“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
Advertisements

Coal Mining Activities Mark A. Taylor Huntington District Corps of Engineers.
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Coastal Hazards Management.
Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Contingency Management in Wetlands Paul R. Krause, Ph.D. Knowledge Management Program Sensitive Ecosystem.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mitigation in a Modern World or 33 CFR 332 and You Presented by Jayson M Hudson To the Texas Association of Environmental Professionals.
Modified Charleston Method (MCM)
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Best Practices and Best Available Technology for Prevention and Mitigation of Impacts of Hydrocarbons Within.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
What are Waters of the United States and why should I care? According to USACE, those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are.
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Company Shelton, Washington
1 Wetland: Types Marsh Swamp Bog Floodplain/Bottomland Playa Prairie Pothole Vernal Pool Wet Meadow.
Coastal Zone Management.  Coastal Zone Management Act (1972) –Administered by Coastal Programs Division of NOAA –Covers over 22% of U.S. Land Area –Multi-purpose.
Freshwater Wetlands in South Carolina. Wetlands Wetlands are delineated by the Corps based on the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Soils, evidence of.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
Chris Cavendish Adam Clutter Charles Gala Eric Juve Kevin Kollar Simon McClung Shawn O’Malley.
1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Protecting Wetlands Expanding the Clean Water Act Environme1tal Politics & Policy 1.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities Impacting Wetlands – Case Studies Paul R. Krause, Ph.D.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
California Wetlands: Update on new state definition and policy development California Native Plant Society Fall Conservation Symposium September 10, 2011.
1 Wetland and Riparian Protection Resolution. 2 Wetland Policy Development Team State Water Board Staff: Val Connor Bill Orme Cliff Harvey San Francisco.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Cooperative Federalism in the Regulation of the Environment Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Tony Willardson Executive Director Western.
Wetland Creation Why and How Char Ison and Caleb Asbury.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Section 404 Permits Update
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REGULATORY PROGRAM WILMINGTON DISTRICT March 13, 2008.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
BUILDING STRONG SM Partnering and Coordination to Accomplish the Navigation Mission.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Carrie Bond Project Manager ODOT Liaison Portland, Oregon April 21, 2015 Understanding the Corps Permitting.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
Alternative Sediment Remediation Authorities to CERCLA: Elizabeth River Demonstration Robert Engler Moffatt & Nichol),
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
By: Amanda, Rakkir, Rebecca, and Franklin. Executive order U.S army Corps Engineers Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Section 401 of the Clean.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
October 16, 2013 Mira Monte Marina PERMITTING MITIGATION UPDATE MIRA MONTE MARINA.
The SWANCC Decision and 2001 WI Act 6 NGA State Wetland’s Workshop October 21, 2002 Michael Cain Staff Attorney- WI DNR.
AGENCY ROLES Level 1B: Advanced Fundamentals July 2016 LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL 1.
State of Alaska Assumption of Section 404 program Michelle Bonnet Hale, Director, Division of Water Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Steven.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
Coal Mining Activities
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Coal Mining Activities
The Clean Water Act and Oil & Gas Operations Professor Tracy Hester
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Law Fall 2018
Wetland Mitigation.
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations
Proposed Mitigation Rule Amendment Rulemaking Pre-Proposal State and Local Government Outreach June 20, 2019.
Environmental Law Fall 2019
Presentation transcript:

“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands The world’s leading sustainability consultancy

Body text What’s this layout for? This slide forms the base of the majority of slides – a text box with bullets are included ready for you to type into. Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 2 US Federal Legislation Protecting Wetlands Clean Water Act Rivers and Harbors Act Coastal Zone Management Act Coastal Barriers Resources Act US Wetland Regulatory Programs Oversight Authority US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) US National Marine Fisheries Service (USNMFS)

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 3 The primary mechanism for wetland protection in the US falls under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) ■Section 404 of the CWA requires authorization from the USACE for the placement of dredged or fill materials into wetlands and other US waters. ■This section helps protect wetlands from being damaged or filled without review. Illegal dumping in wetland – violation of Section 404 of CWA

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 4 ■Section 10 of the RHA regulates operations around “navigable waters” ■Authorized by the USACE ■Construction in or over waterways ■Excavation and dredging ■Disposal of material ■Alteration of water course ■Obstruction of waters "Navigable waters" are those subject to the ebb and flow of the tide shoreward to the mean high water mark. The term includes coastal and inland waters, lakes, rivers and streams that are navigable and the territorial seas. Sections 10 and 404 overlap in some activities involving wetlands. Permits for activities regulated under both are processed simultaneously by the USACE.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 5 The Coastal Zone Management Act (1972) and the Coastal Barriers Resources Act (1982) by setting policy – NOT regulating activity. ■The Coastal Zone Management Act encourages states to establish voluntary coastal zone management plans and provides funds for developing and implementing the plans. ■The Coastal Barriers Resources Act denies Federal subsidies for development within undeveloped, unprotected coastal barrier areas, including wetlands, designated as part of the US Coastal Barrier Resources System. ■Transfers financial responsibility to the developer and not the US Government

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Recent Updates in US Wetland Regulations 6 In 2006, the US Supreme Court reviewed the scope of Section 404 of the CWA. The decision provides new standards for determining whether wetlands are subject to CWA jurisdiction and set up the wetland delineation program. Eliminated federal protection of many inland “hydrologically isolated” wetlands. Hydrologically isolated “prairie pothole” wetland, Nebraska USA US Supreme Court Rapanos v. US and Carabell v. US.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 7 US States also have the authority to enact their own regulatory programs for wetlands. State programs can be more stringent than the federal program. ■New York, Washington, and California are among the states with strong wetland regulations.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Legislation and Regulation of Wetlands - US 8 States often use a combination of approaches in an effort to provide more comprehensive protection of wetlands. In addition to Federal CWA requirements, North Carolina has adopted rules pertaining to wetlands that fall outside federal jurisdiction, requiring water quality permits for “isolated” wetlands. The state has also enacted a separate regulatory program for coastal wetlands. Both Michigan and New Jersey have assumed the Federal CWA program, but have also adopted coastal-specific regulatory requirements that are more stringent than the federal regulations. New Jersey Coastline

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text What’s this layout for? This slide forms the base of the majority of slides – a text box with bullets are included ready for you to type into. Authorizing Activities within Wetlands 9 Federal and state permits are required for projects that have unavoidable impacts to wetlands Federal permitting process can take between 6 months to 3 years, depending on the complexity of the project and agency backlog. Proposals involving major impacts to federally-protected wetlands also trigger other federal environmental regulations, such as the National Environmental Policy Act State permitting can have a similar processing time as the federal process but are typically accomplished simultaneously with the federal process. Authorized impacts to wetlands under federal or state regulations require mitigation.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Mitigation for Wetland Impacts – New US Approach 10 In 2011, USACE officially declared their support for wetland banking as the primary means for wetland mitigation. When a land developer impacts a wetland they may buy offsets from an approved mitigation banker. The mitigation banker restores, enhances, creates or preserves an area of wetland to generate credits. The number of credits available at a mitigation bank is related to the area of wetland and/or the functional value of the wetland. Images of two wetland mitigation banks in California and Virginia, USA.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Mitigation Banking – The Way Forward 11 Mitigation banks are essentially large mitigation sites for multiple projects Mitigation bank credit prices range anywhere from $3,000 to $600,000 USD per credit. The variability in the market value of credits reflects differences in the availability and price of land suitable for bank development and the cost to create an acre of wetland compensation within a given region. Snohomish County, Washington Mitigation Bank designed to mitigation for impacts to wetlands and rare species

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text_vertical image What’s this layout for? Use this slide to insert text on the left and a portrait image on the right Mitigation Banking – The Way Forward 12 ■Wetland mitigation banking is now expanding into biodiversity banking where credits for impacts to other regulated resources (endangered species, water quality) can be purchased. ■Currently, there are over 120 approved biodiversity banks in the US covering over 400 ha and protecting over 60 listed species.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Contents What’s this layout for? Formatting for contents slide – this slide has slightly different spacing between lines to emphasise topics Conclusions ■US Federal regulations provide the overall framework for wetlands regulations. ■Clean Water Act ■Rivers and Harbors Act ■US Federal policy provides the financial framework for development in wetlands ■Coastal Zone Management Act ■Coastal Barriers Resources Act ■US States have the ability to regulate wetland operations and developments if they choose to ■Oil and gas exploration projects are subject of all wetland regulations ■Oil and gas projects must satisfy the regulatory process through impact analysis and planning in consultation with the regulatory agencies.

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Body text What’s this layout for? This slide forms the base of the majority of slides – a text box with bullets are included ready for you to type into. Effects on Wetland Function or Service 14 Any Questions?

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Graphics What’s this layout for? Plain slide without a text box – used for inserting graphics e.g. pies, bars or images 15