Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006 AGU Fall Meeting. 14 Dec. 2006, San Francisco – Poster #G43A-0985 Jim Ray (NOAA/NGS), Tonie van Dam (U. Luxembourg), Zuheir Altamimi (IGN), Xavier.
Advertisements

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver.
SVN-49 Signal Anomaly Presented by Tom Stansell GPSW POC: Lt. Col. James Lake, Ph.D.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
SURVEYING II UNIT IV PRESENTATION II.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
National Survey and Cadastre - Denmark Crustal deformations at permanent GPS sites in Denmark Shfaqat Abbas Khan and Per Knudsen, Geodetic Dept., Kort.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Estimating Heights and Atmospheric Delays “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical more sensitive.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
Matt A. King 1, Christopher S. Watson 2 1 School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK 2 School of Geography.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Toward “Broadband Exploration” of Tectonic-Magmatic Interactions: Demonstration of Self-Consistent, "All-in-One" Rapid Analysis of GPS Mega-Networks using.
Original objective = quantify intraplate deformation –Pros: Larger number of sites High density of sites in some areas Minimal cost… –Cons: Density varies.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
GPS Multipath and its Relation to Near-Surface Reflectivity Slide 1/14 Natasha Whitney Harvard University National Geodetic Survey/NOS Mentor:
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Ian Thomas, Nigel Penna, Matt King, Peter Clarke Introduction GPS measurements of Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) and Precipitable Water (PW) vapor are.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 6 Point Positioning –By now you should understand: F How receiver knows GPS satellite coordinates F How receiver produces pseudoranges.
Improved Radio Occultation Observations for a COSMIC Follow-on Mission C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, B. Schreiner UCAR / COSMIC D. Ector NOAA.
Are thermal effects responsible for micron-level motions recorded at deep- and shallow-braced monuments in a short-baseline network at Yucca Mountain,
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Improving GPS RO Stratospheric Retrieval for Climate Benchmarking Chi O. Ao 1, Anthony J. Mannucci 1, E. Robert Kursinski 2 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
Vertical velocities at tide gauges from a completely reprocessed global GPS network of stations: How well do they work? G. Wöppelmann 1, M-N. Bouin 2,
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Software Development: Massive, Rapid Network Processing with Ambiguity Resolution Geoff Blewitt.
Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Interminimum Changes in Global Total Electron Content and Neutral Mass Density John Emmert, Sarah McDonald Space Science Division, Naval Research Lab Anthony.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 17
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Presentation transcript:

Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King Introduction GPS signals may travel along several paths before reaching the receiving antenna due to signal multipath (MP) as they are reflected off surrounding buildings, structures, or the ground. This multipath bias may be partially mitigated - in the field by careful site selection and monument design (e.g., avoiding large diameter pillars), in the data analysis by using an appropriate elevation cut-off angle or through elevation-dependent weighting. However, these approaches are not able to remove all multipath signal and since geodetic analysis soft-ware does not model it these errors may propagate into the GPS solutions. King and Watson (2010) have shown that, together with subtle changes in the GPS observation geometry, unmodelled multi-path may produce time-correlated noise, including anomalous harmonics, which will be largely site specific. Method To investigate the effect of artificially generated multipath on time series we use a multipath model which is based on the model by Elosegui et al. (1995) although extended to be appropriate for the antenna near field and include the effects of antenna gain (T.A. Herring, pers. comm., 2009). The model is shown in Figure 1 alongside that of Elosegui et al. (1995) (King and Watson, 2010). We examine the effect of azimuthally symmetric and asymmetric multipath at a range of sites, including one site (PLAT) with sub- stantial obstructions and which also undergoes hardware changes. Processing Strategy  Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with GIPSY v5, reprocessed JPL GPS orbits, ambiguity resolution using ambizap (Blewitt, 2008), absolute antenna phase centres, 7º cut-off angle.  Offshore site PLAT(form) and IGS sites ONSA, NTUS, NYAL (Figure 2).  Several PPP runs for each site: one base run with the original AOAD/M_T antenna, i.e. no multipath induced (MP00), and a series of runs perturbed by the Herring model - multipath reflector at 0.1m (MP0.1), 0.2m (MP0.2), 1.5m (MP1.5) below AOAD/M_T antenna – inducing azimuthally symmetric multipath (Figure 4).  Additionally, asymmetric multipath is modelled for different 45º sectors of the sky MP45 (0º-45º), MP90 (45º-90º), MP135 (90º- 135º), MP180 (135º-180º), MP225 (180º-225º), MP270 (225º-270º), MP315 (270º-315º), MP360 (315º-360º) based on the model with reflector at 0.1m (Figure 6). Figure 1: Ionospheric-free (LC) range bias with different model settings for the Elosegui et al. (1995) model (left) and the model used here (right) for H=0.1m (grey), H=0.2m (cyan) and H=1.5m (magenta). Elosegui et al (1995) T.A. Herring Figure 2: GPS sites. Figure 5: Amplitude spectra of time series based on the Lomb-Scargle periodogram method for offshore station PLAT and IGS sites NYAL, ONSA, NTUS. Figure 4: Effect of multipath reflector at 0.1m, 0.2m, 1.5m below antenna on raw time series (compared to multipath-free model MP00) for offshore station PLAT and IGS sites NYAL, ONSA, NTUS (hardware change at vertical line). Figure 6: Effect of multipath reflector at 0.1m for different 45º sectors of the sky on 91-day smoothed time series (compared to multipath- free model MP00) for offshore station PLAT and IGS sites NYAL, ONSA, NTUS (hardware change at vertical line). Figure 3: Skyplots showing number of observations before and after receiver change for station PLAT. Results and Conclusions  Study of azimuthally symmetric multipath supports conclusions of King and Watson (2010) ▪ Height time series is less noisy for PLAT after the receiver change, presumably due to improvements in observation geometry (Figure 4) ▪ Multipath propagation changes as the satellite geometry changes (e.g. due to hardware changes), with each multipath scenario giving a slightly different offset magnitude (see vertical line for PLAT in Figure 4 and Figure 6) ▪ Large periodic signals are evident at near-annual signal (ONSA and NTUS, Figure 5) and semi-annual (PLAT). The latter disappears after the receiver change (Figure 5).  Asymmetric MP results in a complex relationship between different models for height, longitude and latitude components (Figure 6) ▪ Much larger effect on time series than azimuthally symmetric MP, including site velocity biases (Figure 4 and Figure 6) ▪ Longitude and height component effects are largest; latitude slightly less affected.  Multipath is likely to be a significant contributor to GPS noise, and changes in its nature (e.g., horizontal distribution) or hardware changes leading to tracking changes may also change the coordinate time series. References Blewitt, G. (2008), Fixed point theorems of GPS carrier phase ambiguity resolution and their application to massive network processing: Ambizap, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B12410, doi: /2008JB Elosegui, P., Davis, J. L., Jaldehag, R. K., Johansson, J. M., Niell, A. E., Shapiro, I. I. (1995), Geodesy Using the Global Positioning System: The Effects of Signal Scattering, J. Geophys. Res., 100, pp King, M.A., and C.S. Watson (2010), Long GPS coordinate time series: multipath and geometry effects, J. Geophys. Res., doi: /2009JB Symmetric MP Asymmetric MP Hardware change