Need for an accurate Reno velocity model to understand amplification in the Reno Basin Aasha Pancha.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.

Advertisements

J. Louie 9/5/2005 OutlineOutline 1.Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Vs 2.ReMi-Borehole Comparison 3.Los Angeles Transect 4.Las Vegas Transect 5.Effect.

PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.

EAGE Dubai 12/11/ Interpretation of hydrocarbon microtremors as pore fluid oscillations driven by ambient seismic noise Marcel.

Intro to Spectral Analysis and Matlab. Time domain Seismogram - particle position over time Time Amplitude.

1 CVM Efforts in Wellington, New Zealand John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab Collaborators: R. Benites, G. McVerry, & W. R. Stephenson, GNS Science S.

10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)

Shallow Shear Velocity and Seismic Microzonation of the Urban Las Vegas Basinwww.seismo.unr.edu/hazsurv Rasmussen, Tiana; Smith, Shane B.; and Louie, John.

Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.

Predicting Earthquake Shaking and hazard John N. Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab. with UNR undergraduate interns: Will Savran, Brady Flinchum, Colton Dudley,

Microwindow Selection for the MIPAS Reduced Resolution Mode INTRODUCTION Microwindows are the small subsets of the complete MIPAS spectrum which are used.

J. Louie, GBCVM Workshop 1/14/2008 The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment and Initial Ground-Motion Computations for Reno and Las Vegas J.

103/25/04 NGA Workshop Parameterization of Basin Response Based on 3D Simulations by PEER/SCEC 3D Ground Motion Project Team PI: Steven M. Day San Diego.

1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 ATC-63 Selection and Scaling Method Charles Kircher Curt B. Haselton Gregory G.

Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)

NGA-East: National Seismic Hazard Mapping Perspective Mark Petersen USGS Golden, CO.

Las Vegas Valley Seismic Response Project Catherine Snelson, Wanda Taylor, and Barbara Luke University of Nevada Las Vegas John Louie, John Anderson, and.

March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:

Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.

03/24/2004NGA Workshop: Validation1 BROADBAND SIMULATION METHODOLOGY: A HYBRID DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACH  Use Deterministic Methodology at.

UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.

Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.

Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of

1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson Carleton University.

1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.

GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE MARMARA REGION: ATTENUATION OF SEISMIC WAVES (1) M.B.SØRENSEN, (2) A. AKINCI, (2) L. MALAGNINI and (3) R. B. HERRMANN (1)

Description of selected broadband ground motion simulation methods Paul Somerville, URS Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden.

Kinematic Representation Theorem KINEMATIC TRACTIONS Time domain representation Frequency domain representation Green Function.

RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.

Simulation of Nonlinear Effects in Optical Fibres

Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2

CENA GMPEs from Stochastic Method Simulations: Review, Issues, Recent Work David M. Boore Blue Castle Licensing Project (BCLP) Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis.

Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.

The Rupture Process of the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake Martin Chapman Virginia Tech.

Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.

Sigma - Background Norm Abrahamson Sep 30, Sigma for CEUS EPRI (2006) –Truncation of log-normal distribution –Evaluation of Application of NGA sigma.

High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.

An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.

Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.

Moment Tensor Inversion in Strongly Heterogeneous Media at Pyhasalmi Ore Mine, Finland Václav Vavryčuk (Academy of Sciences of the CR) Daniela Kühn (NORSAR)

HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.

Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update 3 November 2014 through 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.

Focal mechanisms and moment tensors of micro-earthquakes in the Malé Karpaty (Little Carpathians) Mts., Slovakia Lucia Fojtíková 1, Václav Vavryčuk 2,

J. Louie, SSA 4/12/2007 Computing Scenario Shaking For Nevada Urban Areas With The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment (MA-CME) J. Louie and.

Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.

NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.

Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update November 3, 2014 – 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.

Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for: Broadband synthetic time histories from different methodologies Broadband synthetic time histories versus.

Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.

Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.

Brief summary of Seattle URM Policy Committee actions

Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin

Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:

How the ground shakes? Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D., by

Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake

Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Building a Las Vegas Seismic Model

2University of Southern California, 3San Diego Supercomputer Center

1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.

Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra

Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra

Computing Scenario Shaking For Nevada Urban Areas With The Model Assembler Community Modeling Environment (MA-CME) J. Louie and L. Preston Nevada Seismological.

Nonlinear modulation of O3 and CO induced by mountain waves in the UTLS region during TREX Mohamed Moustaoui(1), Alex Mahalov(1), Hector Teitelbaum(2)

Interferogram Filtering vs Interferogram Subtraction

Comparison of Seismic and Well Data

Gravity of the Reno Basin

Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7

by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O

Prediction of Orientation Selectivity from Receptive Field Architecture in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex Ilan Lampl, Jeffrey S. Anderson, Deda C.

Presentation transcript:

Need for an accurate Reno velocity model to understand amplification in the Reno Basin Aasha Pancha

Reno Area Basin ANSS stations: installed

Reno Area Basin Abbott and Louie (2000)

1. M=4.4 12/02/ M= /03/2004

1. M=4.4 12/02/2000

Reno Area Basin Abbott and Louie (2000)

1D synthetic Green's functions, computed in a layered elastic solid using the generalized reflection and transmission coefficients (Luco and Apsel, 1983; Zeng & Anderson, 1995). E3D – fourth order, 3D staggered grid elastic finite difference code (Larsen & Schultz [5]; Larsen & Grieger [6]). 0.2 to 0.6 Hz frequency band. Compare these simulations with the observed data

Velocity Model = MA 0.25 km grid

RFNV RFMA SKYF

SKYF RFMA SF02 RFNV

1. M=4.4 12/02/ M= /03/2004

Earthquake Locations

Spatial Variation

Insignificant correlation with basin depth Correlation is significant at the 68% confidence level.

Basin Depth vs Travel Time Residuals Correlation is significant at the 98% confidence level.

Travel time residuals vs Fourier spectral amplification Correlation is significant at the 90% confidence level.

Correlation with Vs30 and Vs100 Vs100 (98%) Vs30 (94%)

Earthquake Locations

Azimuthal dependence

X X X X X X

Blue = soil to rock (SR) horizontal spectral ratios. Red = soil to rock (SRv) spectral ratios of the vertical components of motion. Black = horizontal to vertical spectral ratios (HVSR) for individual stations. The black dashed = ratio the SR and SRv mean response spectra.

RF10/RFNZ E N Z

SF02 E N Z

RF11/RFMA E N Z

RF07/SKYF E N Z

Summary Good agreement is observed between the amplitudes of the data, and that of the 3D simulation. E3D matches the durations in the data and may anticipate some of the later arrivals. The 1D code does not. 3D basin effects are important and a 3D model is required to model ground motion within the Reno area basin. Need for refinement on the velocity and basin structural model.

ID Parameters Mo = 5.17E+22 dyne-cm Calculated: Area = km Rise time = 0.69 seconds Slip = 6.3 cm E3D Parameters Grid spacing = 0.25 km 77 by 99 km down to depth of 40 km Rise time 0.7 seconds  Gaussian STF to = 0.5 seconds Depth 11 km dt = 0.015, t=4800  72 seconds

1. M=4.4 12/02/ to 0.6 Hz

Reno Area Basin Abbott and Louie (2000)ANSS stations:

Correlation with Vs30 and Vs100 Vs100 (98%) Vs30 (94%)

Spectral Amplification

NGA models Campbell and Bozorognia (thin dashed line); Choi and Youngs (thin line); Boore and Atkinson (dashed-dot line)