program Research Integrity and Codes of Conduct : How to add scenery to the roadmap?
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
LSA Responsible Conduct of Research and Scholarship (RCRS)
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Statistical Fundamentals: Using Microsoft Excel for Univariate and Bivariate Analysis Alfred P. Rovai Data Ethics PowerPoint Prepared by Alfred P. Rovai.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Pre-ratification meeting to present the proposed Academic Freedom language for the Collective Agreement April 23, 2015 Faculty Association pre-ratification.
Challenges in Promoting RCR: Reflections from a Public Funder´s Perspective Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research [Canadian Institutes of Health.
Ethical Considerations Dr. Richard Adanu Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (IJGO)
University of North Carolina Wilmington Mission Review Overview for the Faculty Senate October 14, 2008.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Promotion & Tenure Workshop

COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Responsible Conduct of Research at The University of Queensland
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
ICJME Authorship Criteria
Who we are…. Sponsored Programs and University Initiatives Grant Writing Workshop 6/6/18.
Research Integrity & RMIT
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
World Conference on Research Integrity
The Activities of COPE: Code, International Standards and Best Practices on the Ethics of Scientific Publications The 7th International Scientific and.
Presentation transcript:

Research Ethics: Review and Resources 2008 Summer Seminar for Postdocs UNC-Chapel Hill Douglas MacLean and Jamaal Pitt

UNC – Mission Statement Themes of the Course Resources for Ethics Questions

UNC Mission The mission of the University is shaped in large measure by the constitutional and statutory mandates by which public higher education is established and maintained. Article IX of the Constitution of the State declares: –Sec. 8. Higher education. The General Assembly shall maintain a public system of higher education, comprising The University of North Carolina and such other institutions of higher education as the General Assembly may deem wise.... –Sec. 9. Benefits of public institutions of higher education. The General Assembly shall provide that the benefits of The University of North Carolina and other public institutions of higher education, as far as practicable, be extended to the people of the State free of expense.

UNC Mission, cont. The Higher Education Reorganization Act of 1971, which placed those 16 institutions under one governing board, asserted the basic objectives and purposes for the University of North Carolina: to foster the development of a well-planned and coordinated system of higher education, to improve the quality of education, to extend its benefits, and to encourage an economical use of the state's resources.

UNC Mission Statement The University of North Carolina is a public, multi-campus university dedicated to the service of North Carolina and its people. It encompasses the 16 diverse constituent institutions and other educational, research, and public service organizations. Each shares in the overall mission of the University. That mission is to discover, create, transmit, and apply knowledge to address the needs of individuals and society. …

UNC Mission Statement, cont. This mission is accomplished through instruction, which communicates the knowledge and values and imparts the skills necessary for individuals to lead responsible, productive, and personally satisfying lives; through research, scholarship, and creative activities, which advance knowledge and enhance the educational process; and through public service, which contributes to the solution of societal problems and enriches the quality of life in the State. In the fulfillment of this mission, the University shall seek an efficient use of available resources to ensure the highest quality in its service to the citizens of the State. …

UNC Mission Statement, cont. Teaching and learning constitute the primary service that the University renders to society. Teaching, or instruction, is the primary responsibility of each of the constituent institutions. The relative importance of research and public service, which enhance teaching and learning, varies among the constituent institutions, depending on their overall missions.

Review: Purpose of this course Increase knowledge of and sensitivity to issues surrounding research ethics Improve the ability of participants to reason about ethical choices

Review, cont. Research: –A systematic investigation, including development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Practical Ethics: –A branch of philosophy that analyzes arguments about what is good and bad, right and wrong. Professional values: –Self-regulating –Pursue social goals

Review, cont. Voluntary informed consent –Legal capacity to give consent (no children or mentally impaired) –Genuinely free to exercise choice (no force, fraud, or deception) –Institutional Review Boards (IRB) (Designed to protect research subjects)

Review, cont. Authorship –Requires substantial participation –The following conditions are all necessary: Help to conceive design and method, or help to analyze and interpret data Help to draft article or revise its intellectual content. Approve final draft. –Does not justify authorship: Secured funding Generally supervised the group Has seniority or outstanding credentials

Review, cont. Avoiding authorship disputes –Communicate early and often –Acknowledge sponsor –If conflicts persist, send colleague in writing a detailed account of your perspective

Review, cont. Research misconduct –Falsification – altering data –Fabrication – creating data –Plagiarism – borrowing ideas or words without appropriate attribution Copyright (legal protection of intellectual property) –Original works of authorship (books, software) –Covers the particular expression of an idea in the work –The idea itself cannot be copyrighted.

Ethics Web Sites POLICY AND PROCEDURES ON ETHICS IN RESEARCH

Ethics Web Site, cont. Procedure: –1. Consult informally and in confidence with the department chair. –2. If discussions confirm the seriousness of the report, the chair should report in writing to the Dean. If the chair does not go forward, the Post-doc may go directly to Dean. –3. The Dean is responsible for conducting an inquiry. The School of Medicine has its own research integrity officer, Dr. Robert Collier, Department of Pediatrics.

University Compliance Hotline Tel:

Conflicts of interest

For all matters on ethics -- The Parr Center for Ethics:

National Institutes of Health Ethics Web Sites on the Web

Responsible Conduct of Research Education Consortium

Data acquisition, management, ownership

Mentor / trainee responsibilities

Authorship and peer review

Research involving use of humans

Research involving use of animals

Research misconduct

Conflict of interest and commitment