FEDERAL PROGRAM INTEGRITY REGULATIONS Spring 2011 Webinar Series Webinar 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reporting and Disclosure Requirements - Module 1 Gainful Employment 1.
Advertisements

§§668.16(e), (f) and  The institution must establish a reasonable SAP policy  WHAT MUST A RESONABLE POLICY CONTAIN? ◦ The policy must.
Satisfactory Academic Progress: Does your Policy make the Grade? Presented by David Bartnicki Federal Training Officer
Final Regulations Published 10/29/10.  Repeating Coursework  Ability to Benefit rules  Validity of High School Diploma  Gainful Employment  Definition.
S ATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Sandy Neel SASFAA Past President Bellarmine University.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators The following is a presentation prepared for: MASFAA Indianapolis, IN October 6 – 9, 2013.
SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Gregory Martin U.S. Department of Education Session FF-09.
Satisfactory Academic Progress 2012 All Directors Training Tim Bonnel Chancellor’s Office.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 Satisfactory Academic Progress. New SAP Policy Elements 1 st SAP evaluation after 7/1/11 must meet new rules (excluding summer term)
Jamie A. Malone | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Foreign Schools Satisfactory Academic Progress Session 38.
Satisfactory Academic Progress –Managing the Components Qualitative (grade-based) and Quantitative (time-based) measures.
SAP SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS PASFAA CONFERENCE OCTOBER, LANCASTER, PA.
Written Agreements Between Schools WVASFAA Conference April 1, 2015 Consortiums & Contracts: Craig D. Rorie, Training Officer Federal Student Aid US Department.
Presented by Daniel Weigle School Support Manager, FedLoan Servicing Resolving Inadvertent Overborrowing.
GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT NeASFAA 2015 Spring Conference Vicki Kucera, Central Community College Paula Kohles, Creighton University.
Basics of Satisfactory Academic Progress
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education PASFAA Conference – Oct Pittsburgh, PA a.
Resolving Cases of Inadvertent Overborrowing
Final Rule (2011)Draft Regulation (2013) Applicable students Title IV & non-Title IVTitle IV only Accountability Metrics annual DTE discretionary DTE annual.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards Claire “Micki” Roemer School Services and Training Federal Student Aid Dan Klock Federal Student Aid.
2015 PACE/USO TDN Conference Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education Return of Title IV Funds – The Basics.
Winter 2011 ISFAA Conference Gainful Employment December 8, 2011.
Gainful Employment Disclosures
Gainful Employment - Overview Rhonda Mohr, Student Financial Assistance Programs Myrna Huffman, Management Information Systems.
2015 PACE/USO TDN Conference Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education Gainful Employment – Reporting & Disclosures.
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19,
The following is a presentation prepared for:. Slide 2 © NASFAA 2012 David Tolman Training Specialist Division of Training & Regulatory Assistance, NASFAA.
MASFAA 2013 October 6 th – 9 th, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana Satisfactory Academic Progress Tara Piantanida-Kelly, USA Funds.
New Aid Officer Training Satisfactory Academic Progress Alicia Scott Atlanta Metropolitan College.
Gainful Employment Disclosure Requirements, Correcting Data and Adding Programs Susan Bowder Cynthia Hammond U.S. Department of Education 1.
Session 107 Study Abroad Issues Marianna Deeken Federal Student Aid Anthony Jones Office of Postsecondary Education.
SAP Components 3 Components to SAP  Minimum Grade Point Average  Undergraduate Students: 2.0  Graduate Students: 3.0  Completion Rate  Each student.
Gainful Employment NASFAA ‘2011 Boston Jeff Baker, Federal Student Aid John Kolotos, Office of Postsecondary Education.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Postsecondary Education Return of Title IV funds NASFAA Conference July 2000.
Title IV Administration for Clock-Hour Programs MAFAA 2012 Spring Conference.
Gainful Employment NASFAA ‘2011 Boston Jeff Baker, Federal Student Aid John Kolotos, Office of Postsecondary Education.
Jessica Finkel and Cynthia Hammond | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Gainful Employment Disclosures Session 47.
MILES COMMUNITY COLLEGE FINANCIAL AID Funding your way through education.
The New & Improved SAP Rules Rick Shipman Director of Financial Aid Michigan State University October, 2011 Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Session #17Session 17 a RETURN OF TITLE IV FUNDS - back to the basics.
44 th NYSFAAA Conference “On Track for Excellence” Satisfactory Academic Progress Thomas J. Dalton, Excelsior College & Curt Gaume, Canisius College.
What You Should Know About Financial Aid and TOPS
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) U.S. Department of Education NJASFAA 2011 Sandy Santana a.
Session #39 Gainful Employment Disclosures and Template Demonstration Jessica Finkel Cynthia Hammond Elise Miller U.S. Department of Education.
Fall OASFAA Conference November 9-10, 2015 Gainful Employment Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education.
Cynthia Hammond and Greg Martin| Dec U.S. Department of Education 2015 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Gainful Employment.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) 1. What we will cover… 2 Changes in Federal Regulations SAP Policy Requirements Maximum Credits/Timeframe SAP Reviews.
Program Integrity Final Rule Gainful Employment. Lays the groundwork for future, substantial changes regarding gainful employment programs Establishes.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Managing the Components & Monitoring Compliance.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
Margaret Ayanian and Cynthia Hammond| Dec U.S. Department of Education 2015 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Gainful Employment.
Jessica Finkel and Cynthia Hammond | Dec U.S. Department of Education 2013 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Gainful Employment.
Beginners & Advanced CLOCK HOUR SCHOOLS WVASFAA presentation 2016 Spring Conference, Updated presentation from 2012.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Keep Your Students on the Path to Completion.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
The following is a presentation prepared for:
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19, 2012
Janet Dodson, presenter
Director of Financial Assistance Services
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
The Must & may of SAP Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
TASFAA 2017 Education Is Key
Title IV Financial Aid: Shifting the Focus
SAP Who? & R2T4 What? Danchees Ingram Tarrant County College
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
Don’t let SAP get you into sticky situations!
Gainful Employment Disclosures
Presentation transcript:

FEDERAL PROGRAM INTEGRITY REGULATIONS Spring 2011 Webinar Series Webinar 2

PI REGS: AGENDA Gainful Employment Reporting and Disclosures §600.2, 600.4, 600.5, 600.9, Satisfactory Academic Progress §668.16(e), (f), Written Arrangements §668.5 State Authorization §600.9 and §

PI REGS: GE REPORTING AND DISCLOSURES Gainful employment: The HEA defines a proprietary school as an institution that “provides an eligible program of training that prepares students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” Public or private non-profit schools are defined as “institutions of higher education” 3

PI REGS: GE REPORTING AND DISCLOSURES These reporting and disclosure requirements apply to all programs that lead to gainful employment in a recognized occupation – All programs at proprietary schools (except BA degrees in liberal arts) – Non-degree (certificate or diploma) programs at public and non-profit institutions 4

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Disclosures must be made by July 1, 2011 – Intent of the provisions is to “enable students to make an informed choice about a program—by making the disclosures in a clear, timely, and meaningful manner.” – Information must be available in school’s “promotional materials conveyed to prospective students.” 5

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Disclosure information must be: – Prominently displayed on the home page of the program website – Posted in an “open format that can be retrieved, downloaded, indexed, and searched by commonly used Web search applications.” Open-format = platform-independent and machine- readable – Simple and meaningful 6

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Website must provide “prominent and direct links” to the program web pages on any other pages “containing general, academic, or admissions information about the program.” Institutions must use the disclosure form developed by ED when it becomes available; it will be a template similar to the NPC 7

