Anthony Cahill, Ph.D. Heidi Fredine, MPH Barbara Ibanez, MA Luciana Zilberman, MA Selected Findings From The 2010 Survey of Independent Living For New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Course Module 3 Patients Right to Object to Disclosures (Opt Out) START Click to begin…
Advertisements

Current Advance Directive Use in South Australia: Results from the 2012 Spring South Australian Health Omnibus Survey Sandra L Bradley, Presenter PhD Candidate,
How to Fill Out Your 2010 Census Form A National Initiative to Achieve a Full Latino Count in the 2010 Census.
National Center for Health Statistics DCC CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION Changes in Race Differentials: The Impact of the New OMB Standards.
Advancing Outcomes June 3, 2014 Jackey Matson Director, Bureau of Performance Improvement and Patient Safety.
Dissemination of U.S. Census Data and Results: The role of ICPSR First Conference of Al-Khawarezmi Committee on Statistics Doha, Qatar 6-8 December 2010.
Written Care Plans for Children with Chronic Conditions: What Do Families Think? Linda Barnhart Shervin Churchill Jean Popalisky Nanci Villareale June.
Part Three Target Market Selection and Research Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation 7 7.
Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
AGENDA - Community Meeting #1
The American Community Survey: Practical Applications with Current Data U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey U.S. Census Bureau Summer 2001.
11 American Community Survey Summary Data Products.
Facilitated by: FACILITATOR Community Needs Assessment Template Community Health Needs Assessment R National Center for Rural Health Works Community Needs.
11 American Community Survey Data Products. 2 What do I need to know before using ACS data and data products?
Joint Finance Committee Hearing
Module 1 Are CD Services for You? Consumer-Directed Services in Virginia’s Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Waivers.
Tools for Registration Reporting Race, Ethnicity and Language: A Guide to Helping Patients.
MMIA 2006 Compensation Survey Summary Report Prepared by: Gregory Figaro, Culturesmart, Inc.
NLM Database Central: The First Place to Look for Your PHSR Research Data F. Douglas Scutchfield 1, M.D., Michelyn W. Bhandari 2, DrPH, and Allison Amrhein,
Issues Concerning the Aging Population Presented by Jan Figart, Associate Director, Community Service Council To the Tulsa Regional Chamber of Commerce.
A Brief Demography of California Hans Johnson Public Policy Institute of California November 30, 2010.
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
Bridging the Gap Between Social Determinants and Electronic Health Records for Patient and Public Health Robert A. Hahn, Ph.D., M.P.H. Community Guide.
American Community Survey ACS Content Review Webinar State Data Centers and Census Information Centers Gary Chappell ACS Content Review Project Lead April.
AGING IN THE ASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY Presented by the Chinese Community Center of Houston.
Module 3 Self-Direction: An Introduction for Families and Professionals.
Arkansas Voters Age 50+ and the 2014 Election Key Findings from a Survey among Likely Voters Age 50/over Conducted June 2014 for.
Target Markets: Segmentation and Evaluation
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Improving Security, Systems, and Statistics San Diego, CA June 4 th – 8 th, 2006 Developing a Community Health Information System NAPHSIS Conference –
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2012 Kindergarten Entry Assessment as the Fulcrum of the Birth-Grade 3 Continuum NGA – Policy Institute.
Improving Federal Measurement in the Early Years of Life Matthew W. Stagner Executive Director, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago and Senior Lecturer,
Joseph J. McDowall © 2014 ACWA 2014: Children in a Changing World, Sydney, August 18 – 20, 2014 Contact between, and Placement of Siblings in Out-of-Home.
