Scott Evans VP of Engineering Eberle Design Inc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legendary Performance. Endless Possibilities. ITS America 2007 Palm Springs, CA June 6 th 3:00PM-4:00PM Session 49: Detection Systems “Advanced Video Detection.
Advertisements

Travel Time Estimation on Arterial Streets By Heng Wang, Transportation Analyst Houston-Galveston Area Council Dr. Antoine G Hobeika, Professor Virginia.
T3 Webinar September 2012 Performance Measures Edward J. Smaglik September 18 th, 2012.
- Product Overview – The LMD DEFLECTOMETER ® Series Inductive Loop Detector Why guess when you can know! © Copyright EDI 2013.
VTrack: Accurate, Energy-Aware Road Traffic Delay Estimation Using Mobile Phones Arvind Thiagarajan, Lenin Ravindranath, Katrina LaCurts, Sivan Toledo,
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
Group 3 John Gregory John Marsh Gerri Houston Samantha McNeily.
11October 19, 2011 Comparison of Queue Estimation Models at Traffic Signals Jingcheng Wu October 19, 2011 Presented at the 18th World Congress on ITS.
GST FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS DEPARTMENT , GST BEIJING
Real-time Estimation of Accident Likelihood for Safety Enhancement Jun Oh, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Western Michigan University March 14, 2007.
Calibration of an Infrared-based Automatic Counting System for Pedestrian Traffic Flow Data Collection Step 3: Calibration Models Calibration models were.
Development of An Affordable Loop Detector Simulator (LOOPSIM) for In- Laboratory Traffic Research and Training Patikhom Cheevarunothai, Dr.Yinhai Wang.
Ch 8: Traffic Data Collection and Reduction Methodologies 1  Explain how traffic data are used  List typical traffic studies  Use typical data collection.
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Traffic Detection Systems CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Introduction to Transport
Information Systems Development and Acquisition Chapter 8 Jessup & Valacich Instructor: Ramesh Sankaranarayanan.
1 Vehicular Sensor Networks for Traffic Monitoring In proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN 2008)
ATMS Advanced Traffic Management Systems. ATMS Intent of ATMS: –Improve operational control –Adapt control strategies to current/expected traffic –Provide.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Adaptive Traffic Light Control with Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by Khaled Mohammed Ali Hassan.
New Opportunities in Loop Detectors  Presented by Tom Potter Sr.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Transportation Engineering
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Aaron B Wilson, EIT WesTech Engineering, Inc., SLC, UT Mitsuru Saito, PhD, PE Brigham Young University, Provo, UT ITE Western District Annual Meeting Santa.
Envisioned Role for NTI Concerning ITS Deployment in Egypt by Dr. Mahmoud EL-HADIDI Professor of Telecommunications at Cairo U & Consultant at NTI 3 rd.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Copyright © 2007 Sensys Networks, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Sensys and the Sensys logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
Software Estimation and Function Point Analysis Presented by Craig Myers MBA 731 November 12, 2007.
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
June 2006 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting June Evaluation of Single-Loop Detector Vehicle-Classification Algorithms using an Archived Data User.
A Model for Improving Operations through Archived Data 2005 ITS America Annual Meeting Mark Carter – SAIC Robert Haas - SAIC May 2 nd, 2005 i Florida’s.
Traffic Engineering Studies (Travel Time & Delay Studies)
Prediction of Traffic Density for Congestion Analysis under Indian Traffic Conditions Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent.
November 15, 2005 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Chapter 1: Fundamental of Testing Systems Testing & Evaluation (MNN1063)
Accessing and Integrating CV and AV Sensor Data into Traffic Engineering Practice Dr. Jonathan Corey ITITS 2015 December 12, 2015 Chang’an, China.
Technology Subcommittee November Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.
SUBMITTED BY: AKSHAY KAMBLE-09D223 SAURABH CHAVAN-09D210 ALOK VANJARE-12203A1012 ANAM SAYED-11D250.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
City of Portland - Isolated Timing Operations January 9, 2005 Isolated Timing Operations - Workshop on Best Practices for Signal Timing Bill Kloos Signals.
Technology Solutions for Tolling and Traffic Management N Video Detection Technology and Marketplace Michael Wieck Business Development Manager, Roadway.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
Road Investment Decision Framework
QAD Demand Management Patrick Grace, QAD Solutions Consultant September 27th, Fall MWUG Session.
Thinking Inside the Box
Outline Sensys SensMetrics Solution SensMetrics Performance Measures
Intelligent Transportation System
Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program(ATTAP) MIDCAP & MUID
Vehicle Segmentation and Tracking in the Presence of Occlusions
Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office
Instrumentation and control
Presentation transcript:

