1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consideration of Off-site Emergency Planning and Response using Probabilistic Accident Consequence Assessment Models M. Kimura, J. Ishikawa and T. Homma.
Advertisements

Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
WP 5 Safety and Transient Analysis Task 5.6 Containment and source term assessment for the ETDR LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor.
Radiological Assessment March 25, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 70 hours of flying – Flight operations.
DATA MINING AND GENERATION FOR NPP REP IPXs. Relevant Published Statement “The projected dose for comparison to the early phase PAGs is normally calculated.
David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Determining a Backup Source of Meteorological Data for Dispersion Characteristics (Wind and Stability) Mark T. Carroll Heather A. McDonald Andrew J. Lotz.
Geographic Information Systems Methods of Generating Geographic Data for Ingestion Pathway Exercises.
Constellation Energy “The Way Energy Works” PWR Tritium Issues G. C. Jones.
Dose Assessment RASCAL Interface National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey, Athey Consulting James (Van) Ramsdell,
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
What’s in the Black Box Known as EMERGENCY DOSE ASSESSMENT Stephen F. LaVie Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist Nuclear Security and Incident Response.
CANSAC Products tour From the perspective of an operational fire-weather Meteorologist.
Modeling boiling water reactor main steam isolation valve leakage using MELCOR Presented at the 21 st Annual Regulatory Information Conference March 10-12,
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
1 Nuclear emergency management: taking the right decisions with uncertain models Catrinel Turcanu, Johan Camps & Benny Carlé
1 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION METHODS S. Vanderperre Belgatom Vanderperre, Belgatom, chapter 7.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 Part 1 - George.
Warmup 1.What are isotopes? 2.Which particles reside in the atomic nuclei? 3.Which particle hold the nucleus together? 4.How many protons and neutrons.
Page 1 DOE/NV/ Vision Service Partnership Lessons Learned from FRMAC Participation in Ingestion Pathway Exercises RaJah Mena Alexis Reed Presented.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Revision of NUREG-0654 Supp. 3 RI Scheduling Conference December 11, 2008 Mystic, Ct Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Cleaning up residential areas after a nuclear accident – Accident scenario Michael Ammann, STUK.
Presented at the USNRC 20 th Regulatory Information Conference Washington, DC March 11, 2008 Randall Gauntt, Sandia National Laboratories Charles Tinkler,
SCCOOS Web Site Real-time Oil Spill Response Scenario.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
March “Experience Gained from the Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Authority in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level 2 Development for Laguna.
State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA)
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Nuclear Chemistry Chapter 19
Dose Equivalent Xenon replaces 100/E-bar Steve Sandike, Entergy, Indian Point Energy Center June, 2008.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
Computerized Tillage System Calculator Help Manual Created by: Jake Walker, Aaron Weinhold, Adam Duff Agricultural Systems Management Copyright 2004 Purdue.
New DOE Software Quality Assurance Requirements: Implications for Meteorological Software Cliff Glantz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
1 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Volatile FP release from VERCORS tests Preamble :  What have we learnt.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
PLUME MODELING WALTER CHROBAK HEADQUARTERS PROGRAM MANAGER NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC RELEASE ADVISORY CENTER (NARAC) OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS NATIONAL.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
CERNER™ PowerOrders Orders Status Interface June 8, 2009.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Authorized Limits Request for Release of Neutron Scattering Experiment Samples From SNS and HFIR Donald.
Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 EXAMPLE Dose Calculation for Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 FRAMES-2.0 Workshop U.S. Nuclear.
Radiological Assessment April 4, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
CERNAVODA NPP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY BUCUR CRISTINA CERNAVODA NPP-ROMANIA.
1 An Introduction to the Headquarters Operations Center and RASCAL Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 21.
Monitored Natural Attenuation of Metals and Radionuclide-Contaminated Sites Pat Brady Sandia National Laboratories Mike Truex Pacific Northwest National.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO
4th ISOE European Workshop on Occupational Exposure Management at NPPs Lyon, France, March 2004 Kirsi Alm-Lytz Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority.
Rosalyn Leitch Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
An object travels 40 miles in 2 hrs. Calculate its speed?
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
Presentation transcript:

1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey, Athey Consulting James (Van) Ramsdell, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Part 3 - Lou Brandon, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Paul Holland, Exelon Energy RASCAL 4.0

2 Contrast w/RASCAL Highlight new features – new ATD model Case Study - Fixed Parameters Byron NPP, Core uncovered 1 hr 2% release per day, no spray, no filters activity released – 9.5 E5 Curies E5 Curies 4.0 Case Study – Varying Parameters Stability Classes B and E 2 & 8 mph wind speeds, no precip

Byron Unit 2: Source Term 3

Release Pathway 4

Release Pathway Options 5 Minimum 10 m release height is optimum model default

6 Meteorology

Calculate 7 Default 8 hour dose calculation

8 Results New Check this

9 Activity Released 6% lower RASCAL RASCAL 4.0 Notice Cs-137*

10 RASCAL TEDE (top) & CDE Values about 1/3 lower

11 New options Check TEDE

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 TEDE 3.9 rem vs 1.2 rem at 2 mi 1.3 rem vs 0.38 at 5 mi 12 8 mph, E Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 Thyroid 23 rem vs 5.7 rem at 5 mi 8.9 rem vs 2.4 rem at 10 mi 13 8 mph, E Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 TEDE 3.3 rem vs 2.3 rem at 2 mi 1.9 rem vs 0.65 at 5 mi 14 2 mph, E Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 Thyroid 36 rem vs 13 at 5 mi 15 rem vs 3.2 at 10 mi 15 2 mph, E Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 TEDE 2.1 rem vs 0.44 rem at 2 mi 0.88 rem vs 0.23 at 5 mi 16 2 mph, B Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 Thyroid 16 rem vs 3.9 at 5 mi 5.9 rem vs 1.2 at 10 mi 17 2 mph, B Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 TEDE 2.4 rem vs 0.33 rem at 2 mi 0.64 rem vs 0.11 at 5 mi 18 8 mph, B Stability

3.0.5 (left) vs 4.0 Thyroid 11 rem vs 1.6 at 5 mi 4.0 rem vs 0.83 at 10 mi 19 8 mph, B Stability

µCi/m 2 at 3.0 miles New Feature Click Cells for Detail 8 mph, B Stability

Radionuclide Deposition 21 Sampling required before decision making

22 30 µCi/m 2 I-131at 3.0 miles Click Cells for Detail Specific Radionuclides

23 Release still in progress but calculation stopped at 8 hr.

24 Monitored Mixtures Can now enter I-131 equivalent release rate

25 Release starts 1:00 AM Duration expected 4 hours Release Pathway – Monitored, Filtered

2 mph, E Stability, Results 26 Check this

27 RASCAL RASCAL 4.0 Both 1000 Ci/s nobles 1 Ci/s I-131 Cesiums corrected, only I-131 & I daughters

28 FM to Dose Enter sample data

Result 29 Deposition time Starts at 4 days Compare to:

30 Radionuclide(µCi/m²) Ba La Cs Cs Cs Ba-137m2.24 I I I Xe-135m3.63 Np Sr Sr Y-91m0.919 Te-131m0.581 Te Te I Compare sample data-slide 79 TF values about 80% RASCAL values Dose unit mrem

Relocation DRLs (mR/h) 31 DRL map contours shrink with decay as days pass

On the Horizon… Automated weather entry Work with DOE – TurboFRMAC consistency Work with DTRA – HPAC consistency Detailed verification and validation State of the Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) source terms Create New Reactor models for RASCAL Continued progress on future model improvements 32

SOARCA Station Blackout Based on MELCOR run at Sandia PWR Scenario – earthquake – no AC power 1 st cladding release - 16 h Containment design leakage increase – 28 h BWR Scenario 1 st fuel cladding release – 10 h iodine release exceeds 1% inventory – 20 h Scenario ready to incorporate into RASCAL 33