Mass Analyzer of SuperHeavy Atoms Some recent results 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 9.oct.2012 I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Advertisements

GEANT4 Simulations of TIGRESS
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
JYFLTRAP: Spectroscopy with multi-trap facility Facility Mass purified beams In-trap spectroscopy Future plans.
Yoro TALL Santiago de Compostela (Spain) June 7 – 10, Second IP EUROTRANS Internal Training Course on Nuclear Data for Transmutation: status, needs.
Teresa Kurtukian-Nieto Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan Precision half-life determination of the superallowed 0 + → 0 + β + -emmiters 42.
XPS and SIMS MSN 506 Notes.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
1 ACCULINNA Group, FLNR JINR, Dubna Russia ( & Lund University, Sweden Radiation hardness test of PD’s and APD’s, Energy resolution.
1 An Introduction to Ion-Optics Series of Five Lectures JINA, University of Notre Dame Sept. 30 – Dec. 9, 2005 Georg P. Berg.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Superheavy Element Studies Sub-task members: Paul GreenleesJyväskylä Rodi Herzberg, Peter Butler, RDPLiverpool Christophe TheisenCEA Saclay Fritz HessbergerGSI.
© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 JINR SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL 106 nd Session, 24 September 2009, Dubna.
Radioactive Ion Beam (RIB) Production at ISOLDE by the Laser Ion Source and Trap (LIST) Sven Richter for the LIST-, RILIS- and ISOLDE IS456 Collaborations.
Mass Spectrometry Brief introduction (part1) I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 1.oct.2012.
Lee, Myeong Jae DMRC, Seoul national university
Abstract The 13 N(p,γ) 14 O reaction is very important for our understanding of explosive astrophysical sites, such as novae and supernovae. This reaction.
Heavy Element Research at Dubna (current status and future trends) Yuri Oganessian Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions Joint Institute for Nuclear Research.
Nuclear Astrophysics with the PJ Woods, University of Edinburgh.
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Sunday, October 11, 2015 Release of Light Alkalis (Li, Na, K) From ISOLDE Targets Strahinja Lukić,
8 B at ISOLDE Jochen Ballof | ISOLDE GUI Meeting Investigate the structure of 8B, which is expected to be proton halo in ground state, reaction.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Radioactive ion beam facilities How does they work ? 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 9.oct.2012 I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
V.Grishin, A.Koshelev, A.Larionov A.Pushkarev, V.Seleznev, M.Sleptsov A.Sytin.
abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
MS Calibration for Protein Profiles We need calibration for –Accurate mass value Mass error: (Measured Mass – Theoretical Mass) X 10 6 ppm Theoretical.
106 th Session of the JINR Scientific Council September 24-25, 2009, Dubna Perspectives of JINR – ORNL Collaboration in the Studies of Superheavy Elements.
Enter The DRAGON Investigating the 13 C(p,γ) 14 N reaction Aaron M. Bebington (University Of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, England) ISAC talk – 24 th November.
Fundamental Interactions Physics & Instrumentation Conclusions Conveners: P. Mueller, J. Clark G. Savard, N. Scielzo.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
XXIV International Symposium on Nuclear Electronics and Computing. Bulgaria, Varna, 9-16 September, A.A. Voinov,V.G. Subbotin,A.M. Zubareva A.A.
SEM- Schematic Overview. Electron Detection Tungsten Filament Electron Source.
Neutron production study with the thick lead target and uranium blanket irradiated by 1.5 GeV protons Filip Křížek, ÚJF AV ČR.
Status Report of the LISOL Laser Ion Source Yu.Kudryavtsev, T.Cocolios, M.Facina, J.Gentens, M.Huyse, O.Ivanov, D.Pauwels, M.Sawicka, P.Van den Bergh,
GAN Zaiguo Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Alpha decay of the neutron-deficient uranium isotopes.
Review of synthesis of super heavy elements: reactions, decays and characterization. Experimental Setup of MASHA. Results of first experiments. study.
Experimental search for the nuclear analog of the Prandtl- Glauert singularity effect at SIS100 A good reason to look back to a possibility of shock wave.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION of the element Db as decay product of the element 115 in the 48 Ca Am reaction CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION of the element Db.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
Test of PRISMA in Gas Filled Mode B.Guiot for PRISMA collaboration INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro.
February 12-15,2003 PROCON 2003, Legnaro-Padova, Italy Jean Charles THOMAS University of Leuven / IKS, Belgium University of Bordeaux I / CENBG, France.
Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.
Karolina Danuta Pągowska
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Saturday, March 05, 2016 Comparison of ISOLDE yields with calculated in- target production rates Strahinja Lukić,
1 A two-phase Ar avalanche detector with CsI photocathode: first results A. Bondar, A. Buzulutskov, A. Grebenuk, D. Pavlyuchenko, R. Snopkov, Y. Tikhonov.
A realistic simulation of the AGATA Demonstrator +PRISMA Spectrometer Elif INCE, Istanbul University 7 th AGATA Week, July 2008.
The experimental evidence of t+t configuration for 6 He School of Physics, Peking University G.L.Zhang Y.L.Ye.
March, 2006SERC Course1  Z>92 (Heaviest Element in Nature) and upto Z= achieved by n irradiation or p,  and d bombardment in Cyclotron ( )
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
MICRO-STRIP METAL DETECTOR FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION Passing through metal strips a beam of charged particles or synchrotron radiation.
Focal plane detector discussion Kwangbok Lee Low Energy Nuclear Science team Rare Isotope Science Project Institute for Basic Science July 11,
STATUS REPORT ON THE “MASHA” SET-UP A.M.Rodin, A.V.Belozerov, S.N.Dmitriev, Yu.Ts.Oganessian, R.N.Sagaidak, V.S.Salamatin, S.V.Stepantsov, D.V.Vanin PAC.
by students Rozhkov G.V. Khalikov E.V. scientific adviser Iyudin A.F.
Giant Monopole Resonance
of secondary light ion beams
of secondary light ion beams
4.3 NOTES Nuclear Radiation
FEBIAD ion source development efficiency improvement
The experiment on JINR Dubna Nuclotron
Geometry of experimental setup for studies of inverse kinematics reactions with ROOT Students*: Dumitru Irina, Giubega Lavinia-Elena, Lica Razvan, Olacel.
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Mass Analyzer of SuperHeavy Atoms Some recent results 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 9.oct.2012 I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru

MASHA scheme 1 – focal strips (3x64) - width 1,1 mm 2, 3 – up & down side strips 2x(2x32) 4 – left & right side strips 2x(16) Well-shape silicon strip detector:

Mass separator MASHA

Hot catcher and ECR ion source Ion source scheme. Schematic view of target and hot catcher chamber.

MASHA ion-optical system 4 dipole magnets (D resp. M) 3 quadrupole lenses (Q) 2 sextupoles (S) 2 focal points – F1 (rough separation) a F2 (precise mass analysis) Schemes of vertical (a) and horizontal (b) ion trajectories trough separator (c). (a) (b) (c)

SETUP PARAMETERS Mass separator MASHA

Mass resolution and efficiency Mass resolution of Xe isotopes by calibrated leaks into ECR ion source Efficiency (ξ Ion ξ Sep ) by leaks of inert gases (Xe: 84%) Strip numberMass [a.m.u.] Intensity Efficiency [%]

Time charasteristics Exponential character of gas extraction from catcher chamber, measured time constants for noble gases Time constants of exponential decrease of pressure in catcher chamber. Efficiency dependence on proton number of gas. air Air A efficiency

Time response – diffusion from graphite Overlapping 40 Ar beam by Faraday cup (~ 0,5 s) By decrease of secondary beam intensity the time constant was estimated Intensity Time

Total efficiency of setup by 222 Rn Accumulation of 226 Ra recoils in graphite plate with shape and matrix of catcher (saturation) Measuring alpha decay of 222 Rn implanted to detector with 24 hrs time of implantation (diffusion from catcher) For the same time of implantation Si detector of the same dimensions as plate measured decay of activity implanted into this graphite plate Overall efficiency of mass separator was estimated for isotope 222 Rn was estimated to 13 ± 1,3 % Time [hrs] beginning 24 hours after accumulation Counts

