Supporting Meaningful Use Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HEALTH HOMES HEALTH HOMES TECHNOLOGY SIMULATION WORKSHOP Ron HendlerNish Thakker.
Advertisements

2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Understanding Patient Engagement in Stage 2 MU: Direct, HIPAA, VDT, and Patient Engagement.
Recommendations on Certification of EHR Modules HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup April 11, 2014.
Slide 1 Regional Care Collaborative March 26, 2015.
Texas Approach to Supporting Statewide Health Information Exchange January 2013.
Understanding and Leveraging MU Stage 2 Optional Transports (SOAP)
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
CMS NPRM proposes requirements for Stage 3 of EHR Incentive Programs (in FR March 30, 2015) In conjunction with.
NextGen Interoperability – Leading the Charge Presenter – David Venier DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the.
Electronic Health Records – Meaningful Use, Certification, and the Regulatory Rulemaking Process June 18, 2015 Lori Mihalich-Levin,JD
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Temporary Certification Program: Overview Educational Session August 18, 2010 Carol Bean, PhD Director, Certification Division Office of the National Coordinator.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group May 17, 2013.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
EsMD Background Phase I of esMD was implemented in September of It enabled Providers to send Medical Documentation electronically Review Contractor.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Direct Exchange An Introduction for Providers Engaged in Stage 2 Meaningful Use David.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Cross Vendor Exchange Testing and Certification Plans April 18, 2013.
NHIN Direct Project Communications Work Group Messages for Physicians August 24, 2010.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Cross Vendor Exchange Testing and Certification Plans April 18, 2013 Meaningful Use Stage 2 Exchange Summit Avinash Shanbhag, ONC.
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
An XMPP (Extensible Message and Presence Protocol) based implementation for NHIN Direct 1.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group August 9, 2013.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group August 16, 2013.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group July 19, 2013.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group July 26, 2013.
Submit Quality Measures Sender Onboarding 1 Michigan Health Information Network Shared Services Marty Woodruff – Director, Production and Operations Megan.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group September 13, 2013.
West Virginia Information Technology Summit November 4, 2009.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group June 14, 2013.
Beacon Community Program Build and Strengthen – Improve – Test innovation Beacon-EHR Vendor Full Affinity Group June 7, 2013.
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Standards and Certification Requirements for Certified EHR Modules Dixie Baker, Chair Walter Suarez,
Meaningful Use Measures Series – Session 3 Objectives related to interoperability and exchanging data to outside entity 1.
The NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Presented by: Rachael Williams, Program Manager Layne Roberts, Data Specialist.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

Supporting Meaningful Use Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements

Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) CEHRT & MU Relationship Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) CMS: Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 outlines incentive payments (+$$$) for early adoption outlines payment adjustments(-$$$) for late adoption/non-compliance Reference: CMS Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program – Stage 2 Final Rule 495.6 ONC: Standards, Implementation Specifications & Certification Criteria (SI&CC) 2014 Edition Specifies the data and standards requirements for certified electronic health record (EHR) technology (CEHRT) needed to achieve “meaningful use” Reference: ONC Health Information Technology : Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition; Revisions to the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology 170.314(b)(1)&(2)

MU2 Electronic Exchange Requirements MU2 focuses on actual use cases of electronic information exchange Measure #1 requires that a provider send a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals. Measure #2 requires that a provider electronically transmit a summary of care for more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals Measure #3 requires at least one summary of care document sent electronically to recipient with different EHR vendor or to CMS test EHR

Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) – Care Coordination CEHRT & MU Relationship Care Coordination / Transitions Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) – Care Coordination CMS: Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Measure #2 : Provide an electronic ‘‘summary of care record for more than 10 percent of such transitions and referrals” using one of the accepted transport mechanisms specified in the rule. Reference: CMS Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program – Stage 2 Final Rule 495.6 ONC: Standards, Implementation Specifications & Certification Criteria (SI&CC) 2014 Edition Electronically receive and incorporate a transition of care/referral summary Electronically create and transmit a transition of care/referral summary Reference: ONC Health Information Technology : Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition; Revisions to the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology 170.314(b)(1)&(2)

CEHRT Criterion 170.314(b)(2) – Transition of Care (Send) In order for a certification criterion to be met, all specific capabilities expressed as part of it need to be demonstrated. For example, in 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2) there are two: Create CCDA with requisite data specified for MU Enable a user to electronically transmit CCDA in accordance with: Direct (required) Direct +XDR/XDM (optional, not alternative) SOAP + XDR/XDM (optional, not alternative) Thus, whatever EHR technology is presented for certification must demonstrate compliance with both (i) and (ii) under (b)(2) to meet the certification criterion. This also means that there’s no certification for ‘transport only’ as part of MUS2 / CEHRT 2014 Edition

Valid Certification Scenarios for EHR Technology (Sending with Direct) 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2) Create CCDA with requisite data specified for MU Enable a user to electronically transmit ToC in accordance with Direct (or Direct +XDR/XDM; or SOAP + XDR/XDM) Whatever EHR technology is presented for certification must demonstrate compliance with both (i) and (ii) under (b)(2) to meet the certification criterion. Scenario 1 EHR generates CCDA EHR performs as STA and sends Direct msg Complete EHR or EHR Module certification issued. STA/HISP function integrated into EHRs; no separate certification testing for HISP. Scenario 2 EHR sends “data” to HISP HISP generates CCDA HISP performs as STA and sends Direct msg EHR Module certification issued HISP certified independently as EHR Module. Scenario 3 EHR sends CCDA to HISP Complete EHR or EHR Module certification issued HISP certified as “relied upon software” with the EHR. Certification given to the pair, not EHR and HISP separately. Provider A Provider B Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) HISP Provider A Provider B Any Edge Protocol Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) Provider A EHR Affiliated HISP Provider B Any Edge Protocol Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) What gets presented for certification

MU Transition of Care Measure #2: The eligible provider, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10 percent of such transitions and referrals either: (a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient, or (b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network.

