The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target Prof. Yacov Bar-Shlomo ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Various Polarization Processes
Advertisements

Viscosity of Dilute Polymer Solutions
Chapter 5 Distributed Force. All of the forces we have used up until now have been forces applied at a single point. Most forces are not applied at a.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Transfer FAS UAS SAINT-PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS Introduction Physical basis Molecular dynamics Temperature and thermostat Numerical.
STATICALLY DETERMINATE STRESS SYSTEMS
Ch 24 pages Lecture 8 – Viscosity of Macromolecular Solutions.
Un-classify 1 First Israeli Multinational BMD Conference Haim Shuqrun, IAI/MLM Division New Approach in Lethality Enhancer Design for Exo-atmospheric "Hit.
WALES, Ltd. MAY 2010 UNCLASSIFIED Interception Debris- from Initials to Full Signature- 1/16 INTERCEPTION DEBRIS – FROM INITIALS TO FULL SIGNATURE Approved.
Chapter 23 Gauss’ Law.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Problem Solving For Conservation of Momentum problems: 1.BEFORE and AFTER 2.Do X and Y Separately.
Various systems of coordinates Cartesian Spherical Cylindrical Elliptical Parabolic …
Lecture 3 The Debye theory. Gases and polar molecules in non-polar solvent. The reaction field of a non-polarizable point dipole The internal and the direction.
Prof. Reinisch, EEAS / Simple Collision Parameters (1) There are many different types of collisions taking place in a gas. They can be grouped.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Lecture 34, Page 1 Physics 2211 Spring 2005 © 2005 Dr. Bill Holm Physics 2211: Lecture 34 l Rotational Kinematics çAnalogy with one-dimensional kinematics.
Physics 151: Lecture 20, Pg 1 Physics 151: Lecture 20 Today’s Agenda l Topics (Chapter 10) : çRotational KinematicsCh çRotational Energy Ch
Empirical Virtual Sliding Target Guidance law Presented by: Jonathan Hexner Itay Kroul Supervisor: Dr. Mark Moulin.
Work and Energy Work by a Constant Force Work by a Varying Force Kinetic Energy and Work.
Tracking a maneuvering object in a noisy environment using IMMPDAF By: Igor Tolchinsky Alexander Levin Supervisor: Daniel Sigalov Spring 2006.
Unit 30 SPHERES AND COMPOSITE FIGURES: VOLUMES, SURFACE AREAS, AND WEIGHTS.
Physics 106: Mechanics Lecture 02
Chapter 23 Gauss’s Law.
Measurement of Kinematics Viscosity Purpose Design of the Experiment Measurement Systems Measurement Procedures Uncertainty Analysis – Density – Viscosity.
You will learn to solve problems that involve the perimeters and areas of rectangles and parallelograms.
Further Mathematics Geometry & Trigonometry Summary.
Integration Work as an Application. The BIG Question Did you prepare for today? If so, estimate the time you spent preparing and write it down on your.
Problem Solving Using Common Engineering Concepts Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and Engineering.
Torque & Rotational Inertia Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton.
Applications Proportions
Universal Gravitation
Rogawski Calculus Copyright © 2008 W. H. Freeman and Company Jon Rogawski Calculus, ET First Edition Chapter 4: Applications of the Derivative Section.
INTEGRALS Areas and Distances INTEGRALS In this section, we will learn that: We get the same special type of limit in trying to find the area under.
Electric Flux and Gauss Law
Fish Aquarium Problem. The management of an ocean life museum will choose to include either Aquarium A or Aquarium B in a new exhibit. Aquarium A is a.
Fields and Forces Topic 6.
Introduction : In this chapter we will introduce the concepts of work and kinetic energy. These tools will significantly simplify the manner in which.
Chapter 8 Rotational Motion.
INTEGRALS 5. INTEGRALS In Chapter 2, we used the tangent and velocity problems to introduce the derivative—the central idea in differential calculus.
Integrals  In Chapter 2, we used the tangent and velocity problems to introduce the derivative—the central idea in differential calculus.  In much the.
Chapter 4 Motion in Two Dimensions. Kinematics in Two Dimensions Will study the vector nature of position, velocity and acceleration in greater detail.
1 Algebra 2: Section 9.1 Inverse and Joint Variation.
Direct and Inverse Variations Direct Variation When we talk about a direct variation, we are talking about a relationship where as x increases, y increases.
Physics 1501: Lecture 19, Pg 1 Physics 1501: Lecture 19 Today’s Agenda l Announcements çHW#7: due Oct. 21 l Midterm 1: average = 45 % … l Topics çRotational.
CRCT Domain Review Geometry. Key Vocabulary  Radius  The distance from the center to the edge of a circle  Half of the circle’s diameter  Diameter.
Monday, June 11, 2007PHYS , Summer 2007 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1443 – Section 001 Lecture #8 Monday, June 11, 2007 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Forces in Non-uniform.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER Radian Measure 3.
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
CHAPTER 26 : CAPACITANCE AND DIELECTRICS
Chapter 13 Gravitation Newton’s Law of Gravitation Here m 1 and m 2 are the masses of the particles, r is the distance between them, and G is the.
4.1 Rotational kinematics 4.2 Moment of inertia 4.3 Parallel axis theorem 4.4 Angular momentum and rotational energy CHAPTER 4: ROTATIONAL MOTION.
Chapter 5: Ratios, Rates & Proportions Section 5 Using Similar Figures.
Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vu, T. T.,
Capacitance Chapter 25. Capacitance A capacitor consists of two isolated conductors (the plates) with charges +q and -q. Its capacitance C is defined.
Chapter 10 Lecture 18: Rotation of a Rigid Object about a Fixed Axis: II.
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
Review on Coulomb’s Law and the electric field definition
Hanyang University Antennas & RF Devices Lab. ANTENNA THEORY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Prof. Jaehoon Choi Dept. of Electronics and Computer Engineering
Jon Rogawski Calculus, ET First Edition
Motion in Two Dimensions
Corresponding Parts of Similar Triangles
12.7 Similar Solids THE LAST ONE!!!!!!! WOO-HOO!!!!!!!
Grade Eight – Algebra I - Unit 3
Microscopic Model of Conduction
Devil physics The baddest class on campus AP Physics
Using Similar Figures Chapter 5 Section 5.5.
Problem Solving and data Analysis
Optimal defence of single object with imperfect false targets
Similar figures & scale drawings
Presentation transcript:

The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target Prof. Yacov Bar-Shlomo ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 2 Introduction In the present work a system analysis of the capability of destroying a maneuvering target is performed. The probability of killing a target is dependent on: The pursuer warhead size; The miss distance size; The geometry of warhead fragments and their energy; Each of the factors of a successful pursuit, is influenced and contributes to all other. In that presentation we will discuss the interaction between the main factors to a successful encounter. The presentation is based on independent research done by the author.

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 3 Warhead Assumptions Spherical Warhead radius Discrete spherical fragments Condensed envelope of fragments. Spherical explosive with specific velocity Sealed envelope. Warhead total weight: Detonation according to Gurney assumption

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 4 Gurney Assumption The product gasses of the detonation are at rest in the center of the sphere, and their velocity increases linearly with the distance from the center. In that case it can be shown that the energy is divided between the gasses and the metal enclosure according to: We assume that the fragments energy does not diminish during their flight to the target. It can be shown that fragments velocity at the target is: where:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 5 Fragments Quantity and Energy In case that we maintain the warhead geometry, the weight relation between the metal envelop and if the explosive fills all the allowed spherical volume, we can reach the following conclusion about the lower bound of fragments quantity: where: In that case, it is possible to estimate that the single fragment energy is: where:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 6 Pursuing Missile Assumption We assume that the pursuing missile characteristics are: Length: Diameter big enough to hold the warhead: The ratio between the length and the diameter is: Aerodynamic steering with lateral forces proportional to the angle of attack: The conclusion is that the pursuer aerodynamic time constant is: where:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 7 The Miss Distance and The Vulnerable Cross Section To estimate the miss distance, a simplified model is used. We assume that the miss distance is proportional to pursuing missile maneuver: It can be estimated that: For that miss distance, the footprint of a single fragment is: Assume that the total needed energy for the target kill is: Then the total needed footprint at the target is: Therefore it is requested that the target vulnerable cross section is bigger then :

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 8 Conclusions from the Last Equation The research main problem is the minimization of the total needed footprint. is not an explicit function of the miss distance. is proportional to the total needed damage energy, and to the square of the maneuvers. is inverse proportional to the explosive energy, fragments specific weight, and the warhead size. There is an optimal value for which the needed fragments footprint is minimal:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 9 Numerical Example We choose a warhead radius of 0.1m, steel fragments (specific weight 7.9), explosive Comp. B (s.w. 1.71) angle of attack of and maneuver of ; It is calculated that: (that is about 10% of the expected missile weight) and fragment energy. On the assumption that the kill energy is 1MJ, then:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 10 Parametric Analysis In that figure we analyze the total needed footprint as function of metal proportion in the total warhead weight, in a case of 0.4m diameter warhead, steel fragments and Comp. B explosive:

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 11 Minimal Damaged Cross Section Next, in the attached figure we analyze the total needed footprint as function of the warhead size and diverse fragment metals.

ORT Braude College UNCLASSIFIED The Capability of Destroying a Maneuvering Target 12 Summary and Conclusions In that work, based on some simple assumptions, we estimate the damaged cross section of maneuvering target, and the capability of its destruction. The warhead weight and size determine the pursuer size and its aerodynamic time constant and therefore influence the encounter miss distance. It is feasible to use diverse models for the warhead or miss distance that differ from those used here, but the end results are expected to be essentially similar. The main conclusion is that in a certain envelope, the bigger the warhead the smaller is the necessary damaged cross section.