AIPLA Closed Meeting with JPAA April 9, 2013 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Tokyo, Japan The Trans Pacific Partnership – Update on IP Aspects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESIDENT OBAMAS APPROACH TO ASIA-PACIFIC Trans-Pacific Partnership Betsy Barrientos March 5, 2012.
Advertisements

Trans-Pacific Partnership by: Eric Florence. Contents Overview U.S. National Interest, Policy, Politics Issue: TPP Policy Recommendation Conclusion and.
External Trade 1 5th Global Congress Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Global and Regional IPR Enforcement Initiatives Luc-Pierre Devigne Head of Intellectual.
Coping with multiple uncertainties: Latin America in the TPP negotiations Sebastián Herreros Geneva, 24 September 2012.
Durban, South Africa January 29 to 31, 2013 Topic 6: Flexibilities Related to the Definition of Patentable Subject Matter Regional Seminar for Certain.
UOttawa.ca CETA – A New Model for Regulatory Cooperation, Transparency and Coherence? Presentation by: Professor Debra Steger University of Victoria European.
Trade Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and Other Asian Countries Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Traditional Knowledge and the TRIPS Agreement Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Kira M. Alvarez CHIEF NEGOTIATOR AND DEPUTY ASSISTANT U.S.T.R. For intellectual property enforcement.
1 Review of Art 39.3 TRIPS – interpretation and controversy Sanya Smith Third World Network 25 August 2006 Bangkok.
Regional Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan’s FTA Policy March, 2010 Shujiro URATA Waseda University.
Patent Law Issues in Recent FTAs Joshua D. Sarnoff Washington College of Law American University Washington, DC, USA IP, FTAs,
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Thailand-Japan FTA passara suchaya
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
Jade Brewer.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
AUSTRALIA’S DOHA ROUND AGENDA. TODAY’S DISCUSSION  briefly, the WTO and Australia  what was decided at Doha  what has happened since Doha  Australia’s.
AIPLA Mid Winter Meeting January 28, 2014 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Phoenix, Arizona The Trans Pacific Partnership – Update on IP Aspects.
MSE602 ENGINEERING INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
September 28, 2012 Expanding Market Opportunities Through Trade Policy: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Sushan Demirjian Deputy Assistant U.S.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
Japan and TPP Group 5 Day 4 Chien-Hui Chan, Julian Yang, Yi-Hau Li, Luigi Gonzales.
1 Bilateral IP Agreements Jean-Frédéric Morin PhD Candidate at the Université de Montpellier Researcher at Unisféra International Centre and Institut du.
The Road Transport harmonisation Project Group (RTHP) 21 st APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP MEETING RTHP Phase 5 Stage 3 Workshop 24, September,2002.
Ten Years of the Doha Declaration: The State of Implementation Geneva 14 November
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
TRIPS+ provisions in FTAs and the implications for access to medicines Sanya Smith Third World Network 27 August 2005.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 IP Provisions in Bilateral & Regional Trade Agreements and Public Health ICTSD/QUNO Dinner Discussion on IPRs in Bilateral & Regional Trade.
Intellectual Property provisions in Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Americas David Vivas-Eugui International Centre for Trade and Sustainable.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
TPPA Kimberlee Weatherall ADA Forum, Canberra, March 2012.
Agreement on TRIPS TRIPS Agreement  When the WTO was established, it led to 18 specific agreements to which all members need to adhere. Members necessarily.
SM © 2012 Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, P.A., some rights reserved - DISCLAIMER: This presentation and any information.
‘Linkage’ & other TRIPS+ provisions: a public health perspective Karin Timmermans World Health Organization Seminar “Data exclusivity and patent Bangkok.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
The Changing Landscape of Trade Negotiations Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan For presentation at 2015 Seoul Conference.
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)
The World is Open for Your Business October 8, 2015 Koreen Grube U.S. Export Assistance Center.
Overview of State of Play on TPPA Jane Kelsey TPPA Workshop Wellington, 20 December 2011.
Reform(aliz)ing Copyright BCLT, April 18-19, 2013 Three Steps Towards Formalities Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University
Standing Committee on the Law of Patents Standing Committee on the Law of Patents Created in 1998, it ‘serves as a forum to discuss issues, facilitate.
February 9, 2016 The Pike Law Firm, P.C..  The Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”) is a trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries  The TPP agreement.
Trans-Pacific Partnership Primer Published May 20, 2013 Updated August 5, 2013 National Journal Presentation Credits Producer: Jenna Fugate Director: Jessica.
Trans-Pacific Partnership. Free trade agreements.
The Intellectual Property Provisions of Recent US FTAs CARSTEN FINK Video Conference for Andean Countries on Intellectual Property Rights, May 4, 2005.
Economic Vitality and Intellectual Property Rights Discussion at Hanyang University May 26, 2005.
TRIPS-Plus Pressures: Trade Agreements, and New Trade Policy Prof. Brook K. Baker OSI Kiev – IPRs & A2M, Sept. 16, 2009.
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP: OVERVIEW March 17, 2016Cielito F. Habito.
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP An overview. History 2005: Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, a free trade agreement, signed by Brunei,
Intellectual Property Negotiations Between the United States and Colombia, Peru and Equator for a Free Trade Agreement, Relating to Medicine James Love.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT. Lesson 39 Word Trade Organization (WTO.
Two Ways forward – a crossroad in the global economy -
2016 ILS Retreat September 30- October 2, 2016 Boca Raton Resort & Club “Thoughts on the Trans Pacific Partnership, The Election, and the Future of Trade”
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
FTA Plus Issues in Asia — IP and Health
Patent law update.
IP Protection under the WTO
IMPI’s Role in the International Arena
Will membership in TPP really help Japan?
IP Provisions in Bilateral & Regional Trade Agreements and Public Health ICTSD/QUNO Dinner Discussion on IPRs in Bilateral & Regional Trade Agreements.
EBS Law Term 2016 Intellectual Property Law Fields and Principles
Presentation transcript:

