Neponset River Dredge Spoils Assessment RESULTS Boston and Milton Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Assessment Team
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ROBINSON SCHOOL WINDOW REPLACEMENT 5/2/ Robinson School: Assessment of Existing Conditions.
Environmental Risk Assessment for “Facet Enterprises”, New York, USA Presentation by Marie, Seun, and Deb.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Status More on gardening pathway & historic fill proposals – situations addressed under the “Permanent Solutions with Conditions (No AULs)” MCP Public.
Neponset River Capen Street Investigation Milton, MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental Protection.
Presentation by Judith Enck, EPA Regional Administrator, US EPA Region 2 5/17/20151 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PCBs in Lighting Fixtures in NYC.
Enviromental aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Marcela Maturová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
The Hudson River PCB Problem
Excess Mercury Levels Increasing; Survey Shows Fifth of Women of Childbearing Age Are Affected The study, which was commissioned by an environmental advocacy.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
General Electric – Housatonic River Project November 6, 2002 Overview of NAPL and Groundwater Programs Mike Nalipinski EPA New England Mike Nalipinski.
MassDEP Food for Thought Addressing the Gardening Pathway Paul W. Locke MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
SOUTHWEST DIVISION Evaluation of Ambient Metals in the San Francisco, California Area Presentation for the NDIA Conference G. Patrick Brooks, R.G. NAVFAC,
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results 1 Data Evaluation Summary - Columbia River Component River Corridor Closure Project Safety People.
Revised TCE Fact Sheet (a.k.a. “Status Update”) Q&A’s & Template IH Notice Form March 27, 2014 Paul W. Locke MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (617)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluations of Heavy Metal Listings on the State of Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters Assabet.
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
 Do you have an Interest in Math and Science?  Do you have good problem solving skills?  Do you approach problems in an analytical manner?  Can.
Enviromental aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Marcela Maturová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
P:\LE Mason\Hyde Park\final06\presentations\ PIP Meeting.ppt 1 Public Involvement Plan Meeting Former L.E. Mason Property 98 Business Street Hyde.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
Challenges of Performing Contaminated Sediment Remediation and Restoration in China and Taiwan Brian J. Mastin, Ph.D. Dave Renfrew Jerry Chen Samuel Wu.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Lead Contamination in the Belledune Area: Past and Present Prepared by Inka Milewski Conservation Council of New Brunswick October 2003.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
Developing a Cumulative Effects Monitoring Program for the Saint John Harbour – Contaminants Karen Kidd and Angella Mercer Canadian Rivers Institute, UNB.
Today’s Topics Hartford Iron site assessment Cleanup to date Cleanup steps to come What can you do.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
EHS 507 Food Exposures: Fruits and Vegetables  Fruits and vegetables may become contaminated by multiple pathways –Purposeful spraying or soil treatment.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
South Framingham Initiative MassDEP’s Project to Improve Environmental Quality in an Environmental Justice Neighborhood 2015.
Tacoma Smelter Plume Yard Program Technical Workshop April 11, 2013 Wilson High School.
Laboratory Decommissioning : Essential Tools and Lessons Learned Jim Carscadden Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities.
An Overview DCC Annual Retreat February 20, 2012.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
EPA Targeted Brownfields Assessment Applications for Culturally Sensitive Sites The TseWhitZen Village Cemetery Restoration Project Joanne LaBaw, EPA Matthew.
Health Consultation Cincinnati Country Day School Lead Site Cincinnati, OH Ashley Roberts February 9,2009.
Brownfields 2011 Philadelphia, PA – April 5, 2011 Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick, Ohio EPA Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA Urban Gardens on Brownfields: Making Them.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
The Challenge of PCBs in the Spokane River
Welcome.
TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION IN RESPONSE TO CONTAMINATED SOILS ALONG THE EASTSIDE DITCH NEAR DEER LODGE, MONTANA G.S. Vandeberg1, D.J. Dollhopf1, D.R.
Environmental sampling and monitoring
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Neponset River Dredge Spoils Assessment RESULTS Boston and Milton Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) Prepared by MassDEP, DCR & MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Contractor to MassDEP

