Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
WASC Report Board of Trustees February 2010 Diane Jonte-Pace Vice Provost Chair, Re-accreditation Self Study.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Mr. Jack Pond, Vice President Fall 2005.
Accreditation: Evolution and New Challenges 2015 Accreditation Institute Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District 1.
WASC Accreditation Visit March 2009 Doug Moses and Rob Dell Co-Chairs, WASC Steering Committee Eleanor Uhlinger Chair, WASC Capacity and Preparatory.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII WEST OAHU REAFFIRMATION OF WASC ACCREDITATION The journey here and the path ahead April 17, 2015 Teri Cannon, Higher Education Consultant.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Silver Linings: Thriving Through Sanctions Stan Carrizosa, President, College of the Sequoias Jennifer Hamilton, Dean, Modesto Junior College Phil Crawford,
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
2013 A CCREDITATION S ELF S TUDY K ICKOFF M AY 2, 2011 Presented by Chairs: Aimee Myers, Faculty Chair Laurie Thiers, Classified Chair Brian Haley, Management.
Proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes - March 15, 2013  ACCJC College Status Report on Student Learning Outcomes Implementation  Respond to.
ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.
March 23, 2009 Accreditation and Trusteeship: What Every Board Should Know A Presentation for Rancho Santiago CCD By Barbara Beno, President ACCJC.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Accreditation in the higher education
WASC Re-accreditation Site Visit Educational Effectiveness Review Diane Jonte-Pace Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Administrative Leaders, November 30,
Accreditation Hot Topics Marcy Alancraig - Cabrillo College Janet Fulks - Bakersfield College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
1 Crawling Out of the Abyss: Sanctioned for the Common Good Tracy Schneider, Solano Community College Louisa Moon, MiraCosta College Angelina E. Stuart,
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Overview Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building – Lexmark Public.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Preparing for SACS Reaffirmation The SACS Principles of Accreditation and impact on Georgia Tech.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
ACCREDITATION ISSUES Presented By Claudette H. Williams.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Why is My College on warning? Understanding the Accreditation Process.
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Accreditation Pathway
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
Presented by: Mary L. Dowell, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011

What is WASC? The Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), a 501(c)(3) organization, is recognized as one of six regional associations that accredit public and private schools, colleges, and universities in the United States. The Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), a 501(c)(3) organization, is recognized as one of six regional associations that accredit public and private schools, colleges, and universities in the United States. The Western region covers institutions in California and Hawaii, and areas of the Pacific and East Asia where American/International schools or colleges may apply to it for service.

What is WASC Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a form of institutional accreditation that involves a comprehensive review of all institutional functions. Regional accrediting organizations do not accredit individual programs, although new programs are actively reviewed through the substantive change process. Voluntary, non-governmental, institutional accreditation, as practiced by WASC and other regional commissions, is a unique characteristic of American education. Accreditation is granted at the completion of a peer review process, and assures the educational community, the general public, and other organizations that an accredited institution has met high standards of quality and effectiveness.

Why are we on Probation? Probation is a determination that an institution has been found to have serious issues of noncompliance with one or more Commission Standards. CDU failed to demonstrate that we are in compliance with each of WASC’s 4 standards

How do we get out of Probation? We need to follow the WASC accreditation standards and implement all of their recommendations. CDU must demonstrate at the time of 2011 Special Visit that it is in compliance with all Commission Standards and has demonstrated that it has the resources, organizational arrangements, academic standards and processes necessary to give assurance of continuous self-monitoring, as well as the continued stability of its purposes, programs, faculty and staff, and financial and physical resources for a minimum of five years.

WASC Standards I and II Standard I: Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives –Institutional Purposes –Integrity Standard II: Achieving Educational Objectives through Core Functions –Teaching and Learning –Scholarship and Creative Activity –Support for Student Learning

WASC Standards III and IV Standard III: Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability –Faculty and Staff –Fiscal, Physical, and Information Resources –Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes Standard IV: Creating an Organization Committed to Learning and Improvement –Strategic Thinking and Planning –Commitment to Learning and Improvement

How do we get out of Probation? We need to follow the WASC accreditation standards and implement all of their recommendations. CDU must demonstrate at the time of 2011 Special Visit that it is in compliance with all Commission Standards and has demonstrated that it has the resources, organizational arrangements, academic standards and processes necessary to give assurance of continuous self-monitoring, as well as the continued stability of its purposes, programs, faculty and staff, and financial and physical resources for a minimum of five years.

So, What can happen? WASC has only a particular set of actions it can take…. Grant Candidacy or Initial Accreditation Deny Candidacy or Initial Accreditation Defer Action Continue Accreditation between the Capacity and Preparatory Review and the Educational Effectiveness Review Reaffirm Accreditation Issue a Formal Notice of Concern Issue a Warning Impose Probation Issue an Order to Show Cause Terminate Accreditation WASC has only a particular set of actions it can take…. Grant Candidacy or Initial Accreditation Deny Candidacy or Initial Accreditation Defer Action Continue Accreditation between the Capacity and Preparatory Review and the Educational Effectiveness Review Reaffirm Accreditation Issue a Formal Notice of Concern Issue a Warning Impose Probation Issue an Order to Show Cause Terminate Accreditation

What’s next, then? Three potential outcomes: –Reaffirm Accreditation –Issue an Order to Show Cause –Terminate Accreditation

Reaffirmation Reaffirmation of accreditation occurs at the completion of the comprehensive review cycle (following the EER) or when an institution is taken off of a sanction. It indicates that the Commission has found that an institution has met or exceeded the expectations of the Standards and the Core Commitments to Institutional Capacity and Educational Effectiveness. Reaffirmation is granted for up to ten years and may be accompanied by a request for interim reports and/or special visits, or a formal Notice of Concern.

Formal Notice of Concern This action provides notice to an institution that, while it currently meets WASC Standards, it is in danger of being found out of compliance with one or more Standards if current trends continue. A formal Notice of Concern may also be issued when an institution is removed from a sanction and the Commission wishes to emphasize the need for continuing progress and monitoring. Institutions issued a formal Notice of Concern have a special visit within four years to assess progress. If the Commission’s concerns are not addressed by the time of the visit, a sanction is imposed.

Order to Show Cause An Order to Show Cause is a decision by the Commission to terminate the accreditation of the institution within a maximum period of one year from the date of the Order, unless the institution can show cause why such action should not be taken. Such an Order may be issued when an institution is found to be in substantial noncompliance with one or more Commission Standards or, having been placed on Warning or Probation for at least one year, has not been found to have made sufficient progress to come into compliance with the Standards. In response to the Order, the institution has the burden of proving why its candidacy or accreditation should not be terminated. The institution must demonstrate that it has responded satisfactorily to Commission concerns, has come into compliance with all Commission Standards, and will likely be able to sustain compliance.

Terminate Accreditation A decision to terminate accreditation is made by the Commission when an institution has been found to be seriously out of compliance with one or more Standards. Although not required, a decision to terminate may be made after an Order to Show Cause or another sanction has been imposed and the institution has failed to come into compliance. When accreditation is terminated, a specific date of implementation is specified. An action to terminate accreditation is subject to both the Commission review procedures and the WASC appeals process. If an institution closes after a termination action, the institution must comply with federal requirements and WASC policies about teach-out arrangements.

This CAN happen to us A number of colleges HAVE lost their accreditation, even after working very hard to change their university Recent WASC accreditation losses: University of West Los Angeles (2006); New College of California (2008) –The New College story: California California California

What does this visit mean? WASC wants to see if we are in compliance with the four standards Particularly, they are interested to see if we have rectified the issues they observed in five major areas: –Open Communication with WASC and the CDU community –Presidential and Board Leadership –Financial Stability, Planning, and Management –Faculty Governance, Policies, and Development –Assessment of Student Learning and Student Success and University Endeavors

How can I help? READ THE DOCUMENTS! –Be familiar with the correspondence between CDU and WASC especially the 7/9/09 letter from WASC and the Special Visit Report from 12/10 Understand how the WASC standards apply to your role as a faculty member, whether a teacher, researcher, or clinician Be prepared for the visit with evidence of compliance with WASC’s standards Be available for the WASC visit and for work that needs to be done Participate in meetings and in making change happen