AIPLA Closed Meeting with JPAA April 9, 2013 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Tokyo, Japan The Trans Pacific Partnership – Update on IP Aspects of TPP

Origins and History of the TPP  Negotiations on Sidelines of APEC Meetings since 2002  4-Nation Agreement Entered into Force May 2006  Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore  Goal of More Liberalized Trade and Investment in APEC  Covers goods, services, IP, Government procurement, etc.  7 Additional Nations Negotiating to Join – 40% world GDP  Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, US and Vietnam  Others Expressing Interest  Columbia, Japan, Laos, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand © AIPLA

The Potential Reach of the TPP © AIPLA

Current Over-arching Goals of the TPP  PROMOTE AN OPEN INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM  Tariffs – reduce to zero in 10 years  Trade Disputes – provide an effective measure to resolve  ENHANCE TRIPS  Reinforce and Further Develop TRIPS Policies  Expand to include "Other IP Issues"  Genetic resources and Traditional Knowledge  PRECLUDE REGIONAL DOMINATION BY ANY ONE COUNTRY  Focus on China © AIPLA

Current U.S. Strategic Goals  HARMONIZATION  Uniformity of Patent, Copyright, Trademark Laws  Consistency with Current US Laws  ADDRESS PIRACY and COUNTERFEITING  Provide a Uniform Policy in the Pacific Region  OPEN MARKETS  Agriculture, Public Works, Services, Insurance, Health  ENGAGE CHINA  Encircle China with IP laws and Favorable Trade Policies © AIPLA

U.S. Strategic Goals Statement  Reinforce and develop existing WTO/TRIPS "rights and obligations to ensure an effective and balanced approach to intellectual property rights among the TPP countries. Proposals are under discussion on many forms of intellectual property, including trademarks, geographical indications, copyright and related rights, patents, trade secrets, data required for the approval of certain regulated products, as well as intellectual property enforcement and genetic resources and traditional knowledge. TPP countries have agreed to reflect in the text a shared commitment to the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health." © AIPLA

Participation in FTA's by Japan  Historical reluctance by Japan to participate in FTA's  Most FTAs include reduction in tarrifs in up to 90% of markets  Japan's agricultural (rice-778%) and other markets highly protected  Participation in TPP as Observer under JDP PM Naoto Kan (2010)  First Proposal to join TPP by JDP PM Yoshihiko Noda (2011)  Opposition from many economic sectors  TPP requires reduction of tarrifs in 100% of markets © AIPLA

Participation in TPP by Japan 2013  Return of LDP to power in 2012  Three pillar approach to returning Japan to being a power in the Asia-Pacific region  Monitary policy, spending and structural reform  Request to Join TPP Negotiations by LDP PM Shinzo Abe (3/15/2013)  "This is our last chance. If we don't sieze it, Japan will be left out"  100 member task force set up  Discussion of "sanctuaries" and not "exceptions" to tarrif reduction  Japan recognizes current need to counterbalance China © AIPLA

