AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part V

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Advertisements

Module 9 Bonded Contact.
WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.
Rotational Motion Chapter Opener. Caption: You too can experience rapid rotation—if your stomach can take the high angular velocity and centripetal acceleration.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
FE analysis with 3D elements
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
Joël Cugnoni, LMAF/EPFL,  How can we model more complex cases ? ◦ It is possible to define interactions between different regions of a model by.
ABAQUS I Summary Program Capability Components of an ABAQUS Model
Katsuyo Thornton*, R. Edwin García✝, Larry Aagesen*
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
J.Cugnoni, LMAF-EPFL,  Stress based criteria (like Von Mises) usually define the onset of “damage” initiation in the material  Once critical stress.
ABAQUS – Advanced use Element and Node Sets
ABAQUS – Advanced use Element and Node Sets Shear Locking in solid elements Reduced Integration and Zero Energy Modes Sign Convention Integration Schemes.
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part III
FE analysis with bar elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part II
Introduction to ABAQUS 27 th February, Units Before starting to define any model, you need to decide which system of units you will use. ABAQUS.
Seal Analysis Jeremy Osguthorpe Mitchell Woolf Jon Blotter 7 / 12 / 2007.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Computational Fracture Mechanics
1cs533d-term Notes  list Even if you’re just auditing!
Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Structure Design Dr. A. Sherif El-Gizawy.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
1 Kul Finite element method II – Vibration of a four storey building.
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part I
Finite Element Analysis Using Abaqus
Tutorial 2: Abaqus with Analysis Input File
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Axisymmetric Analysis of a Pipe Assembly
AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part IV
Workshop 1 Taylor Impact Test – Basic Simulation
9.0 New Features Large Deformation Analysis of thin plate assembly spotwelded together Workshop 2 Spotwelds.
ANSYS Fundamentals This document contains no technical data subject to the EAR or the ITAR.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 Tutorial 5-1: Part Sketch / Geometric Constraints.
Tutorial 3: Plane Beam.
GTSTRUDL The GTSTRUDL Base Plate Wizard A Module for the Modeling and Analysis of Base Plates Rob Abernathy CASE Center GTSUG June, 2008 Las Vegas, NV.
ADAMS Assignment 5 ME451:Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems.
Energy Transformations and Conservation of Mechanical Energy 8
Workshop 7: Thermal Steady State Analysis of a Composite Slab University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Department of Mechanical Engineering Modified by (2008):
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Rene Herrmann Compounding and Composites. FEM static load analyzes The purpose of the static test is to define areas of large strain. It is these areas.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Thermo-mechanics J. Cugnoni, LMAF / EPFL Three kind of « thermo-mechanics » 1. Un-coupled: Known temperature field => mechanical model (linear statics.
GTSTRUDL Using the GTSTRUDL Base Plate Wizard Example of Creating and Analyzing a Base Plate Rob Abernathy CASE Center GTSUG June, 2009 Atlanta, GA.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Tutorial 6-1: 3D Modeling.
9.0 New Features Metal Shaft with Rubber Boot Workshop 7 Load Steps in Workbench.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
ADAMS Assignment 6 ME451:Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems (Fall 2013) Assigned: November 13, 2013 Due: November 20, 2013.
ME 498CM Fall 2015 Loading & Analysis.
Workshop 5-1 NAS101 Workshops Copyright  2001 MSC.Software Corporation WORKSHOP 5 Stiffened Plate Subjected to Pressure Load.
Wednesday, Nov. 10, 2004PHYS , Fall 2004 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 1.Moment of Inertia 2.Parallel Axis Theorem 3.Torque and Angular Acceleration 4.Rotational.
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
WORKSHOP 15 PARASOLID MODELING NAS120, Workshop 15, November 2003 WS15-1.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
ME 160 Introduction to Finite Element Method-Spring 2016 Topics for Term Projects by Teams of 2 Students Instructor: Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor, Dept. of Mechanical.
WORKSHOP 11 PRESS FIT CAT509, Workshop 11, March 2002 WS11-1.
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Chapter 7 Explicit Dynamics: Body Interactions
WORKSHOP 14 KNOWLEDGEWARE
ENFORCED MOTION IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
Thermo-mechanics J. Cugnoni, LMAF / EPFL 2012.
Presentation transcript:

