The Water Course Water Law & Administration January 19, 2009 Kyle Whitaker Division of Water Resources Assistant Division Engineer, Water Division No.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nebraska Water Management Nebraska Department of Natural Resources September, 2004.
Advertisements

Water Law 101: Surface Water
Water in the West: Current Use and Future Challenges Christopher Goemans, Ph.D. Agricultural and Resource Economics 13 th Annual Farmers Cooperatives Conference.
Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
PRODUCED WATER FROM COALBED METHANE PRODUCTION: WATER LAW ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENTS Zach C. Miller Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Denver, Colorado December 14,
Water Supply Law Use and ownership of water ( Water Law). Riparian Doctrine – land owners have a right to use water adjacent to their land (but they cannot.
WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004.
Thomas C. Turney, P.E. 1 Agreement Between Interstate Stream Commission and the Holder of OSE Permit RG Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District July.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office.
Pueblo Water Rights Under Mexican Law (prior to 1848), prevailing law was pueblo right—pueblo rights are paramount to the beneficial use of all needed,
Responses to the New Normal Creative Partnerships for Innovative Water Solutions Colorado Water Workshop – July 17, 2013.
Water Center Symposium The Colorado River Cooperative Agreement Chris Treese, External Affairs Manager October 31, 2011 Grand Junction, CO.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Small Acreage Workshop March 8, 2008 Sheridan, Wyoming Kara Brighton Hageman & Brighton, P.C.
Recommendations for a Statewide Water Plan By: Ewan Hadgraft Alabama Rivers Alliance Birmingham-Southern College.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Administration of surface and ground water within Colorado with the assistance of modeling Mike Sullivan, P.E. CO DWR - Deputy State Engineer James Heath,
Conjunctive Management in Idaho A State Perspective Rexburg, Idaho December 9, 2014Mat Weaver, IDWR.
INTRABASIN, INTERBASIN AND TRANSMOUNTAIN WATER MOVEMENT TO MEET GROWING WATER DEMAND CASE STUDIES David Merritt, P.E., D.WRE Chief Engineer Colorado River.
1 Statewide Water Supply Initiative Gunnison Water Workshop July 29, 2005.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Dividing the Water An Introduction to Western Water Rights and Resources by Charles M. Brendecke PhD PE September 12, 2008.
WATER RIGHTS AND ENDANGERED FISH FINDING SOLUTIONS FOR FLOWS UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS
Green River Water Rights Distribution Model (MODSIM) Update By Division of Water Rights
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SURFACE WATER RIGHTS UNIT.
Taking Care of Your Water Rights: Permits, Extensions & Certificates Oregon Association of Water Utilities August 2013 Lisa Jaramillo Water Right Services.
Introduction to Water Law & the Central Arizona Project (CAP)
IRRIGATION LAWS IN MISSOURI Jim Vandike Missouri Department of Natural Resources Geological Survey and Resource Assessment Division.
IDWR PUBLIC HEARING February 28, 2012 Mountain Home, ID.
Boise River Accounting Liz Cresto February 26, 2013.
Water Law Wyoming Land Law for Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors Kara Brighton Hageman & Brighton, P.C. Attorneys at Law 222 E. 21 st Street Cheyenne,
Water: 101 Adjudication. Permit vs. Adjudication Permit Issued Authorizes Holder to Make Use of the Water as Limited by the Permit Beneficial Use Adjudication.
Public Water Supplier Considerations Rural Water Association of Utah April 25, 2013 April 25, 2013 Utah Division of Water Rights Kirk Forbush, P.E. Regional.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Colorado Water Law By Travis Hoesli. Colorado Water Law Unit Objectives 1. Understand who makes water laws in Colorado. 2. Recognize the general laws.
How Do You Administer a Bird Call?. Sharing the Resource.
Water Demands in the Jackson Blue Spring Basin.
Distribution of Water Rights Jared Manning, P.E. Utah Division of Water Rights March 17, 2014.
Division Engineer Water Supply Report Gunnison State of the River Meeting June 1, 2015 Bob W. Hurford, P.E. Division Engineer Water Division 4.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 21 Policy History: Rivers as a Legal Battleground Public Policy in the American Federal System – An Overview Prepared by.
IDWR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING March 19 & 27, 2013 Mountain Home & Idaho City, ID.
Public Meeting at Moab To Discuss Water Resource Issues August 21, 2007.
Law School for Journalists Colorado Bar Association Ken Knox Division of Water Resources March 13, 2007.
1 Certainty in Uncertain Times? Policy Implications of the Colorado River Compact Eric Kuhn, General Manager.
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF CONJUNCTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF ESPA WATER SOURCES PREPARED BY CLIVE J. STRONG FOR GOVERNOR’S WATER SUMMIT APRIL 17, 2007.
WATER RIGHT CURRENTS Utah Division of Water Rights September 2009.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
Whiskey’s for drinking; water’s for fighting. Mark Twain.
Municipal Water Rights…… Water Law & Policy Seminars March 12, 2012 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
Council of Economic Advisors Water Rights Overview Utah Division of Water Rights Jerry Olds.
Upper Colorado River Basin Current Policy and Issues Utah Division of Water Rights September 2009.
Colorado’s Water Plan Presentation for Kiwanis Club of Grand Junction January 7, 2016 Hannah Holm, Coordinator Ruth Powell Hutchins Water Center at Colorado.
Meeting Colorado’s Future Water Needs: CWCB’s Role The Colorado Water Conservation Board.
1 Water Conservation What Do We Really Want? Four States Irrigation Council 63 rd Annual Meeting January 14 th, 2016 Joe Frank, Lower South Platte Water.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
Urban Water Institute- August 2015
The Future of the Colorado River – Business as Usual or ???
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
19 States & Mexico Rely on Colorado Water
Texas Hydrological Conditions An Overview
“Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over.”
Request for Approval of Cape Fear / Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Model
Improving Binational Water Management Policy through Science
2018 Kern County Water Summit
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Brooke McGregor, Program Liaison, Watermaster Section
Presentation transcript:

The Water Course Water Law & Administration January 19, 2009 Kyle Whitaker Division of Water Resources Assistant Division Engineer, Water Division No. 5 (970) ,

The Hydrologic Cycle

19 States & Mexico Rely on Colorado Water

COLORADO HISTORICAL AVERAGE ANNUAL STREAM FLOWS (acre feet) OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Prepared by the Hydrographic Branch (2003 Revision) Historic averages obtained from USGS Water - Data Report CO - YAMPA WHITE LITTLE SNAKE ELK NO. PLATTE CACHE LA POUDRE SOUTH PLATTE NORTH FORK REPUBLICAN SOUTH FORK REPUBLICAN NO. FORK ARKANSAS NO. FORK UNCOMPAHGRE McELMO MANCOS LA PLATA ANIMAS & FLORIDA LOS PINOS PIEDRA SAN JUAN CONEJOS PURGATOIRE GUNNISON SAN MIGUEL LARAMIE COLORADO DOLORES RIO GRANDE 1,531, ,200 4,500, ,300 1,127, , , ,800 37,100 36,890 25, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,600 1,872, ,100 31, ,200 96,300 49,640 47, ,200 89, , , , , ,200 45, , , , ,400 31,680 28,750 69,750 FOUNTAIN APISHAPA 18,970 HUERFANO 26,930 GRAPE 24,933 BEAR 33,760 58,146 88,051 63, , , , , , ,800 99, ,500 ST. VRAIN BOULDER 158,800 50,050 PICEANCE 27, , , ,700 2,799, ,400 54,760 85,540 EAST TOWARD ATLANTIC OCEAN 1,050,900 af WEST TOWARD PACIFIC OCEAN 9,189,550 af TOTAL LEAVING COLORADO 10,240,450af ROARING FORK EAGLE BLUE TOMICHI SOUTH FORK SAN JUAN - CHAMA 94,180 At Benkelman, NE

Water Deliveries in Colorado Agriculture 86% Municipal/Domestic 7% Recreation/Fisheries 3% Industrial/Commercial 2% Augmentation 1% Recharge 1%

Office of the State Engineer Division of Water Resources

Department of Natural Resources Agencies n Water Resources n Wildlife n Oil and Gas Conservation Commission n Geological Survey n Forestry n Water Conservation Board n State Parks n Reclamation, Mining, and Safety n State Land Board

Division of Water Resources Responsibilities n Water Administration n Public Safety n Ground Water Permitting n Interstate Compacts n Hydrographic Program n Public Information Services n Additional Program Activities

Key Statutes DWR Operates Under Title 37, Article 92 Water Rights Determination and Administration (Water Courts, Water Right Decree Process, Substitute Water Supply Plans, Tabulation, Administration, Exempt Well Permitting) Title 37, Article 90 Well Permitting Title 37, Article 80 State Engineer Authority and Responsibilities Title 37, Article 84 Responsibility of User of Water for Maintenance of Diversion Structures, Ditches and Measuring Flumes Title 37, Article 87 Review of Plans and Specifications for Reservoir and Determination of Safe Storage Levels

Prior Appropriation The Colorado Doctrine Green Mountain Reservoir

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862 Max’s Power Plant 5.0 c.f.s Industrial 1865

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862 Max’s Power Plant 5.0 c.f.s Industrial 1865 Fruit Town 0.5 c.f.s. Municipal 1868

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862 Max’s Power Plant 5.0 c.f.s Industrial 1865 Fruit Town 0.5 c.f.s. Municipal 1868 Hannah’s Brewery.033 c.f.s. Entertainment 1869

