Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis Lengeler et al. pp. 514-523.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Receptor clustering and signal processing in E.coli Chemotaxis Ref.1----TRENDS in Microbiology Vol.12 No.12 December 2004 Ref.2----PNAS Vol. 102 No. 48.
Advertisements

Bacterial motility, chemotaxis Lengeler et al. Chapter 20, p Global regulatory networks and signal transduction pathways.
5/10/2015Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
Prokaryotic Cell Structure and function (Part II) Prokaryotic Cell Structure and function (Part II) BIO3124 Lecture #3 (II) 1.
Chemotaxis and Motility in E. coli Examples of Biochemical and Genetic Networks Background Chemotaxis- signal transduction network Flagella gene expression.
Bacterial chemotaxis Dr. habil. Kőhidai László 2012.
Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis UCSF iGEM Team 2006 Patrick Visperas Matthew Eames Eli Groban Ala Trusina Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao.
Sept 25 Biochemical Networks Chemotaxis and Motility in E. coli Examples of Biochemical and Genetic Networks Background Chemotaxis- signal transduction.
Tuning Bacterial Behaviour Judy Armitage University of Oxford Department of Biochemistry and Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology StoMP 2009.
Quorumtaxis: Programming E. coli to Eavesdrop, Stalk, and Kill B. subtilis.
Marcus Tindall Centre for Mathematical Biology Mathematical Institute St Giles’ Oxford. PESB, Manchester, 2007.
Sites of regulation. Feedback inhibition Mechanism of allosteric inhibition.
Chemotaxis: Another go Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University.
Modeling the chemosensing system of E. coli
2 component regulatory systems Maltose=effector, BUT if signal not DIRECTLY involved, but needs to be transmitted and changed = signal transduction Sensor.
Bacterial Chemotaxis Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre University of Birmingham, UK March 2007 Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre.
The flagellar motor is reversible CCW: runCW: tumble.
Other Extracellular Layers Outer membrane Capsule Sheath Cell Appendages Filamentous, small: Fimbriae, Pili, & Spinae Filamentous, large: Flagella Outer.
BIOC3800 Sensory Transducers Dr. J.A. Illingworth.
Cellular Theory and Evolution. The Cell Theory 1. All cells come from pre-existing cells (Virchow) 2. All plants and animals are composed of cells (Schleidan.
E. coli exhibits an important behavioral response known as chemotaxis - motion toward desirable chemicals (usually nutrients) and away from harmful ones.
Bacterial chemotaxis lecture 2 Manipulation & Modeling Genetic manipulation of the system to test the robustness model Explaining Ultrasensitivity and.
1 Introduction to Biological Modeling Steve Andrews Brent lab, Basic Sciences Division, FHCRC Lecture 1: Introduction Sept. 22, 2010.
The chemotaxis network is able to extract once the input signal varies slower relative to the response time of the chemotaxis network. Under an input signal.
Overview of next five lectures: How is directional motility accomplished at the single cell level? An emphasis on experimental approaches for testing models.
Adaptation Essential for sensory perception Nearly universal Salmonella How to move towards unseen food?
Robustness in protein circuits: adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis 1 Information in Biology 2008 Oren Shoval.
Two - Component Signal Transduction modular stimulas-response systems  Response Regulator: conserved receiver domain + specific effecter domain  Histidine.
March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana.
Optimal Strategy in E. coli Chemotaxis: An Information Theoretic Approach Lin Wang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington,
Fig 7.1. Fig 7.2 The bacteria flagella motor [source: Berg HC, Ann. Rev. Biochem 2003] Fig 7.3.
L17. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis response
12/24/2015Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
1/2/2016Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
Optimal Strategy in E. coli Chemotaxis: An Information Theoretic Approach Lin Wang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington,
Microbiology and Molecular Biology for Engineers IGEM, 20 June 2006.
Lin Wang Advisor: Sima Setayeshgar. Motivation: Information Processing in Biological Systems Chemical signaling cascade is the most fundamental information.
In-silico Implementation of Bacterial Chemotaxis Lin Wang Advisor: Sima Setayeshgar.
Approach…  START with a fine-tuned model of chemotaxis network that:  reproduces key features of experiments (adaptation times to small and large ramps,
The chemotaxis network is able to extract as much as information possible once the input signal varies slower relative to the response time of the chemotaxis.
Dr. habil. Kőhidai László
Advanced Aspects of Chemotactic Mechanisms:
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
The chemotaxis network of E. coli
Module 2: Robustness in Biochemical Signaling Networks
to photoreactive amino acid
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Bacterial flagellar motor
Nutrient-Sensing Mechanisms across Evolution
Dr. habil. Kőhidai László
Signal transduction: Gyrating protein kinases
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
The biochemistry of memory
Fundamental Constraints on the Abundances of Chemotaxis Proteins
The four rhodopsins of H. salinarum.
Mechanism of chemotaxis in E
Rasika M Harshey, Ikuro Kawagishi, Janine Maddock, Linda J Kenney 
Bacterial chemotaxis: The five sensors of a bacterium
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Toshinori Namba, Masatoshi Nishikawa, Tatsuo Shibata 
Model of Bacterial Band Formation in Aerotaxis
Components and outcomes of selected TNF-superfamily signalling pathways. Components and outcomes of selected TNF-superfamily signalling pathways. (Left)
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Simulating cell biology
Bacterial chemotaxis Current Biology
Model of the change in receptor structure on engagement of the ligand IFN-γ. Model of the change in receptor structure on engagement of the ligand IFN-γ.
Presentation transcript:

Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis Lengeler et al. pp

Chemotaxis: responses E. coli –Makes temporal comparisons –Responds to spatial gradients –Compares environment of present with environment of past –Time: 1 to 2 sec

Expt –expose E. coli to stepwise change of… [ATTractant] or [REPellant] 1. Isotropic conditions: S   T –Sudden increase in [ATT]  S Excitation response = fast: < 0.2 sec –Same [ATT]: S   T Sensory adaptation = slow: sec to min

2. Isotropic conditions: S   T –Sudden increase in [REP]  T Excitation response = fast, < 0.2 sec –Same [REP]: S   T Sensory adaptation = slow, sec to min Conclusion –Cell seeks “better” environment……

stages Cell… samples its chemical environment Makes comparison between current conditions and past conditions Response: if better, suppresses tumbling; more smooth swimming ……………if worse, no suppression of tumbling ……………if no change, alternate S, T Updates of short-term memory

Chemotaxis: components 4 receptor proteins Signal transduction proteins Adaptation proteins 4 receptors = methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) span CM

4 receptors Tsr Taxis serine and some repellents; Leu = rep; acids = rep Tar Taxis aspartate and some repellents Maltose = attractant Trg Taxis ribose and galactose Tap Taxis to dipeptides

Chemotaxis: components Signal transduction proteins CheA CheY CheW CheZ Adaptation proteins CheR CheB

MCPs NH TM highly variable sensory domain TM linker MH seq conservation; signaling domain MH COOH TM = transmembrane segment MH = methylated helix Sensory domain: periplasm Signaling domain: cytoplasm

Signal transduction Excitation –Bind REP to MCP in CM –MCP sends signal via CheW CheW: adaptor / intermediate in cytoplasm CheW: mediates signals to CheA –CheA = protein kinase on binding of REP, increased CheA kinase His48  increase CheA~P

Excitation, cont’d –CheA~P + CheY  CheY~P Asp57 = tumble factor CheY~P binds to FliM of flagellar switch Signal = CW rotation = tumbling

–Bind ATT to MCP in CM –MCP sends signal via CheW –CheW  CheA –CheA = protein kinase on bdg of ATT, decreased CheA kinase Lower autoP  lower CheA~P –Lower CheA~P + CheY  lower CheY~P Signal = CCW rotation = smooth Excitation = ~P and de~P

Signal transduction Adaptation CheR + CheB + MCPs [ATT] –converted into intracellular “short term memory” –registered as methylated MCP

Adaptation MCP + CheR (methyltransferase)  MCP-CH 3 Methyl group = S-AdoMet Each MCP: methylated at Glu Methyl’n affects {MCP – CheW – CheA} communication MCP-CH 3 + CheB (methylesterase)  MCP + CH 3 OH

Extent of methylation affects –kinase activity of CheA –Rate of producing CheY~P Complex interplay of CheR and CheB Outcome: –Adaptation restores CheY~P to same levels as before stimulus