Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highway / Office of Traffic Safety or Web Request 5% Report County or City Specific Reports.
Advertisements

Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
FMCSA Regulatory Update
Office of Highway Safety Tallulah, Louisiana Motorcoach Run-off-the- Road Accident October 13, 2003.
Office of Highway Safety Glen Rock, Pennsylvania April 11, 2003.
Gary Nichols Director of International Sales US Xpress, Inc. September 16, 2010.
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department M.C.S.A.P. Unit (Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program)
Carrier Oversight National Transportation Safety Board Truck and Bus Safety: A Decade of Progress May 10-11, 2011.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
Motor Fleet Safety Basics: Training for the Safety Supervisor Unit 4: Accident Prevention and Basic Investigation.
OPERATING SAFELY AND IN COMPLIANCE James Daulerio CDS CDT Senior Risk Consultant.
Pasadena Police Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Unit.
1 USDOT Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Program Overview USDOT Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Program Overview.
Transportation Safety Assessments Commodor E. Hall, CDS ISRI Transportation Safety Manager
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.
Office of Highway Safety WILMER, TEXAS September 23, 2005.
National Transportation Safety Board Bus & Truck Safety Forum May 10-11, 2011.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
2015 Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements: An Overview Maryland Regional Aviation Conference – June 6, 2015 Ocean City, Maryland Thomas.
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
Victor, New York Motorcoach Run-off-Road and Overturn Accident June 23, 2002.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations Jim LeBerte.
An Introduction to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
1 Comprehensive Safety Analysis CSA 2010 January 28, 2009.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Update Arkansas Trucking Association Safety Management Council Don Holman, Tyson Foods, Inc. Corporate Director of Transportation.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration & DOT Safety Regulations Updates.
Office of Highway Safety Victoria, Texas Motorcoach Rollover January 2, 2008.
 Why Change?  What is CSA?  Field Test & National Rollout  Summary.
CVEO 3 Larry Pasco Spokane Washington State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Division District Supervisor 1.
Loraine, Texas June 9, Investigative Team James LeBerte - Motor Carrier Operations Mark Bagnard - Highway Factors Robert Accetta - Scene Documentation.
Transportation & Logistics Anthony P. Gallo, CFA(410) office, (410) mobile Michael R. Busche(704)
1 Commercial Vehicle Safety Data Quality and Uniformity.
Office of Highway Safety CVSA Bus Safety Summit March 6, 2009 Member Debbie Hersman.
Jeff Davis, C.D.S. Fleet Safety Services, LLC. Anonymous Polling Question #1 1 Does your Company currently have any “deficient” or “monitored” CSA BASIC’s?
Click to edit Master title style 1. 2 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is part of the.
Talking Freight Seminar Presenter Chuck Horan Director of Enforcement and Compliance.
June 2009 | U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Overview and Oversize/Overweight.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Pete Kotowski.
CSA Driver Training. Who is subject?  Carriers and their drivers are subject if the carrier:  has a U.S. DOT Number; and  operates commercial motor.
LARGE TRUCK CRASHES Michigan Traffic Safety Summit East Lansing, Michigan March 13, 2007 PRESENTED BY: Capt. Robert R. Powers Commanding Officer Motor.
CSA 2010 Update:. FMCSA’s Challenge: Industry Volume Significantly more carriers than federal/state investigators –FMCSA regulates ~725,000 interstate.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Jim LeBerte.
What It Means for Great Dane Customers Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
Office of Highway Safety Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003.
CSA 2010 Overview Presented by Brandon Putz Loss Control & Safety Representative.
IRP Registration Sanctions Best Practices for the Various Types of FMCSA OOS Orders.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration – Agency Overview
SAFETEA-LU PRISM Related Provisions. SAFETEA-LU: PRISM Provisions Section 4101 – Authorization of Appropriations: –Federal Fiscal Year: $ 5 million.
Driver Violation Notification Study Presentation to: ITS America CVFM Homeland Security SIG Presented by: Jeff Secrist Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
SBA Roundtable| February 14, Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Small Business Administration February 2012.
Commercial Truck Collision with Stopped Vehicles on Interstate 88, Naperville, Illinois January 27,
COMPLIANCE SAFETY ACCOUNTABILTY FMCSA ANALYSIS & INFORMATION ONLINE.
The FMCSA Program Effectiveness Study How Effective Are Compliance Reviews?
Crash Profiles Online Overview. What are Crash Profiles? What is Crash Profiles Online? What Data Sources are used to Compile Crash Profiles? FARS Data.
FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders| December FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders.
CSA 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety.
Traffic Enforcement Around Commercial Motor Vehicles Presented by Sergeant J.D. Williams Colorado State Patrol.
Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) and Drivers Winter 2016.
Virginia Ready Mixed Concrete Association Spring Convention
Who We Are: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Commercial Carrier Journal Forum Scottsdale, Arizona December 2012.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
IANA M&R Committee Meeting
CSA 2010 A Compendium for Shippers April 14, 2010.
CSA 2010 The New Approach.
Who is FMCSA? What do they do?
Transport Portfolio Committee
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Charlotte, NC March 26, 2015 Presented by: Rob Moseley
Have you been in a car accident? Who is responsible?
Presentation transcript:

Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations

Global Limo Compliance Reviews Preaccident (2004) – Numerous violations (drivers, vehicles) – Satisfactory rating Postaccident (2005) – Numerous violations (drivers, vehicles) – Unsatisfactory rating – Consistent violations

Motor Carrier Safety FMCSA – To reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities FMCSRs – To establish safe operating requirements for vehicles, drivers, and motor carriers Compliance review – To investigate safety regulation violations and calculate company safety fitness

Compliance Review Factors General Driver Operational Vehicle Accident rate Hazardous materials

Compliance Review Determination Certain violations given numerical weight Final safety fitness calculated – Satisfactory – Conditional – Unsatisfactory

Safety Rating Calculation FMCSA: All six factors weighed equally NTSB: Two most important factors are vehicle and driver

NTSB Accidents Indianapolis, Indiana, 1995 – 2 fatal – Significant driver, vehicle violations – H-99-6 issued NTSB’s Most Wanted List – H-99-6 added May 2000 Mountainburg, Arkansas, 2001 – 3 fatal – Significant driver, vehicle issues – H-99-6 reiterated

Additional Accidents Victor, New York, 2002 – 5 fatal – Significant driver, vehicle violations Wilmer, Texas, 2005 – 23 fatal – Significant driver, vehicle violations

FMCSA Response to H-99-6 Reviewing safety rating method CSA 2010 Initiative New rating method by 2010 dependent on – Legislation – Rulemaking – Pilot testing – Training for deployment – Implementation

Compliance Review Rating Violations of Federal safety regulations – “Acute” – “Critical” – Unrated violations not used in safety rating Scenario of 100% noncompliance with unrated violations – “Satisfactory” carrier even with safety violations

Ineffective Rating Method NTSB investigations of “satisfactory” carriers with fatal accidents Compliance reviews (2005) – 8,097 completed, 96.7% with violations – 65% resulted in satisfactory ratings – 61,924 violations – 53,069 violations unrated (85.7%) Method inconsistent with safety

Summary Accidents will continue until CSA 2010 Initiative is completed With unrated violations in a carrier’s compliance review, safety violations occur without affecting safety rating Current program does not identify unsafe operators Interim measures necessary to improve current safety rating process