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES For each program, the institution must disclose: – Occupations by name and SOC codes that the program prepares students to enter, along with the links to occupational profiles on O*Net – On-time graduation rate 8

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Tuition and fees, books and supplies, room and board the institution charges a student for completing the program within normal time – Placement rate for completers – Median loan debt as determined by ED Median = middle in a range; not average (mean) 9

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Occupations by name and SOC code – Enter the full 6 digit CIP code –institution must post the links and names of the occupations that are listed For CIP codes that result in more than 10 occupations, the school may “provide links to a representative sample of the SOCs for which its graduates typically find employment within a few years after completing the program.” 10

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES On-time graduation rate – Defined by award year (July 1 st through June 30 th ) – Of the students who completed the program in the most recently completed award year, who completed the program within normal time – “Normal time” is what the institution publishes in the catalog (§668.41(a)) and may include make-up days 11

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Regardless of transfers, program changes, LOAs Students who transfer in must complete within the normal program length from the point of entry, regardless of any transfer hours – Excused absences are permissible within the lesser of 10% of the payment period clock hours or the threshold established by the state or accrediting agency 12

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES On-time graduation rate is NOT – ACCET completion rate – State completion or graduation rate – SRTK completion rate Methodology focuses on the concept of on- time, not program completion overall 13

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Tuition and fees, books and supplies, room and board the institution charges a student for completing the program within normal time – Must disclose on the same program web page as the other information – Books and supplies are typical costs for completing the program, unless included as part of tuition and fees 14

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Room and board charges if the institution provides it – May disclose other costs, such as transportation and living expenses – Must include a link or access to the program cost information required under §668.43(a) Institutional information requirements—includes tuition and fees, room and board, books and supplies, estimates of transportation costs, any additional costs 15

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Placement rate – NCES will develop a placement rate methodology and “the processes necessary for determining and documenting student employment and reporting placement data to the Department” using IPEDS – Until that methodology is in place, schools must use the state or accrediting agency placement rate 16

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Institution must disclose on website and in promotional materials placement rate by program If available or can be determined from institutional placement rate calculations – The institution must identify the accrediting agency or state agency under whose requirements the placement rate was calculated 17

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES Median Loan Debt – Institutions report institutional financing plan debt to ED—”the amount a student is obligated to repay upon completing the program.” – Institutions must also report any private education loans it knows about – Private education loans can include institutional loans 18

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Private education loans do not include an extension of credit if 1) the term of the extension of credit is 90 days or less OR 2) interest is not charged and the term of the extension of credit is one year or less, even if payable in more than four installments 19

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – In the preamble, ED states that: “any loan, extension of credit, payment plan, or other financing mechanism that would otherwise not be considered a private education loan but that results in a debt obligation that a student must pay to an institution after completing a program, is considered a loan debt arising from an institutional financing plan and must be reported as such under §668.6(a)(4).” 20

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – ED will use the reported private loans and financing plan data in conjunction with Title IV loan debt to determine a median loan debt for each educational program Title IV loan debt is both FFEL and DL, from NSLDS Does not include debt incurred by students at a prior institution, unless there is common ownership or control, or otherwise related If a student changes programs, ED associates the amount of debt incurred by the student to the highest credential program completed 21

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – Example: Student attends Medical Assisting certificate program at ABC Institute. While enrolled in that program, student borrows $9,500 Stafford loans. Student completes MA certificate and enrolls in Medical Office Management OAD. While enrolled in the OAD program, she borrows an additional $15,

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES If she does not complete the OAD program, only the debt associated with the MA program ($9,500) is used by ED when calculating the median loan debt for the MA certificate program. If she does complete the OAD program, the total debt ($9,500 + $15,000 = $24,500) is used by ED when calculating the median loan debt for the OAD program. 23

