AS Psychology: Cognitive Approach  So far you have considered 1) Loftus & Palmer (1974) – Reconstruction of automobile destruction 2) Savage-Rumbaugh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: What must we understand before designing an study? HW#2: complete the assignment on the last slide (must be typed and article must be included when.
Advertisements

Methodology of the Behaviourist Approach
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
 starter activity You are a medieval health inspector. Note down some of your worries and concerns about this town.
Experiential Learning Cycle
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
Eye-witness testimony
Autism The findings of baron-cohen et al.. What is autism? Many people believe autism to be a straight forward disease you either have it or you don’t.
Evaluation & exam Social Approach Core Study 1: Milgram (1963)
Lesson 02: Experimental Design
1.What emotions do you think these cartoons are showing? 2.What are the key features of the face that we use to show emotion? 3.Now draw faces for the.
Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task.
BARON-COHEN, S., JOLLIFFE, T., MORTIMORE, C. & ROBERTSON, M. (1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults.
Autism Awareness Leaflet Autism is a disorder of neural development and affects information processing in the brain by altering how nerve cells and their.
Theory of Mind and the Self by: Francesca Happe
VALIDITY. Aims: To ensure that the concept of validity is understood To consider different types of validity To apply examples of studies which relate.
AS Cognitive exam techniques. Outline one assumption of the cognitive approach in psychology (2) Group 1 work in threes Group 1 work in threes Group 2.
Cognitive Level of Analysis. What is Cognition? Cognitive LoA is new to psychology (40-50 years) Important way to look at your life – important to be.
AQA Questions and answers
Section A Experiments.
Mock Exam Feedback Core Studies. Cognitive studies: Loftus IV: word in critical question: “About how fast were the cars going when they…..each other”
Ms. Carmelitano RESEARCH METHODS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
Unit 2 Understanding the Individual Methodology. You need to PET MRI Be able to describe and evaluate PET and MRI scanning techniques twin and adoption.
©2005, Pearson Education/Prentice Hall CHAPTER 2 Choosing Topics and Methods for Research.
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Revised Version: a study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High- Functioning Adults Baron Cohen,
Click a button…get a plenary
Reliability of one cognitive process
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
Complete Group Study Proposals Peer Review Study Proposals Define and Evaluate all types of study DESIGNS and METHODS Homework: Complete Exam Q.
BARON-COHEN ET AL. (2001) “READING THE MIND IN THE EYES” TEST REVISED VERSION: A STUDY WITH NORMAL ADULTS, AND ADULTS WITH ASPERGER’S SYNDROME OR HIGH-FUNCTIONING.
Learning Objectives  ALL will understand advantages and disadvantages of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation and will be able to complete a table with necessary.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Baron-Cohen Answers Section A style. Why did they need to devise a new test of theory of mind? [2] Previous tests (Sally Anne) designed for a 6 year old.
INTRODUCTION TO METHODS Higher Psychology. What do Psychologists do?  Discuss in groups  5MINS.
Theory of Mind and Executive Functioning: Dual Task Studies Claire Conway, Rebecca Bull & Louise Phillips School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen,
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Baron-Cohen Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Explanations of Autism Individual Differences. Cognitive Explanations Individual Differences.
AUTISM. 1. Autistic Disorder n Impairments in social interaction, communication, and imaginative play. n Apparent before age 3. n Also includes stereotyped.
Lesson 4. In a laboratory experiment involving a medical consultation role-play, participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions. In Condition.
Physiological Psychology The Core Studies
Bartlett SAQ. Lesson Objectives Compile a key study sheet for the ‘chocolates make you smarter study’ and evaluate our study using the MECG framework.
Loftus and Palmer (1974).  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory  Field of psychology:
REVISING STUDYING SOCIETY Learning objective: To independently answer short mark exam questions. Starter: Splat! Work on your own to write as many definitions.
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.”
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.”
“This presentation contains copyrighted material under the educational fair use exemption to the U.S. copyright law” Baron-Cohen et al. (2001) “Reading.
Psychological Methods
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPROACH
Population of South Africa
What is development? Domains of development
Research methods Lesson 2.
Post event discussion (PED) and EWT
Baron-Cohen.
Experimental methods Worksheet:
Baron Cohen et al (1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome.
Psychology Life Hack of the Week
Baron Cohen et al (1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reorder the words into a sentence
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Baron-Cohen et al. (1997).
Quantitative Research
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
The cognitive area.
Experiment 1: Aim, sample, method and procedure
People watched Love Island because deep down they love happy endings
Presentation transcript:

AS Psychology: Cognitive Approach  So far you have considered 1) Loftus & Palmer (1974) – Reconstruction of automobile destruction 2) Savage-Rumbaugh et al. (1986) – Spontaneous Symbol Acquisition and Communicative Use by Pygmy Chimpanzees 3) ….