Advances in Inductive Loop Detectors for Stop Bar Detection and Counting Scott Evans VP of Engineering Eberle Design Inc Detection Systems ITS America Annual Meeting & Expo June 6, 2007, Palm Springs CA 050807

Evolution Invented in Mid 50’s… yes the “1950’s”. Engineering Standards beginning in the early 80’s until present. 80’s & 90’s saw major developments in electronics, geometrics, and installation standards. I intend to make two main points: State of the Art improvements of Inductive Loop Detectors Solution for developing traffic counts at the intersection using existing infrastructure Like Tiger’s Oldsmobile, This is not “your Dad’s detector anymore”

Evolution Mid 90’s to present day, loop detection is reliable, accurate, simple to engineer and install, and conforms to standards. Many new capabilities over generally understood simple detection have become available. Loops are an invasive technique and do require maintenance. Inductive loop detectors are a mature product. We are currently in the 3rd Generation of the product cycle Initial development of analog loop amplifiers and in-road loop design Development of commodity type products Advanced product development beyond “just making them work”. Challenges still exist in maintaining the physical loop sensor in the roadway. Preformed loops provide a very rugged product to address some of the reliability issues.

What is new? New enhanced digital electronic designs leading to very high reliability and near faultless performance Robust – less reliance on loop quality Diagnostics for simple field installation & troubleshooting Advanced Count Algorithms Loop detection works in poor weather and poor lighting conditions Powerful microprocessor based designs (>5 MIPs)

Sophisticated Capabilities Advanced capabilities LCD Graphical Menu Driven User Interface Built in tools to aid in correct setup Advanced uP based algorithms with higher operating and sampling speeds Automatic environmental tracking Fewer components for reliability Properly configured modern loop detectors can provide exceptional operation even when presented with adverse conditions or poorly maintained loop systems. Major improvements in User Interface – LCD menu driven Provides tools for ensuring correct installation tailored to field conditions. Set it up right to avoid problems, not come back and fix them later. Relatively simple in mechanical / electrical complexity -> high reliability Much work has been done of late to eliminate typical problems such as lock-up, cross-talk, and noise immunity.

Sophisticated Capabilities Built-in tools for simple installation & trouble shooting Call Strength meter Frequency meter Frequency stability meter Fault Monitoring Detect and report loop issues such as open, shorted, and large change in inductance Communications NTCIP TSS Object MIB Vehicle classification and identification via Signature analysis Built-in Applications Speed Trap Directional Logic 3rd Car Logic The key is to install and configure correctly Have confidence that the settings are consistent with the installation and not just “it detects” When problems do occur, provide the technician with tools to diagnose and remedy. NTCIP, TSS object MIB Lead in to counting application here….

The Need For Traffic Data The NTOC recently published National Traffic Signal Report Card gave an overall grade of D- with detection getting an F. Cycle by cycle data has been shown to be an effective method of analyzing a signalized intersection with Measures of Effectiveness such as volume to capacity ratios, arrival type, and average vehicular delay. Traffic counts form the basis of almost all work performed by transportation engineers and planners. If the FHWA was the Father of this industry, we would all be grounded. Deploying advanced systems and then quantifying results is difficult at best without data and measurement capabilities. Advanced systems need accurate data input.

