Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Database of Potential Sources for Earthquakes larger than M 5.5 in Italy, and surrounding areas, version.
Advertisements

SAFER Project - FINAL MEETING Elin Skurtveit & Amir M. Kaynia - NGI
Seismic analysis and design of
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Response Spectrum Analysis as per Indian IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002
Name of School Date Earthquakes and Seismology. Plate Tectonics.
International Insurance-Reinsurance Forum 2012 Managing catastrophic risks From Seismic Hazard Analysis to Seismic Risk mitigation C.O.Cioflan Ph.D., Senior.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS Stability of a slope can be affected by seismicity in two ways: earthquake and blasting. These seismic motions are capable of inducing.
GMSM Mission and Vision Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.
8: EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Recall the momentum equation:  ∂ 2 u i /∂t 2 = ∂ j  ij +f i, where f i is the body force term An earthquake source is usually considered slip on a surface.
03/09/2007 Earthquake of the Week
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
Learning objectives Understand the relationship of earthquakes to faulting Familiarization with earthquake & wave (energy) terminology Understand the.
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
Seismic LRFD for Pile Foundation Design
Earthquakes An earthquake is shaking or movement of the Earth. They are caused by plate tectonics.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging earthquakes and understanding seismic exposure Undertake loss assessment.
Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Critical Infrastructure Workshop Edward Perez, FERC Background - Part 12D Report. - Every 5 years. - Top-to-bottom.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A REGIONAL EEW SYSTEM FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN REGION ZUCCOLO Elisa, SALAZAR Walter, DI SARNO Luigi, FARRELL Anthony, GIBBS Tony,
Earthquakes (Chapter 13). Lecture Outline What is an earthquake? Seismic waves Epicenter location Earthquake magnitude Tectonic setting Hazards.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#15 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
University of Palestine
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation The geometric moment Brittle strain The usefulness of the scaling laws.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Evaluation.
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
Ground Motions and Liquefaction – The Loading Part of the Equation
Seismic Sources CEE 431/ESS465. Seismic Sources Identification Geologic evidence Field reconnaissance Trench logging Test pits, borings Airphoto interpretation.
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
Fault Segmentation: User Perspective Norm Abrahamson PG&E March 16, 2006.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
March 11, John Anderson: GE/CEE 479/679 Lecure 15 Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 15. Character of Strong Motion on Rock and Ground.
EARTH SCIENCE Geology, the Environment and the Universe
What are Magnitude and Intensity?
Plate tectonics: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
How the ground shakes? Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D., by
Key terms Risk The exposure of people to a
NGA-East Tentative Plan
CE 5603 Seismic Hazard Assessment
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Creating the Virtual Seismologist
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Earthquakes.
Earthquake Magnitude Ahmed Elgamal
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Kinematics VI: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for some significant structures Nuclear power plants Large dams Large bridges Hazardous waste containment facilities As “cap” for probabilistic analyses

Corps of Engineers Regulation (1995) Sec. 5.h.2.a Deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA). The DSHA approach uses the known seismic sources sufficiently near the site and available historical seismic and geological data to generate discrete, single-valued events or models of ground motion at the site. Typically one or more earthquakes are specified by magnitude and location with respect to the site. Usually the earthquakes are assumed to occur on the portion of the site closest to the site. The site ground motions are estimated deterministically, given the magnitude, source-to-site distance, and site condition. Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Consists of four primary steps: 1. Identification and characterization of all sources 2. Selection of source-site distance parameter 3. Selection of “controlling earthquake” 4. Definition of hazard using controlling earthquake Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Identification and characterization of all sources Identification All sources capable of producing significant ground motion at the site Large sources at long distances Small sources at short distances Characterization Definition of source geometry Establishment of earthquake potential Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Identification and characterization of all sources Which sources are capable of producing significant motion at the site of interest? What is significant motion? Parametric definition Peak acceleration - usually ~0.05g Spectral acceleration - at fundamental period, if known Other parameters Use predictive (attenuation) relationship to determine distance of interest Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Identification and characterization of all sources Estimate