AE4131 ABAQUS Lecture Part V Patrick Roberts gt0398b@prism.gatech.edu x5-2773 Weber 201

Starting ABAQUS CAE You can start ABAQUS CAE from the start menu or with a command line by typing abaqus cae TIP: You should start ABAQUS CAE via command line from the directory you want your results files to end up.

Dynamics We have seen how we can compute and view the results of static loading on 1D, 2D and 3D models. We may also be interested in how a model moves as a function of time or dynamic modeling. Reason: Stresses and displacements can be greater in a dynamic model than a static model.

The Beam Example: Let’s look at a 3D beam that has dimensions of 1m length, 0.1 m height, and 0.2 m width.

Material Properties We used standard 2014-T6 aluminum alloy properties which are: Density: 174 lbm/ft3 (2800 kg/m3) Young’s modulus : 10,400,000. psi (72 GPa) Poison’s ratio: 0.33

The Step Module Under the General procedure type there are two basic types of dynamic analysis; implicit and explicit. ABAQUS/Standard uses the implicit Hilber-Hughes-Taylor operator for integration of the equations of motion. This offers the use of all elements in ABAQUS but can be slower than Explicit. ABAQUS/Explicit uses the central-difference operator. In an implicit dynamic analysis the integration operator matrix must be inverted and a set of nonlinear equilibrium equations must be solved at each time increment.

ABAQUS Explicit ABAQUS/Explicit offers fewer element types than ABAQUS/Standard. For example, only first-order, displacement method elements (4-node quadrilaterals, 8-node bricks, etc.) and modified second-order elements are used, and each degree of freedom in the model must have mass or rotary inertia associated with it. However, the method provided in ABAQUS/Explicit has some important advantages: The analysis cost rises only linearly with problem size, whereas the cost of solving the nonlinear equations associated with implicit integration rises more rapidly than linearly with problem size. Therefore, ABAQUS/Explicit is attractive for very large problems. The explicit integration method is more efficient than the implicit integration method for solving extremely discontinuous events or processes. It is possible to solve complicated, very general, three-dimensional contact problems with deformable bodies in ABAQUS/Explicit. Problems involving stress wave propagation can be far more efficient computationally in ABAQUS/Explicit than in ABAQUS/Standard.

Dynamics For our modeling we will use ABAQUS Standard (implicit). Edit Step Dialog Basic tab: Time period : 5 Incrementation tab: Type : fixed; Maximum number of increments : 50000; Increment size: 0.0001; Check: Suppress half-step residual calculation. Monitor the displacement of a node in the transverse direction.

The loading We apply a 5 Newton load to the top two corners of the beam at the free end.

Running the model The model may take some time to run. You should monitor the model as it runs. If there is a problem it’s important you see how the problem manifests itself.

Results

Results What we see is an initial transient region then the oscillation settles to a steady state with a bias from 0 of about 0.65. Because there is no damping the energy cannot dissipate so it will oscillate about this point at that amplitude forever. Numerical errors can often appear as “artificial” damping (usually negative damping which causes exponential growth)

Dynamic modeling with contact analysis Contact/noncontact analysis is studied extensively in finite element modeling. Any time two or more parts come in contact the nature of the contact surfaces must be defined.

Example problem In our example we consider a block bonded onto a plate. There is a circular area in the center that is not bonded. We want to model how this non-bonded area effects the dynamic response of the block when there is a periodic pressure load applied on the bottom of the plate.

