Please, move slowly through this PPP + with timed features.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smart interconnections and urban growth – the Polish case* Tomasz Komornicki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences.
Advertisements

Kern Countys Population will More than Double Growth Driven by Spillover from Southern California and Our Kids Trend: Kerns Changing Ethnicity Hispanics.
Southern California Association of Governments Where Will Our Children Live? Darin Chidsey Member Relations Officer Growth, Change and Rising Prices.
Transportation in Amsterdam Final Presentation. The Randstad.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Smart Growth: Big and Small Steps in the Bay Area Steve Heminger, Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission National Governors Association.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Central Place Theory “Models are not real, but help us understand reality”
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
CHICO 101. Where is California? Do you know? What is the most beautiful city in CA? ◦ San Francisco Which city is the state capital? ◦ Sacramento What.
Introduction | LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities. The Rose Institute report examines key.
1 Welcome the San Joaquin Valley. 2 San Joaquin Valley is located in the heart of California.
A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE Dan Richard, Chair California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 Sacramento, CA.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
Coaching consulting design raschbichler | consulting DR. MICHAEL RASCHBICHLER Maglev – Future of High Speed Rail? Long Wave Theories and Infrastructures.
Rosen Consulting Group Employment California Million.
Title Slide California High Speed Rail Authority Board Meeting September 28, 2005.
Jason Hade, Regional Planner Kern COG Workshop – November 21, 2002 High-Speed Rail for the Kern Region Kern Council of Governments.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
Private Sector Initiatives On Greening Taxi Services In California By Charles Rathbone May 2011 – Rio de Janeiro Expert Group.
Analysis of the High Speed Rail in California Daniel Montanez 1, Antonio Castro 1 1 Napa Valley College, Napa, CA Abstract: San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Land Use Benefit/Cost Transit Slides. Development – Sprawl – Traffic – Roads An Important Local Issue In America  “What do you think is the most important.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
Is the expenditure on the ‘HS2’ rail route to Birmingham justified? To see more of our products visit our website at Mark Evetts, Cheltenham.
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
UCLA Anderson School of Management Los Angeles: Long Run Challenges and Opportunities Christopher F. Thornberg Senior Economist.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
Development Deltrametropool (1) Part of 5th National spatial planning program Deltametropool: –highly populated western part of the Netherlands –Including.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
LT Catherine Long LT James Koffi.  Background  Problem/Model Scenario  Network Model  Interdiction  Takeaways/Further Research  Summary/Conclusions.
1 Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) within the transport operational programme Marco Cecchetto
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
Welcome to San Jose. A City of Growth and Change.
T Transportation and Land Use There is a growing acceptance in the transportation planning community that the effects of transportation and land.
Classic Urban Models.
Population Summer School List: Where Is the World’s Population? Largest Countries in Land Size Largest Population.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Why are Different Places Similar?. Scale from Local to Global.
Parallel Workshop Session: Workshop 1.1 Urban Fabric ESPON Internal Seminar 2012 “Territorial Development Opportunities in Europe and its Neighbourhood.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Ships. Motorcycling is popular in Britain, both as a means of transport and as a pastime with over one million motorcyclists. A moped with an engine.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
SB 375: CREATING GREAT COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Airport and Airline Access Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental.
MERCEDES MARQUEZ GENERAL MANAGER LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Informational Hearing SB 1024 December 13,
Introduction to Metropolition Region Rotterdam – The Hague Eric Bavelaar Head public transport department Stadsregio Rotterdam.
Impact of the California High Speed Rail System Lee Ann Eager, Chief Operating Officer Economic Development Corporation serving Fresno County.
Author - Topic - Date of Production. 2 May 15, 2002 McGraw-Hill Construction Confidential 2003 California Construction Forecast McGraw-Hill Construction/Dodge.
HUMAN AP. LEARNING OUTCOMES  Understanding Urban Land use Patterns.
Re-imagining Norfolk – Budget consultation
Urban Patterns
Urban Sprawl Warm Up p. 47 Urban Rural Create a 4 square positive
Christaller – Central Place Theory
Automated Transit Network
California Transportation Planning Conference Rail Modernization to Improve Mobility for California Moderator: Melissa Elefante DuMond, AICP Director of.
Public Conference December
Lessons for the U.S. from High-Speed Rail’s Urban Impact in China
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Urban Transportation Grid A comparison
Chapter 12 Key Issue 3: Services
California High-Speed Rail
AP Day 75.
If You Build It, They Will Not Come
Changing the Definition
CHAPTER 1 Introduction.
AN INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE
Presentation transcript:

Please, move slowly through this PPP + with timed features

California High Speed Rail And how to get the best rail for the best price! Fredrick Schermer Penta Publishing Production 

California High Speed Rail What would aliens conclude when looking from outer space at the California high-speed rail system?