maximum magnitude that could be produced by any source in vicinity of site Find value of R max - corresponds to M max at threshold value of parameter of interest, Y min. log R ln Y M = M max Y min R max Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Identification and characterization of all sources Characterize geometry Point source Constant source-site distance Volcanos, distant short faults Linear source One parameter controls distance Shallow, distant fault Source Site Source Site Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Characterize geometry Areal source Two geometric parameters control distance Constant depth crustal source Volumetric source Three parameters control distance Identification and characterization of all sources Site Source Site Source Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Identification and characterization of all sources Establish earthquake potential - typically M max Empirical correlations Rupture length correlations Rupture area correlations Maximum surface displacement correlations “Theoretical” determination Slip rate correlations Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Slip rate approach Recall seismic moment M o =  A D where  = shear modulus of rock A = rupture area D = average displacement over rupture area Identification and characterization of all sources Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Slip rate approach If average displacement relieves stress/strain built up by movement of the plates over some period, T, then D = S x T where S is the slip rate Identification and characterization of all sources Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Slip rate approach Then M o =  A S T and the “moment rate” can be defined as M o = M o /T =  A S Identification and characterization of all sources Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Slip rate approach Knowing the slip rate and knowing (assuming) values of m, A, and T, the moment rate can be used to estimate the seismic moment as M o = M o T Then M w = log M o / Identification and characterization of all sources Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select source-site distance parameter Define source-site distance Must be consistent with predictive relationship Should include finite fault effect Select source-site distance Hypocentral distance Epicentral distance Distance to closest point on rupture surface Distance to surface projection of closest point on rupture surface Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select source-site distance parameter Distance measures r hypo r seis r rup r jb Seismogenic depth Vertical Faults Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select source-site distance parameter Distance measures Dipping Faults r hypo r seis r rup r jb =0 r hypo r seis & r rup r jb Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select source-site distance parameter Typically assume shortest source-site distance (“worst case” scenario) Source Site Source Site Point source Linear source R min Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select source-site distance parameter Typically assume shortest source-site distance (“worst case” scenario) Areal source Volumetric source Volumetric source Site Source Site Source R min Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select controlling earthquake Decision based on ground motion parameter(s) of greatest interest Consider all sources Assume M max occurs at R min for each source Compute ground motion parameter(s) based on M max and R min Determine critical value(s) of ground motion parameter(s) Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select controlling earthquake Site Source 3 Source 1 Source 2 M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 R1R1 R2R2 R3R3 Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Select controlling earthquake log R ln Y M = M 1 R1R1 M2M2 M3M3 R2R2 R3R3 Y2Y2 Y3Y3 Y1Y1 Source 2 controls Combination of M 2 and R 2 produces highest value of Y Source 2 controls Combination of M 2 and R 2 produces highest value of Y Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Use M and R to determine such parameters as: Peak acceleration Spectral accelerations Duration log R ln a max Define hazard using controlling earthquake SaSa T 0 Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Comments DSHA produces “scenario” earthquake for design (design earthquake) As commonly used, produces worst-case scenario DSHA provides no indication of how likely design earthquake is to occur during life of structure Design earthquakes may occur every 200 yrs in some places, every 10,000 yrs in others DSHA can require subjective opinions on some input parameters Variability in effects not rationally accounted for Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Corps of Engineers Regulation (1995) Sec. 5.h.2.a Deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA). The DSHA approach uses the known seismic sources sufficiently near the site and available historical seismic and geological data to generate discrete, single-valued events or models of ground motion at the site. Typically one or more earthquakes are specified by magnitude and location with respect to the site. Usually the earthquakes are assumed to occur on the portion of the site closest to the site. The site ground motions are estimated deterministically, given the magnitude, source-to-site distance, and site condition. DSHA calculations are relatively simple, but implementation of procedure in practice involves numerous difficult judgements. The lack of explicit consideration of uncertainties should not be taken to imply that those uncertainties do not exist. Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis