Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance Bengt-Åke Lundvall Aalborg University and Tsinghua University Advancing Knowledge conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How CCIs can contribute to innovation and smart specialisation strategies.
Advertisements

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
The University and the Learning Economy DRUID January 2003 Bengt-Åke Lundvall Aalborg University.
The American Economy What are the major factors and theories that determine how people and businesses make economic decisions in the USA?
National innovation systems – theoretical foundations and implications for economic development Globelics Academy Lissabon May 2004 B.-A. Lundvall.
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
Delivering effective enterprise education: the role of learning design and technology Professor Pauric McGowan University of Ulster Dr Richard Blundel.
Virginia and the U.S. in the Global Economy
The Role of Local Government in Response to Population Ageing Emerging Messages from the Local Government Association’s Task and Finish Group.
SOCIAL CAPITAL THE AIMS OF THESE NOTES – Social capital: a controversial concept THREE KEY WORDS – Networks – Trust – Institutions.
Managing knowledge and innovation Gauteng SMS Conference March 2006.
5. November 2007 Technologie & Innovationsmanagement M. Fiedler/ I. Strohofer „The technical entrepreneur“ Chapter 9 Structure: 1, Context 2, Definition.
Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy Dominique Foray Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne January 2005 Washington D.C.
Answering the Three Economic Questions
Interactive learning perspectives on innovation Bengt-Åke Lundvall Aalborg University NORSI Lecture October Kristiansand.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women’s Fund Incorporated ATSI Women’s Initiatives For the advancement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.
Industrial clusters and competence building in the globalizing learning economy Presentation at Technical University of Lisboa October 2003 Bengt-Åke Lundvall.
Institutions and the Entrepreneurial Discovery Process Andrés Rodríguez-Pose London School of Economics Workshop on S3 Governance: The ‘What’, ‘Who’ and.
Applying innovation policy and innovation theory in Small open economies Gulbenkian seminar Lisboa October 2003 B-A Lundvall, Aalborg University.
The intercultural city - cultural diversity and the creation of wealth The benefits of diversity – conference Oslo Benedicte Brøgger Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
1 OECD/NSF Conference on Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy National Academies, Washington DC January 2005 OECD Work on Knowledge and.
Research Institute for Health and Social Change “We don't believe you want a genuine partnership.” University work with communities Karen Duggan and Carolyn.
Schumpeter (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Schumpeter stands out among early contributors to the economics of innovation His ideas are foundational,
ITC Product Inclusive package services - Guided theme excursions - Interactive games and simulative activities Entertainment and educational events and.
Anastácia Rodrigues Patrick Montgomery INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Topic: Dynamics of Technological Change and Innovation Broadening the Analysis.
Chapter 8: Organizational Culture
Innovation systems Globelics Academy Lissabon May 2005 Bengt-Åke Lundvall University of Aalborg & University of Tsinghua.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Demonstrating the impact of creative research
Lecture 3 Tuesday, September 9 THE MARKET: HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.
Free Trade Theory Why Nations Trade.
1 Tom Schuller Centre for Educational Research and Innovation OECD Jerzy Wiśniewski CERI Governing Board Presented on the Conference „Knowledge and Innovation.
Chapter 12 The Macro Environment – Technological Influences
Are there alternatives to growth pessimism? ‘Challenges for Europe in a new age’ Utzon-Center, March 2013 Björn Johnson and Bengt-Åke Lundvall Aalborg.
#ShapeRMIT project update, developing strategy and next steps: 1 September 1.
ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS IN SMÅLAND-BLEKINGE (Ch.2) Yancy Vaillant Regional Development Policy Division Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial.
The Evolution of Innovation Policy: Theory and Practice By Jan Fagerberg, Aalborg University, University of Oslo and University of Lund
ATEM Conference 2003 Regionalisation and the TAFE University Interface.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry ‹#› KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES European Commission Enterprise and Industry Budapest, 25 January 2011.
Economic Issues and Concepts Chapter 1
Building the social and solidarity economy through partnerships and networking Social and solidarity economy Academy Montreal, Canada October 2011.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Knowledge Exchange and Impact in the AHRC Susan Amor Head of Knowledge Exchange Conny Carter Impact and Policy Manager University of Exeter 7 April 2011.
Business Responsibility and Sustainability Dr Eshani Beddewela Week 04.
Social Pragmatism Perspectives of John Dewey. Features of Social Pragmatism  Social conditions can be improved through mutual trust and cooperation;
Business Environment An Introduction. Meaning And Definition  Business Environment means the aggregates of all conditions, events and influences that.
Gustavo Márquez, RES. Coordinador General Alberto Chong, RES; Suzanne Duryea, RES; Jacqueline Mazza, SCL; Hugo Ñopo, RES Economic and Social Progress in.
The near future of workplace adult education Paolo Federighi Prof. University of Florence.
Amity School of Business Economics for Managers: Gaurav Shreekant 1.
“Clarity of mind means clarity of passion”. Let’s explore the following 3 questions: 1. Why is AIESEC relevant? 2. How does AIESEC do that? 3. What is.
HR 1004 Organisations, Management and People Week 1 Lecture 1 Introduction to the Module Module Leader: Wilma Garvin.
Innovation: A Dutch European perspective Luc Soete University of Maastricht MERIT Washington, January 27 th -28 th, 2003.
1 Policy Frameworks for the Knowledge-based Economy ICTs, Innovation and Human Resources Brasilia September 2002 Session 2.2. ICTs and e-business.
Lecture 3 Tuesday, September 11 THE MARKET: HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.
Anders Malmberg Regional Economies in a Globalising World Enhancing Intellectual Capacity and Innovation Cardiff, 21 November 2008 Localised Clusters in.
Engaging People in Their Communities The role of the Voluntary & Community Sector.
The American Economy What are the similarities and differences between traditional, market, mixed, and command economies?
 Identify the four different economies  Analyze the difference between economies.
Free Market. The Free Market What is a market? A market is an “arrangement” that allows people to buy and sell items Why are markets important? No one.
UNICREDS Conference Sabhal Mor Ostaig June 2011 Can universities benefit rural communities Prof. Norman Sharp.
Outcome One: Explain the allocation of resources in an economy The Basic Economic Problem.
Is It Possible To Teach Service Science? © Leonard Walletzký PA181 – Service Systems, Modeling and Execution.
Understanding Economics
Presentation prepared for ANDRAS Conference
The University and the Learning Economy
Technology and the Global Economy.
Economic Issues and Concepts Chapter 1
Free Trade Theory Why Nations Trade.
Slides by Alex Stojanovic
Presentation transcript:

Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance Bengt-Åke Lundvall Aalborg University and Tsinghua University Advancing Knowledge conference Washington, January 11, 2005

Two main points and the conclusion – ’Adam Smith in the Learning Economy’ Learning by interacting is an important way to generalise local knowledge produced by learning by doing and learning by using – an alternative to codification. Independent producers and users who interact with a multitude of diverse agents are privileged as compared to vertically integrated users and producers. Access to ’social capital’ determines the division of labour and the division of labour is a key to interactive learning and wealth creation Conclusion: In the learning economy the key to wealth lies outside the economy! Cf. Russia.

Starting point: Product innovations as outcomes of interactive learning in organised markets Product innovations are of fundamental importance for economic growth. Product innovations must combine knowledge about technological opportunity with knowledge about user need Therefore little innovation in ’pure markets’ (anonymity). My solution to the paradox is ’the organised market’ where users and producers engage in interactive learning (1984) (See Christensen and Lundvall 2004: Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance. Elsevier)

Four building blocks – advancing on the shoulders of Great Economists Learning in production and consumption is key to economic growth (Luigi Pasinetti 1981) – but his vertically integrated sectors excludes the analysis of interactive learning. Further developing the division of labour is the key to economic growth (Adam Smith 1776) – but mainly focus on intra-organisational and static effects having to do with scale economies. Transaction costs favour vertical integration (Oliver Williamson 1975) - but vertical integration reduces the flexibility of the economy as a whole (George Richardson 1972/2002) – next step taken here is to analyse the impact on the economy through the effect on innovation and learning! Learning by doing (Kenneth Arrow 1962) and Learning by using (Nathan Rosenberg 1982) are important – but they produce local knowledge (Dominique Foray 2000).

My contribution: A dynamic interpretation of Adam Smith For the economy as a whole a highly developed vertical division of labour (predominance of product innovation!) is a key to economic growth – because it constitutes many interfaces for interactive learning engaging agents with diverse characteristics and interests in creating and sharing of knowledge. Because: Learning by interacting is a process where local knowledge becomes generalised as it is embodied in new products, systems and services. Independent producers and users interacting with a multitude of diverse users are privileged in terms of learning as compared to vertically integrated users and producers.

Conclusion: The key to economic wealth lies outside the economy This implies that the key to promote wealth creation in the learning economy is an institutional context – a society – making it attractive to engage in interactive learning across organised markets (where transaction costs are less than the learning benefits) (cf. similar conclusion by Douglass North (1996) based on narrow transaction cost view). Arrow (1971): You cannot buy trust – and if you could buy it …it would have no value whatsoever! This is why the learning economy must root its efficiency, outside the economy, i.e. in society, social cohesion and good citizenship – greed is not enough to make the system work.

Opening the conversation with my co- presenters in this session Eric: You are right locally but not generally. In some fields innovating users contribute to over all knowledge creation but this is not true for big vertically integrated organisations as users. (OK for sports and computer freaks but not for GM and IBM). Stefan: You are right and I would just add that experimenting in several different contexts (in a collaboration with diverse users) at the same time promotes problem-solving and learning.