CEE 320 Winter 2006 Freeway & Highway Level of Service CEE 320 Steve Muench.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12: Capacity and Level-of-Service Analysis for Freeways and Multilane Highways Chapter objectives: By the end of these chapters the student will.
Advertisements

Chapter 131 Chapter 13: Fundamental Concepts for Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Explain why capacity is the heart of transportation issues. Define capacity.
Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)
Chapter 14: Basic Freeway Segments and Multilane Highways
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Chapter 15: Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements on Freeways and Multilane Highways Chapter objectives: By the end of this chapter the student will.
An Analytical Framework for Managed Lane Facility Performance Evaluation Xiaoyue Cathy Liu University of Washington To Be Presented at the Western ITE.
Geometric Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Chapter 2 (supplement): Capacity and Level-of-Service Analysis for Freeways and Multilane Highways Objectives of this presentation: By the end of this.
Capacity Analysis CE 453 Lecture #14.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
SIGHT DISTANCE Spring 2015.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 4: HCM Directional Analysis.
HCM 2010: TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
2 Lane 2 way Rural hwys CTC-340. HMWK CH 16 # 1, 3, 6 use HCS+ software.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 4: HCM Directional Analysis.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics HW3 and HW4 returned Midterms returned Wednesday HW5 assigned today, due next Monday Project 1 due Friday.
Chapter 5: Traffic Stream Characteristics
2/27/06Michael Dixon1 CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 16: Freeways Basic Sections.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Queuing CEE 320 Steve Muench.
CEE 320 Spring 2008 Level of Service and Design Traffic Volumes CEE 320 Kelly Pitera.
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Highway Capacity Software Based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Special Report 209 Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council.
Lec 5: Capacity and LOS (Ch. 2, p.74-88)
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics Course grading scheme correct Team assignments posted HW 1 posted Note-taker needed Website and Transportation wiki.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments.
Level of Service Section 4.5. Level of Service: The Basics MMeasure performance by density. RRatio of operating capacity to speed. UUnits: passenger.
Signalized Intersections
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
ENGR 340 Wind Energy & Transportation (Part II) Nadia Gkritza CCEE
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Ramps & Weaving.
Lec 17, Ch.9, pp : Capacity of freeway sections (objectives) Understand capacity and level of service are the heart of transportation analyses Understand.
Lec 5: Capacity and Level-of-Service Analysis for Freeways, Multilane Highways & 2-Lane 2-Way Highways (p.2-60 to 2-70) Chapter objectives: By the end.
Freeway Capacity Analysis
Transportation Engineering
Hcm 2010: work zones.
Chapter 5: Traffic Stream Characteristics
Freeways and Multilane Highways CTC-340. HMWK Ch 13 Read Section 13.7 Ch 13 # 2, 3 Ch 14# 1, 4, 5, 6, 8.
Chapter 13: Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements on Freeways and Multilane Highways Chapter objectives: By the end of these chapters the student will.
Geometric Design (I). Learning Objectives To understand the considerations and quantifiable aspects of geometric design.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Problem 1: Determination of Facility Types for Analysis.
Highway capacity and Level of Service Analysis Dr. Attaullah Shah Transportation Engineering - I.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Freeway Level of Service
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Traffic Flow Characteristics. Dr. Attaullah Shah
The New 2010 Highway Capacity Manual An Overview.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7 Problem 2.
INTRODUCTION TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. of roads, streets and highways, their networks and terminals, abutting lands, and relationships with other modes.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7 Problem 4
Multilane Highway Capacity Analysis
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Freeway Capacity and Level of Service
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
Freeway & Highway Level of Service
Freeway & Highway Level of Service
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
HIGHWAY CAPACITY & LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Transportation Engineering Calculating Signal Delay February 23, 2011
SIGHT DISTANCE Spring 2019.
Presentation transcript:

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Freeway & Highway Level of Service CEE 320 Steve Muench

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Outline 1.Definitions 2.Level of Service (LOS) 3.Freeway Segment LOS Determination a.Free-flow speed b.Flow Rate 4.Multilane Highway LOS 5.Design Traffic Volume

