Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUMETSAT 2006 Helsinki Exploitation of GERB/SEVIRI data for evaluation of the Met Office global forecast model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental.
Advertisements

GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Summary of GEO-CAPE Aerosol Working Group Progress Members: Mian Chin, Pubu Ciren, Hiren Jethva, Joanna Joiner, Shobha Kondragunta, Alexei Lyapustin, Shana.
GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST th December, Imperial.
Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
CERES-GERB meeting, Boulder, 3/2004 Validation of GERB unfiltered radiances S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Satellite Observations of Clouds and the Earth Radiation Budget over Snow: The Importance of Surface Roughness Stephen R. Hudson Other collaborators: Richard.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop Hye-Yun Kim (IMSG), Istvan Laszlo (NOAA) and Hongqing Liu (IMSG) GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop, Jan , 2014.
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR observations Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
Surface Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred Rose 2, David Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Tom Caldwell 2, David.
Accent Plus Symposium, Urbino, Italy, Sep2013 Observations of Enhanced Black Carbon radiative forcing over an Urban Environment A.S.Panicker, G.
1. The MPI MAX-DOAS inversion scheme 2. Cloud classification 3. Results: Aerosol OD: Correlation with AERONET Surface extinction: Correlation with Nephelometer.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
MT Workshop October 2005 JUNE 2004 DECEMBER 2004 End of OCTOBER 2005 ? MAY 2002 ? Capabilities of multi-angle polarization cloud measurements from.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
The MEaSUREs PAR Project Robert Frouin Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA _______________________________________ OCRT Meeting, 4-6 may 2009,
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
On the application of CERES SW ADMs Cédric Bertrand.
GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005.
Direct LW radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 25, 24 Oct 2006, UK Met.
POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Dust Longwave Forcing from GERB and SEVIRI Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 26, 03 May 2007, RAL, Abingdon Thanks.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Cloud Forcing Studies using CERES and GERB(-like) data Joanna Futyan, Jacqui Russell and John Harries GIST 22 RMIB, Brussels,
Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4.
A processing package for atmospheric correction of compact airborne spectrographic imager (casi) imagery over water including a novel sunglint correction.
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Estimating the radiative effect of mineral dust over ocean The radiance to flux problem Dust retrieval quality Applying.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
2004/04/02GIST 21, Boulder M. Viollier et al.1 Time sampling bias: combination of CERES with Meteosat narrow-bands and beginning a comparison with GERB.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Modelled & Observed Atmospheric Radiation Balance during the West African Dry Season. Sean Milton, Glenn Greed, Malcolm Brooks,
SCIAMACHY TOA Reflectance Correction Effects on Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval W. Di Nicolantonio, A. Cacciari, S. Scarpanti, G. Ballista, E. Morisi,
Aerosol Radiative Forcing from combined MODIS and CERES measurements
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Offenbach, April 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Inter-comparisons of monthly mean (and monthly time-step mean) GERB clear sky fluxes Joanna Futyan, Richard Allan and Jacqui.
Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations Anand Inamdar & A. French Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (ALARC/ARS/USDA)
Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Deriving clear-sky fluxes for GERB Jo Futyan Gist 21, CERES-GERB meeting 02/04/04 Boulder, Colorado.
Nan Feng and Sundar A. Christopher Department of Atmospheric Science
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Using GERB and CERES data to evaluate NWP and Climate models over the Africa/Atlantic region Richard Allan, Tony Slingo, Ali Bharmal Environmental Systems.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
GIST, Abingdon, 5/2007 GERB 1/GERB 2 and GERB/CERES comparisons S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
Bluing of Aerosols near Clouds: Results from a Simple Model and MODIS Observations Alexander Marshak (GSFC) Tam á s V á rnai and Guoyong Wen (UMBC/GSFC)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017, Pasadena, CA
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Eumetsat conference 2004, Praha
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Validating CERES calibration and ADMs Using Data from East Antarctica
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Earth Radiation Budget: Insights from GERB and future perspectives
Presentation transcript:

Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.