Census At-A-Glance September 14, Overview Background of Census Background of Census History History How the Census is organized How the Census is.
 Collecting Quantitative  Data  By: Zainab Aidroos.
HHS Data Standards for Race, Ethnicity, Sex, Primary Language and Disability Status Rashida Dorsey, PhD, MPH Department of Health and Human Services Office.
Sociological Research Methods Sociology: Chapter 2, Section 1.
Human Subjects Research Cynthia Edmonds Director, Office of Research Support Committees.
Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Ph.D., Min Qi Wang, Ph.D., Dawn M. Loughlin, Ph.D., University of Maryland Center on Aging Developed in collaboration with: Kevin.
Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center Expenditure Data for Fiscal Year Public Stakeholders Meeting Presented on June 26, 2013.
Factors Associated with Health Status for Children in Cross-border Appalachian States Tonimarie Black, B.S. Julia Farides-Mitchell, M.A. Robert McGrath,
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Assessing the “Year of Naturalization” Data in the American Community.
RHODA MEADOR, PHD ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OUTREACH AND EXTENSION, COLLEGE OF HUMAN ECOLOGY CORNELL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ON AGING Project Home.
Brianna Gass, MPH November 17, 2014 Local Needs, Local Data.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003.
Outcome Measures of Triple Board Graduates: Marla J. Warren, MD,MPH; David W. Dunn, MD; Jerry L. Rushton, MD,MPH. Section of Child Psychiatry.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 7–17–1 What Is a Market? Requirements of a Market –Must need or desire a particular product.
Census 2000 Supplementary Survey: An Operational Feasibility Test Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau July 2001.
Welcome to the April 10 th CPI meeting Today’s agenda includes the following items: Update and summary of CPI Principal Investigator survey – Dr. Lori.
Addiction Treatment Workforce Characteristics for California, Arizona, & New Mexico: Implications for Workforce Development NAADAC/CAADAC/NALGAP National.
Emergency Preparedness and People With Disabilities in New Mexico: Collaboration & Partnerships Cate McClain, MD Center for Development and Disability.
Including The Needs and Priorities Of People With Disabilities in Emergency Preparedness And Response: The New Mexico Experience Anthony Cahill, Ph.D.
A Study of Senior Housing Preferences By Cory Daughton, The Ohio State University.
An Introduction to Virginia’s Standards of Learning, Assessments, and Related Resources Provided by the Virginia Department of Education Dr. Linda Wallinger.
Chapter 7 Data for Decisions. Population vs Sample A Population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information.
Module 1 (Part B) Making Choices and Planning Introduction to Self-Direction.
Introduction Results and Conclusions Results: On demographic and social characteristics, ATR completers were more likely to be male, Hispanic, employed,
Lesson 1 A Diverse Nation.
Module 2 Dreaming, Making Choices, and Planning Introduction to Self-Direction.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Finding it, Analyzing it, Applying it. Sridevi Mohan, Public Health Madison & Dane County Eric Grosso, Wisconsin Dept. of.
1 South Carolina ACCESS Plus (ARDC) Planning Retreat Susan C. Reinhard, R.N., Ph.D. Co -Director Rutgers Center for State Health Policy.
The Reduction of Emergency Room Visits for Non- Emergent Health Concerns in Bakersfield, California Mariah Walton, MPH Public Health Advisor Office for.
Behavioral Health Mapping Tool County Profiles
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Making Choices and Planning
Dane County Department of Human Services Survey of Consumers and Guardians Developed and Administered in conjunction with the Dane County Developmental.
Berrien County FACT SHEET
Presentation transcript:

Anthony Cahill, Ph.D. Heidi Fredine, MPH Barbara Ibanez, MA Luciana Zilberman, MA Selected Findings From The 2010 Survey of Independent Living For New Mexicans With Disabilities

This project, including project design, protocols and instruments used, was reviewed by the Human Research Review Committee (HRRC) of the Health Sciences Center of the University of New Mexico. The HRRC determined that the research is exempt from the requirements of Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations for the protection of human subjects as defined in 45CFR46.101(b) under category 2. The HRRC application number is Institutional Review Board Funding for this study was provided by the New Mexico Human Services Department through the Behavioral Health Services Division. Funding Disclaimer The opinions in this presentation are those of the authors, and do not represent the official positions of the Center for Development and Disability of the University of New Mexico, the New Mexico Human Services Department or the Behavioral Health Services Division.

Development of the Survey Inter-agency working group: DDSD, HSD, Optum Health NM, DVR, ALTSD Review of the literature Multiple iterations of instrument Institutional Review Board approval On-line, hard copy and electronic versions of the instrument in English and Spanish were disseminated statewide through snowball sampling Web site with instructions for facilitators in one-on-one and group settings Overall ‘N”: 739

Domains Influencing Independent Living

Findings: Comparing Survey Respondents to All New Mexicans On Key Characteristics

The survey used snowball, not random, sampling: overall “N” of 739. Thus, the results cannot be statistically generalized to the unknown population of New Mexicans with disabilities. Survey respondents are generally representative of the population of the state on key demographic characteristics including gender, race and Hispanic identity. This means the results are not from a skewed distribution unlike the state as a whole.

Gender N = 694 Figures for New Mexico are taken from the 2009 American Community Survey, Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce

Hispanic Identity N = 673 Figures for New Mexico are taken from the 2009 American Community Survey, Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce

Race N = 611 Figures for New Mexico are taken from the 2009 American Community Survey, Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce

Age Category N = 689 Figures for New Mexico are taken from the 2009 American Community Survey, Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce

Respondents by Geographic Region 13.4% 16.4% 30.1% 23.2% 16.9% N = 611

Findings: Disability, Services And Supports

Type of Disability What type of disability or health condition do you have? N (Disability/Condition) = 961

Services and Financial Supports Are you currently receiving services or financial support from any of these programs or organizations? N (Services): 1,263

Most Frequent Combinations of Services and Financial Supports SSI/SSDIMedicaidMedicareSNAP SSI/SSDI Medicaid Medicare SNAP

Findings: Independence in Choosing Where to Live

Choice in Deciding Where to Live Which best describes who chose where you live now? N = 684

Satisfaction with Decision Making in Choosing Where to Live How satisfied were you with the amount of decision-making you had in choosing where you live? N = 419

Who Was Involved in the Decision of Where To Live? You said that someone else was involved in choosing the place where you live. Who else was involved? N = 411

Findings: What’s Important In Deciding Where To Live?

What’s Important in Deciding Where To Live? How Important Is This in Deciding Where To Live? N = 655

Gaps In Importance and Satisfaction How Important Is This in Deciding Where To Live? How Satisfied Are You With This Where You Live Now? 14.2%23.1%10.1%10.5%

Findings: Current and Preferred Living Situations

Current Living Situations Which of the following best describes your current living situation? N = 684

Satisfaction With Current Living Situation Overall, how satisfied are you with your current living situation? N=705

Gaps: Current and Ideal Living Situations Which of the following best describes your current living situation? Regardless of your current living situation, what would your ideal living situation be? N= 684

Living With Biological Family as Preferred Living Situation by Type of Disability Regardless of your current living situation, what would your ideal living situation be? Ideally, I would like to live with one or members of my own family… N (Disability Type) = 155

Living Alone as Preferred Living Situation by Type of Disability Regardless of your current living situation, what would your ideal living situation be? Ideally, I would like to live alone… N (Disability Type) = 393

Congregate Housing as Preferred Living Situation by Type of Disability Regardless of your current living situation, what would your ideal living situation be? Ideally, I would like to live in a group or congregate home… N (Disability Type) = 194

Next Steps Additional analysis: question 6 (current and desired levels of assistance with activities of daily living) and statistical significance on key demographic variables Full report Executive Policy Summary ?

Dr. Anthony Cahill Director, Division of Disability and Health Policy Center for Development and Disability 2300 Menaul Boulevard NE Albuquerque, NM (505) For More Information To review or download a copy of this report, or to see other reports as they become available, please visit Click on “Programs and Projects” and then on “Survey of Independent Living”