CEE 320 Winter 2006 I-5 Average Daily Traffic from the WSDOT 2001 Annual Traffic Report

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Freeway Defined A divided highway with full control of access and two or more lanes for the exclusive use of traffic in each direction. Assumptions –No interaction with adjacent facilities (streets, other freeways) –Free-flow conditions exist on either side of the facility being analyzed –Outside the influence or ramps and weaving areas

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Basic Freeway Segment From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions Freeway Capacity –The maximum sustained 15-min flow rate, expressed in passenger cars per hour per lane, that can be accommodated by a uniform freeway segment under prevailing traffic and roadway conditions in one direction of flow.

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions – Flow Characteristics Undersaturated –Traffic flow that is unaffected by upstream or downstream conditions. Queue discharge –Traffic flow that has just passed through a bottleneck and is accelerating back to the FFS of the freeway. Oversaturated –Traffic flow that is influenced by the effects of a downstream bottleneck. From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Speed vs. Flow Flow (veh/hr) Speed (mph) S f Free Flow Speed Optimal flow, capacity, v m Uncongested Flow Congested Flow SmSm

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Uncongested Flow From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions – Free-Flow Speed Free-Flow Speed (FFS) –The mean speed of passenger cars that can be accommodated under low to moderate flow rates on a uniform freeway segment under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. Factors affecting free-flow speed –Lane width –Lateral clearance –Number of lanes –Interchange density –Geometric design

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions Passenger car equivalents –Trucks and RVs behave differently –Baseline is a freeway with all passenger cars –Traffic is expressed in passenger cars per lane per hour (pc/ln/hr or pcplph) Driver population –Non-commuters suck more at driving –They may affect capacity Capacity –Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions – Level of Service (LOS) Chief measure of “quality of service” –Describes operational conditions within a traffic stream. –Does not include safety –Different measures for different facilities Six measures (A through F) Freeway LOS –Based on traffic density

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Levels of Service LOS A –Free-flow operation LOS B –Reasonably free flow –Ability to maneuver is only slightly restricted –Effects of minor incidents still easily absorbed From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Levels of Service LOS C –Speeds at or near FFS –Freedom to maneuver is noticeably restricted –Queues may form behind any significant blockage. LOS D –Speeds decline slightly with increasing flows –Density increases more quickly –Freedom to maneuver is more noticeably limited –Minor incidents create queuing From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Levels of Service LOS E –Operation near or at capacity –No usable gaps in the traffic stream –Operations extremely volatile –Any disruption causes queuing LOS F –Breakdown in flow –Queues form behind breakdown points –Demand > capacity From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 LOS Calculation Does not consider –Special lanes reserved for a particular type of vehicle (HOV, truck, climbing, etc.) –Extended bridge and tunnel segments –Segments near a toll plaza –Facilities with FFS 75 mi/h –Demand conditions in excess of capacity –Influence of downstream blockages or queuing –Posted speed limit –Extent of police enforcement –Intelligent transportation system features –Capacity-enhancing effects of ramp metering Freeway LOS

