Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRoxanne Warner Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France About the active role played by the UO 2 oxidation on irradiated fuel collapse temperature M. Barrachin (IRSN) P.Y. Chevalier, B. Cheynet, E. Fischer (THERMODATA/INPG/CNRS)
2
2 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Background (1) In case of a severe accident, one challenge of the safety analysis is to evaluate the amount of materials in the lower plenum and the composition of the molten pool. This depends on the degradation scenarios, in particular on the interaction between UO 2 fuel and Zry cladding. Large spectrum of conditions : temperatures between 900 and 2800 K and atmosphere from highly oxidising to reducing. Expected different values for the fuel collapse temperature (SA code parameter), function of these different conditions.
3
3 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Background (2) Two extreme situations Highly reducing atmosphere Zry extracts oxygen from UO 2 fuel and can dissolve it Interaction solid-solid (1273-1973 K) (Hofmann-1984) Interaction liquid Zry-UO 2 solid (> 2023 K) (Olander-1994-96) Expected fuel collapse temperature ~1000 K below fuel melting temperature Highly oxidising atmosphere (this presentation) Zry quickly oxidised, transformation in ZrO 2 In this situation, no UO 2 fuel reduction Interaction ZrO 2 solid-UO 2 solid (UO 2 -ZrO 2 phase diagram,Lamberston-1953) Expected fuel collapse temperature > 2800 K, i.e. slightly below fuel melting temperature
4
4 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Experimental observations VERCORS tests UO 2 irradiated fuel (from 38 GWd/tU to 70 GWd/tU) Complete oxidation of the cladding at low temperature : complete transformation Zr ZrO 2 After this period, high temperature phase in oxidising atmosphere Detection of the fuel collapse by gamma signal There was evidence of fuel collapse temperature at about 2500-2600 K It means that the observed fuel collapse temperature is 300 K below than the expected fuel collapse temperature (2800 K) SO WHY ?
5
5 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Proposed interpretation for the reduction of fuel collapse temperature (1) VERCORS tests (Pontillon et al.-2005) They mentioned the effect of the burn-up (BU), i.e. the UO 2 -Fission Products interactions MATPRO correlation melting Temperature of UO 2 (BU=50 Gwd/tU) reduced by 200 K NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA Experimental data (apparently contradictory) -Christensen (1964) melting temperature decrease with BU -Yamanouchi (1970) melting T. of UO 2 (30 Gwd/tU) = melting T. UO 2 (fresh) Christensen technique = tungsten crucible, possible interaction, composition change during the measurement unsignificant up to 50 GWd/tU (on the basis of the Yamanouchi’s results)
6
6 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Proposed interpretation for the reduction of fuel collapse temperature (2) VERCORS tests Effect of non fully oxidised cladding during the low temperature plateau could be a satisfactory explanation Difficult to go further in the VERCORS test analysis : no PIE examination only qualitative interpretation. Another explanation is possible on the basis of the PHEBUS FPT1 post-mortem examinations BUT No consistent with the VERCORS RT4 test observation : UO 2 -ZrO 2 debris bed initial configuration, It means no cladding pre-oxidation, highly oxidising atmosphere, fuel collapse temperature at 2500 K.
7
7 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France FPT1 PHEBUS test Main events Fuel bundle : 1 m high, 18 irradiated rods (23 GWd/t), 2 instrumented fresh fuel rods, 2 zircaloy grids (0.24 and 0.76 m), SIC control rod (steel clad) Oxidising atmosphere (P=2.2 atmospheres) Main degradation events : Cladding burst ~5600-5800 s at T 1100 K (inner rods) Rupture of control rod ~9690 s at T=1623 K (steel-Zr interaction) : RELOCATION OF METALLIC MATERIALS TOWARDS THE BOTTOM OF THE TEST SECTION Oxidation period (11060 s-13200 s) : LARGE RELOCATIONS OF FUEL MATERIALS DUE TO THE INTERACTION BETWEEN MOLTEN ZIRCALOY CLADDING/UO2 High temperature period (11060 s-13200 s) : PROGRESSIVE RELOCATION OF UO 2 /ZrO 2 MIXTURES (as in VERCORS TESTS) from 15380 s for 0.4-0.6 m elevation Complete formation of the molten pool at 16900 s between 0.16 and 0.23 m elevations
8
