1 Early Intervention Funding Model NSW Department of Community Services Ben Smith Senior Economist 4-5 October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Maternal and Child Health Service
Advertisements

Effective Practices for Preventing and Addressing Young Children’s Challenging Behaviors Mary Louise Hemmeter, Ph.D.: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Prevention and Early Intervention. PEI’s Function and Purpose Texas Family Code Sec PREVENTION AND EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES DIVISION. "Prevention.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra Common Elements of Strong Program Evaluation THEORY OF.
A Home Visiting Program that Works. The Importance of Prevention Diverse communities and service providers across the U.S. have come to the same conclusion.
Content 1.Background on AbSec? 2.Keep Them Safe Projects 3.Intensive Family Based Services (IFBS) 4.Protecting Aboriginal Children Together (PACT)
Sue Richards CEO NSW Family Services (FamS) Sue Richards Managing Director Results Leadership Group Australia.
1 SPATIAL CASEWORKER ALLOCATION NSW Department of Community Services Ben Smith Senior Economist 4-5 October 2005.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011.
Outcomes Based Service Delivery Alberta Children and Youth Services
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
Welcome to the 1 st Annual Summer Early Childhood Public Policy Institute!
What’s the “ Intense” in “ Intensive”? The experience of Barnardos Australia in establishing Redfern/Waterloo Intensive Family Support Service Presentation.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Chapter 257 of the Acts of 2008 Provider Information & Dialogue Session: Lead.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
The Road To Implementation Where Are We?. The Road To Implementation March 31, 204…Small Groups to address: Communication Plan (Melissa) – EA CSPD Vision,
Coming Together for Young Children and Families.  What we know  Where we have been  Where we are today  Where we need to go.
SESSION 19: SAVING AND INVESTING Talking Points Saving 1. Saving is allocating part of one’s current income toward the purchase of goods and services in.
Flying Start - Wales Fran Dale RGN RHV MA Team Leader Flying Start/Sure Start Wrexham.
DCFS School Readiness Planning Initiative Insure that all young children in the system start school ready to learn –Physically –Socially –Emotionally.
THE MASSACHUSETTS EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM Department of Public Health.
1 Issues in Preparing and Supporting the Workforce to Implement the Part C Referral Requirements of CAPTA Cordelia C. Robinson, Ph.D., RN Departments of.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Cost Measurement in Evaluations of Prevention Programs for Children * Eric Slade, Ph.D. University of Maryland, School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins.
SERVICES TO AT-RISK (STAR) AND UNIVERSAL PREVENTION PROGRAMS.
Child Protection Training Package
Family Support Program of Albemarle County February, 2010.
NSW Department of Community Services Restoration Initiatives ACWA Reunification Forum 6 December 2007 By Linda Mallett Executive Director Child and Family.
Children's Family Centres: what's working in practice? Interventions through Integrated Family Support Services.
Family Advocates Home Visiting Program. Mission Strengthen families and communities so they can be safe, healthy and thriving. We do this by providing.
Home Visiting at EIPH.  All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  To provide the information, support and encouragement.
Re-affirm DCFS’ role of surrogate parent Early identification and treatment of trauma Anticipate child development needs Recognize emotional attachments.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Report-back Seminar “ Early Intervention ” in Family and Preschool Children Services Outcome Framework and Critical Success Factors / Principles.
Understanding and Using the Results from the NCSEAM Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. NCSEAM Measuring Child and Family Outcomes NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Shropshire Parenting Strategy Our aim is to provide a multi-agency approach to supporting parents and carers in taking responsibility for helping their.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Sharing is Good for Kids Kathy Hebbeler NERCC Part C Coordinators Meeting April 24, 2013.
RBA in Action Louisa McKay Director of Policy and Projects.
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Keep Them Safe Budget Overview Vicki D’Adam A/Deputy Director General Policy and Strategy Department of Premier and Cabinet.
1 Making the most of evaluation a provider perspective on the outcomes of Brighter Futures Andrew Anderson, The Benevolent Society.
1 External influences shaping the evaluation of a tertiary child protection program Andrew Anderson, The Benevolent Society.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Supporting Children’s Rights and Entitlements Outcome One The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 PC b) Explain a range of rights and entitlements relating to.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.
Using Data to Make the Case for Policy Change in Times of Fiscal Crisis National Association of Council for Children Conference October 21, 2010 Jane Burstain,
Investing in a healthy community: making the most of NICE’s ROI tools Judith Richardson Health & Social Care Directorate.
Center For The Study of Social Policy’s Strengthening Families A Protective Factors Framework Strengthening Families Goodwin College.
Session 136: Community approaches for increasing coverage of child health interventions Community approaches for increasing coverage of child health interventions.
James Buchanan Duke CHILD CARE RURAL CHURCH FOUR AREAS OF FOCUS HIGHER EDUCATION HEALTH CARE.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
Change Fund Specialist LAAC Health Visitors. Context  A proposal was submitted from health, social work and education to the Early Years Change fund.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families,
Board of Health Proposed 2011 Public Health Budget October 29, 2010 Dr. David Fleming Director and Health Officer.
Homelessness and social housing reform launch sites Brimbank Melton 15 June 2016.
1 Training Family Carers in the Implementation of Positive Behavioural Support Marie Thomson Depute Manager Positive Behaviour Support Team
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
Supporting Continuous Quality Improvement in Family Child Care: A Peer Learning Group Session 5: Improving Outcomes for Children in Family Child Care:
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Presentation to the Senate Finance Article II Workgroup
Presentation transcript:

1 Early Intervention Funding Model NSW Department of Community Services Ben Smith Senior Economist 4-5 October 2005

2 Early Intervention Program  By 2008 $48m p.a. worth of new early intervention services will be purchased for at-risk families.  The aim is to stop at-risk families entering the child protection system by preventing child abuse and neglect earlier.  Research has shown improved child outcomes from these types of services.

3 Service Needs  Families are classified as low, medium or high needs.  Higher need families need more intensive services for a longer time. 1. Casework 2. Home Visiting 3. Child Care 4. Parenting Programs

4 Allocating Funding  Funding needs to be allocated across geographic areas and to different types of services.  Each area’s percentage of child protection reports of abuse and neglect for 0 to 8 year olds is used to allocated geographically.  Splitting the funding into service types meant projecting the services families need and their unit costs.

5 Policy Development  Higher service intensity and duration means less families can be served.  Increasing one service can be offset by reducing another.  The model projects the trade-offs, allowing decision-makers to make informed policy choices.

6 Sensitivity Testing Sensitivity testing was used to show which service parameters generated the biggest trade-offs. Variable No. of Families Change (%) 1. Reduce caseworker caseload to 1/12 from 1/20 (70% increase in hours of casework per family)-18.6% 2. Reduce EI program duration by 1 year9.6% 3. Hours of casework per family-2.7% 4. % of caseworkers that are DoCS caseworkers2.7% 5. Hours per home visit-1.4% 6. Frequency of home visit-1.4% 7. Average days of child care per week-7.1% 8. Hours per parenting program session-0.9% 9. No. of parenting program sessions-1.1% 10. No. of families per parenting program session1.0% 11. Brokerage $ available-1.4%

7 Tailoring to Local Needs  Travel time differences  Number of children per family  Interpreter services  Mix of high, medium and low needs

8 Results For each planning area, the model provides p.a. estimates of:  the number of families that can be serviced  quantities of each service to be funded (eg counselling sessions)  the total level of funding for each service type

9 Implementation  Model service specifications are broad averages.  Actual specifications will match individual family needs.  Expressions of interest from service providers are compared to the model.

10 Future Development  Future refinements to service specifications will be incorporated into the model.  Based partly on the model output, the future impacts of the early intervention services can be estimated.