Baron Cohen et al (1997) – Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind Learning Objective Question: How could you test for Theory of Mind (TOM) in adults with autism & Asperger syndrome & what might be the issues?

Baron Cohen et al (1997) – Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind What do you know about autism? THINK-PAIR-SHARE (in your group, 1 - 3)

Who is Simon Baron-Cohen? What is Theory of Mind (TOM)? Learning Objective Question: How could you test for TOM in adults with autism & Asperger syndrome & what might be the issues? Success Criteria: 1)Describe autism. 2)Explain who Simon Baron- Cohen is. 3)Describe TOM. 4)Outline the Sally-Anne test & an issue with it.. 5)Outline the eyes task including strengths and weaknesses. Starter: THINK – PAIR - SHARE What is autism? You have 2 minutes to mind-map everything you know about autism (THINK). Once you have done this work with a partner to share your ideas. The best ideas should be written on a post-it note and stuck on the white-board. (PAIR – SHARE) Prior Cognitive Knowledge: Loftus & Palmer (complete) & Savage-Rumbaugh (started) How could we test for a lack of TOM in children?What about in adults? What are the issues with such a study? Extended learning: How might you answer this question from the January 2009 (section B) -Suggest how your chosen study could be improved. [8] -Outline the implications of the improvements you have suggested for your chosen study. [8] Name: Task: Understanding Theory of Mind (TOM) in adults with autism & Aspergers syndrome (AS) The real Rain Man (2mins 50sec) ‘get a grip of yourself’

Daniel Tammet

Memorised 12,000 books. Could read two pages at a time using one eye for each page. Could recall 98% of everything that he ever experienced in perfect detail.

Theory of Mind  “Developing a theory of mind allows the child to begin to understand other people & to predict what other people are likely to do & believe”. Baron-Cohen, 1997 Professor of Developmental Psychopathology at the University of Cambridge

Baron-Cohen, Leslie and Frith (1985) The Sally-Anne Test - The autistic child's inability to employ a theory of mind.  How does this test work & what is it exactly testing?

The Sally-Anne Test  The Sally-Anne was for children (up to a mental age of 6). But what about high functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome?

Baron Cohen et al (1997) – Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind Learning Objective Question (re-cap): How could you test for theory of mind in adults with autism & Asperger syndrome & what might be the problems? If you can think of any good strengths or weaknesses of the whole study write it on a post-it note and put it on the whiteboard!

Procedure: 4 tasks 1) The Eyes Task (complete today) 2) Strange Stories Task (complete today) (control tasks) 3) Gender Recognition Task 4) Basic Emotion Recognition Task Consider these whilst reading the full study (H/W task)

Group participants with high functioning autism or Asperger syndrome - 13M & 3F - Age range years - All of normal intelligence - Recruited using an advert in the National Autistic Society magazine as well as through clinics Group normal (age- matched) adults - 25M & 25F - Age range years - Selected from general population of Cambridge (no students) - No history of any psychiatric condition & assumed to have normal IQ Group participants (age-matched) with Tourette's syndrome - 8M & 2F (mirroring the sex ratio of group 1) - Age range years - Recruited from a referral centre in London - Normal IQ Was the sample representative of all people with Autism/AS? How does this affect the conclusions that can be drawn?

Task 2 - Strange Stories Task (Happe, 1994) Read the following: Ann's mother has spent a long time cooking Ann's favourite meal: fish and chips. But when she brings it in, Ann is watching TV, and she doesn't even look up or say thank you. Ann's mother is cross and says ‘Well that's very nice, isn't it! That's what I call politeness!’ Question 1 - Is it true what Ann's mother says? Question 2 - Why does Ann's mother say this? Question 3 – Is any irony experienced?

Why is this a test for TOM & What results would you expect to see based on your group?

