Improving implementation and Enforcement 17 February 2011 Terry Shears - IMPEL Vice Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Intelligent Energy – Europe Programme at a glance
Advertisements

Structural and Cohesion Funds – an Important Tool to Support Climate Protection Improving the climate resilience of Cohesion Policy Funding Programmes:
Supporting Environmental Improvement in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia OECD/EAP Task Force Secretariat
International Cooperation in FP7 Ayman A. Issa Philadelphia University Liaison Officer 21/09/2010.
Customs 2013 Programme Customs 2013 is a programme which gives the national customs administrations of the EU, together with the European Commission, the.
How the countries in South East Europe are dealing with DWCP’s P. Morgado de Carvalho Dusseldorf, 6 November 2009.
EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
The European Railway Agency in development
Enforcement of EU legislation Expectations of EU Citizens and Non-Governmental Organisations Sonja Van Tichelen Director Eurogroup for Animals.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Introduction of The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe April, 2008 Zsuzsanna Ivanyi Head of Climate Change Department.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 Analysis of minimal criteria for environmental inspection.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
SOLUTIONS The Transferability of Sustainable Urban Mobility Solutions from Europe, Asia, Latin America and the Mediterranean region
Review of the IRI Malta, October What is an IRI? Impel review initiative Voluntary scheme for review of environmental authorities RMCEI and Doing.
Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.
Jolanda Roelofs Inspectorate of the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment The Netherlands IMPEL waste transport inspections A step.
Enforcement Networks Workshop for Central and Eastern Europe countries on the prosecution of illegal traffic of hazardous and other wastes under the Basel.
ECENA Exchange Programme First Plenary Meeting January, 2006 Zagreb, Croatia Update on strengthening the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental.
TransNEW Project - Brussels, February 2009 Ms Siân Evans NewRail – Centre for Railway Research United Kingdom ASSESSING, ANALYSING.
2nd ECENA Plenary Meeting Brussels, Sept Overview of the recent IMPEL activity Hilda FARKAS IMPEL Secretariat.
Third BERCEN Plenary Meeting December 16-17, 2004 Brussels, Belgium Key Achievements in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance in the Republic of Montenegro.
4 th Exchange Programme Cluj Napoca, October, 2005 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Updates in the Transposition and Implementation of IPPC directive Updates.
The International Network for Environmental Compliance & Enforcement Seaport Environmental Security Network ECENA Training session 9-12 December 2008 Budapest,
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
Balkan Environmental Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement Network BERCEN Secretariat The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe.
PRISON HEALTH IN EUROPE: MISSIONS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Strasbourg, France 27 th May 2014.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
1 ASPECTS REGARDING PLANNING AND REPORTING RELATED TO RECOMMENDATION 331/2001/EC ON MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
The European agenda on improving the efficiency of employment and social policies: Bratislava, December 2011 The example of social experimentation.
Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels 1.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
1IMPEL Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 IMPEL European Network for the Implementation and Enforcement.
Stabilisation & Association Process: the EU Policy for South East Europe Brussels December 2004.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Twinning project ENEA – ENforcing Environmental Acquis Skopje, 19 th of November, 2015.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
Svetlana Parežanin, head of Department Sector for control and surveillance Major activities of the Serbian inspectorate from September the second.
The European Union Forum of Judges for the Environment Prof. Dr. L. Lavrysen Justice Belgian Constitutional Court President EUFJE.
ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION Session 2. Luc Lavrysen  There is a pressing need to provide judges with sufficient initial and continuous training in environmental.
Introduction of Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe November, 2007 Zsuzsanna Ivanyi Head of Climate Change Department.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
European Migration Network National Contact Point Finland.
The European Union Forum of Judges for the Environment Prof. Dr. L. Lavrysen Justice Belgian Constitutional Court President EUFJE.
Stream A LEGISLATION AND POLICY report back. Main issuess Formal Aspects Experience and lessons learned Plans and visions for the future Actions.
Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water ManagementAlbania ECENA Exchange Programme First Plenary Meeting January, 2006 Zagreb, Croatia.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
The Commonwealth Cybercrime Initiative David Tait, Cybercrime Policy Analyst.
EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations Michel Viaud and/or Ingrid Weiss EPIA, Brussels,
BERCEN plenary meeting Budapest, September Agenda item 4 National key achievements in environmental enforcement and compliance, and proposals on.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Interregional cooperation and smart specialisation PERIA final conference 9 October 2012 Stefania Amorosi | Finance.
Slide 1 The contribution of a world-class regulatory environment to the future of the industry in Ireland Pat O’Mahony Chief Executive, Irish Medicines.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
Networking in a globalized world RALI Conference, Baku, Azerbaijan, November, 2012 Mr.Elnur Sultanov Head of Social Security Policy Department, MLSPP.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 IMPEL European Network for the Implementation and Enforcement.
The role of IMPEL in promoting the implementation and enforcement of European environmental law Giuseppe Sgorbati & Michael Nicholson IMPEL
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
HPH Strategy Seminar Beijing, China 7 september 2013 Andrea Limbourg
Themis: Raising standards of environmental law compliance through regional cooperation Oxford, 21 September 2017.
Commission Action Plan on Environmental Compliance and Governance
Outcomes of the International Conference on Water Scarcity and Drought: “the path to climate change adaptation”
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Accessible Information Provision for Lifelong Learning
Presentation transcript:

Improving implementation and Enforcement 17 February 2011 Terry Shears - IMPEL Vice Chair

Presentation will cover Introduction to IMPEL How IMPEL work helps improve implementation and enforcement in Europe Cooperation with other networks Conclusions

Introduction to IMPEL Set up in 1992 The only network of practitioners looking at implementation and enforcement of environmental law Association established under Belgian law in 2008 A major focus is work relating to the Recommendation on minimum criteria for environmental inspections Work is carried out through a range of projects approved in annual work programme

Organisation All 27 Member States plus Norway, Croatia, FYROM Turkey and Iceland are members. Commission continue to participate Biannual General Assembly meetings to approve work programme Funded by LIFE+ and membership fees IMPEL office in Brussels

The mission of IMPEL “To contribute to protecting the environment by promoting the effective implementation and enforcement of EC environmental law”

IRI – a cornerstone of IMPEL work IMPEL Review Initiative Fulfils a requirement in the Recommendation on Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections Informal review of environmental authority Highlights good practice and opportunities for development Started in 2000 and reviewed in 2008/09 New simplified scheme has increased take-up

The combined IMPEL/NEPA checklist Assessing practicability and enforceability New and existing legislation Combined with work from the Network of Heads of Environment Protection Agencies (NEPA) Feedback to policy makers Previous assessment on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment (WEEE) Next proposal is the Waste Shipment Regulation

Focus of collaboration improving permitting, inspection and enforcement transfrontier shipment of waste better regulation

Cluster 2 - Waste Transfrontier Shipments

Waste Shipment Regulation- Exchange of inspectors Waste Shipment Regulation cannot be implemented without international cooperation Inspectors exchange days: Network of national contact points sharing of examples of practical cases share enforcement intelligence Inform participants about new developments

Joint enforcement actions Need for cross-border collaboration Joint activities and participation of customs Inspections across many countries in set period of time Results analysed and common problems identified

Heads of Environmental Protection Agencies European wide network Focus on strategic issues Range of interest groups – Better regulation to natural resources Vision on improving effectiveness of environmental regulation Seeking greater cooperation with IMPEL

INECE International Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Global umbrella network Focus on compliance and enforcement Capacity building and regional networks New stream of work on climate compliance 9 th International conference in Canada

Value of international collaboration Exchange of good practice Benchmarking of own approach Invaluable development of networks Feedback from practitioners to policy makers Access to information on more efficient solutions

Conclusions It is essential to share knowledge Informal networks encourage participants to openly share experiences Cooperation helps achieve better implementation and creates a level playing field Learning from others’ experiences is important to improve efficiency and effectiveness