PI REGS: GE DISCLOSURES – ED will provide to schools for each program offered by the school: Median loan debt (total) Median loan debt—FFEL and Direct Loans Median loan debt—private and institutional financing – Until ED provides the info, schools must calculate themselves (per Regulatory Update Workshop) – School includes this information on the program web page and in promotional materials 24

PI REGS: GE REPORTING Reporting is required by October 1, 2011 – Will be annual reporting requirement with electronic format; DCL will be published with details – Applies to all gainful employment programs currently offered by institution – In future years, report will be due no earlier than September 30th 25

PI REGS: GE REPORTING In first report due October 1, 2011, school must report on – award year (if available) – , , award years If a school cannot provide some or all of the data for any award year, it must provide an explanation to ED as to why the data is not available 26

PI REGS: GE REPORTING Reporting data for each award year: – Identifying information about the school and about each student who enrolled in each program, along with the CIP code of the program if the student began attending the program; 27

PI REGS: GE REPORTING – For each student who completed a program during the award year: The name and CIP code of the program, and the date the student completed the program; The amounts the student received in private education loans and the amount of institutional financing the student owes the school upon completion; Whether the student matriculated to a higher credentialed program at the school, or to such a program at another school (if there is documentation); 28

PI REGS: GE REPORTING – For each program, by name and CIP code, the total number of students enrolled in the program at the end of the award year, and identifying information for those students 29

PI REGS: GE REPORTING School Perspective DCI—SAMPLE PROGRAM DISCLOSURE DCI Medical Assistant – DCI Website 30

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Institutions must notify students of the effective date of the revised policy – Crossover payment periods: institution may decide to use the current SAP policy; this must be addressed with the effective date of the new policy Institutions may evaluate different categories of students differently – Must be consistent within each category 31

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS SAP evaluations must occur at the end of a payment period – For non-term programs, this may be a significant change and could be difficult to implement – Payment period end dates can vary by student For programs one academic year or less, SAP must be evaluated at the end of each payment period 32

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS For programs longer than an academic year in length, SAP is measured at the end of each payment period, or at least annually to correspond with the end of a payment period GPA and pace (rate of progress) must be measured at each evaluation 33

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS 1.Minimum GPA – A student must have a C average or equivalent after two years of attendance, regardless of enrollment status 2.Pace – “the pace at which a student must progress through his or her educational program to ensure that the student will complete the program within the maximum timeframe...” 34

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS – For credit hour programs, pace must be measured as credits earned vs. credits attempted – Remedial coursework may be included when determining pace; this is up to the institution – Transfer credits MUST be counted as both earned and attempted credits 35

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS SAP Statuses – Warning and Probation are defined and must be used as defined in the regs Both allow for one payment period of eligibility Student must be in attendance Not possible to have consecutive payment periods on warning or on probation; it is possible to have more than one payment period (non-consecutive) on either throughout a student’s academic career – New concept of Academic Plan 36

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Financial Aid Warning Status – May only be used by institutions that evaluate SAP at the end of every payment period – The first time a student is not meeting SAP standards, he or she can be placed on Warning, without an appeal – The student continues to be aid eligible 37

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Financial Aid Probation Status – Student is not meeting SAP standards and appeals After payment period on Warning OR If institution evaluates SAP annually for that program (instead of after every payment period) – The appeal is granted and the student can regain SAP status within one payment period on Probation 38

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Appeals – Optional; institutions do not have to allow appeals – Institutions decide how and when students may appeal; how often and how many times a student may appeal – Appeals must contain two elements: Why the student failed to make SAP; AND What has changed in the student’s situation to allow the student to demonstrate SAP at the next evaluation 39

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS – The basis on which a student may appeal must be included in the policy: “The death of a relative, an injury or illness of the student, or other special circumstances...” – Outcome of granting an appeal: Probation (one payment period) OR Academic Plan 40

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Academic Plan – Optional for institutions to include in their SAP policy; “Academic plans need not be complicated or detailed...” – Specific to that student – Ensures that student is able to meet SAP standards by a specific point in time 41

