Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct 2010. What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.
Advertisements

Potential Solutions Goals for Design – What are we concerned about? –Primary Goal: Get the deck on successfully Stability during deck pour Stability during.
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge.
Actions and Retrofit of Post Earthquake-Damaged Bridges
Seismology and Earthquake Engineering :Introduction Lecture 3
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
Structural System Overview
Ma.Carlota Fermín Jorge Matheus
CEA UNIT 3 TERMS & DEFINITIONS. BEAM A structural member, usually horizontal, that carries a load that is applied transverse to its length.
MUSE 11B Buildings in Earthquakes Why do buildings do the things they do?
Annual Meeting Montréal September 26, 2009
ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
Foundation Systems.
STRUCTURAL BASICS. Redundancy Redundancy Brittleness/ductility Brittleness/ductility Building dynamic behavior Building dynamic behavior Degradation of.
POTENTIAL ISSUE TEAM STUDIES CONCRETE CODIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES 1. CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS Current Codes provide detailed provisions for the seismic design.
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/ Izmit Earthquake August 17, 3:02am, 1999 Mw 7.4 Mw earthquake: >18,000 fatalities >300,000 homeless.
Damage Illustrations. Potential Bridge Damage Bridge Component / DamagePossible Cause Approach Slab or Pavement  Raised, lowered, cracked, or buckled.
PILE FOUNDATION BY-.
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
COLUMNS.
Bearings and Beam Ends Jeff Naum Maine DOT. Bridge Nomenclature.
Prioritizing SPEBI. Computer Files File Name*Description Bridgepostearthquake.mdbProgram file. AprilWinBoltsInAccess.mdbBridge data file. Since this data.
Introduction to Columns
By PARIKH KALPESH. Overview Introduction Structural evaluation of the bridge deck, girders, abutment, and piers Recommended non destructive tests Short.
The ground must push up as hard as the building pushes down
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Unit U nit 3- Mitigation Measures by Type of Disaster.
Roof Terms Span –Distance across the building. Roof Terms Run –1/2 the distance across the building (1/2 span distance)
Reading Structural Drawings
Al-Najah National University Engineering Faculty Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project: Analysis & Design of Warehouses in Jaba’-Jenin.
Bridge Engineering (5) Substructure – Abutments and Piers
Basic Structural Theory. BASIC STRUCTURAL THEORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 Beams Different member types.
MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Seismic Retrofitting of Bridges Donald Kirkcaldie Seismic Retrofitting of Bridges Donald Kirkcaldie.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
Foundation Systems Unit 11. Types of Foundations Pilings Continuous Grade Beam.
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Daire McCormack Natasha Brady Peadar Barrett.  Constructed in 1928 and spanned the Ohio River between Point Pleasant, West Virginia and Kanauga, Ohio.
Overview of the “Recommended LRFD Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges” Ian M. Friedland, P.E. Bridge Technology Engineer Federal Highway.
Practical Design of PT Buildings
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
Structural Systems Design of the Lincoln Fire Department Headquarters Michelle Burback Structural Engineering Capstone and Senior Honors Project.
Vulnerable Structural Elements
Structural Technology Foundations of Technology Standard 20: Students will develop an understanding of and be able to select and use construction technologies.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
2005 PS3 Summer Institute Buildings in Earthquakes Why do buildings do the things they do?
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge. contents Bearings Horizontal and transversal wind bracing Classification of bridges.
Confined Masonry Construction
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Mohammad Maher Jaradat Raghad Abdel-Salam Owaidat
Seismic Design Impact to
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - 
SeminAR ON LINTELS --SANTHOSHKUMAR.M..,.
Wood Structures Topic 8 Quality Workmanship
ASSESSEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Seismic Design of Fatima Al Zahra Mosque
TOLMAN HALL RETROFIT POSSIBILITIES
Presentation transcript:

Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct 2010

What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements

What puts bridges at risk? Hazard factors (proximity, magnitude, duration…) Site factors (soil conditions e.g. soft saturated soils) Bridge design – Bridges built before 1980 often have inadequate provisions for horizontal loading since modern seismic design codes weren’t adopted until late 1970’s – Structural continuity; redundancy; skewed or curved – Seat width (support length); bearing type (high rockers) – Reinforcing details, especially in reinforced concrete piers – High piers; piers with varying heights Bridge condition – Fatigue; corrosion – Retrofitted? – Flagged? Consequence of failure (lifeline route, high AADT)

It’s all in the details.

Many of the following examples are from Hurricane Katrina but the concept is the same.

Shear blocks provides lateral restraint

Lateral forces can move entire spans This and other examples are from Hurricane Katrina but the principle is the same.

Displaced Joint

“Pounding” from longitudinal movement

Pedestals provided lateral restraint

Support Length

Dropped Spans

Lateral Shift

Column Retrofit (Steel jackets & FRP Wraps)

Open Finger Joints

Unreinforced & Masonry Abutments

Floor Beam Hanger Detail