Overview of Presentation Background Purpose and Objectives Sampling and Analysis Data Evaluation and Conclusions Path Forward

What are Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)? Chemicals used widely as cooling, insulating and di- electric fluids, especially in transformers. Manufactured by Monsanto from 1930s to 1970s. Persistent in nature and not very soluble in water. Accumulate in sediments and can accumulate in animal and plant life. PCBs are found widely in sediments. They are associated with cancer and non-cancer health effects in animals and people. ATSDRATSDR fact sheet

Neponset River Dredge History 1955 flooding of Neponset River and across southern New England In 1962 and 1964, MDC performed repair work and flood control, including dredging: –1962: Walter Baker Dam to Tileston-Hollingsworth Dam –1964: Tileston Hollingsworth Dam to Paul’s Bridge USGS sediment study found elevated PCB concentrations in Neponset River sediment Concern over potential for dredge spoils to be impacted with PCBs Concern for public health

Dredging Barge on Neponset River

Purpose of Project Historical dredge spoils had been placed in areas along the Neponset River that are currently accessible to and used by the public Some recent studies of the Neponset River suggested that the dredge spoils might contain PCBs and possibly metals at levels of concern These areas were investigated to determine if they are safe for recreational use

STUDY AREA

Purpose of Sampling Assess locations that are used frequently and have received dredge spoils. Determine if PCBs and metals are present at levels of concern in soil that people could come in contact with. Determine if more sampling is needed to fully define an area of concern or whether there is no need for concern. Determine if actions are necessary to address short term risk or long-term risk (if any) - eliminate access to and prevent direct contact with any soil that presents a public health risk.

Exposure Discussion Contact with soil or sediment containing PCBs at elevated levels is required to put one at risk. Generally the top foot of soils or sediment is thought to be “readily accessible”. Potential Exposure Pathways: –Skin contact with soil and absorption through skin, –Incidental ingestion of soil (hand-to-mouth activity), –Inhalation of dust (typically negligible unless soil is significantly disturbed).

Exposure Discussion MassDEP has identified levels of concern for PCBs and metals in soil in the “Massachusetts Contingency Plan” (the MCP). Soil levels above MCP standards may pose a health risk. MCP looks at life time exposure and short term exposure. If there is a short term risk, access and exposure to soils should be prevented or eliminated.

MCP Soil Standards Chemicals in soil at levels greater than or equal to the following could pose a potential health risk over a lifetime: PCBs: 2 parts per million (ppm) Total Arsenic: 20 ppm Total Lead: 300 ppm Total Nickel: 20 ppm Prevent direct contact with chemicals in soil at levels greater than or equal to the following: PCBs: 10 ppm Total Arsenic: 40 ppm

Completed Assessment Work Surface soil and sediment sampling December 2007 & January surface soil sample locations (160 samples) and 4 sediment samples at canoe launches Sampling completed in the most publicly accessible areas: –Trails –Playgrounds, Baseball outfield –Vegetable gardens (Raised Bed) –Canoe launches Sampling at privately owned properties to be conducted in future

Additional Metals Analysis Based on review of initial metals results, more of the collected samples were analyzed for metals –Delineate further –Allow calculation of representative concentrations for the areas (average (AVG)) 39 samples analyzed in this effort (total of 67 soil samples analyzed for metals)

Dredge YearDredge Spoil AreaDescription and Nearest Receptor Sampling Status 1962 Spoil Area “C” Residential Area near Truman Highway, Milton Completed Spoil Area “D” Kennedy Playground and Walking Trail, Residential Area near Edgewater Drive, Boston Completed Spoil Area “E”DCR building on Truman Highway, Milton Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 planned with soil removal Spoil Area “G” Public access/path near Riverside Place, Boston Completed Spoil Area “H” Ryan Playground (DCR) near River Street, Boston Completed Spoil Area “I”Residential Area near Eliot Street, Boston Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 sampling planned 1964 Spoil Area “A” Business/Residential Area near Railroad Avenue/Riverside Square, Boston To be scheduled Spoil Area “C” Business area (Stop & Shop) near Truman Highway, Milton To be scheduled Status of Sampling Program

