1 Ohio Department of Transportation Michael Miller, Auditor Division of Finance & Forecasting Division of Finance & Forecasting Office of Audits Rural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

Financial Literacy May 10, 2007 Jonnie M. Jenkins, CPA Walker and Company LLP.
Financial Monitoring Techniques
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Innovative Thinking and The Road Less Traveled Stimulus Funding Opportunities Aid to State and Local Governments $53.6 Billion – 18% Public Safety and.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Omni Circular The CNCS Basics.
Grant Guidance Changes
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
THE NEW OMB SUPERCIRCULAR: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU?
1 To conduct annual fact-based program and fiscal audits on each delegate agency and partner. An exception to this policy may be granted in certain cases.
Fiscal Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring. Agenda I. Fiscal Monitoring I. Fiscal Monitoring II. Follow-up II. Follow-up III. Correction Action Plan III. Correction.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Audit Plan Overview.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
SAS 112: The New Auditing Standard Jim Corkill Controller Accounting Services & Controls.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
HARRIS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Federal Transit Administration Direct and Indirect Cost Essentials.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Harris County Community Services Department Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM ATLANTA, GEORGIA APRIL 26-29, 2005.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Harris County Community Services Department FINANCE ACCOUNTING SECTION LaKenya Wilson - Grant Accounting Manager Andrea Thomas – Senior Grant Accountant.
1 The Basics - Grant Management 101  Basics of Financial Reporting Requirements  Administrative Requirements (record keeping)  On Site Monitoring.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE CSDA New Directors Orientation.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
HARRIS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Office of Financial Services Grant Accounting Section Craig B. Atkins – Director/CFO Charlie Walker – Assistant.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cash Management June 2009.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
Time Distribution Report OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B. Paragraph 8 h. Standard Operating Procedures
Presentation transcript:

1 Ohio Department of Transportation Michael Miller, Auditor Division of Finance & Forecasting Division of Finance & Forecasting Office of Audits Rural Transit Roundtable Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

2 Office of Audits Transit System Financial Audits Oversight Role & Responsibility Financial Integrity Common Financial Audit Findings Office of Transit Data Reporting Compliance Review Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

3 Oversight Role & Responsibility The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the grantor agency for the 49 U.S.C. Section 5311 Program a.k.a. Rural Transit Program ODOT is the Ohio grantee of the Rural Transit Program funds. Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

4 Oversight Role & Responsibility Broadly defined, it is ODOT’s responsibility as the grantee to: – Provide financial stewardship to ensure federal and state funds awarded to sub-grantees are used appropriately. – Ensure costs submitted by sub-grantees comply with federal and state policies, procedures, rules, regulations, and principles. Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

5 Oversight Role & Responsibility – It is ultimately ODOT’s responsibility to ensure that the Ohio Rural Transit Program is reliable and accountable to the citizens of Ohio. Ensure Prudent Use of Tax Dollars Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

6 Financial Integrity Office of Transit partners with Office of Audits to conduct sub-grantee audits Office of Transit selects sub-grantees for audit based on combination of risk factors including: – Revenue received (federal/state sources) – Staff Turnover - key positions – Length of time since last audit – On-going issues/failure to address – Current issues Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

7 Financial Integrity Office of Audits has performed financial audits of 8 rural transit systems City of Ashland Delaware County Transit Board City of Lancaster Tri-County CAC (Logan County) City of Marion City of Athens City of Chillicothe WSOS/TRIPS (Sandusky County) Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

8 Financial Integrity Audit consisted of 3 – 4 days on-site to test and confirm: – Compliance with OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments. – Compliance with OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations – Compliance with 49 CFR 18 – Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to States and Local Governments Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

9 Financial Integrity Audit consisted of 3 – 4 days on-site to test and confirm: – Compliance with ODOT’s Rural Transit Program Requirements – Compliance with the transit systems own policies and procedures. – Ability to trace costs claimed on invoices to the entity’s financial accounting system. Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

10 Financial Integrity Audit focused on: – Allowable, allocable and reasonable costs. – Ability of transit system to properly segregate direct and indirect costs. – Appropriate and adequate Internal Controls. – Compliance with terms of ODOT contract. – Compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

11 Common Audit Findings Non-Compliance Determined Unsupported or Inaccurate Costs. Ineligible Expenses. Failure of Internal Controls. Duplicate Costs. Non-compliance with Rural Transit Program Requirements. Inability to reconcile financial data reported on the 4 th quarter operating invoice to the general ledger. Failure to comply with Ohio Revised Code §9.38 Timely Deposit of Public Funds. Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

12 Office of Transit Data Reporting Compliance Review Conducted by ODOT Transit Rep. in Conjunction with Financial Audit Compliance Review Purpose – Verify use of correct data definitions – Review data collection process Compliance Review Process – Desk review to prepare for on-site phase – Conduct on-site review process to include Testing of selected records and reports Interviews with front line transit system staff – Office of Transit issues report Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

13 Office of Transit Data Reporting Compliance Review Compliance Review Report Follow-up – If non-compliance is determined the report will document required process improvements – ODOT Transit Rep. will work with transit system to develop implementation schedule for required process improvements – ODOT Transit Rep. will conduct follow-up with transit system to ensure continued compliance with Rural Transit Program requirements Questions regarding the Data Reporting Compliance Review process should be directed to ODOT Transit Rep. or Transit Manager Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

14 ODOT Office of Audits Contact Information Michael Miller, Auditor (614) Jana Cassidy, Administrator (614) Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008

15 Questions? Rural Transit Roundtable July 31, 2008