Is New Governance Supplementary or Opposite of New Public Management? : Lithuanian Case Arvydas Guogis, associated professor, doctor of Political science at Public administration department of Mykolas Romeris university, Vilnius, Lithuania

Why is it necessary? Shock therapy” in Lithuanian development from 1990-ies and liberalization in many places of the world during the last two decades diminished the values of social justice Even imposing the traditional scheme of efficiency by 3 E concept (economy, efficiency and effectiveness) is not enough in Eastern European context where reforms suffered more from the lack of social justice than in the developed Western democracies. The fourth - 4 E – equity (or social justice) is necessary to add to the scheme of efficiency

Efficiency scheme 5 (or even 6) E concept: Economy. Efficiency, Effectiveness Equity ? Equality ?, ? Ethics ? 4-th E: Equity (social justice) 3 E concept: Economy, Efficiency, Effectiveness

New Public Management – private sector principles and methods in Public Administration Key problem for NPM – efficiency Principles of NPM: Steering, not rowing Orientation to results Competition, etc. Concrete methods of NPM: Benchmarking Global budgeting Priorities planning Quality management „One window“ systems Contracting out

New Governance – other accents (more about principles): Democracy Participation Transparency Good interaction between institutions No corruption Empowerment Involvement of non-governmental organizations Lacking of concrete methods – how to reach the results?

Table No. 1 Major Characteristics of Public Administration Models New GovernanceNew Public ManagementTraditional public administration EmpowermentEnablementObedienceThe relations between citizens and the state To citizens and social partners To consumersTo politiciansAccountability of higher officials Accountability, transparency and participation Productivity and results Pursuing rules and regulations Directing principles ProcessOutcomeProcess and outcome Success criteria ResponsibilityProfessionalismImpartialityMajor characteristics

Table No 2. Comparison of Public Administration Models New Governance New Public Management Traditional public administrationCriteria NetworksMarketHierarchyManagement method AgreementsContractsAdministrational right Normative basis Partnership, consultations ManagementBureaucratic administration Leading style Equality and mutual dependence Competitions and cooperation Domination and subordination Format of relations Developing social trust Change provocation Order consolidation Goal of the activity NeedsResultsProceduresActivity orientation Civil society, poly-centric system Autonomic systemMono-centric system Organisational status

Quadrant of “Social Quality”

Thank You for Your attention