Sampling and Analysis Samples collected with hand tools for PCBs analysis Quality control and assurance measures incorporated in sampling Equipment decontamination tested and no evidence of residual equipment contamination and cross- contamination found All soil and sediment samples analyzed for PCBs 67 soil samples and all 4 sediment samples analyzed for EPA Priority Pollutant Metals analysis (13 metals)

Analytical Details PP-13 Metals (EPA 6010B (ICP), EPA 7470/7471, EPA 7000) -Beryllium- Arsenic -Cadmium- Mercury -Chromium- Antimony -Copper- Selenium -Nickel- Lead -Silver- Thallium -Zinc PCBs (EPA 8082 (GC)) -Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor Aroclor 1268 Nomen

Soil Sampling

Sediment Sampling

Dredge Spoil 1962-C (ppm)AverageStandard Total PCBs ppm – parts per million

Dredge Spoil 1962-D & 1962-E (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs Walking Path 1962-E Kennedy Playground AVG – Average STD – Standard ppm – parts per million (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs Arsenic8.020 Lead Nickel9.520 (ppm)Concentration Total PCBsNot detected Raised Bed Garden 1962-D

Dredge Spoil 1962-D & 1962-E (ppm) Depth Interval AVGSTD Total PCBs Sediment ” ” D Canoe Launch 1962-E AVG – Average STD – Standard ppm – parts per million Canoe Launch (ppm) Depth Interval AVGSTD Total PCBs Sediment Not detected 2

AVG – Average STD – Standard ppm – parts per million Dredge Spoil 1962-G, H & 1962-I (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs0.682 (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs < (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs G Walking Path 1962-I Ryan Playground (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs0.272 Arsenic Lead (ppm)AVGSTD Total PCBs0.122 Arsenic5.720 Lead H

AVG – Average STD – Standard ppm – parts per million Dredge Spoil 1962-G, H & 1962-I 1962-G 1962-I 1962-H (ppm) Depth Interval AVGSTD Total PCBs Sediment ” ”0.58 Canoe Launch

PCB Sampling Results With respect to PCBs, soils are safe for recreational use No soil cleanup necessary for PCBs No restrictions necessary

Metals Sampling Results With respect to metals, soil at all areas except Area 1962-E are safe for recreational use and even for residential use. No cleanup necessary, except for lead at one location at Area 1962-E –Lead at one sampling location in Area 1962-E will be removed

Dredge Spoil Area 1962-E DCR Building DCR Building

Summary of Results and Conclusions Soil and sediment sampling shows that all areas except Area 1962-E are safe for recreational use and no cleanup is necessary One soil sampling location at Area 1962-E requires further sampling and limited soil removal due to lead concentrations –Soil sampling and removal is planned Confirmatory testing for metals is planned at three locations in Area 1962-I Due diligence sampling confirms historical dredging does not impact public safety in these areas

Next Steps Area 1962-E –More sampling and metals analysis to bound impact at one location –Remove impacted soil (less than 20 cubic yards) Area 1962-I –More sampling and metals analysis to further investigate 3 separate locations –Evaluate results to confirm that standards are met and no cleanup is necessary Complete further investigation of the Braided Channel Continue to prepare for sampling and analysis of privately owned properties MassDEP and DCR will continue public communication of results and plans as they develop

MassDEP Weblink and Future Actions A Mass DEP Weblink established for public access to the information about this investigation and its findings This presentation will be posted on the weblink Copies will be placed in public repositories (Hyde Park Library, Mattapan Branch Library, and East Milton Library). Details of future activities will be provided thru public meetings and on the Weblink. Final project completion report will be provided in the same manner.

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS Contact: Christopher Pyott MassDEP Northeast Regional Office 205B Lowell Street Wilmington, MA (978)