8 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France FPT1 PHEBUS test Post-mortem examinations 607 mm 473 mm 1 m The composition of irradiated fuel remnant was measured after the test (U 0.86 Zr 0.12 Fe 0.01 )O 2.42 Interaction Fuel/Cladding Interaction Fuel/steam (U 0.99 Zr 0.01 )O 2.23 Interaction Fuel/steam Impact of the fuel oxidation on the fuel collapse temperature ? PROGRESSIVE RELOCATION OF UO 2 /ZrO 2 MIXTURES FROM 0.4-0.6 m
9
9 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France FPT1 PHEBUS test Fuel oxidation experimental evidences Measurements : oxygen contents measured by EPMA : not reliable Molybdenum FP absent in the 5-metal FP precipitates (Mo-Ru-Tc-Rh-Pd) oxidation of the molybdenum during the test
10
10 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France FPT1 PHEBUS test Fuel oxidation calculations Thermodynamic evaluations Kinetic approach (Dubourg-2005) TMI-2 post mortem analyses : O/M=2.14 (Bottomley-1989) O/M=2.08 O/M=2.11 PO2 (2673 K, 2.2 bars)
11
11 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on melting UO 2 temperature O-U phase diagram (atmospheric pressure) Liquid FCC G hyperstoichiometric hypostoichiometric U3O8U3O8 U 3 O 8 UO 2+x +G UO 2+x +G Liquid -Transition fixed by the shape of the liquidus of UO 2+x at high temperature -Up to very recently, only experimental data of Latta was available (1970), W contamination. -Different published values 3077 K (Chevalier-2002) 2873 K (Roth-1981) 2700 K (Guéneau-2002)
12
12 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on melting UO 2 temperature New Manara’s data on liquidus-solidus on UO 2+x (2005) Laser heating enabling fast melting and freezing Container-less conditions High pressure to prevent non-congruent Evaporation Thermal arrest method
13
13 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France PhasesThermodynamic modelExperimental information Reference liquid phase UO 2+x solid solution (FCC) associate model (U,O,UO 2 ) 3-Sublattice model (U) 1 (O, □) 2 (O, □) 1 Liquidus-solidus RTlnPO 2 = f(O/U) Manara (UO 2+x ) Latta (UO 2-x ) Chevalier-2002 U 3 O 8 UO 3 U 4 O 9 G(T) Cp, Hf, S Chevalier-2002 Gas phase O,O 2,O 3,UO 3,UO 2,OU,U G(T)COACH databaseCheynet-2002 Impact of fuel oxidation on melting UO 2 temperature New thermodynamic modelling of the U-O phase diagram at high temperature (1)
14
14 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on melting UO 2 temperature New thermodynamic modelling of the U-O phase diagram at high temperature (2) Atmospheric pressure High pressure 1atm : UO 2+x +G Liquid 2694 K 2atm : UO 2+x +G Liquid ~2600 K
15
15 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on fuel collapse temperature Modelling of the U-O-Zr phase diagram at high temperature (1) Rich oxygen part of the U-O-Zr phase diagram 1atm : Liquid at T>2500 K 2atm : Liquid at T>2400 K
16
16 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on interaction UO 2+x /ZrO 2 Modelling of the U-O-Zr phase diagram at high temperature (2)
17
17 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Impact of fuel oxidation on interaction UO 2+x /ZrO 2 Modelling of the U-O-Zr phase diagram at high temperature (3)
18
18 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Fuel collapse temperature Come back to the PHEBUS tests CompositionT L calc(K)T S calc(K) (U 0.88 Zr 0.12 )O 2.000 30803020 (U 0.87 Zr 0.12 Fe 0.01 )O 2.00 30602860 Calculation of impact of structurals materials : relatively limited Stoichiometric compositions In agreement with the experimental measurements of Ronchi (2002) on (U,Zr)O 2 (23Gwd/tU) In agreement with the experimental data of Uetsuka (1993) on (U,Zr,Fe)O 2 (TMI2 core simulating material)
19
19 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Fuel collapse temperature Come back to the PHEBUS tests Calculation of impact of oxidation : significant Hyperstoichiometric compositions CompositionT L calc(K)T S calc(K) (U 0.88 Zr 0.12 )O 2.08-2.11 2980-29602760-2660 (U 0.87 Zr 0.12 Fe 0.01 ) O 2.08-2.11 2960-29202560-2460
20
20 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France Conclusions Experimental evidences of fuel collapse temperature at 2500-2600 K in oxidising conditions (PHEBUS FP FPT0 and FPT1 tests, VERCORS tests). New experimental data on liquidus/solidus on UO 2+x was produced by Manara (ITU), more precise than the past one by Latta. New thermodynamic modelling of U-O phase diagram, and U-O-Zr phase diagram taking into account these new data. On the basis of this new modelling, the oxidation of fuel could quantitatively explain the observed low fuel collapse temperatures. Evidence of lower fuel collapse temperature in oxidising conditions (VERCORS HT2) than in reducing conditions (VERCORS HT1 and HT3).
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.