Reform results and the structure of para-fiscal and non-tax charges in the budget of the Republic of Serbia and the local governments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Protection Agency Montenegro. Competent Authority Since November 2006, The competent authority for environmental issues was the Ministry.
Advertisements

State Government Policy. 1. Regulation of Businesses What is an example of a government regulation that applies to a business? Why do we depend on the.
Sixth Regional Forum on Public Procurement 2010, Istanbul Agency for Public Procurement of Goods, Works and Services under the Government of the Republic.
Author: Branislav Stipanović INTERGOVERNMENTAL FINANCE SYSTEM IN SERBIA - Status and next steps - Belgrade, November 01, 2006.
Round table– Para-fiscal charges Financial impact analysis of para-fiscal charges to doing business and business opinions on non-tax charges Belgrade,
Kingdom of Cambodia Nation Religion King   THE TAX SYSTEM OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Ministry of Economy and Finance General Department of Taxation.
KINGWOOD UDGET PRESENTATION TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD 2012 BUDGET PRESENTATION.
1 “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” State Audit Office Nada Sekulovska Gorast.
Budget Classification & Chart of Accounts in Albania
Marek Jakoby Advisor to the State Secretary Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic Vienna February 24, 2005 STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL.
Australian Perspective: EGSS Developments and Application Issues Peter Williams Assistant Director, Centre of Environment Statistics (P)+61 (0)
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Consumption tax trends Maurice Nettley OECD Centre.
STATE REVENUE Where do we get the money from and how do we spend it?
Topic: Fundamentals of taxes and taxation methods.
13th Annual Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on the Audit of Privatisation, London, 26 – 28 September SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH REPUBLIC Audit.
Public Access to Environmental Information in Serbia Filip Radović Environmental Protection Agency Geneva, December
Developing a Waste Water Discharge Fee Programme in Sri Lanka Kolitha Himal Muthukuda Arachchi Deputy Director General, Pollution Control Central Environmental.
Report on Work of the Ministry of Finance in the First 100 Days of the Government Belgrade, September 5, 2007.
ESTONIAN TAXES AND TAX STRUCTURE. Population ( )1,339,662 Total area 45,227 km 2 Average salary (2010)792 EUR (2011 IV quarter)865 EUR Currency.
Business Survey 2013 Belgrade November 13, Business Survey 2013.
PAD190 PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
Business Survey 2014 Belgrade November 21, 2014 #1000preduzeca.
Counties Working Together” “ Counties Working Together” A plan for county and regional collaboration 2009 District Meetings.
NEW MORTGAGE REGISTRATION MODEL IN LITHUANIA CENTRAL MORTGAGE OFFICE LITHUANIA 4 December 2012.
Budget Hearing Sept. 12,  The “Budget” ($9,131,600 expenditures)  Disbursements/Transfers- $10,305,826 Salaries and Benefits - $7,154,154 Supplies,
Legal and fiscal conditions for foundations in the Czech Republic.
Budget Integration to Governmental Accounting Reports.
Cleveland Municipal School District Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Overview.
State and Local Government Budgets Chapter 14 Section 3 and Chapter 25 Section 2.
STATE TREASORY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Ministry of Finance Republic of Croatia.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Development of the Ecoregister, a national metaregister for environmental.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.
The Property Tax Bill Project Team Igor BEVC, Neva ŽIBRIK Ministry of Finance Ljubljana, ’00.
PLAN AND BUDGET COMMITTEE AND THE OVERALL BUDGET PROCESS Yüksel KARADENİZ Legislative Expert.
Proposed SAHA Fiscal Year Consolidated Budget.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
ACCA Annual Convention August 20, 2015 Don Armstrong, ACTA Property Tax Commissioner Shelby County, AL.
Enhancing Market Integrity Taxation 17 May 2006MENA/OECD Investment Programme Cairo, Egypt.
Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Implementation of the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention - Access to.
Major Objectives of Internal Audit Strategy Development in Belarus 2nd Internal auditors’ Community of Practice Workshop Chisinau, Moldova June
Capacity Building of Kazakhstan Aarhus Centres in Providing Access to and Exchange of Environmental Information Olga Melnik, Information and Analysis Center.
3. Finance of Local Government 3. Finance of Local Government 3-1. Revenue Structure 3-2. Revenues from Own Sources 3-3. Transfers from Central Government.
Central government in the planning of municipal revenues and controlling financial sustainability in municipalities Audit department 3, Vilnius division,
Обдуманные ходы Эффективные решения PPP as a mechanism for infrastructure formation in Kazakhstan: legal aspects
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
By Dr. Aisha-Ghaus Pasha Director, Institute of Public Policy, Beaconhouse National University.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE SYSTEM IN SERBIA How to get through the crisis ? Aleksandar Bućić Strasbourg, October 11-12, 2010.
DateNOVEMBER 16, Niger State Context PART ONE.
REAL ESTATE TAXATION SYSTEM IN ALBANIA AND CHALLENGES FOR A EUROPEAN FISCAL SYSTEM Puleri Thodhori 1 Kripa Dorina 2 1) 2) University of Tirana, Faculty.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
Inaugural Extension Council Conference
Appraisal Districts: What They Do For Local Government
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
About the MEDT’s Role in Improving Business Environment
Water System Acquisition
2017 Urban Policy Forum Revenue Sources for Wisconsin Municipalities
Seminar on Evaluation of Internal Control Systems
PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,
Board of County Commissioners
State Government Policy
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Belarus
21st September 2017 doc. JUDr. Radim Boháč, Ph.D.
Budget Transparency and Citizen Engagement in Uzbekistan: Reform Progress Ministry of Finance Republic of Uzbekistan.
Municipal Government.
Franchise Fee Informational Meeting
PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Republic of Croatia Ministry of Finance
Presentation transcript:

