Intense Near-Surface Wind Shear in Severe Thunderstorm Environments: A Closer Look at Implications for Near-Surface Stability and Tornadogenesis Potential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tornado Workshop Langen, Germany, 25 February 2005 Contents 1. Basics –Parcel Theory –Perturbation pressure field –Updraft Rotation 2. Thunderstorm Classes.
Advertisements

Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Boundary Layer Flow Describes the transport phenomena near the surface for the case of fluid flowing past a solid object.
Forecasting convective outbreaks using thermodynamic diagrams. Anthony R. Lupo Atms 4310 / 7310 Lab 10.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Warm Season Frontogenesis Forcing Applications and Implications for Convective Initiation (or Failure) Dan Miller Science and Operations Officer NWS/WFO.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Forecast Parameters.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Horizontal Convective Rolls Asai papers & Simulations w/ ARPS.
The Impact of Gravity Wave/Undular Bore Dissipation on the June 22, 2003 Deshler and Aurora Nebraska Tornadic Supercells AARON W. JOHNSON NOAA/NWS Weather.
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Weismann (1992) Weisman, M. L., 1992: The role of convectively generated rear- inflow jets in the evolution of long-lived mesoconvective systems. J. Atmos.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
More Thunderstorms. Today Homework in Wind shear More multicellular storms.
Tephigrams ENVI1400 : Lecture 8.
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
Meteorology 503 Meteorology 503 Tornadic Analysis Severe Weather Outbreak Dodge City, KS May 7, 2002 Julio C. Garcia! SFSU Julio C. Garcia! SFSU.
Deep Convection A review of processes “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not truth” Marcus Aurelius: AD
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
The General Circulation of the Atmosphere Tapio Schneider.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Thunderstorms Conditions required: 1. Conditional instability 2. Trigger Mechanism (eg. front, sea-breeze front, mountains, localized zones of excess surface.
Use of TAMDAR Data in a Convective Weather Event Saturday, May 21, 2005.
Horizontal Convective Rolls MPO 551 Paper Presentation Dan Stern Horizontal Convective Rolls : Determining the Environmental Conditions Supporting their.
1 Supercell Thunderstorms Adapted from Materials by Dr. Frank Gallagher III and Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Part.
1 The Thermodynamic Diagram Adapted by K. Droegemeier for METR 1004 from Lectures Developed by Dr. Frank Gallagher III OU School of Meteorology.
Solid body rotation (XY):
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
Lecture 2a Severe Thunderstorm Primer Synoptic Laboratory II – Mesoscale Professor Tripoli.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
A Study on the Environments Associated with Significant Tornadoes Occurring Within the Warm Sector versus Those Occurring Along Boundaries Jonathan Garner.
Observations of Near-Surface Thermodynamic and Wind Shear Profiles on Significant Tornado Days Observations of Near-Surface Thermodynamic and Wind Shear.
The Inland Extent of Lake- Effect Snow (LES) Bands Joe Villani NOAA/NWS Albany, NY Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Jason Krekeler State.
How Small-Scale Turbulence Sets the Amplitude and Structure of Tropical Cyclones Kerry Emanuel PAOC.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
Preliminary Radar Observations of Convective Initiation and Mesocyclone Interactions with Atmospheric Waves on 27 April 2011 Todd A. Murphy, Timothy A.
Forecast Parameters. CAPE Convective Available Potential Energy – obviously, positive buoyancy is helpful for producing convection –100 mb mixed layer.
Convective Roll Effects on Sea Breeze Fronts
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis.
A Contrast of Two Las Vegas Flash Flood Scenarios Introduction/BackgroundIntroduction/Background A Classic Monsoon CaseA Classic Monsoon Case »July 8,
Convective Parameters Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a.Stability Indices b.Wind Shear and Helicity c. How to relate to predicted / observed convective.
The July 8, 1999 Las Vegas Flash Flood. The Monsoon Season in Las Vegas.
Summer Tornadoes – NWA 2015 Statistical Severe Convective Risk Assessment Model (SSCRAM) (Hart & Cohen, 2015) SPC Mesoanalysis Data Every hour from
Title card A Look at Environments Associated with Nighttime Supercell Tornadoes in the Central Plains Meteorologist Jon Davies Private © Dick McGowan &
Tornado Warning Skill as a Function of Environment National Weather Service Sub-Regional Workshop Binghamton, New York September 23, 2015 Yvette Richardson.
Observed Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
2. Basic Characteristics and Forecast The 500-hPa pattern for this event featured a deep low centered over Idaho. A composite analysis of past tornado.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
Cirrus anvil cumulonimbus T (skewed) LCL (Lifting Condensation Level) LFC (Level of Free Convection) EL (Equilibrium level) p overshooting CAPE Sounding.
Mobile Integrated Profiling System (MIPS) Observations of Boundary Layer and Water Vapor Variations around Boundaries and Storms Kevin Knupp University.
The Effect of Downdraft Strength on Tornado Intensity and Path Length Dylan R. Card and Ross A. Lazear Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences,
850 hPa Analysis The animation on the previous page contains a 850 hPa analysis, which has the parameters of geopotential heights, Precipitable Water and.
Defining a Threat Area and Miller Techniques
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart
Thermodynamic Diagrams and Severe Weather
Case Study in Conditional Symmetric Instability
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
Forecast parameters, Tornadogensis, maintenance and decay
UNSTABLE Science Question 1: ABL Processes
Tropical Cyclone Supercells and Tornadoes: Gaps in the Knowledge Base
Supercell tornado environments
Presentation transcript:

Intense Near-Surface Wind Shear in Severe Thunderstorm Environments: A Closer Look at Implications for Near-Surface Stability and Tornadogenesis Potential Dan Miller Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service WFO Duluth, Minnesota Dan Miller Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service WFO Duluth, Minnesota NWS Duluth Minnesota Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop14 March 2012 Greg Mann Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service WFO Detroit/White Lake, Michigan Greg Mann Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service WFO Detroit/White Lake, Michigan

CAPE/Shear Relationships Some Forms of CAPE/Shear in use for a long time Sfc-6 km shear Sfc-3 km shear/helicity Sfc-1 km shear/helicity EHI (0-1 km, 0-2 km) VGP (bulk, integrated)

Bulk Shear: 0-1 km agl Focus Increasingly on Layers Progressively Closer to the Surface Integration with Boundary Layer/Inflow RH

Near-Surface Shear: sfc-500m agl 0000 UTC Norman OK: 4 May m agl 350 m agl 1000 m agl Observed Storm Motion SFC Wind 350 m wind

Near-Surface Shear: sfc-500m agl All of this critical “stuff” is going on in a very shallow near-surface layer Red = SFC m agl Cyan = 400 m m agl Lavender = 1000 m m agl Red = SFC m agl Cyan = 400 m m agl Lavender = 1000 m m agl

Near-Surface Thermodynamic Profiles Big tornado outbreak days 1000 m agl 400 m agl 1000 m agl Observed Storm Motion SFC Wind 400 m wind 0000 UTC Pittsburgh PA: 1 June 1985

Near-Surface Thermodynamic Profiles Big tornado outbreak days

Near-Surface Thermodynamic Profiles What about these profiles?

Near-Surface Thermodynamic Profiles What about these profiles?

Theory: Richardson Number Richardson Number in general describes the ability of a fluid to mix and the modality of the mixing process. Mathematically - it is the ratio of Thermal Stratification to Shearing Potential. In practice - it is useful for identifying regions of free convection, forced turbulence, forced mechanical mixing, and laminar/stratified flow. Richardson Number in general describes the ability of a fluid to mix and the modality of the mixing process. Mathematically - it is the ratio of Thermal Stratification to Shearing Potential. In practice - it is useful for identifying regions of free convection, forced turbulence, forced mechanical mixing, and laminar/stratified flow.

Theory: Richardson Number Ri < 0 indicates convective instability (only the numerator can be negative) Ri ~ 1 indicates thermal stratification is balancing mechanical mixing Ri > 1 indicates laminar flow Ri c = 0.25 Theoretical critical threshold for forced Turbulence Ri c < Ri < 1 Graduated mechanical mixing Ri < 0 indicates convective instability (only the numerator can be negative) Ri ~ 1 indicates thermal stratification is balancing mechanical mixing Ri > 1 indicates laminar flow Ri c = 0.25 Theoretical critical threshold for forced Turbulence Ri c < Ri < 1 Graduated mechanical mixing

Implications for “Effective” Stability Stratification is necessary for the preservation of strong near surface shear - minimizes momentum mixing. Stratified regions are not available in whole, rather in laminated layers - so depth considerations are important when assessing the progressive availability of the entire depth. Availability of shear for a rotating updraft increases as rotational velocity increases. localized speed maxima associated with the circulation bore into the stratified region via localized shear instability (Ri < Ri c ) establishing an inflow within the intense shear layer reservoir. Stratification is necessary for the preservation of strong near surface shear - minimizes momentum mixing. Stratified regions are not available in whole, rather in laminated layers - so depth considerations are important when assessing the progressive availability of the entire depth. Availability of shear for a rotating updraft increases as rotational velocity increases. localized speed maxima associated with the circulation bore into the stratified region via localized shear instability (Ri < Ri c ) establishing an inflow within the intense shear layer reservoir.

