Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Lecture 4
Advertisements

2501 THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
International Relations Theory
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
POL 240: Introduction to International Politics Theoretical Review 2012–03–05.
CONCEPT, THEORY, CASE Deciphering the Differences 1.
RealPolitik or Power Politics
Psychlotron.org.uk What makes science different from propaganda?
The best US foreign policy is one based on contemporary understandings of realism. Such a policy would be more successful, particularly in avoiding wars,
Neo-Realism: a structural theory of IR
Realism International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
The Realist Paradigm- Hans Morgenthau
Plan for Today: Understanding Classical Realism and Neorealism
Realism States main actors States are unitary States are rational States’ primary interest is national security.
Realism and American Foreign Policy. Political Realism 1) States (Leaders) are the key actors 2) States (Leaders) seek power 3) States (Leaders) are rational.
Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY IN POLICY DEBATE Houston Urban Debate League.
 Realists see the world as it is  Basic assumptions of realism  Groupism; group cohesion to survive, nation state and nationalism, anarchic social.
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
4.3. Armed Conflict in Global Politics Learning Objectives –Apply the level of analysis tool to explain armed conflict –Familiar with the central trends.
Topics Today: Neorealism and Other Contemporary Realism 1.Completing introduction to neorealist principles. 2.Introduction to another version of contemporary.
2.0. Theoretical Perspectives and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Realists describe global politics Identify the Realist.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
International Relations
Power in International Politics State Power/Power Politics Balance of Power International Systems.
International Relations
International anarchy could be best defined as: Chaos Multilateralism No world government Government by the United Nations No world government.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 3: Classical Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Politics, Security & International Relations O’Connor, Chapter 19.
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
Theories of International Relations - Neo-Realism The Neo-Realist paradigm and comparison with the Classical Realism The Neo-realist conceptualisation.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
Plan Today: (Neo-)Marxist & Feminist Approaches to IR 1. Completing group discussion of postcolonial theory vs. Marxism. 2. Evaluation of Marxist and Neo-
International Security and Peace
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Neoliberal institutionalism 1975 Keohane and Nye-power and interdependence 1984-Keohane After Hegemony.
Today’s Topics Realism and Liberalism 1.Finishing group discussion activity on realism in Rice speech. 2.Evaluating realism as a theory. 3.Introducing.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
POL 3080 Approaches to International Relations Introduction
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Realism Statism…survival…self-help. Why theory “A theory must be more than a hypothesis; it can’t be obvious; it involves complex relations of a systematic.
Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
International system Units/agents/actors Structure Interdependence between units/agents Regular interactions between units Functional differentiation between.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
 Advanced by Kenneth N. Waltz in 1970s  Wrote book Theory of International Politics (1979)  Definition of Neorealism: A theoretical account of states’
International Relations Theory A New Introduction
International Politics- meaning, nature and scope According to Hans Morgenthau International Politics is the struggle for power between states in the international.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
Realism vs Liberalism. What would you do? To be able to define the competing international relations theories of realism and liberalism.
James Fitzgerald School of Law and Government Dublin City University
Intensive Readings in International Relations Fall 2006 Peking University Instructor: Ji Mi ( 吉宓)
Realism. Basic Assumptions of Realism 1. States are the most important actors in world politics 2. States in anarchic systems are driven to seek security.
CONCEPTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS.  Concept: is a general notion or an idea of something.  Cold war: is a state of diplomatic tension between East.
International Relations
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
John T. Rourke Mark A. Boyer
Introduction to International Relations Week 2 Lecturer: Andris Banka
** Emergence of Realism
The Politicization of the Power Transition Theory
Systemic & Dyadic Explanations of Interstate Conflict
REALISM PAMELA RIZIKI I43022.
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
International Security and Peace
Presentation transcript:

Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism. Topics Today: Realism Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.

Classical or Traditional Realism Hans Morgenthau – Politics Among Nations (1948). First attempt at realist textbook. Trying to create “science” of international politics. Level of analysis: More emphasis on human nature than structure of system itself.

Classical or Traditional Realism Morgenthau’s 6 principles of political realism: Politics governed by objective laws with roots in human nature. Interest defined as power. Forms of state power will vary with time and place, but interest defined as power will remain constant.

Classical or Traditional Realism Morgenthau’s 6 principles of political realism: Political action has moral consequences, but morality cannot guide action. There is no universally agreed set of moral principles. Political sphere is autonomous from legal, moral, or economic spheres. Politics deals with power.

Conclusion: What principles do classical realists share? Must look at world as it is, not as it ought to be. Interest of states and leaders is power. Ambition for power comes more from human nature than structure of system. Moral claims or arguments about justice have no place in foreign policy. These principles are permanent aspects of international politics.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: To explain international system, must create system-level theory. Units of system (states) functionally similar. International politics different from domestic politics.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: Anarchy central defining aspect of system. Consequences: Self-help – cannot rely on others. Uncertainty – attack always possible.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: Consequences of anarchy  drive for power to attain security. No assumptions about human nature necessary.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: Consequences of anarchy  states act similar under similar constraints.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: Search for power has limits – states really seek security. Excessive power grab can prompt security dilemma.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Principles of neorealism: Alliance behaviour: States will always balance rather than bandwagon in alliances. Bipolar systems more stable than multipolar systems.

Neorealism – Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979) Distinctive traits of Waltz’s methods: Deductive. Particular observations cannot ever lead to whole theories. Level of analysis: System-level only. Only need to know power capabilities of states.

Other Contemporary Realism -- Robert Gilpin – War and Change in World Politics (1981) Theory of cycle of hegemonic power. Hegemon: single, powerful state that controls or dominates lesser states. E.g. Roman Empire, British Empire, American hegemony (empire?).

Gilpin’s Hegemonic Cycle

Other Contemporary Realism Robert Gilpin – War and Change in World Politics (1981) More analysis of domestic processes of growth and decline than Waltz, in order to explain change. This provides theory with greater scope and detail, but less definite predictions than Waltz’s strict neorealism.