U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Linking County Data to Mapped Land Cover to Estimate Agricultural Sources of Chemicals Gail P. Thelin,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TETRA TECH, INC. Conceptual Models for Constituents of Drinking Water Concern in the Central Valley and Delta: Organic Carbon, Nutrients and Pathogens.
Advertisements

O/E: a standardized way to make site-specific assessments of biological condition Chuck Hawkins Western Center for Monitoring and Assessment of Freshwater.
5. Final Remarks Information and the GIS package developed will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented watershed management practices in.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
Regional Scale Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessments in the Mid-Atlantic Region Based on Statistical Probability Models A Multi-Scale and Multi-Threshold.
Ellen F. Heineman, Ph.D. National Cancer Institute Epidemiology & Genetics Research Program The GIS for the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System By Christy Crandall A New Study Jointly Funded by U.S. Geological Survey.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
An Overview of Groundwater Quality in Texas Cary L. Betz, P. G. Groundwater Planning and Assessment Team, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
The Nevada Department of Agriculture Water Quality Program The Nevada Department of Agriculture has been involved in groundwater protection since 1990.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Characterizing the Landscape for Water-Quality Analysis Methods and implementation 2006 National.
Temporal and Spatial Variability in Nitrate in Subsurface Drains in a Midwestern Agricultural Watershed Paul Capel, USGS, National Water-Quality Assessment.
Data for Water Resource Management Module 14, part A – Data types and sources.
Low Level Organic Chemicals in Surface-Water Sources of Drinking Water Presenters Gregory C. Delzer Lead Scientist, U.S. Geological Survey Thomas Jacobus.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Characterization of the Quality of Source and Finished Water of Community Water Systems (CWSs) U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Geological Survey Greg.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
Evaluating the Potential Human-Health Relevance of VOCs in Samples from Domestic & Public Wells in the U.S. Patty Toccalino, Julia Norman, Barbara Rowe.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
Ecological responses of streams to urbanization: A review of results from the U.S. Geological Survey's urban streams studies North Carolina Water Science.
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Locating livestock systems, starting with dairy Discussion ELPEN Management meeting 3 ELPEN.
Displaying Water Quality Information on Internet Maps May 10, 2006 Sandy Williamson, Nate Booth, and Rick Bell USGS NAWQA.
Data Exploration: Characterization of the Groundwater resources of the Leona Aquifer Lloyd Hemphill December 3, 2002.
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
Effects of Multi-scale Environmental Characteristics on Agricultural Stream Biota in the Midwestern USA 5th National Monitoring Conference May 9, 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Crawford and Robert J. Gilliom National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide National.
Ground Water Age and Chemistry Data along Flow Paths: Implications for Trends and Transformations of Nutrients and Pesticides Jim Tesoriero,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey End-Member Mixing Analysis Applied to the Karstic Madison Aquifer Using Water Chemistry in the Southern.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The use of remotely sensed and GIS-derived variables to characterize urbanization in the National.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
52 NAWQA Study Areas. Occurrence in Water Streams Shallow Ground Water Streams Major Aquifers Percentage of Samples with Detections Land use Agricultural.
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Shallow Ground-Water Quality in Agricultural and Urban Areas Within the Arid and Semiarid.
1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.
Trends in Shallow Ground-Water Quality of the Delmarva Peninsula Results from regional and local studies Linda M. Debrewer Judith M. Denver U.S. Department.
Ground-Water Quality Trends in the South Platte River Alluvial Aquifer, Colorado Suzanne S. Paschke, Shana L. Mashburn, Jennifer L. Flynn, and Breton Bruce.
Transport of Agricultural Chemicals: Atmosphere to Land Surface Michael S. Majewski Jason R. Vogel Paul D. Capel National Water Quality Monitoring Conference,
Quality of Ground Water and Finished Water of Community Water Systems – Preliminary Findings U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jessica.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Screening-Level Assessments of Public Water Supply Well Vulnerability to Natural Contaminants Stephen.
THE NATIONAL MAP: AN AGENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING USING THE WORLD WIDE WEB 8 June 2004 Michael P. Finn Jeffrey D. Spooner David K. Shaver E. Lynn Usery.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
NAWQA Nutrient Synthesis Past, Present, and Future USGS Workshop on Nutrient Processes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin UMESC, LaCrosse, WI March 25.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Using GIS Technology for Emission Inventory and Air Quality Applications Prepared by: Tami H. Funk Lyle R. Chinkin Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA.
Controls on Catchment-Scale Patterns of Phosphorous in Soil, Streambed Sediment, and Stream Water Marcel van der Perk, et al… Journal of Environmental.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Roads without trails Streams Mameyes Watershed Boundary Intersect Buffer 50 meters Buffer 100 meters Intersect represents all of the areas along stream.
Water Quality Monitoring of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer System in Iowa and Illinois U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System—Update Presented by Rick Hicks of FDEP And Christy Crandall of USGS This.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Pesticide Use Web Mapping Application Joanna Nishimura Fall 2014.
NAWQA Program U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regression models for explaining and predicting concentrations of organochlorine pesticides.
Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability through Statistical Methods I NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA.
Watersheds and Polluted Runoff
CE 394 K GIS in water resources
Watersheds and Polluted Runoff
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Linking County Data to Mapped Land Cover to Estimate Agricultural Sources of Chemicals Gail P. Thelin, Naomi Nakagaki, and Kerie J. Hitt U.S. Geological Survey th National Monitoring Conference, San Jose, CA

Overview  Background and objective  Data sources  Method  Limitations  Applications  Summary

Background Estimate agricultural sources of chemicals in study areas to: Interpret water-quality data Predict chemical levels in areas not sampled

Objective How do we estimate agricultural sources of chemicals in study areas using county-based chemical data? County A Study area County B County chemical use Study-area chemical use

Problem How do we estimate agricultural chemicals in counties that partially intersect a study area?

Possible Methods Allocate chemicals to mapped agricultural land in county Allocate chemicals uniformly across the county County ACounty B Study area County ACounty B

Data Sources  Agricultural sources of chemicals by county  GIS datasets: Land coverCounty boundariesStudy boundaries CountyKg A 1,000 B (watersheds, aquifers, well buffers)

Method Overview Estimate of chemical use on agricultural land in study area Land cover County boundaries Study area boundaries Study-area county weighting factors County agricultural chemical use Spatial overlays Tabular computations x

Step 1 Compute total area of agricultural land by county. Agricultural land, countywide CountySq km A 100 B 2, Land cover (agricultural land) County boundaries

Step 2 Compute area of agricultural land in study area by county. Agricultural land in study area Land cover Study area County boundaries Agricultural land B A CountySq km A 0 B 500 County A County B

Step 3 Compute the study area’s county weighting factors of agricultural land. County weighting factor of agricultural land = Area of agricultural land in study area, by county Area of agricultural land, countywide

Step 3 (continued) CountySq km A 0 B 500 CountySq km A 100 B 2, Agricultural land, countywide Agricultural land in study area County weighting factors of agricultural land CountyWeighting Factor A 0.00 B 0.25 } } B A

Step 4 Compute study area’s chemical estimate. a)Multiply each county chemical value by weighting factor. County weighting factors CountyWeighting Factor A 0.00 B 0.25 County Kg A 1,000 B 200 County chemical use } } County A: 0.00 x 1,000 = 0 County B: 0.25 x 200 = 50

Step 4 (continued) Study area’s estimate of chemical b) Sum for all counties in the study area. Compute study area’s chemical estimate. County A: 0.00 x 1,000 = 0 County B: 0.25 x 200 =

Limitations of Source Data  County agricultural chemical inputs developed using many assumptions  Land cover data derived from satellite imagery

Applications  Characterizing study areas into national context  Modeling nitrate and atrazine in unsampled areas  Using weighting factors with other county agricultural data  Applying method with other geographic units

Summary Addition of mapped land cover refines study-area estimates of agricultural sources of chemicals

Contact Information:  Gail P. Thelin, Geographer U.S. Geological Survey, NAWQA Pesticide National Synthesis 6000 J Street, Placer Hall, Sacramento, CA (916)  Naomi Nakagaki, U.S. Geological Survey, NAWQA Pesticide National Synthesis 6000 J Street, Placer Hall, Sacramento, CA (916)  Kerie J. Hitt, U.S. Geological Survey, NAWQA Nutrients National Synthesis Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413, Reston, VA (703)

Publications Method  Estimating agricultural pesticide use using land cover maps and county pesticide data (Nakagaki and Wolock, 2005) Data sources  County nutrient estimates (Ruddy and others, 2006)  County pesticide estimates (Thelin and Gianessi, 2000)  National Land Cover Dataset (Vogelmann and others, 2001)

Publications (continued) Applications  Predicting nitrate contamination in shallow ground water (Nolan and others, 2002)  Predicting concentrations of atrazine in streams (Larson and others, 2001)  Predicting concentrations of dieldrin in fish (Nowell and others, 2005)  Estimating occurrence of atrazine in shallow ground water (Stackelberg and others, 2006)