Input Geometric Data Measured FFS or BFFS Volume BFFS Adjustment Lane width Number of lanes Interchange density Lateral clearance Volume Adjustment PHF Number of lanes Driver population Heavy vehicles Compute FFS Compute flow rate Define speed-flow curve Determine speed using speed-flow curve Compute density using flow rate and speed Determine LOS BFFS Input Measured FFS Input Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determining FFS Measure FFS in the field –Low to moderate traffic conditions Use a baseline and adjust it (BFFS) FFS=free-flow speed (mph) BFFS=base free-flow speed, 70 mph (urban), 75 mph (rural) f LW =adjustment for lane width (mph) f LC =adjustment for right-shoulder lateral clearance (mph) fNfN =adjustment for number of lanes (mph) f ID =adjustment for interchange density (mph) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Lane Width Adjustment (f LW ) Base condition (f LW = 0) –Average width of 12 ft. or wider across all lanes From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Lateral Clearance Adjustment (f LC ) Base condition (f LC = 0) –6 ft. or greater on right side –2 ft. or greater on the median or left side From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Number of Lanes Adjustment (f N ) Base condition (f N = 0) –5 or more lanes in one direction –Do not include HOV lanes –f N = 0 for all rural freeway segments From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Interchange Density Adjustment (f IC ) Base condition (f IC = 0) –0.5 interchanges per mile (2-mile spacing) –Interchange defined as having at least one on-ramp –Determined over 6-mile segment From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determining Flow Rate Adjust hourly volumes to get pc/ln/hr vpvp =15-minute passenger-car equivalent flow rate (pcphpl) V=hourly volume (veh/hr) PHF=peak hour factor N=number of lanes in one direction f HV =heavy-vehicle adjustment factor fPfP =driver population adjustment factor Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) Typical values –0.80 to 0.95 –Lower PHF characteristic or rural or off-peak –Higher PHF typical of urban peak-hour V=hourly volume (veh/hr) for hour of analysis V 15 =maxiumum 15-min. flow rate within hour of analysis 4=Number of 15-min. periods per hour Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment (f HV ) Base condition (f HV = 1.0) –No heavy vehicles –Heavy vehicle = trucks, buses, RVs Two-step process –Determine passenger-car equivalents (E T ) –Determine f HV Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Extended segments method –Determine the type of terrain and select E T –No one grade of 3% or more is longer than 0.25 miles OR –No one grade of less than 3% is longer than 0.5 miles From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Specific grades method –Any grade of 3% or more that is longer than 0.25 miles OR –Any grade of less than 3% that is longer than 0.5 miles From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Composite grades method –Determines the effect of a series of steep grades in succession – Method OK if… All subsection grades are less than 4% OR Total length of composite grade is less than 4000 ft. –Otherwise, use a detailed technique in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine f HV f HV =Heavy vehicle adjustment factor E T, E R =Passenger-car equivalents for trucks/buses and RVs P T, P R =Proportion of trucks/buses and RVs in traffic stream Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Driver Population Adjustment (f P ) Base condition (f P = 1.0) –Most drivers are familiar with the route Commuter drivers –Typical values between 0.85 and 1.00 Two-step process –Determine passenger-car equivalents (E T ) –Determine f HV Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Define Speed-Flow Curve Select a Speed-Flow curve based on FFS From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Average PC Speed (S) Use v p and FFS curve to find average passenger car speed (S) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Average PC Speed (S) For 70 < FFS ≤ 75 mph AND (3400 – 30FFS) < v p ≤ 2400 For 55 < FFS ≤ 70 mph AND (3400 – 30FFS) < v p ≤ ( FFS) For 55 < FFS ≤ 75 mph AND v p < (3400 – 30FFS) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Density Calculate density using: D=density (pc/mi/ln) vpvp =flow rate (pc/hr/ln) S=average passenger-car speed (mph) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Determine LOS Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Geometry 11 ft. lane width Left lateral clearance = 5 ft. Right lateral clearance = 4 ft. Other 7 am PHF = pm PHF = % trucks 3% buses Determine the typical LOS for SR 520 eastbound near Microsoft (MP – shown in the picture below) at 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. from WSDOT’s SRWeb Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine FFS Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine FFS Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine FFS In a 6-mile stretch from I-405 to Redmond there are 5 interchanges from Microsoft MapPoint Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine FFS Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 At 7am the ½ hour volume is about 4000 veh/hr At 10 pm the ½ hour volume is about 1700 veh/hr Graph from the Puget Sound Regional Council’s Puget Sound Trends, No. T6, July 1997 Determine Flow Rate (v p ) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Flow Rate (v p ) Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine LOS Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Multilane Highway LOS Similar to Freeway LOS A few minor differences Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Base Conditions for Multilane Highway Level