Task 1 - The Eyes Task  There are 5 photos (in the actual test there were 25)  On the bottom of the photos are two ‘mental state’ terms  You have 3 seconds to look at the picture and record (A or B) which mental state the person is displaying

Picture 1 Which word term describes what this person is thinking or feeling Serious or Playful AB

Picture 2 Which word term describes what this person is thinking or feeling Reflective or Unreflective AB

Picture 3 Which term best describes what this person is thinking or feeling Sympathetic or Unsympathetic AB

Picture 4 Which word term describes what this person is thinking or feeling Decisive or Indecisive AB

Picture 5 Which word term describes what this person is thinking or feeling Certain or Uncertain AB

Task 1 Answers - The Eyes Task (answers underlined) - Picture 1 = Serious or Playful - Picture 2 = Reflective or Unreflective - Picture 3 = Sympathetic or Unsympathetic - Picture 4 = Decisive or Indecisive - Picture 5 = Certain or Uncertain - Group ___ Score: ___/5 AB

 Findings: out of 25 Task 1: What results would you expect to see based on your group? Eyes TaskAutistic (G1)Normal (G2)Tourettes (G3) Mean???

 Findings: out of 25 Task 1: What results would you expect to see based on your group? Eyes TaskAutistic (G1)Normal (G2)Tourettes (G3) Mean

Eyes task and strange stories task: - All groups completed the eyes task - Only groups 1 and 3 the strange stories Why do you think this would be?

Eyes task and strange stories task: - All groups completed the eyes task - Only groups 1 and 3 the strange stories Why do you think this would be? It demonstrates validity of the eyes task as a test for TOM. If a valid test then the performance of the eyes task should correlate with the performance of the strange stories task (concurrent validity)

Task 1 - The Eyes Task (questions)  Imagine you had to explain to a friend what Theory of Mind is. As a group write a definition for this term.

Task 1 - The Eyes Task (questions)  In your groups evaluate the task (remember your level of response should reflect your target grade!).  Some points to consider: - Does it actually test TOM? - What type of data is being collected? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this? - Is the task ecologically valid? If not what are the strengths and weaknesses of investigating in a way that is not representative of everyday situations? - How would you change this task? How might this affect the outcome and conclusions of study?

Final thoughts…  If you could ask Baron-Cohen one question about his work what would it be?  Do you think this study is useful?  What one thing do you want to know about autism?  Why is this within the cognitive approach?  What could be the cause of autism and should we try and cure it?

Homework Task: January 2009 (section B)  Suggest how your chosen study could be improved. [8]  Outline the implications of the improvements you have suggested for your chosen study. [8] - Read the full study - Think about how you would answer these questions.

Baron Cohen et al (1997) – Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind Learning Objective Question (re-cap): How could you test for theory of mind in adults with autism & Asperger syndrome & what might be the problems? If you can think of any good strengths or weaknesses of the whole study write it on a post-it note and put it on the whiteboard!

Exam Questions: The Eyes Task

January 2009 (section A)  Describe two of these groups. [4]

January 2009 (section B)  Answer the following questions (choice of 3 studies):  Briefly outline the previous research or event which was the stimulus for your chosen study. [2]  Describe how the sample in your chosen study was selected and suggest one advantage of using this sample. [6]  Explain why your chosen study can be considered a laboratory experiment. [6]  Give one advantage and one disadvantage of conducting your chosen study in a laboratory. [6]  Suggest how your chosen study could be improved. [8]  Outline the implications of the improvements you have suggested for your chosen study. [8] - Total 36

May 2009 (section A)  Identify one difference between the performance of the autistic adults and the Tourette Syndrome adults. [2]  Outline what this study tells us about advanced theory of mind. [2]

January 2010 (section A)  The autistic and Asperger Syndrome participants were found to be unimpaired on two control tasks: Describe these two control tasks [4]

June 2010 (section A)  Identify one of the word pairs in the ‘Eyes Task’. [2]  Outline one finding from the ‘Eyes Task’. [2]

January 2011 (section A)  Describe how two of the groups of participants were selected. [4]

June 2011 (section A)  Identify the two control groups used. [2]  Explain why one of these control groups was used. [2]

January 2012 (section A)  Identify the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV) in the Eyes Task. [2]  Explain why this study is considered a quasi-experiment. [2]

May 2012 (section A)  Outline two of the ways the participants were tested. [4]

January 2013 (section A)  Explain the term quasi experiment in relation to this study. [4]