Aliens could conclude that California has central command, and that Fresno is its Capital ! is living in a 19 th /20 th Century setting,

First to notice are five terminals; some in close proximity. There are no connections between the 5 terminals; an indication that these locations are not of most importance. Aliens know that the fastest line is a straight line, and wonder about big bends.

They conclude that the geographical situation must force the result. Aliens know that the fastest line is a straight line, and wonder about big bends.

What are the locations where the most important humans reside? This location must be important. More so than the two nearby un-connected nearby un-connected terminal locations. This well connected location is more impor- tant than either location in the south. This location must be important too, but less so than: This location is important but ranks below the other because it is not connected to the San Diego terminal.

FRESNO ! ! ! Fresno is connected to all terminals and to all important locations. No doubt about it! It’s the Capital. FRESNO ! ! !

California has central command over large population centers - themselves not interconnected!

California must be in a 19 th /20 th C. time frame based on it not making optimal use of transit system knowledge of the 20 th /21 st Century (more about this later).

Let’s start from what we’ve got! Let’s first look at population distribution.

15,600,000 people 7,300,000 people 3,300,000 people 3,000,000 people Source: Rand 2007

15,600,000 people 7,300,000 people 3,300,000 people 3,000,000 people 77.5% of the entire California population 29,200,000 people + More than 3 out of every 4 Californians

15,600,000 people 7,300,000 people 3,300,000 people 3,000,000 people Source: Rand 2007 Medium sized cities with growth forecasts Small but still important cities

The two largest population centers must receive prime position and connect on a straight line to maximize speed and attraction for the largest populations. The next step is to connect the remaining largest population centers, while keeping a close eye on direction and speed. 15,600,000 people 7,300,000 people 3,300,000 people 3,000,000 Making side trips to smaller cities on the left and right diminishes the high speed product. The number of stops needs to be as few as possible to maximize speed and use. Only one place lies close by enough to change this alignment without negative impact. 800,000 people Population 15,600,000 7,300,000 3,300,000 3,000, , ,000,000

This is the F3MA Fastest Maximum Money Making Alignment Population 15,600,000 7,300,000 3,300,000 3,000, , ,000,000

Let’s look at the rail transit systems already in place, ‘easy’ to put in place, or easy to adjust, that could deliver further support for this alignment. 550,000 2,850,000 1,700,000 1,900, ,000,000 98% Population Population 15,600,000 7,300,000 3,300,000 3,000, , ,000,000

Areas with local rail transit Areas without it Having local rail transit in place improves the number of people using High Speed Rail.

Fewest Stops of F3MA High Speed Rail Sacramento Station San Francisco Bay Station (Oakland) San Jose Station Avenal Station Bakersfield Station Burbank Station Los Angeles Station Orange County Station San Diego Station

What would the result be for California in 2050? Areas with accelerated growth due to version A:

Growth acceleration due to version B: Version B shows a further concentration of the existing urban areas; as desired in the plans for California (SB375).

Operational Differences San Francisco Bay Station San Diego Station

For the same operational level of service, one needs to SFB StationSD Station go faster or use more trains Either way is more expensive or lead to the California High-Speed Rail perform slower.

Are others making the same decisions as California? Let’s view the High-Speed Rail decisions made in the Netherlands, where The Hague and Rotterdam are found along the best alignment. Yet having a stop in both cities diminishes the High-Speed Rail product. The Hague is where the decision makers reside; 12 miles away from Rotterdam.

High-Speed Rail Decisions in Holland Which city should have a station? Rotterdam? The Hague? The government decides and is seated in The Hague. Source: Mapping Netherlands B.V.

Source: High Speed Rail Netherlands Source: RET Source: GVB Amsterdam Rotterdam

Not only did the decision makers decide against themselves in The Hague, not getting the best connection with the European Capital of Brussels nor with Paris and London, but the stations In Amsterdam and Rotterdam are not perse in the hearts of the cities, but at the hearts of transit: the well-connected Central Stations. The High-Speed Rail alignment is a straight line from A to B, and the reason is simply, because not making the top performer in transit perform at its best, trickles down and diminishes all forms of transit hooking up with that High-Speed Rail. That would be a waste of money. In Europe all High-Speed lines are designed along straight lines from important city to important city.

Version AVersion B Expensive to build Expensive to operate Less expensive to operate FastFaster Politicians’ decisionProduct-based decision Future adjustments possible Future adjustments easier Urban California spreading Urban California spreading less Politicians’ dreamUsers’ dream Requires more investing in regular infrastructure (roads) Requires less investing in regular infrastructure (roads)

Literature Review  California High-Speed Rail Authority  Metropolitan Transportation Commission  California Department of Transportation  San Francisco City Scape  Bay Area Council  SPUR  California Light Rail Pushkarev, B., J. Zupan  Urban Rail in America, An Exploration of Criteria for Fixed- Guideway Transit (1982) Indiana University Press, Bloomington Vuchic, Vukan R.  Urban Transportation Systems and Technology (1982) Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs

California High Speed Rail And how to get the best rail for the best price! Fredrick Schermer Penta Publishing Production