Investigation of "dry" recriticality of the melt during late in-vessel phase of severe accident in Light Water Reactor D.Popov, KNPP, BG O.Runevall, KTH,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controlled Fission  235U + n  X + Y + (~2.4)n
Advertisements

Nuclear waste vitrification efficiency: cold cap Pavel Hrma Albert A. Kruger Richard Pokorný 1.
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases.
A2 Physics - L.O. Jones 2007 – Information gathered from Wikipedia Critical Mass.
1 Application of the SVECHA/QUENCH code to the simulation of the QUENCH bundle tests Q-07 and Q-08 Presented by A.V.Palagin* Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE)
NUCLEAR FUSION & NUCLEAR FISSION Noadswood Science, 2012.
Splitting The Atom Nuclear Fission. Fission Large mass nuclei split into two or more smaller mass nuclei –Preferably mass numbers closer to 56 Neutrons.
Prior investigation of absorber rod Dy 2 O 3  TiO 2 behavior after severe accident test FSUE SRI SIA “LUCH” ICP MAE Presented by Dmitry N. Ignatiev Forschungszentrum,
Nuclear Energy Targets: Explain how the nuclear fuel cycle relates to the true cost of nuclear energy and the disposal of nuclear waste. Describe the issues.
 A nuclear reactor produces and controls the release of energy from splitting the atoms of certain elements. In a nuclear power reactor, the energy released.
Nuclear Reactors Chapter 4
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
COMPARATIVE NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS OF REGULAR AND COMPACT SPENT FUEL STORAGE AT CHORNOBYL NPP Yu. Kovbasenko, Y. Bilodid, V. Khalimonchuk, State Scientific.
CHEM SOL REVIEW DAY 4 SOL S 1 & 5. S CIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS A ___________________ is an explanation that might be true and can be tested. Hypothesis.
А Е Ц “К О З Л О Д У Й” - Е А Д N P P K O Z L O D U Y – P L C 17 th Symposium of AER Y alta, Crimea, September 24-28, 2007 WWER-1000 SPENT FUEL NUCLIDE.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Assessment of Margin for In-Vessel Retention in Higher Power Reactors 2004 RELAP5 International.
Fundamentals of Neutronics : Reactivity Coefficients in Nuclear Reactors Paul Reuss Emeritus Professor at the Institut National des Sciences et Techniques.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission Q for 235 U + n  236 U is MeV. Table 13.1 in Krane:
USE OF VVER SPENT FUELS IN A THORIUM FAST BREEDER P. Vértes, KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary 17 th AER Symposium Yalta,
Lecture 9 Phase Diagrams 8-1.
Why are you trying so hard to fit in, when you were born to stand out?
Types of reactors.
Logo. ﴿قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَعِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَاعَلَّمْتَنَا إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ﴾ بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
IP How nuclear reactors work © Oxford University Press 2011 How nuclear reactors work.
Complex Approach to Study Physical Features of Uranium Multiple Recycling in Light Water Reactors A.A. Dudnikov, V.A. Nevinitsa, A.V. Chibinyaev, V.N.
Nuclear Fission. unstable nucleus mass closer to 56.
MODELLING OF THE VVER-440 REACTOR FOR DETERMINATION OF THE SPATIAL WEIGHT FUNCTION OF EX-CORE DETECTORS USING MCNP-4C2 CODE Gabriel Farkas, Vladimír Slugeň.
Nuclear Power Reactors SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR.
1 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France About the active role played by the UO 2 oxidation on irradiated fuel.