Ri Critical Thresholds Given a constant delta-  (4 K here), consider the relationship between stability (via depth) and bulk shear through the layer. Depth not only governs the overall stability; but it is also important to consider with regard to dissipative effects. Therefore, the greater the depth the lower the Ri should be to allow circulation extension to the surface (circulation strength dependent) Given a constant delta-  (4 K here), consider the relationship between stability (via depth) and bulk shear through the layer. Depth not only governs the overall stability; but it is also important to consider with regard to dissipative effects. Therefore, the greater the depth the lower the Ri should be to allow circulation extension to the surface (circulation strength dependent) Environmental Ri values close to Ri c may not be conducive for lengthy circulation maintenance, because the storm (not the circulation) inflow may force Ri < Ri c causing the available surface layer to lose shear. Environmental Ri values close to Ri c may not be conducive for lengthy circulation maintenance, because the storm (not the circulation) inflow may force Ri < Ri c causing the available surface layer to lose shear. Layer Depth Bulk Shear Magnitude delta 

Using Ri Critical Thresholds First things first, diagnose regions favorable for deep organized convection (including elevated) via parameter space evaluation (SPC meso page/LAPS/etc.) 400 m agl 1000 m agl Observed Storm Motion SFC Wind 400 m wind Identify regions of appreciable m agl bulk shear (0-1 km often too deep) Especially coincident with relatively high CINH (> 50 J/kg) (i.e. nocturnal/pre warm front)

Using Ri Critical Thresholds Assess availability of accessing shear given a superimposed circulation using m agl Ri: Ri > 1 - generally unavailable Ri ~ 1 - only accessible to a very strong parent mesocyclone Ri ~ 0.5 ± shear layer available to localized perturbation Ri < turbulence disrupts ambient shear (i.e. shear transitions to flow) additional storm scale modulation necessary Ri < 0 - free convective turbulence encourages large eddies Assess availability of accessing shear given a superimposed circulation using m agl Ri: Ri > 1 - generally unavailable Ri ~ 1 - only accessible to a very strong parent mesocyclone Ri ~ 0.5 ± shear layer available to localized perturbation Ri < turbulence disrupts ambient shear (i.e. shear transitions to flow) additional storm scale modulation necessary Ri < 0 - free convective turbulence encourages large eddies

Cursory Example: 5-6 June 2010 Sfc-500m Richardson Number (shaded) Sfc-500m Bulk Shear (Black Contour) Sfc-500m Richardson Number (shaded) Sfc-500m Bulk Shear (Black Contour) 03Z04Z 05Z 06Z Millbury EF4 Millbury EF4 Dundee EF2 Dundee EF2 Dowagiac EF2 Dowagiac EF2 Constantine EF2 Constantine EF2 Colton EF2 Colton EF2 Lincoln EF3 Lincoln EF3 Clay EF3 Clay EF3 Several More EF0-1 in the favorable zone Several More EF0-1 in the favorable zone

Cursory Example: 29 February 2012 Cursory Example: 2 March 2012 Branson EF2 Branson EF2 Harrisburg EF4 Harrisburg EF4 Henryville EF4 Henryville EF4 West Liberty EF3 West Liberty EF3 Sfc-500m Richardson Number (shaded) Sfc-500m Bulk Shear (Black Contour) Sfc-500m Richardson Number (shaded) Sfc-500m Bulk Shear (Black Contour)

Case Example: 17 June June 2010 Outbreak: All Tornadoes

Case Example: 17 June 2010 Saint Croix Valley Tornado: 0144 UTC UTC 18 June 2010

Case Example: 17 June 2010

SPC Mesoanalysis Data: 0200 UTC 18 June 2010 SBCAPE/CIN 0-6 km Bulk Shear 0-1 km Bulk Shear 0-1 km SRH 100 mb LCL Height LCL-LFC Mean RH

Case Example: 17 June 2010 RUC PFC near Rush City, MN: 0200 UTC 18 June 2010 Sig SBCIN, but not “capped” Very Strong sfc-500 m agl bulk shear

Case Example: 17 June 2010 Richardson Number: 0000 UTC 18 June 2010

Case Example: 17 June 2010 Richardson Number: 0100 UTC 18 June 2010

Case Example: 17 June 2010 Richardson Number: 0200 UTC 18 June 2010

Case Example: 17 June 2010 KDLH Z/SRV ~0150 UTC: 18 June 2010 What happens if we superimpose an updraft perturbation?

DiscussionDiscussion Significant/Violent long-track tornadoes are typically coincident with environments containing extreme near surface shear Near surface stratification is necessary for the production of significant surface layer shear Richardson Number is very useful in accessing the “effective” stability and accessibility of the near surface shear layer to a superimposed circulation Significant/Violent long-track tornadoes are typically coincident with environments containing extreme near surface shear Near surface stratification is necessary for the production of significant surface layer shear Richardson Number is very useful in accessing the “effective” stability and accessibility of the near surface shear layer to a superimposed circulation Extremely Important Caveats How well do the models handle near-surface layers (0-500 m)? Requires some knowledge of actual storm inflow layer

Thanks For Your Attention Questions/Comments/Discussion?