Reform results and the structure of para-fiscal and non-tax charges in the budget of the Republic of Serbia and the local governments

Amendments to the Law on LG Finance adopted in September 2012 – one of the main manners of the conducted reform of para-fiscal charges in the previous phase The most significant changes – determining maximum amounts or total elimination of local signage fee (depending on concrete taxpayer and the legal entity size and scope of revenues) and limiting the maximum amount of utility fee for keeping motor vehicles The effects in the City of Belgrade are estimated at ca. RSD 3 billion a year The effects in all local government in total are estimated at ca. RSD 5 billion a year Law on local government finance – 2012 amendments

In the analysis of all non-tax charges in 2011, this fee was marked as the most fund-generating individual form in the system (its fiscal importance was nearly RSD 15 billion at that point) Starting from 1 st January 2014, the fee has been entirely abolished and it is not charged anymore On this ground, the local governments in Serbia will lose RSD 16 billion, which was the collected sum in 2013 The City of Belgrade will lose more than RSD 8 billion on this ground, which is more than 12% of total city budget revenues However, given its arbitrariness and discriminatory treatment for different taxpayers, and due to the cease of Constitution justification, its elimination is a significant step. Land use fee – deserved retirement

The Ministry of Finance formed a Working group for drafting the new law The foundations for LG finance need to be set up in a clear and transparent manner, as much as possible, and their funding sources and basic determining elements need to be precisely defined – the aim is to have as little high-amount forms as possible Property tax needs to become the most significant individual revenue source – application of the new Property Tax Law starting from 2014 also needs to allow taxation of construction, agriculture and forest land, in addition to facilities New Law on LG Finance – drafting and adoption planned for 2014

The LG budgets took the greatest burden of the reform of non-tax charges in 2012 The reform of some fees in 2012 did not bring the expected results – financial burden was concentrated on a lower number of taxpayers than before A joint assessment is that the following reform phase needs to focus on the national authorities, institutions and agencies and be subjected to change and reform LGs have further engaged in expanding the number of taxpayers and the scope of some fees (primarily the property tax) in order to compensate the lost revenues Land use fee – possibilities of revenue compensation? The conclusions from a round table with local government representatives

20 most fund-generating non-tax fees in 2013 and their distribution No. Account numberTitleDistributed revenuesNational budgetProvincial budgetTotal LGs Land use fee15,976, ,976, Special fee for use of state road (road fee)15,316, Republic court fees10,155, Land development fee7,862, Republic administrative fees6,061, Fee for use of Republic Geodetic Authority data4,134, Utility fee for company name display (signage fee)3,716, ,716, Fee for use of mineral resources...3,426,1701,814,661241,0411,370, Fee for use of water resources2,917,2352,128,281788, Fee for emission of SO2, NO2, particulate matter...2,916,5741,749,94501,166, Utility fee for keeping motor and road vehicles2,683, ,683, Special environment protection and improvement fee2,676,057402,676, Special fee for registration of motor vehicles 2,472, Fee for products turning into special waste flows2,242, Fees for funding the salaries of disabled persons...2,217, Fee for organizing classic games of chance1,684, Fee for releasing water1,272,8551,172,830100, Fee for organizing special games of chance - betting1,142, Fee for organizing special games of chance – slot machines1,018, Drainage fee for legal entities999,799204,360795, Total90,893,69953,515,4371,925,46035,452, %

20 most fund-generating non-tax fees from 2011 to 2013 and the rank changes Amount in 000 RSDRank No Account numberTitle Land use fee14,519,07314,580,32315,976, Special fee for use of state road (road fee)14,309,77114,595,08415,316, Republic court fees10,609,93210,984,90610,155, Land development fee10,289,5099,705,4227,862, Republic administrative fees9,220,0688,172,5326,061, Utility fee for company name display (signage fee)4,913,1314,154,9463,716, Fee for use of Republic Geodetic Authority data3,427,5093,642,8064,134, Utility fee for keeping motor and road vehicles3,042,5883,082,6482,683, Fee for use of mineral resources2,857,6083,434,5003,426, Fee for emission of SO2, NO2, particulate matter...2,231,3381,828,2622,916, Fee for products turning into special waste flows2,137,4431,865,4932,242, Special environment protection and improvement fee2,114,1902,058,9552,676, Fee for use of water resources2,064,651159, > Funds for financing the salaries of disabled persons1,980,5042,422,0102,217, Fee for organizing classic games of chance1,728,8701,828,5961,684, Special cigarette fee from Article 70 of the Law on Tobacco1,648,0271,255, > Annual fee for road motor vehicles,...1,487,5511,519, > Pollution fee1,430,4181,136,4043, > Water protection fee1,173,1579,9983,80119> Fee for laboratory analysis of food samples...957,215672,62172,64820>20 Total92,142,55387,109,51981,151,377 Source: Ministry of Finance, Treasury

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!