Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
Check In Check Out: A Targeted Intervention
Tier II Interventions Check-In Check-Out Presented by: Student Services --PBIS Team Jeremy Geschwind Karina Kidd Drew Laurence Todd Nicholson.
SCOTT ROSS, PH.D UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY. Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention:
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools
Group-based Behavior Interventions: Tier 2
Building Effective Classroom Management
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia.
Positive Behavior Supports
Keys to Sustaining School-wide PBIS Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Hello, Update, and Goodbye Program Presenters: Pam Hallvik, Administrator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Nancy Brown, Counselor.
Secondary Behavioral Interventions What do we do if universal supports aren’t enough!
March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Advanced SWIS Facilitator Training October 17, 2007 Rosemont, IL Anne Todd, Nadia Katul Sampson, Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
The Behavior Education Program: A Check-In, Check-Out Intervention Jennifer Wright Cottonwood Elementary June 12, 2008.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
PBIS Tier 2 Check-In/Check-Out Program Franklin Flyers
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Secondary Behavior Interventions ABRI Terrance M. Scott, Ph.D.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Dr. Dana Morris Jessica Barrett Alcott Middle School.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
PBIS Opening Day Check-in/Check-out Re-designing ISS.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Assessing the Impact of A Targeted Group Intervention The Middle Part of the Triangle What is BEP? BEP at Indian Head ES.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
Tier II Interventions Check-In Check-Out Overview & Review Presented by: Todd Nicholson, MS, NCSP Positive Behavior Intervention Specialist.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Sustaining and Improving Implementation of SWPBS Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on Positive Behavior Support
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
Iowa Behavior Alliance: School-wide PBS Third Annual State Conference October 2-3, 2007.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
Oregon Coaches’ Training School-wide PBIS
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon

Goals  Emphasize the full continuum of strategies that make up school-wide positive behavior support.  Provide an example of Check-in/ Check-out  Provide an example of Intensive Function-based support  Suggest strategies for building capacity in more intense interventions

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT  27

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

Thanks to Laura Riffel

Positive Behavior Support Adapted from George Sugai, 1996 © Terrance M. Scott, 2001 Universal School-Wide Data Collection and Analyses School-Wide Prevention Systems (rules, routines, arrangements) Targeted Intensive Analyze Student Data Interviews, Questionnaires, etc. Observations and ABC Analysis Multi-Disciplinary Assessment & Analysis Simple Student Interventions Group Interventions Complex Individualized Interventions Team-Based Wraparound Interventions Intervention Assessment

Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

89%74%75% N = 1288 N = 377 N = 124 3%9%8% 94% 1% 73% 10% Pre K K K- 8/12

33%47%46%48%35%

A Concern  Schools often consider only ONE behavior support system Often this system is for those students with most intense needs

Messages  Invest in prevention first  Invest in a full continuum of supports Universal/ Primary Targeted/ Secondary Intensive/ Tertiary

Check In Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon and University of Connecticut

BEP/Check-in Check-out Cycle Weekly BEP Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Program Update EXIT BEP Plan Morning Check-In Afternoon Check-out Home Check-In Class Check in Class Check out Teacher Checks

CICO Record Name: ____________________________ Date: ______________ 0 = Need work, 1 = “OK” 2 = Nice Job SafeResponsibleRespectful Check In0 1 2 Before Recess Before Lunch After Recess0 1 2 Check Out0 1 2 Today’s goalToday’s total points Comments:

HAWK Report Date ________ Student _______________ Teacher___________________ 0 = Not Yet 1= Good 2= Excellent Be Safe Be Respectful Be Your Personal BestTeacher initials Keep hands, feet, and objects to self Use kind words and actions Follow directions Working in class Class Recess Class Lunch Class Recess Class Total Points = Points Possible = 50 Today ______________% Goal ______________%

Why does CICO work?  Improved structure Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior. System for linking student with at least one positive adult. Student chooses to participate.  Student is “set up for success” First contact each morning is positive. “Blow-out” days are pre-empted. First contact each class period (or activity period) is positive, and sets up successful behavioral momentum.  Increase in contingent feedback Feedback occurs more often. Feedback is tied to student behavior. Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded.

Why does CICO Work?  Program can be applied in all school locations Classroom, playground, cafeteria (anywhere there is a supervisor)  Elevated reward for appropriate behavior Adult and peer attention delivered each target period Adult attention (and tangible) delivered at end of day  Linking behavior support and academic support For academic-based, escape-maintained problem behavior incorporate academic support  Linking school and home support Provide format for positive student/parent contact  Program is organized to morph into a self-management system Increased options for making choices Increased ability to self-monitor performance/progress

Linking CICO with Function-based support  Leanne Hawken  Robert March  Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman

Plan for the future: We want self-managers  Embed self-management strategies as driven by the data Use natural signals for monitoring as much as possible Self-monitor Self-record, check for accuracy Fewer check points during the day  Maintain AM and PM times for awhile Manage own CICO account  More on self management in the future…..

Check-in Check-out Embedded Within SWIS

Check-in/ Check-out Self-Assessment  Individually score the elements of the CICO Self- Assessment  In place; In progress; Not in place  As a team review your ratings, and agree on a single summary for the school  For elements not scored as “in place” define the actions that will move you toward implementation. Who will do what, when?  Define a schedule for meeting to review progress and implement your CICO plan.

Is CICO appropriate for your school?  Download the ppt and self-assessment (online library) (presentations)  Consider reading and reviewing Crone, Horner & Hawken (Behavior Education Plan) Leanne Hawken DVD  Request training and coaching support from your state SWPBS trainers  Review CICO data system embedded within SWIS

Function-based Supports