Participation in TPP by Japan 2013  Role of US in Permitting Japan to Enter Negotiaions  Meeting with Obama in February 2013  Joint statement that "all goods would be subject to negotiation"  Bilateral sensitivities recognized relating to "certain agricultural products for Japan and certain manufactured goods for the United States" the final outcome will be determined in negotiation"  Recent bilateral discussions regarding automotive, insurance, etc.  Process for US Agreement  Obama Administration name Japan for negotiations,  90 day period for review by the Congress  First chance to participate would be September meeting © AIPLA

Participation in TPP by Japan 2013  Potential Opposition by New Zealand and Australia  Already late in the game  16 rounds of negotiation completed  17 th is in May (Peru) and will focus on the most challenging issues – IP, competition and environment  Japan cannot participate  18 th r round is in September 2013  Target for conclusion of the TPP negotiations is October 2013  Concern that Japan will enter, delay and eventually not sign  Concern that Japan will weaken strong gains © AIPLA

Impact of TPP on Japan if it Joins  HARMONIZATION  Significant Impact on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks  OPEN MARKETS  Significant impact on Domestic Policies Related to Agriculture, Public Works, Services, Insurance, Health  Significant opposition by Democratic Party of Japan  CHINA  Improved access to Chinese and Asian markets and improved enforcement of IP against piracy © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement and IP Issues  2005 Agreement  High Level Treatment of IP Issues  Considered Protection of Traditional Knowledge  Addressed Exhaustion of IP Rights  Addressed Geographical Indications  Addressed TRIPS and General Cooperation  Draft 2011 Agreement  Detailed Treatment of IP Issues  Proposed Chapter by USTR © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on IP Issues  2005 Agreement  High Level Treatment of IP Issues  Considered Protection of Traditional Knowledge  Addressed Exhaustion of IP Rights  Addressed Geographical Indications  Addressed TRIPS and General Cooperation  Draft 2011 Agreement – leaked version  Detailed Treatment of IP Issues  Proposed Chapter on IP by USTR (2/10/11)  Recent Drafts – unavailable to the public © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on IP Issues  Required Accession to International IP Agreements - (PCT, Madrid, Budapest, Berne, UPOV, etc. (Art. 1)  PLT and Hague-Designs optional  Trademarks and Geographical Indications ( Art. 2)  Domain Names on the Internet (Art. 3)  Copyrights (Arts. 4-6)  Encryption and Protection (Art. 7)  Patents (Art. 8)  Enforcement and Customs (Arts )  Side letter re service providers © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on Trademark Issues  Registrability  Marks not visually perceptible, sounds and smells are registrable  Certification marks and Geographical Indications are registrable as trademarks  Exclusive rights extend to identical or similar marks based on likelihood of confusion standard  Fair use is permitted  Well known marks – protection does not require registration, listing or prior recognition © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on Copyright Issues  Exclusive rights given to rights holders to "authorize or prohibit" copies permanent or temporary (transitory?)  Reproductions, performances and importation of works  Parallel Imports authorized or prohibited (Kirtsaeng?)  Term is the US standard – life of author + 70 years  Berne (Art. 18) and TRIPS (Art. 14.6) shall apply  Technological Protection and Rights Management - extensive provisions included re circumvention  Regulation of Related Rights for broadcasting and communication to the public of performances © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on Patent Issues  Patentable Subject Matter – any invention in all fields of technology if new, unobvious and useful  New forms and uses of known product  Plants and animals  Diagnostic, therapeutic or surgical methods for humans  Permitted exception – ordre public and morality  Post Grant Invalidity – only on grounds used for determining patentability  Pre-grant Oppositions – prohibited  Best Mode – not required © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US Proposal on Patent Issues  Novelty Exception – AIA exclusion from prior art of inventor derived publications within 12 months is required  Enablement, Written Description and Utility – specified as required for patentability  No Requirement for Best Mode  Mandatory Disclosure of File History – search, communications with applicant and patented/non- patented art cited by applicants © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US/Japan IP Issues  Changes to copyright term and formal complaint practice  Impact on manga and cosplay  Impact on parallel imports  Increased access to orphaned works by limiting damages  Disclosure requirements from ISPs  Enforcement of medical inventions  Treatment of non-technical inventions © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - Remaining Controversy  Secrecy and Lack of Transparency  Open forum for 300 stakeholders   Obama Administration - no decision about allowing or opposing Japan, China and Mexico joining the TPP – opposition to Japan is focused on Automobilie industry © AIPLA

The TPP Agreement - US/Japan IP Issues DOMO ARIGATO GOZAIMASU © AIPLA