terrain, with grades no greater than 2 percent Minimum lane width = 12 ft Objects no closer than 6 ft from the edge of the traveled pavement (at the roadside or median) No direct access points along the roadway Divided highway Traffic stream composed entirely of passenger cars Free flow speed of 60 mph or more Driver population composed principally of regular users Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Free Flow Speed (FFS) Measure FFS in the field –Low to moderate traffic conditions Use a baseline and adjust it (BFFS) FFS=free-flow speed (mph) BFFS=base free-flow speed, 60 mph is typically used f LW =adjustment for lane width (mph) f LC =adjustment for right-shoulder lateral clearance (mph) fMfM =adjustment for median type (mph) fAfA =adjustment for access points (mph) Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Lane Width Adjustment (f LW ) Base condition (f LW = 0) –Average width of 12 ft. or wider across all lanes From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS Same as Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Lateral Clearance Adjustment (f LC ) Base condition (f LC = 0) –12 ft or greater TLC LC L = 6 ft for undivided highways –(accounted for in median type adjustment) LC L = 6 ft for two-way left-turn lanes From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Median Adjustment (f M ) Base condition (f M = 0) –Divided highway From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Access-Point Density Adjustment (f A ) For each access point/mi FFS decreases by 0.25 mph Base condition (f A = 0) –0 access points per mile For NAPM ≤ 40: f A = 0.25 × NAPM For NAPM > 40: f A = 10 From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determining Flow Rate Adjust hourly volumes to get pc/ln/hr vpvp =15-minute passenger-car equivalent flow rate (pcphpl) V=hourly volume (veh/hr) PHF=peak hour factor N=number of lanes in one direction f HV =heavy-vehicle adjustment factor fPfP =driver population adjustment factor Multilane Highway LOS Same as Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment (f HV ) Base condition (f HV = 1.0) –No heavy vehicles –Heavy vehicle = trucks, buses, RVs Two-step process –Determine passenger-car equivalents (E T ) –Determine f HV Same as Freeway LOS Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Extended segments method –Determine the type of terrain and select E T –No one grade of 3% or more is longer than 0.5 miles OR –No one grade of less than 3% is longer than 1 mile From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Specific grades method –Any grade of 3% or more that is longer than 0.5 miles OR –Any grade of less than 3% that is longer than 1 mile From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Same as Freeway LOS Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Same as Freeway LOS Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Composite grades method –Determines the effect of a series of steep grades in succession – Method OK if… All subsection grades are less than 4% OR Total length of composite grade is less than 4000 ft. –Otherwise, use a detailed technique in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Same as Freeway LOS Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine f HV f HV =Heavy vehicle adjustment factor E T, E R =Passenger-car equivalents for trucks/buses and RVs P T, P R =Proportion of trucks/buses and RVs in traffic stream Multilane Highway LOS Same as Freeway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Driver Population Adjustment (f P ) Base condition (f P = 1.0) –Most drivers are familiar with the route Commuter drivers –Typical values between 0.85 and 1.00 Same as Freeway LOS Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Average PC Speed (S) Use v p and FFS curve to find average passenger car speed (S) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Average PC Speed (S) For For For 55 < FFS ≤ 75 mph AND v p < (3400 – 30FFS) For v p < 1400 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine LOS Use v p and passenger car speed (S) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Determine Density Calculate density using: D=density (pc/mi/ln) vpvp =flow rate (pc/hr/ln) S=average passenger-car speed (mph) Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 LOS Criteria for Multilane Highways Multilane Highway LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Design Traffic Volumes

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Design Traffic Volumes Need to select the appropriate hourly traffic volume to get the design LOS

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions Annual average daily traffic (AADT) –Annual traffic averaged on a daily basis Design hourly volume (DHV) –Traffic volume used for design calculations –Typically between the 10 th and 50 th highest volume hour of the year (30 th highest is most common) K-factor –Relationship between AADT and DHV

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Definitions Directional distribution factor (D) –Factor reflecting the proportion of peak-hour traffic traveling in the peak direction –Often there is much more traffic in one direction than the other Directional design-hour volume (DDHV)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Typical Graph Hourly volume as a proportion of AADT Number of hours (annually) with specified or greater volumes Highest 100 Hourly Volumes Over a One-Year Period for a Typical Roadway

WSDOT Graphs

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Primary References Mannering, F.L.; Kilareski, W.P. and Washburn, S.S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition. Chapter 6 Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual National Research Council, Washington, D.C.