Approach #1 -- Send with CEHRT Required Transport: Using Direct Scenario 1 EHR generates CCDA EHR performs as STA and sends Direct msg Complete EHR or EHR Module certification issued. STA/HISP function integrated into EHRs; no separate certification testing for HISP. Scenario 2 EHR sends “data” to HISP HISP generates CCDA HISP performs as STA and sends Direct msg EHR Module certification issued HISP certified independently as EHR Module. Scenario 3 EHR sends CCDA to HISP Complete EHR or EHR Module certification issued HISP certified as “relied upon software” with the EHR. Certification given to the pair, not EHR and HISP separately. Provider A Provider B Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) HISP Provider A Provider B Any Edge Protocol Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) Provider A EHR Affiliated HISP Provider B Any Edge Protocol Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) CEHRT

Approach #2 -- Send with CEHRT Optional Transport: SOAP + XD (Example) EHR generates CCDA EHR (certified to include optional SOAP + XDR/XDM transport) sends message to Provider B using SOAP + XDR/XDM In this scenario, the EHR must be certified to support both Direct (required) and SOAP + XDR/XDM (optional) as transport standards. Provider A Provider B SOAP + XDR/XDM CEHRT Note: This is one example of how a provider may use EHR technology that has been certified to include optional transport standards. The CEHRT could support a different optional transmission mechanism (e.g., Direct + XDR/XDM). Also, as with the required Direct transport, the CEHRT has architectural flexibility to use relied upon software in their solution, seek modular certification, etc.

Approach #2 -- Send with CEHRT Optional Transport: SOAP + XD via Intermediary (Example) EHR generates CCDA EHR (certified to include optional SOAP + XDR/XDM transport) sends message to Provider B (via HISP) using SOAP + XD HISP repackages content as Direct message and sends to Provider B In this scenario, the EHR must be certified to support both Direct (required) and SOAP + XDR/XDM (optional) as transport standards. The HISP does not need to be certified. This meets the MU requirement for using CEHRT. HISP Provider A Provider B Direct (SMTP + S/MIME) SOAP + XDR/XDM CEHRT Because Provider A is sending to Provider B using their CEHRT’s SOAP + XDR/XDM transport option, the fact there’s a “HISP in the middle” is irrelevant with respect to Provider A meeting MU requirements. This allows any EHR vendor supporting the SOAP + XDR/XDM option to interoperate with any HISP that also offers SOAP + XDR/XDM support. Under this approach, HISPs do not have to be certified If EHRs implement SOAP/XD support and then partner with a HISP (i.e., use the HISP as relied upon software for certification), they can also fulfill their Direct requirement under Scenario #3 with minimal (or no) additional development/technical work on their part.

NwHIN Exchange Participant Approach #3 – Send via NwHIN Exchange Participant NwHIN Example EHR generates CCDA EHR sends CCDA to NwHIN Exchange Participant NwHIN Exchange Participant sends to Provider B Complete EHR or EHR Module certification issued. NwHIN Exchange participant does not get certified. Provider A NwHIN Exchange Participant (now eHealth Exchange) Provider B CEHRT CEHRT Note: the regulation also permits an EP, eligible hospital, or CAH to count in their numerator instances where a summary care record for transitions of care or referrals was received via electronic exchange facilitated in a manner consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network. ONC has not yet established a governance mechanism for the nationwide health information network. Until ONC establishes such a governance mechanism, this specific option will not be available.

Key Points HIEs providing HISP services have multiple options for supporting providers in meeting the MU Stage 2 ToC requirements: Allow EHRs to connect using SOAP + XDR/XDM (HISPs do not need modular certification under this model to support MUS2) Become NwHIN Exchange participant Partner with an EHR vendor and get certified as pre-coordinated bundle Get modular certification for CCDA translation and Direct HIEs should analyze the options and select one (or more) that best serve the needs of their stakeholders/communities

Want to learn more? State HIE Direct CoP Call Monday, 11/19 @ 3PM Eastern MU Stage 2 interoperability training modules coming soon

Reference

Key Terms / Acronyms SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol): is an Internet standard for electronic mail (e-mail) transmission across Internet Protocol (IP) networks. S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): an Internet standard for public key encryption and signing of MIME data. MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): an Internet standard that extends email to support other content types, including non-text attachments SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol): a protocol specification for exchanging structured information in the implementation of web services in computer networks XDR / XDM: IHE standard for supporting XML-based detailed metadata along with SMTP- or SOAP-based transport options. See XDR/XDM for Direct to learn more. CCDA (Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture): an XML-based markup standard intended to specify the encoding, structure and semantics of clinical documents for exchange XML (eXtensible Market Language): defines a set of rules for encoding documents in a format that is both human-readable and machine-readable

CEHRT Definition (2) For FY and CY 2014 and subsequent years, the following: EHR technology certified under the ONC HIT Certification Program to the 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria that has: (i) The capabilities required to meet the Base EHR definition; and (ii) All other capabilities that are necessary to meet the objectives and associated measures under 42 CFR 495.6 and successfully report the clinical quality measures selected by CMS in the form and manner specified by CMS (or the States, as applicable) for the stage of meaningful use that an eligible professional, eligible hospital, or critical access hospital seeks to achieve.