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862 Max’s Power Plant 5.0 c.f.s Industrial 1865 Fruit Town 0.5 c.f.s. Municipal 1868 Hannah’s Brewery.033 c.f.s. Entertainment 1869

Mark’s Gold Mine 2.0 c.f.s. Mining and Milling 1861 Mesa Town 1.0 c.f.s. Municipal 1862 Max’s Power Plant 5.0 c.f.s Industrial 1865 Fruit Town 0.5 c.f.s. Municipal 1868 Hannah’s Brewery.033 c.f.s. Entertainment st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Water Administration

Water Commissioner Responsibilities Day to Day Administration – Setting the Call Based on Supply and Demand – Assuring Diversions In Priority For Decreed Uses Without Waste – Delivery of Reservoir Releases and Other Water After Assessing Transit Losses – Assuring Diversions Are Measured – Assuring Other Decree Conditions in Augmentation and Change Cases Are Complied With Review of Accounting and Maintenance of Diversion Records

Statutory Provisions Commonly Used for Water Administration C.R.S General Jurisdiction to Administer Water C.R.S Daily Administration – (2) order total or partial discontinuance of use to extent water not necessary for beneficial use or needed by senior user (see also C.R.S – control of headgates) – (2) won’t order discontinuance unless makes water available at the place of seniors need. – (2) Stop discontinuance if water does not become available to senior priorities in time and place of need – (5)(a) Authority to order installation of measuring devices (also C.R.S , – SEO rates flumes) – (6) staff may enter private property C.R.S (5) release of water to account for evaporation from on-stream reservoirs C.R.S Exchanges (several other references)

Definition of Terms for a Call Free River – the supply of water in the river exceeds the demand for water by all decreed water users Call – the demand for water by a user Call Recognized and Administered by Division of Water Resources – the determination by the Water Commissioner of the most junior right that may divert when the supply of water in the river is less than the demand on the river by all decreed water users (also known as “the Call”) Note: These definitions are not found in statute, but are working definitions. The primary statute that water administration occurs under is C.R.S.

How Does A Commissioner Set The Valid Call For A Portion Of The River? Determines river conditions (supply) from stream gaging stations Determines the demand (calls) by various water right holders from water user contacts Sets the valid call based on a comparison of river conditions (supply) and demand (calls) and knowledge of water gains or losses and water travel times between points on the river

Conditions Commissioners Review Prior to Placing A Valid Call for a User User must be in priority Water diverted by user must be used in accordance with the decree terms and conditions Water cannot be wasted User must have an acceptable headgate and an accurate measuring device User must be taking all the water that is available at their headgate Must determine whether user can get the water they are asking for without setting a call Must determine whether user will get the water they are calling for by curtailing upstream junior rights

Typical Call Colorado River Grand Ditch (Admin. No )

Ditch A cfs Ditch B cfs River Example: Ditch A is taking 50 cfs. Ditch B owner calls the commissioner and is 70 cfs short. The call becomes Ditch B with a call. Ditch A is completely curtailed.

Ditch B cfs Ditch A cfs River Example: Ditch A is taking 50 cfs. Ditch B owner calls the water commissioner and is 30 cfs short. The call becomes Ditch A with water being bypassed to Ditch B with a priority date. Assuming no inflow or outflow in the interim reach, Ditch A is curtailed to 20 cfs.

Ditch A cfs Ditch C cfs Ditch B cfs Tributary River Example: Ditch A is taking 50 cfs and Ditch C 100 cfs. Ditch B owner calls the commissioner and is 120 cfs short. You are the commissioner, what do you do?

Is it really that simple? What are some factors that might make the decision more difficult?

Plans for Augmentation and Changes of Water Rights

Change of Water Right Change in type, place, or time of use Change in point of diversion Change from direct application to storage and subsequent application Change in point of storage

Change of Water Right Generally, a change of an irrigation right to municipal purposes. This may involve new or alternate points of diversion, but not always.

Plan For Augmentation A plan to replace out of priority depletions caused by a junior water right to senior water rights. The replacements are made with another source of water. Depletions must be replaced in time, place and amount in order protect senior water rights. The application for approval of a plan for augmentation in water court allows others the opportunity to express their concerns regarding its ability to protect their water rights.

Water Rights Issues

CRS Right-of-way through other lands. Any person owning a water right or conditional water right shall be entitled to a right-of-way through the lands which lie between the point of diversion and point of use or proposed use for the purpose of transporting water for beneficial use in accordance with said water right or conditional water right.

Prescriptive Easement “An easement created from an open, adverse, and continuous use over a statutory period.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition

Irrigation Efficiency

“ You better cut the pizza in four pieces because I’m not hungry enough to eat six.” Yogi Berra - #8