Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
Walking and Biking the Busiest Roads Around Atlanta: a Bike/Ped Plan that establishes non-motorized transportation among regional-scale priorities Regan.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Operations Webinar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 28, 2006.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Forecasting Travel Time Index using a Travel Demand Model to Measure Plan Performance Thomas Williams, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2015 TRB.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Infrastructure – Mission to Preserve & Renew. Infrastructure – Transportation funding must be sufficient to both repair and sometimes replace our highway,
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.
New Visions Bicycle & Pedestrian Action Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation – Bicycle and pedestrian travel is vital to the region’s public health,
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
2030 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council 2 nd Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL May 26, 2009Staff Director.
Talking Technology & Transportation (T3) Webinar July 25, 2007.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Think Regionally - Act Locally The Development and Evolution of the I-95 Corridor Coalition: Think Regionally - Act Locally John Baniak Executive Director,
Transportation 2035: Investment Trade Offs Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation 2035 Public Involvement Program June 13, 2008.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Georgia’s Regional Traffic Operations Program Christopher Barrow, E.I.T. Traffic Engineer II.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: The Hampton Roads Experience Presented by: Camelia Ravanbakht, PhD Talking Technology & Transportation (T3)
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Linking Planning and Operations in Las Vegas Talking Operations Seminar March 23, 2005.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
ITS Architecture Development in a Regional Planning Context Central Ohio Case Study Erika Witzke Principal Engineer Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission.
Travel Reliability – Reliable traffic flow is more important than reducing congestion – traffic congestion is often a sign of an area’s economic vitality.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
A case–driven comparison of Freeway Performance Measurement Systems by Shailesh Deshpande.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
VicRoads – Movement & Place
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
VicRoads – Movement & Place
AMPO Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) Working Group
Problem 5: Network Simulation
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
MPO Board Presentation
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
Presentation transcript:

Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill

Capital District Albany Troy Schenectady Saratoga Springs 800,000 population

Four counties Eight cities CDTA, NYSDOT, CDRPC, NYSTA, Port, Airport Rotating membership for two towns at a time (71 towns & villages) Capital District Transportation Committee

EndEnd New Visions Regional Plan Extensive Public Participation– Structured Workshops, Task Forces, Working Groups, Community Linkage Studies, engaged the business community

EndEnd New Visions Regional Plan Variety of stakeholders- State Police, environmental groups, neighborhood associations, business community, different NYSDOT offices

EndEnd New Visions Regional Plan Wide public support for Operations & Management components of the Plan Operations & Management consistent with regional land use vision

EndEnd New Visions Regional Plan Integrated Operations and Management into the Plan and the Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Transit, walking, quality of life, access management— important components of congestion management.

Not “minimize congestion at any cost, consider other impacts if possible” Trade offs needed among all performance measures. -- This is a choice to be made with public input, not a mechanical determinism. Performance Measures

Trade-offs with design standards, design year level of service, transit/pedestrian/bike needs, and community context are not easy, but must be considered NYSDOT is confronting and addressing this issue--”Context Sensitive Design/Solutions” Trade-offs based on the objectives of the regional transportation plan Performance Measures

Get public input into the trade-offs between performance measures. In many cases, the trade off between, say, traffic congestion and community quality of life is an easier choice than we think for the public; while planners and engineers can get stuck thinking there is a mandate to address traffic level of service as the first priority Performance Measures

Would you be willing to accept traffic levels and congestion roughly as they are on Route 5 now if we could improve transit, walking, biking, landscaping, attractiveness and safety?

while unpredictable, non-recurring delay is not tolerable. The public process in the New Visions Plan has led us to the conclusion that the public experiences recurring delay as tolerable;

If you know your commute home every day is 15 minutes longer than you would expect at 10 PM, you can plan around this. But if your commute home one day is an hour and fifteen minutes longer, because of an incident, this is a much more significant hardship. Performance Measures

Analysis using the travel demand model indicated that widening the Northway would result in filling up with traffic on the day of opening; without reducing incident delay. However, the planning and design process still tends to focus exclusively on recurring delay. Performance Measures

CDTC used a data base from NYSDOT, called “MIST”, which measures expressway speeds by lane every 15 minutes, 24/7, to develop performance measures. Used MIST to estimate vehicle hours of recurring excess delay vs. non- recurring; by facility Performance Measures

A measure of predictability and reliability (developed by Texas Transportation Institute) Ratio of driving time on a ‘worse than average delay day’ (95 th percentile) to a ‘free flow day’ PTI >1.0 ~ trip would take longer time PTI =1.0 ~ trip would take no extra time PTI 55 mph even on the “worst” day Planning Time Index

Example: For a 30 minute trip, if the planning time index is 1.5, then on a “worst” day, trip would take 45 minutes; In other words, you would have to leave 15 minutes earlier than normal to have a 95% confidence of being on time. Planning Time Index

I-87: PM peak NB: 1.66 AM peak SB: 1.46 I-90: PM peak WB: 1.37 AM peak WB: 1.55 I-787: PM peak NB: 1.26 Alt Rt-7: PM peak WB: 1.20 AM peak EB: 1.34

Any major highway expansion considered by CDTC will include a management approach Trade offs between performance measures are necessary—congestion is only one of many Congestion Management Principles

CDTC relies on our MPO role as facilitator of the operating agencies. We do not think of ourselves as having expert in-house ability to design M & O strategies. CDTC is seen not as the expert on operations and management, but as a convener, a consensus builder; we are recognized as being turf neutral in a field that often has a lot of turf wars Management and Operations and the MPO

Planning for Management & Operations is valuable because planners can articulate the need for more M & O funding Management and Operations and the MPO

The New Visions Plan includes planned 20 year funding levels for ITS– incident management, signal coordination—which is considered in TIP project selection. Management and Operations and the MPO

ITS Priority Network- The ITS priority network, updated by the New Visions Working Group B, was incorporated into the CMP; priority corridors for incident management and signal coordination.

CDTC has established a Regional Operations Committee, which will assist in proposing M & O strategies and initiatives for the TIP. The NYSDOT Regional Director is interested in giving CDTC an expanded role in management and operations. Management and Operations and the MPO

CDTC has found that Management and Operations initiatives and policies are strongly supported by the public. Management and Operations and the MPO

Thank You Chris O’Neill