PROTO Method WG Chair Lunch IETF 62. PROTO Team Aaron Falk Barbara Fuller Bill Fenner Allison Mankin Dave Meyer Henrik Lefkowetz Margaret Wasserman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IETF 74, 30 Jul 2009draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05.txt Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP security draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05.txt.
Advertisements

Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Timeliness, Effectiveness, Quality and the IETF Aaron Falk
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
Education (EDU) BOF IETF 57 – Vienna, Austria Margaret Wasserman
A tech spec requirements draft IETF 64 TECHSPEC BOF.
Routing Area Open Meeting Paris, March 2012 Area Directors Adrian Farrel Stewart Bryant.
WG Leadership Tutorial IETF 86: Orlando March 10, 2012 Margaret Wasserman
Ietf64 Nov Report on the Early-copy-editing Experiment Bert Wijnen Nov, 2005.
A Comprehensive Approach to Quality (COACH) IETF 57 Vienna, Austria Monday, July 14, :00 – 15:00
Dime WG Status Update IETF#81, THURSDAY, July 28, Afternoon Session I.
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
DIME WG IETF 84 DIME WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
RUCUS BOF IETF-71 IETF Exploratory Groups Bernard Aboba Microsoft Corporation Laksminath Dondeti Qualcomm, Inc. March 10, 2008 Philadelphia, PA.
IAB Report Technical Plenary IETF 81 July 25, 2011.
SIRs, or AIRs, or something draft-carpenter-solution-sirs-01.txt Brian Carpenter without consulting my co-author Dave Crocker IETF 57, 07/03.
1 IETF Status at IETF 71 Russ Housley, IETF Chair.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
IETF #82 DRINKS WG Meeting Taipei, Taiwan Fri, Nov 18 th
RSOC Fred Baker Chair. What is the RSOC supposed to do? RSOC is tasked with hiring and overseeing the activities and budget of the RFC Series Editor,
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF-91 Honolulu Co-Chairs: Stewart Bryant and Andy Malis
NEWTRK WG Paris, August 5, Agenda 0 – agenda bashing – 10m 1 - introduction & status - chair- 10m discussion on the issues with ISD proposal.
A Practical Guide to PROTO Shepherding WG Chairs Training Lunch IETF68 Prague Margaret Wasserman
IPPM WG IETF 79. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and.
IETF-90 (Toronto) DHC WG Meeting Wednesday, July 23, GMT IETF-90 DHC WG1 Last Updated: 07/21/ :10 EDT.
Who’s watching your network The IETF standards process and OpenPGP Jon Callas 8 October 1998.
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 7 January, 2016 Slide 1 Process and Tools (PROTO) Team General Area Meeting IETF59, Seoul, Korea -- March 2004
Web Authorization Protocol (oauth) IETF 90, Toronto Chairs: Hannes Tschofenig, Derek Atkins Responsible AD: Kathleen Moriarty Mailing List:
IETF Trust Chair Report Ed Juskevicius November 19, 2008 Minneapolis, MN, USA.
P2PSIP WG IETF 87 P2PSIP WG Agenda & Status Thursday, August 1 st, 2013 Brian Rosen, Carlos J. Bernardos.
Routing Area Open Meeting Vancouver, July/August Area Directors Adrian Farrel Stewart Bryant.
IETF55 Internet FAX and VPIM WG IETF 55 Internet FAX and Voice Profile for Internet Mail WG joint meeting Atlanta, November 20th 2002 Agenda.
7 March 2005IETF-62 Applications Area Open Meeting Jabber Room: Ted Hardie Scott Hollenbeck.
IETF Report – July th IETF Meeting Vienna, Austria Aaron Falk, Joyce Reynolds Bob Braden.
DMM WG IETF 84 DMM WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Julien Laganier.
1 An RFC Stream for the IRTF Wednesday, 12 March 2008 Scalable Adaptive Multicast RG.
Welcome to the Plenary Harald Alvestrand IETF Chair IETF-61, Washington DC, USA.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
SIP Working Group IETF 72 chaired by Keith Drage, Dean Willis.
EDU BOF IESG Plenary – IETF57, Vienna Margaret Wasserman
PROTO Team Update IETF 64 9 Nov 2005 / Plenary.
HIP WG Gonzalo Camarillo David Ward IETF 80, Prague, Czech Republic THURSDAY, March 31, 2011, Barcelona/Berlin.
1 Yet Another Mail Working Group IETF 76 November 11, 2009.
Long-term Archive and Notary Services (LTANS) Working Group.
SIEVE Mail Filtering WG IETF 70, Vancouver WG Chairs: Cyrus Daboo, Alexey Melnikov Mailing List: Jabber:
1 Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses Jung-Soo Park, Myung-Ki Shin ETRI 54th IETF – Yokohama, Japan draft-ietf-ipv6-link-scoped-mcast-01.txt.
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF-92 Dallas Co-Chairs: Stewart Bryant and Andy Malis
56 th IETF Internet Fax WG Claudio Allocchio Hiroshi Tamura Mar 18 th 2003.
1 IETF Status at IETF 73 Russ Housley, IETF Chair.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Agenda Wednesday, July 29, :00 – 15:00 Congresshall B Please join the Jabber room: LEDBAT WG IETF 75.
May 12, 2015 Dan Romascanu Adam Montville
ID Tracker States: An Internet Draft’s Path Through the IESG
WG Chairs Forum Wednesday 29 March 2017.
NOTE WELL Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
IETF 86 Orlando MBONED.
Note Well All statements related to the activities of the IETF and addressed to the IETF are subject to all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026, which.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 66 Montreal
Working Group AD Area Director Evaluation Individual Assignment
How long does it take to publish an RFC?
Standards and Certification Training
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 73 Minneapolis 18 Nov 2008, 17:10-18:10
Harald Alvestrand IETF Chair IETF-61, Washington DC, USA
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG
Scott Bradner & Martin Thomson
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
Presentation transcript:

PROTO Method WG Chair Lunch IETF 62

PROTO Team Aaron Falk Barbara Fuller Bill Fenner Allison Mankin Dave Meyer Henrik Lefkowetz Margaret Wasserman

PROTO Document(s) draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding- 04.txt Coming document on the PROTO Advisor Coming document on document lifecycle

PROTO in a nutshell OLD –WG Chair(s) request publication –Responsible AD takes over all efforts on behalf of document (tracking, advocating, asking for revisions when needed, reporting out review changes, approving, following up during RFC publication)

Nutshell NEW: –WG Chair(s) on requesting publication identify one as a shepherd for the document –The shepherd takes on most of the tasks of the Responsible AD (tracking, advocating, asking for revisions, reporting out review changes, etc…) –Responsible AD needs to be cc’d in the shepherd’s work as a check and balance matter, and approval is still in IESG, but work quality and speed shifts to the WGs. –Throwing over the wall is no longer the paradigm. –Teamwork of Chairs, Editors and Area Directors.

When? PROTO is an evolution of approaches some WGs already use IESG will request that most groups start using PROTO according to draft However, for some WGs, there may be a preference to stay with a more traditional approach –TBD by the Area Directors –Example would be where the document(s) written by the WG Chair

PROTO Steps Publication Request –Writeup submission (Section 3.1 of document) –This includes information that AD can use for background of AD Review (to speed review) and also the draft of the “announcement writeup” –Note one question concerns possible appeals and should be sent under separate cover (3.1.f)

AD Review and Discuss Review These are similar; the WG Shepherd ensures that the Editor quickly responds to all comments on the document. –Timeliness and completeness –Coordination of all parties –Maintaining the document’s integrity

PROTO Advisor With a new widespread practice, we expect questions, ups-and-downs, but want this to succeed, so IESG is appointing a PROTO Advisor to encourage: Team member with expertise, Dave Meyer. –Will contact PROTO Chairs on entry of a new document –Will be available for questions –Will report to community at intervals on takeup, nature of questions

Conclusion PROTO is for the working groups Documents energy is your energy Best energy for getting them to the finish line quickly is also your energy PROTO lets this be a team effort Questions?