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS – “the institution has the flexibility to specify whether students on an academic plan would have their academic progress evaluated at the same time as other students, or whether they would be subject to more frequent SAP evaluations. They should determine what is best for students and make their policy clear in their SAP standards.” 42

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS Maximum Timeframe – 150% is unchanged; institutions define MTF as they determine is most appropriate – The 150% MTF applies only to Title IV eligibility; whether a student can continue in the program and complete his or her program is established by academic criteria Notification – Only required for students if the results of the SAP evaluation affects the student’s T4 eligibility 43

PI REGS: SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS School Perspective DCI Sample SAP POLICY 44

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS Does not apply to public or private nonprofit institutions Institutions not under common ownership or control: no limitation Institutions under common ownership or control: degree or certificate-granting institution must provide more than 50% of the program 45

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS Degree or certificate-granting institution is required to have “all the necessary approvals to offer the educational program in the format in which it is being offered” – Distance education, for example: institution has written arrangement with another entity to offer some DE courses; but if the proportion goes over 50% of a program, accrediting agency approval is required 46

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS Arrangements between eligible and ineligible institutions or organizations permissible if the ineligible institution has not: – Had its Title IV eligibility terminated; – Voluntarily withdrawn from Title IV eligibility under a termination, show-cause, suspension or similar order from the state, accrediting agency, guarantor, or ED; 47

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS – Had its Title IV certification revoked by ED; – Had itsTitle IV recertification application denied by ED; OR – Had its Title IV certification (initial) application denied by ED. 48

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS The institution must include in its consumer information a description of the written arrangements (§668.43(a)(12)) : – The portion of the program the degree or certificate-granting institution is not providing; – The name and location of the other institution or organization that is providing that portion of the program; 49

PI REGS: WRITTEN ARRANGEMENTS – The method of delivery of the portion of the program not provided by the degree or certificate- granting institution; and – Estimated additional costs a student may incur as the result of enrolling in a program that is provided in part under the written arrangement; 50

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION Institutions must be state approved or licensed—if a state does not have an approval or licensing process, the state must implement one The state must have a process to review and act on complaints 51

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION Institutions must make available to students and prospective students information about filing complaints with their accrediting agencies and with the state approval or licensing entity and any other relevant state agency that would handle a student’s complaint – Could be multiple agencies 52

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION An institution that offers distance education programs must provide the contact information for the state in which it is located and also provide the information for states in which it provides DE courses to the extent that the states have licensure or approval for institutions providing DE coursework 53

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION An institution that offers distance or correspondence education in a state in which it is not physically located “must meet any State requirements for it to be legally offering distance or correspondence education in that State. An institution must be able to document upon request from the Department that it has such State approval.” 54

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION For more information on states’ distance education regulations: – – WICHE Cooperative for Educational Technologies – Go to “State Approval: A ‘Starter’ List” 55

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION DCL GEN-11-05: – For the award year only, “the Department will consider an institution to be making a good-faith effort to prospectively comply with the distance education regulations for State authorization, if— The institution has applied for approval of its offerings in such a State, either in response to the publication of the regulations, or earlier if the State notified the institution that such approval was required; 56

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION The institution is able to document its application for approval and the application’s receipt by the State; and The institution notifies the Department when the State issues its decision on the pending applications for approval.” – If a state does not license or approve institutions for DE coursework, the institution is considered to be legally operating in that state 57

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION – The institution must identify where a student is located and seek approval from that state. “While the location of the student is initially determined at the time of enrollment in a program, consistent with other determinations of student eligibility, it must also be reevaluated each time an institution makes a new award to a student.” 58

PI REGS: STATE AUTHORIZATION – There is no federally set minimum number of students that triggers the requirement for state licensure or approval – Some states may have de minimus requirements 59

CONTACT INFORMATION Judy Hendrickson Kris Strom Peggy Tiderman 60