Part module Block dimensions: Length = 6 inches (0.1524 m) Width = 6 inches (0.1524 m) Height = 3 inches (0.0762 m) Plate dimensions: Length = 12 inches (0.3048 m) Width = 12 inches (0.3048 m) Height = 0.375 inch (0.009525 m)

Property module Block material: Density = 12 lb/ft3 (192 kg/m3) Young’s modulus = 29 x 106 psi (200 GPa) Poisons ratio = 0.33 Plate material: Density = 174. lb/ft3 (2800 kg/m3) Young’s modulus = 10,400,000 psi (72 GPa)

Assembly module When you create each instance make sure to auto offset. To place the tile correctly use datum points on the center of the bottom of the block and the top of the plate. Translate the block so it is centered on the top of the plate.

Assembly Module

Step Module Create a dynamic step just like in our beam example. Monitor one corner of the block in the transverse direction.

Interaction Module This is the module you will define the contact surfaces. Two types of contact for this model: Tied (for areas that are perfectly bonded) and NoFric (for those areas not bonded). We will create a circular partition on the center of the contact surface of the block and plate with a radius of 0.03 m. Under View you will see an option of Assembly Display Options. Go to the Instance tab. You can use this to turn on/off views of parts.

Interaction Module ABAQUS/Standard defines contact between two bodies in terms of two surfaces that may interact; these surfaces are called a “contact pair.” ABAQUS/Standard defines “self-contact” in terms of a single surface. The order in which the two surfaces are specified on the *CONTACT PAIR option is critical because of the manner in which surface interactions are discretized. For each node on the first surface (the “slave” surface) ABAQUS/Standard attempts to find the closest point on the second surface (the “master” surface) of the contact pair where the master surface's normal passes through the node on the slave surface. The interaction is then discretized between the point on the master surface and the slave node. We will use the plate as the Master surface and the block as the slave surface. (From the ABAQUS documentation)

Interaction Module Inside the circle on both parts we need to define the NoFriction contact definition. Go to Interaction, Manager, Create and give it a name; Step is Initial, Surface-to-Surface contact, pick the master and slave surface. Outside the circle on both parts we need to define tied contact. Go to Constraint and pick Tie from the list. Choose each surface outside the circle.

Load Module Fully constrain the four sides of the plate. We want to have a periodic pressure applied to the bottom of the plate of 10 Hz (62.8 rad/s) and a magnitude of 5.

Defining Periodic loading These are constants that are defined on the data lines of *AMPLITUDE (From the ABAQUS documentation)

Defining Periodic loading Go to Tools, Amplitude, Create, give it a name and choose Periodic. Add the values as seen in the next slide.

Load Module

Load Module Define a pressure load on the bottom of the plate with a magnitude of 5. When you get to Amplitude pick the periodic amplitude you just defined.

Mesh Module When choosing which parts mesh controls, element type, seed and mesh instance hold down the Shift key and choose both parts.

Job Module Submit the job and watch for Warnings. We immediately see zero pivot and overconstraint warnings. Notice that the nodes in question have been placed in node sets. Kill the job. Go into Results.

Visualization module ABAQUS helps you locate problems by assigning nodes or elements to sets so you can view them in the Visualization module. Turn on Node labeling Create a Display group. When you choose Node Sets you will see a list of sets the system created when it had problems. Pick one and you will see they are near the perimeter of the circle we created.

The problem All attributes of a node are defined by the elements that are attached to them. The nodes along the perimeter of the circle are connected to elements with two different contact surface definitions. Therefore, ABAQUS doesn’t know which rule set to apply to these nodes.

The Solution Go back and delete all the tied contact surface definitions. Add a circle that has a radius of 0.035. It should look like

The Solution The area inside the inner circle is already defined as NoFriction. Define the area outside the outer circle as Tied contact. The area between the two surfaces are undefined. This way a node has at most one contact surface definition. Now rerun the model.

The Results This model takes quite some time to run. The important item to notice is no more warnings. The results should be compared with theory.

The Conclusion Dynamic modeling in ABAQUS is very easy and can provide very meaningful results. Check results against established theory to confirm what the software is calculating. Take the time to understand all the dynamic procedures in ABAQUS to choose the best one for your analysis.