ADM Normalization Factor (to account for the nonlinear variation of the radiance within an angular bin) Radiance-to-flux conversion Instantaneous SW flux estimation: (all scenes) RMIB: (1) (2) CERES: GERB SW correction factor (resolution enhancement factor) Interpolated CERES-TRMM ADM ACF

RMIB/CERES COMPARISON Instantaneous flux estimation: (clear ocean) CERES: Aerosol correction term where R adm (ws,  sm,  vm,  m ) = determined from the wind speed-dependent ADMs R th (ws, L m ) and R th (ws, L adm ) = anisotropic factors inferred from the measured and ADM interpolated radiances, respectively. determined by comparing L m (  sm,  vm,  m) and L adm (  sm,  vm,  m ) with LUT of theoretical SW radiances stratified by aerosol optical depth

MS-7 DATA ALL AVAILABLE 2003/07/02 DAY TIME SLOTS 4 SELECTED ZONES outside sun glint occurrence acquisition geometry SBDART RTM clear sky SW radiance time series RMIB SBDART CERES COMPARISON R2F CONV.

Monthly mean clear sky SW flux difference at l.n. ± 2 hours (April 04) GERB-like SEVIRI GERB CERES-TRMM ADMs l.n. – (l.n.-2)l.n. – (l.n.+2) Max: < 1.33 W.m -2 Avg.:  0.11 W.m -2 West: Max F SW  TOA after local noon East: Max F SW  TOA before l.n. Local noon = Min(SZA)

Selected ocean footprints (3x3 SEVIRI pixel resolution) [38.74 o N, o W] [37.00 o N, 0.00 o E] [37.70 o N, o E] [11.97 o S, o W] [11.69 o S, 0.00 o E] [12.43 o S, o E] [20.80 o S, o W] [20.36 o S, 0.00 o E] [21.37 o S, 41,29 o E]

SEVIRI spectral conversion (NB-to-BB) L uf SW (  s,  v,  ) =c o (  s ) + c 1 (  s ) L 0.6  m (  s,  v,  ) + c 2 (  s ) L 0.8  m (  s,  v,  ) + c 3 (  s ) L 1.6  m (  s,  v,  ) Data base of theoretical SBDART spectral radiances curves at TOA (150/600 clear ocean scene types)

Fictitious AOD diurnal cycle Retrieved AOD from L uf SEVIRI  distinct diurnal cycle pattern = artifact AOD sinusoidal shape  function of sin(RAA): AOD min   = 180 o ; AOD max   = 90 o Azimuth dependence of the diffuse radiation  scattering phase function of the atmos. Aerosol scattering phase function  aerosol type. Wrong model  scattering angle dependent error in the retrieved AOD

Fictitious AOD diurnal cycle LUTs of theoretical SW radiances  DISORT RTM (assuming the Hess et al. (1998) maritim tropical aerosols model) SEVIRI spectral modeling  SBDART RTM (assuming all the default SBDART aerosols models) Estimated SEVIRI BB SW radiances  theoretical SBDART SW radiances IF SBDART ocean surface = very different from the real ocean ADM ACF adjustment sensitive to more than just the presence of aerosols Ex.:  ocean too bright: R th (L SBDART (No Aero) ) /R th (L ADM ) > 1 for the wrong reason Sensitivity to the DISORT ocean surface is a second-order effect since R th (L SBDART (No Aero) ) /R th (L ADM ) = ratio of DISORT ACFs in a particular angle

Numerical noise Cloud contamination

Old response  enhanced sensitivity in the blue Adoption of the new response will  GERB SW radiance  ADM ACF partial adjustment

F 3.SEVIRI (  s )    F GERB/3.SEVIRI (  s ) estimation:

Numerical noise Cloud contamination

Conclusions: 1.asymmetry in the diurnal evolution of GERB(-like) SW flux is an ocean surface related problem 2. there is a discrepancy between the theoretical NB-to-BB conversion from SEVIRI and the expected (CERES) BB radiances (used as input in the ADM aerosol adjustment procedure) 3. since the aerosol adjustment is a ratio of theoretical anisotropic factors that depends upon the departure of the observed BB radiance to the mean radiance used to develop the ADMs, introducing new “observed” BB radiances that are inconsistent with CERES radiances can lead to problems.

Conclusions: 4. correcting the SEVIRI based spectral modeling by the GERB measurement allows to reduce part of the disagreement between the estimated and the ADM radiances 5. The GERB TOA reflected SW flux over clear ocean surfaces should be estimated from the corrected SEVIRI BB radiance and the RGP should consider the new spectral response functions

IF SBDART ocean surface = very different from the real ocean ADM ACF adjustment sensitive to more than just the presence of aerosols Ex.:  ocean too bright: R th (L SBDART (No Aero) ) /R th (L ADM ) > 1 for the wrong reason Sensitivity to the DISORT ocean surface is a second-order effect since R th (L SBDART (No Aero) ) /R th (L ADM ) = ratio of DISORT ACFs in a particular angle