Chapter 4. Power From Fission 1.Introduction 2.Characteristics of Fission 3. General Features 4. Commercial Reactors 5. Nuclear Reactor Safety 6. Nuclear.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors Martin W. Metzner November 19, 2007.
Building a CANDU reactor
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. The Nucleus Protons – × 10  27 kg Neutrons – × 10  27 kg.
Chapter 8: The Thermodynamics of Multicomponent Mixtures
FAST MOLTEN SALT REACTOR –TRANSMUTER FOR CLOSING NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ON MINOR ACTINIDES A.Dudnikov, P.Alekseev, S.Subbotin.
AERB Safety Research Institute 1 TIC Benchmark Analysis Subrata Bera Safety Research Institute (SRI) Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) Kalpakkam –
USE OF THE AXIAL BURNUP PROFILE AT THE NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS OF THE VVER-1000 SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY IN UKRAINE Olena Dudka, Yevgen Bilodid, Iurii.
Physics Design of 600 MWth HTR & 5 MWth Nuclear Power Pack Brahmananda Chakraborty Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
Melting and Dissolving
Melt Pool Behavior and Coolability in the Lower Head of a Light Water Reactor - Progress in WP5-2 of SARNET2 Weimin Ma Division of Nuclear Power Safety.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Analysis of Corium Behavior in the Lower Plenum of the Reactor Vessel during a Severe Accident Rae-Joon Park,
CHOOSE EXPERTS, FIND PARTNERS Parametrical study on MCCI reactor cases under dry cavity conditions for assessment of parameters of importance Philippe.
Matter, Energy and Change Chemistry and Measurement Sections 1.3 – 1.4.
Unit 7 Test Review. quantity of heat needed to raise the temperature of 1 g of water by 1 C calorie.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt.
Eric Mathet, OECD-NEA MASCA Seminar June 2004 PROJECT USE ONLY 1.
Oxygen Potential in High Burnup LWR Fuel using Themochimica in MOOSE/BISON Theodore M. Besmann.
IAEA Sources of Radiation Nuclear Fuel Cycle – Fuel Fabrication Day 4 – Lecture 7 1.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF MODELING OF MOST LOADED FUEL PIN IN TRANSIENTS Y.Ovdiyenko, V.Khalimonchuk, M. Ieremenko State Scientific.
Nuclear Fuel Production Fissile Nuclei Uranium and Plutonium 235 U 239 Pu.
The design of a hybrid FNS "fusion-fission" system for manufacture of artificial nuclear fuel and nuclide transmutation is actual [1-4]. At a stage of.
Controlling Nuclear Fission. Thermal neutrons Uranium 235 is the main fissile material which we are concerned with. Uranium-233 and plutonium-239 can.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd Energy release in fission and fusion Nuclear binding energy Nuclear fission Nuclear fusion.
Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases in binding.
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL
Metallic Materials-Phase Diagrams
A.Borovoi, S.Bogatov, V.Chudanov, V.Strizhov
Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation
Nuclear Fission Motivation Principle Nuclear reactor & Weapon
What are fission and fusion? What fuels a nuclear reaction?
CHEM 312: Lecture 19 Forensics in Nuclear Applications
NUCLEAR FISSION gamma rays High speed ‘fission’ Nuclear fission
Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
CHAPTER 8 Phase Diagrams 1.
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
Chemical Equilibrium Mass transfer takes place from higher chemical potential to lower chemical potential. If the chemical potential of reactants are.
Presentation transcript:

Investigation of "dry" recriticality of the melt during late in-vessel phase of severe accident in Light Water Reactor D.Popov, KNPP, BG O.Runevall, KTH, Se International Conference “Nuclear power for the people”, 18 – 21 September 2013, Sl.Briag, Bulgaria

Content 1.History of the problem 2.Working task 3.Methodology 4.Results 4.1. From MCNP 4.2. From ASTEC calculations 4.3. From Thermocalc calculations 4.4. Calculation of Keff 5.Conclusion This work has been performed in , but first reported now 2

3 HISTORY of the problem - cont’d After issuing the results from MASCA (Fig.1) project, and especially about the formation of a layer of pure metals (U, Zr, Fe…) at the bottom of the experimental nstallation The explanation is that at high temperatures, Zr and possibly other metals like Fe, Cr, Ni are more chemically active to recombine the Oxygen than heavy metals like Uranium: at T>2300K: UO 2 +Zr->ZrO 2 +U ….(1) Fig.1 MASCA experimental results

The MASCA project has shown that in late stage of in-vessel phase of SA, the formed pool is stratified at least at three levels: - upper – metallic – layer - medium – oxidic – layer - lower – heavy metals (including U and Zr) The oxidic layer is the largest one among the three ones. It also can be sub-stratified depending on the density of some oxides (shown in the table in the right). 4 HISTORY of the problem - cont’d CompoundMelting point,  C Density, d [g/cm 3 ] (at 20  C) Different iron (incl. non- stoichiomeric) oxides – 5.74 ZrO UO More complex compounds, e.g. FeZrO g/mol Pu 2 O PuO PuO

5 Referent: the 11th cycle of Unit 5, KNPP, VVER-1000: Result from ORIGEN: 362 kg of Pu-239 at EOC, T=261.4 efpd, but also: 6 kg of Pu kg of Pu kg of Pu kg of Pu-242 -Total amount of Pu – 517 kg, from kg UO 2 (61881 kg U) at average burn-up ~26 MW.d/kgU HISTORY of the problem - cont’d

6 At the end of cycle in a VVER (LWR) it will be formed a considerable amount of Pu, mainly due to the following thermochemical reaction at T>2000: PuO 2 +Zr->ZrO 2 +Pu….(2) This quantity will be present in the pool formed in late in-vessel phase of SA of LWR, when all the water is evaporated (the pool is “dry”) Could it form some critical configuration? 7- 8 kilograms of liquid Pu metal accumulated in the bottom of the reactor be enough for recriticallity on fast neutrons? There was no information about the investigation of Pu behavior in the molten pool in the open literature

7 Working task Inside of the deep pool formed during in-late phase, the plutonium could be formed due mainly to reaction (1) and to exist in pure metallic form HOW MUCH plutonium can be accumulated? Can it form critical mass at given geometry? This problem had to be checked further by numerical simulations

8 Methodology 1.Run MCNP calculations for a typical core loading at 40 MWd/tU 4,4% enrichment and new Zirconium content for TVSA assemblies to calculate the fission products 2.Run ASTEC (v.1.3 at the time) for: –assessment of Pu decrease in form of FP release of Pu oxides –quantitative assessment of pool components 3.Run Thermocalc code for Thermochemical equilibrium calculations (through solving the Gibbs equation) to assess the chemical form of Pu and the mixture of heavy metals in the bottom layer 4.Run again MCNP with the Pu and othe heavy metals formed after achievement of thermochemical balance in the pool to calculate Keff

9 Results from ASTEC calculations Run for VVER-1000: - slow accident progression: SB LOCA + Total Loss of Feedwater (TLFW), Safety systems no available Result: The rate of PuO 2 release as FP is <1.E-9 kg/s Conclusion: One can estimate that all Pu remains in the pool assessment of Pu decrease in form of FP release of PuO 2

quantitative assessment of pool components after the core and RPV internals degradation 10 Results from ASTEC calculations –cont’d Initial mass of components for the Thermocalc calculations (kg) Total mass of molten material ~142 t (not taking into account some other components like B 4 C, Cr etc. for the next calculations) UFeZrO

11 - There were quite rescently published solution models for the U-O-Zr and the Pu-O-Zr systems -These were used for thermochemical calulations to estimate the composition of the different layers -The time scale allowed the system to reach equilibrium layers out of thermodynamic equilibrium layers in thermodynamic equilibrium Radiative heat transfer Molten oxide pool Heavy metal layer Light metal layer Results transition from ASTEC to Thermocalc calculations

Results from Thermocalc calculations 12 3 sensitivity calculations for different amount of Fe in the thermodynamic equilibrium metallic layer of the lower part of pool before oxidation and minimization of Gibbs energy:

Results from Thermocalc calculations – weight percents of metals in the thermodynamic equilibrium ionic/oxide layer after oxidation and minimization of Gibbs energy 13

Results from MCNP calculations - k eff 14

CONCLUSION There is no probability to formation of critical mass during severe accident even with formation of heavy metallic layer at the bottom of RPV Thank you 15