ON-BEAM MODEL REACTIONS Methodology

Experiments on 40 Ar beam Reactions: 284 MeV 40 Ar+ nat Sm→ y Hg+xn (Hg: chem. analogue 112 th element) 255 MeV 40 Ar+ 166 Er→ 206−xn Rn+xn (Rn: α – radioactive noble gas) 2-dimensional mass spectra of isotopes Hg (a) and Rn (b). (a) (b) RnHg

40 Ar+ nat Sm→ y Hg+xn Mass spectrum of Hg isotopes (a), energy spectrum from strips with mass A = 182 (b). Registered decays from 180 Hg to 186 Hg in focal plane Si detector Decays of daughter nuclei were observed

40 Ar+ 166 Er→ 206−xn Rn+xn Mass spectrum with decay of daughter nuclei Obr. Mass spectrum of Rn isotopes with beam energy E = 217 MeV (a) and energy spectrum from strips with mass A = 202 (b).

40 Ar+ 166 Er→ 206−xn Rn+xn Measured Rn spectra from A = 199 (E Ar = 231 MeV) to A = 206 (E Ar = 202 MeV). Energy were 3-times (3 measurements) changed by Ti degraders in front of target. E(Ar), МeV 199 Rn 200 Rn 201 Rn 202 Rn 203 Rn 204 Rn 205 Rn 206 Rn Rn yields normed total beam integral on target (with given energy). Tab. Rn isotopes yields.

Assembly testing Confirmed ability of MASHA setup for mass measurement of 112 th and 114 th elements By observation of radon isotopes yields was estimated “speed” of setup as < 5s (mean lifetime of 201 Rn) Measured energies of alpha particles are in perfect accordance with table values. 40 Ar beam and calibrated leaks measurement showed 1,3s and 2,5s time constants for catcher chamber evacuation and evacuation + diffusion from graphite respectively.

Conclusions Off-line measurements showed efficiency of ionization 84 ± 10 % for Xe isotopes with mass resolution R = M/ΔM = Ar beam measurements showed transport efficiency 25 ± 20 %. Measurements with 222 Rn provided estimation of total MASHA efficiency to 13 ± 1,3 %. MASHA is ready for experiment 48 Ca U → (283) Cn + 3n.

Spring in Dubna…

CHARACTERISTICS OF SILICON DETECTOR Dead layer problem

Monte carlo simulations in Geant 4 Geometrical efficiency of Si well-shaped detector Energy losses of alphas and recoils in detector materials Angular dependency of alpha particles energy losses in detector (dead layers) Energy calibration of detector by 226 Ra (real energies measured by detector) Analysis of alpha registration processes - elimination of peak “tails”

Geometrical efficiency beam F96 beam F1

Geometrical efficiency beam f-96beam1st2nd3rdbeam1st2ndbeam1stbeam jadroABCDBCDCDD focal96,8%56,4%49,6%46,5%97,0%59,0%52,3%97,2%62,8%97,4% U+D9,7%31,8%34,6%35,8%8,9%29,7%32,4%8,0%27,0%7,3% L+R0,3%2,0%2,5%2,7%0,3%1,9%2,3%0,4%1,8%0,4% lost2,5%7,4%4,1%2,5%2,3%7,8%3,9%2,2%8,8%2,2% total106,9%90,2%86,7%85,0%106,2%90,6%87,0%105,6%91,6%105,1% Systematic error ≈ +5 %. beam-f96 ABC focal.[192]44,9%29,8%26,7% bok.[64]40,5%36,0%31,1% kraj.[16]2,7%3,4% total 88,1%69,3%61,3% Tab. Registrácia of alphas in detector planes. Tab. Registration of recoils by detector planes.

Transport trough dead layer Depending on source position: – Energy calibration (energy loss from source to sensitive volume of detector) – Depth of implantation (40 keV secondary beam) – Alpha peak “tails” (decay if implanted nuclei)

Alpha tails Simulation of decay of implanted 202Rn compared to real values.

Conclusions Geometrical efficiency of registering of alpha particles is 92 – 95 % depending on beam position and decreases by ~ 10 % with each decay (100 % alpha decaying isotope) Depth of implantation into silicon is ≈ m Energy calibration of all 352 strips (accordance with table values up to ± 10 keV) Peak tails are mainly due to inhomogenity of electric field inside silicon crystal