Emissions of Size-Segregated Aerosols from On-Road Vehicles in the Caldecott Tunnel Jonathan O. Allen SCOS97 -- NARSTO Data Analysis Conference15 February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Esther Coz 1,2, Gary Casuccio 3, Traci L. Lersch 3, Teresa Moreno 2 and Begoña Artíñano 1 5th DAURE Science Meeting Barcelona, May 26 DAURE Microscopy.
Advertisements

MASS EMISSION RATES AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PM 2.5 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MOTORCYCLES Deniz Karman and Colin Welburn Department of Civil and Environmental.
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
A Tale of Two Extremes: Contrasting NH 3 at the Bakersfield and Pasadena Supersites Jennifer Murphy Milos Markovic Trevor VandenBoer Raluca Ellis Department.
Nos Commanditaires : IRIC 18 mars, h00 Salle S1-151 Pavillon Jean-Coutu Université de Montréal.
PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM TYRE AND BRAKE WEAR ON-GOING LITERATURE REVIEW Sustainable Transport Unit Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre.
Measurement of NO y During SCOS97-NARSTO Dennis R. Fitz University of California, Riverside College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF UK ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and National Centre for Atmospheric Science.
` 1 Source Attribution of Mobile Source Air Toxics Eric M. Fujita, David E. Campbell, William P. Arnott and Barbara Zielinska Division of Atmospheric Sciences.
PM EMISSIONS FROM TYRES AND BRAKES MAIN FACTS AND OPEN ISSUES Sustainable Transport Unit Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 04 April.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOLS WORKSHOP OVERVIEW John G. Watson Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV February 5, 2002.
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (former Ministry of Transport and Communications) State Enterprise «State Road Transport Research Institute» (SE.
S.T. O’Sullivan D.J. Timoney University College Dublin Ireland On-road measurement of particulate emissions from diesel engined vehicles.
Atoms, Molecules and Ions Chapter 2 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Vehicle pollution control
Chemical composition of aerosols Composition of tropospheric aerosols is not uniform. It varies with particle size and source of particles: Ultrafine particles.
California Energy Commission California’s Vehicle Fleet Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts Rosenfeld Hearing Room March.
TADGER Turbulating Atomizer Diesel Gas Emission Reducer
Foundations of Physics
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Size-segregated analysis of PM10 at a tandem urban – rural site combination J. K. Gietl 1*, T. Tritscher 1,2, and O. Klemm 1 1 University of Münster, Institute.
Unit 10 – The Mole Essential Questions:
Surface Measurements of PM, VOCs, and Photochemically Relevant Gases in Support of DISCOVER-AQ. J. Flynn, R. J. Griffin, B. Lefer, H. W. Wallace, Y. Leong,
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
Energy Huntsville Opportunity Report and Government Collaboration September 2015.
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Conversations with the Earth Tom Burbine
Atoms, Molecules and Ions Chapter 2 Sections 2.1 – 2.6 for Test II Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or.
Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.
Thermodynamic characterization of Mexico City Aerosol during MILAGRO 2006 Christos Fountoukis 1, Amy Sullivan 2,7, Rodney Weber 2, Timothy VanReken 3,8,
IEA Hydrogen Annex 30: Global Hydrogen Systems Analysis Experts Kick-off meeting September 16, 2010 US Experts Sandia National Laboratories: Dave Reichmuth,
Regional Modeling of The Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Benzene and Diesel Particles with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun Kristen Lohman, and Shiang-Yuh.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Unit 3: Stoichiometry Part 1. Atomic Masses Atomic mass – (atomic weight) – The atomic mass of an element indicates how heavy, on average, an atom of.
Update on Vehicle Emissions Research California Air Resources Board Board Hearing, April 23 rd
Oxidation Numbers The oxidation number of an atom in an element is zero. E.g. Mg in Mg, O in O 2.
Evolution of Atmospheric Aerosols Along Trajectories Crossing the Los Angeles Basin February 15, 2001 Lara H. Gertler (UC-Riverside) Jonathan O. Allen.
Atoms, Molecules and Ions Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Physical science.
Chemical Apportionment of Size-Segregated Atmospheric Particles during the Burning and Wet Seasons in the Brazilian Amazon O. L. Mayol-Bracero (1,2); M.
Chapter 10 “Chemical Quantities” Yes, you will need a calculator for this chapter!
11 This is the atomic number :-the no. of protons Na This is the symbol for the element 23 This is the relative atomic mass What does it mean?
Template Comparison of PM Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in CAMx Bonyoung Koo, Gary Wilson, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON Alan Dunker.
Organo-Sulfur and Receptor Modeling Status/Challenges Christopher Palmer Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
1. Which of the following is NOT a conversion factor for 1 mole of a substance? A. 1.0 g B. molar mass C X particles D L E. Avogadro’s.
2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles.
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Properties of Particulate Matter
AIR CLIMATE & ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M.
Carbon, Climate, & Energy Resources Unit 4 Carbon Dioxide Production from Burning Fossil Fuels Pamela J. W. Gore, unit author.
Social costs of fuel-vehicle pathways
Relative contributions of NH3, NO2, NH4+ and NO3- to dry deposition of Nitrogen at an agricultural site in the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India Saumya Singh,
Andrey Khlystov and Dave Campbell
Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
Atoms, Molecules and Ions
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Time-Integrated Sampling
First Approach to the EMEP Assessment Report – Slovak Republic
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Presentation transcript:

Emissions of Size-Segregated Aerosols from On-Road Vehicles in the Caldecott Tunnel Jonathan O. Allen SCOS97 -- NARSTO Data Analysis Conference15 February 2001 Environmental Engineering Science Department, California Institute of Technology School of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Georgia Institute of Technology Glen R. Cass Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Arizona State University Chemistry Department, University of California, Riverside Paul R. Mayo, Lynn G. Salmon Lara S. Hughes

Motivation Vehicle emissions are large contributors to ambient aerosol concentrations Los Angeles aerosol in September 1996 study was composed of –9-11% primary particles emitted by vehicles –37-65% gas-to-particle conversion products from NO x, NH 3, SO 2, organic compounds Actual on-road vehicle fleet emissions can be measured in tunnels including –high emitters –non-tailpipe emissions

Bore 1 - HDV and LDV –5-6% Heavy Duty –Nov 17 and 18 –noon to 3 p.m. Bore 2 - “LDV Only” –0.24% Heavy Duty –Nov 19 and 20 –3:30 to 6:30 p.m. Caldecott Tunnel Study HDV - Heavy Duty Vehicles LDV - Light Duty Vehicles

Aerosol Measurements Mass Trace Metals (V,Fe,Br,Mg,…) Carbon (Elemental, Organic) Ions (NO 3 -, SO 4 =, Cl -, NH 4 + ) HNO 3, HCl, NH 3 Organic Tracers (PAHs, Hopanes, …) Fine Particle Filters PM 10 Filters Impactors  m < 0.10 SamplersAnalytes Reactive Gases Electronic Particle CountersParticle Size Distribution

PM 1.9 Concentrations Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides Carbonaceous emissions are most important Higher emissions in HDV than LDV Tunnel Bore

Emissions Calculations Gas phase carbonaceous species (CO 2, CO, CH 4, NMHC) measured Calculate aerosol emissions based on fuel consumption as E C,i =  C i   C C,j  C i Concentration increase in species i E C,i Emission of species i on carbon consumption basis   C C,j Sum of carbon emissions in tunnel

PM 1.9 Emissions Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Size-Segregated Emissions in Bore 1 (HDV and LDV) Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Size-Segregated Emissions in Bore 2 (“LDV Only”) Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

LDV and HDV Fleet Emissions Estimate emission rates of LDV and HDV fleets by linear regression E C,ik =  k E C,i (HDV) + (1-  k ) E C,i (LDV) +  ik  k Fraction of carbon emitted by HDV fleet in experiment k  k calculated from vehicle counts fuel consumption estimates fuel properties

Linear Fit of Mass Emissions Fraction Carbon Emitted by HDVs,  Mass Emissions (mg kgC )

PM 1.9 Emissions by HDV and LDV Fleets HDV emissions  25 times greater than LDV emissions Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Size-Segregated HDV Emissions Size-segregated LDV emissions are indistinguishable from zero Maximum LDV emissions are those for Bore 2 Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Emission Source Measurements Kleeman, Schauer, and Cass (Environ. Sci. Technol., 34:1578–1587, 2000) measured the emissions of –Catalyst-Equipped Gasoline Vehicles –Noncatalyst-Equipped Gasoline Vehicles –Medium Duty Diesel Trucks Size-segregated emission profiles agree with tunnel measurements Note: no afterfilter analyses on these source samples

Medium Duty Diesel Emissions Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Catalyst-Equipped Gasoline Vehicle Emissions Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Noncatalyst-Equipped Gasoline Vehicle Emissions Unidentified Cl - Na + SO 4 = NH 4 + NO 3 - Organic Compounds Elemental Carbon Metals and Metal Oxides

Comparison of Laboratory and Tunnel Emissions Measurements Medium duty diesel truck emissions profile similar to HDV emissions profile Relatively more HDV emissions of particles larger than 0.2  m — due to –heavy duty trucks (source sample was medium duty) –non-tailpipe emissions Organic compounds emissions in Bore 2 similar to profiles for gasoline powered vehicles Elemental carbon emissions in Bore 2 due to –few trucks –non-tailpipe emissions

Conclusions Emission rates measured were comparable with other tunnel studies Size-segregated emission profiles are comparable to those from source tests possible additional emissions from untested sources –heavy duty trucks –gasoline powered trucks –non-tailpipe emissions Ammonia emissions were 194 and 267 mg l -1 fuel consumed

Acknowledgement This work was supported by the Coordinating Research Council, Inc., and the U.S. DOE Office of Heavy Vehicle Technologies through the National Renewable Energy Laboratory under CRC Project No. A-22.