Vehicle Counting at the Stop Bar Good traffic data is used in allocation of federal transportation funds, used in planning and design of the transportation system, used in financial and tax assessment, and used in environmental assessment. Traffic data at signalized intersections are used in a variety of planning and traffic operational analyses: site impact studies, level of service analysis, intersection design studies, signal retiming, etc. The potential to extract traffic counts from existing signalized intersection loop detection provides a golden opportunity. Need for data is hopefully just “Preaching to the choir” The infrastructure is already in place in many cases to gather important data.

Loop Detector Count Capabilities What is a Counting Detector? A primary output provides the traditional presence output indicating the detection zone is occupied. A secondary output of the detector provides a pulse for each vehicle entering the detection zone. Many loop configurations are supported, for example: Single small loop (6 ft length) Single long loop (12 to 50 ft length) Multiple small loops in series (two to eight 6 ft) It performs the basic presence mode operation to provide service to actuated approaches. Adds a secondary output to count vehicles as they pass through the detection zone, even when more than one vehicle occupies the zone. Adaptable to most loop configurations. Trade-off in design related to both loop geometry and placement in the roadway. Final choice of design may prioritize the main function of the loop to zone size, maintenance, or counting.

Loop Detector Stop Bar Counting Recent INDOT field studies of the EDI Oracle Loop Monitor have demonstrated “truthed” loop detection errors less than 1%. Field studies demonstrate errors due to the detector itself are extremely small. Plot shows long term 12 hr results, 2286 vehicles from 2006 Purdue study. A study from as recently as 2001 by NCDOT showed typical errors from 5-18%. This is now “old” technology! Lane placement and design were most important factors. Accuracy required very much depends on the application. Cycle by cycle data the most demanding. The current technology provides a solution to collect accurate count data from existing infrastructure.

Loop Detector Stop Bar Counting Shorter 15 minute bins reveal +/- 4% errors on raw count data due primarily to lane violations. Three loop series is a detection zone of 36 ft One loop series is a detection zone of 6 ft Because of the smaller sample sizes, the error rate is higher. Video replay “truthing” reveals the error rate results primarily from lane violations and truck / trailer traffic.

Stop Bar Counting Analysis Poor lane discipline by drivers contributed far more overall error than actual detector issues. Thus, lane design and loop placement become the primary factors when using modern counting style loop detectors, but very high accuracies can be obtained 24 hours a day, in good or bad weather.

Loop Detector Stop Bar Counting New Adaptive control algorithms depend on accurate and real-time vehicle data input. 365 days per year of data collection. Many agencies develop and deploy advanced techniques to improve traffic flow…But suffer from a reliable method to gauge their effectiveness. To move forward with adaptive and predictive algorithms, accurate and time relevant traffic data will be needed. Even simple timing changes are difficult without traffic data to analyze. Once implemented, grading the results again needs the traffic data.

Still the benchmark to which all others are measured against. In Summary Sixty years of development has led to long term reliability, low cost, and precise results. Developing traffic data from existing loop infrastructure is a golden opportunity. Inductive Loops… Still the benchmark to which all others are measured against. Inductive Loop Detectors are a mature product technology. State-of-the-art enhancements are providing applications impossible until recently, such as intersection traffic data. The loop infrastructure across the country is huge, and extracting count data from the “stop bar” detectors presents a golden opportunity at little extra cost.

References ITE Traffic Engineering Council TENC 103-02 Using Existing Loops at Signalized Intersections for Counts TRB Paper 06-1143, 11/1/2005 Evaluation of Flow Based Traffic Signal Control Using Advanced Detection Concepts ITE Traffic Detector Handbook 2nd Edition, 1997 TENC 103-02 provides detailed analysis of various considerations for obtaining counts at the stop bar.

Thank You Some examples of advanced loop detectors with counting capability: Eberle Design Inc. 3819 East LaSalle Street Phoenix, AZ 85040 Telephone 480-968-6407 Fax 602-437-1996 e-mail support@editraffic.com web site www.EDItraffic.com www.EDItraffic.com