© TNTP 2013 Mutual Consent Hiring Presentation to the Ohio Senate Education Committee March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTING THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: THE ROLE OF SCHOOL LEADERS IMPLEMENTING THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: THE ROLE OF SCHOOL LEADERS Dr. Paul.
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
ESEA Reauthorization and Waivers AFT Teachers PPC Meeting March 13, 2012 New York, NY.
A Grand Bargain for Education Reform A Grand Bargain for Education Reform The Giffin Model 2011 Regional Conference on Strategic Compensation Awareness.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
CLEVELAND’S PLAN FOR TRANSFORMING SCHOOLS Briefing Document November 14, 2012 reinventing public education in our city and serving as a model of innovation.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
Chapter 5: Personnel Decisions
Chapter 6 Conflict & Negotiation1 Chapter 6 Conflict and Negotiation.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Who’s Riding on Your Bus? Presented by Presented by Michelle Moody-Frazier, EdD Michelle Moody-Frazier, EdD Chicago Public Schools Chicago Public Schools.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Thursday 16 September 2010 Presentation #2 of 2. Teacher Quality/Teacher Recruitment Initiatives Louisiana Statewide Staffing Initiative (LSSI) Louisiana.
Human Resource Management
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. TODAY’S OUTCOMES  Examine the role of unions in the workplace and the process of collective bargaining. (a)  Analyze.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Principles of Business, 8e C H A P T E R 8 SLIDE 1 THE U.S. WORKFORCE ●All people 16 years and older who.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
CHAPTER 1 Managing Human Resources
1 © The New Teacher Project (TNTP) works to end the injustice of educational inequality by providing excellent teachers to the students who need.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Human Resources Administration in Education Chapter 5: Placement and Induction Ronald W. Rebore This multimedia product.
Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Grant Program Tate Gould, Program Officer US Department of Education.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
Cindy Wenrich Principal Noname Elementary School Anytown, VA.
Academic Distress Commissions July 14, Outline Introduction to Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs) Integration of Commissions into Statewide System.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
STAFFING- CHAPTERS 19, 20, & 21 CHAPTER 19. The Staffing Process Identification of job descriptions and job specifications to determine qualifications.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE READINESS STAFFING STRATEGIES February 28, 2011.
Building School Capacity Through Teacher Evaluation Susan Moore Johnson Harvard Graduate School of Education Project on the Next Generation of Teachers.
Decatur School Board Meeting January 21, Decatur Superintendent’s Report January 21, 2013.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
JOB EVALUATION MAGNETIC CONTACTORS.
PERFORMANCE BASED COMPENSATION UPDATE ON THE PROGRAM TO REVISE PROVIDENCE PRINCIPALS’ COMPENSATION IN
What Washington Teachers Think About “Race to the Top” Issues Highlights From a Statewide Survey December 2009.
1 Quality Home Care Authority Presented by Department of Health Services October 13, 2009.
1 A Bargaining Continuum by Debbie Rusiski and Susan Sendrow AEA Bargaining Forum.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 1. Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all those procedures that are used to evaluate the personality, performance.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
MEYER ELEMENTARY SPRING ISD LORETTA DAVENPORT Campus Improvement Project III Teacher Mentoring Program.
Tennessee Learning Centered Leadership System FAQ.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
9 Learning Objectives Describe the functions of a department’s personnel management and the laws and regulations influencing fire personnel management.
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Empowerment Zones Partnerships to get communities the schools they want with the results students need.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
Teacher Teams: Powerful Engines of Change
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
Principal Evaluation Update
McDowell County Schools
Identifying Gifted Potential in Underrepresented Populations
Tough Decisions Julie Kowal.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
WHAT ABOUT CONTRACT TEACHERS?
Beginning a New Job Part One: Your first day
Governors Monitoring Performance Related Pay
Work Study and PaCE Planning for their future
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Bargaining for the Schools our Students Deserve
Presentation transcript:

© TNTP 2013 Mutual Consent Hiring Presentation to the Ohio Senate Education Committee March 2015

/ 2 Mutual consent policies rest on a simple principle: teachers should always choose their schools and schools should always choose their teachers. * Source: C. Kirabo Jackson, “Match Quality, Worker Productivity, and Worker Mobility: Direct Evidence From Teachers,” May The study found that North Carolina elementary school teachers who transferred schools between 1995 and 2006 tended to be more effective (measured by growth in standardized test scores) after they transferred due in part to the “match effect” of their new schools. Mutual consent policies have mutual benefits for teachers and schools. Teachers get to work at schools that are good fits for their talents. 90% of Chicago teachers who transferred under mutual consent rules said the process resulted in a good match. Schools get the strongest possible instructional teams. 76% of Philadelphia principals said mutual consent rules helped them build strong teams, compared to only 44% of principals at schools without mutual consent. Quality matches make for more effective teachers. Teachers are more effective when they work in schools that are good fits—which is much more likely to happen under mutual consent staffing rules. Research has shown that 25% of teachers’ effectiveness in the classroom depends on the quality of the match with their school.* 25%

/ 3 In Memphis, non-mutual consent hires were more likely to rank in the lowest category on evaluations and less likely to rank in the highest category.

/ 4 Last year in CMSD, only 11% of principals were satisfied with the QUALITY of non-mutual consent hires caused by necessary transfers 23% Satisfied 53% Satisfied 11% Satisfied 40% Satisfied Combined n=47

/ 5 CMSD Principals think restricting their hiring choice directly harms their school and their students. “I believe the necessary transfer process must be revised. It is harmful to our school and is focused on providing a job for an adult with no consideration for students.” “There's nothing more frustrating than having to take a necessary transfer when I know that person isn't a good teacher.” “I believe that if someone is a necessary transfer they should have to interview for their position. The fact that they can blow off the interview fair and still be placed is not appropriate.”

/ 6 More and more states and districts across the country have created policies to end forced placement and provide for mutual consent hiring. Colorado state law prohibited forced placement in 2010 and requires mutual consent hiring of teachers. DC Public Schools current collective bargaining agreement prohibits forced placement of teachers. Louisiana state law eliminated forced placement in For teacher placement, district superintendents must delegate teacher hiring decisions to school principals. Rhode Island state law prohibited forced placement in 2009 by adopting regulations that require personnel decisions to be driven by student learning and require each district "to maintain control of its ability to recruit, hire, manage, evaluate, and assign its personnel." Tennessee state law eliminated forced placement in 2013 and instead now requires teachers and principals to mutually agree on an excessed teacher's school placement.

/ 7 For mutual consent to be effective, districts should provide options for teachers that lose positions due to layoffs or school closures Options might include: Preferential treatment and support in the hiring process – displaced teachers deserve help finding new positions that are a good fit Reasonable limitations on how long teachers may earn a salary without having a full-time position (e.g., 6-12 months) Provisions that allow displaced teachers to be re-hired at previous seniority level if/when they find a new role.

/ 8 Appendix The following slides also illustrate the impact of mutual consent hiring

/ 9 Changes to TN law, as well as district strategies, enabled Memphis schools to move toward 100% mutual consent hiring. School Year Number of non-MC hires Number of MC hires % of hires through MC % % % % To meet this goal, the district started to track mutual consent hiring four years ago to better gauge improvement. Additionally, the district worked across different internal departments, the union and with principals and teachers to create an environment where choice was prioritized in the hiring process.

/ 10 Forced-placement encourages principals to “game” the system by transferring or excessing poor performers. “Poor teachers are just moved from school-to-school. When moved, issues that the person had at the previous school are not formally shared with the next principal.” —Akron Public Schools Principal More than half of the principals in El Dorado, Arkansas have encouraged a poor-performing teacher to transfer. When poor-performing teachers are transferred or excessed, it merely shifts the problem to another school.