14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Stuart Pittel Bartol Research Institute, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3224 Nuclear and Particle Physics Ruben Saakyan UCL
Advertisements

The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.
Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Introduction to Molecular Orbitals
The Quantum Mechanics of MRI Part 1: Basic concepts
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Cooper pairs and BCS ( ) Richardson exact solution (1963). Ultrasmall superconducting grains (1999). SU(2) Richarson-Gaudin models (2000). Cooper.
Cooper pairs and BCS ( ) Richardson exact solution (1963). Ultrasmall superconducting grains (1999). SU(2) Richardson-Gaudin models (2000). Cooper.
On the formulation of a functional theory for pairing with particle number restoration Guillaume Hupin GANIL, Caen FRANCE Collaborators : M. Bender (CENBG)
1 Nuclear Physics 1 Section 11-1,2. 2 Electron Pressure From the total energy of a free electron gas we can calculate the electron pressure using.
Collective Response of Atom Clusters and Nuclei: Role of Chaos Trento April 2010 Mahir S. Hussein University of Sao Paulo.
CNRS, Saclay, 6 June The Shell Model and the DMRG Approach Stuart Pittel Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.
Spin-orbit effects in semiconductor quantum dots Departament de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears Institut Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats IMEDEA.
No friction. No air resistance. Perfect Spring Two normal modes. Coupled Pendulums Weak spring Time Dependent Two State Problem Copyright – Michael D.
Chaos and interactions in nano-size metallic grains: the competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism Yoram Alhassid (Yale) Introduction Universal.
Single Particle Energies
Lesson 8 Beta Decay. Beta -decay Beta decay is a term used to describe three types of decay in which a nuclear neutron (proton) changes into a nuclear.
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
Crystal Lattice Vibrations: Phonons
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Solid State Physics Bands & Bonds. PROBABILITY DENSITY The probability density P(x,t) is information that tells us something about the likelihood of.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Outline  Simple comments on regularities of many-body systems under random interactions  Number of spin I states for single-j configuration  J-pairing.
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Atomic Orbitals, Electron Configurations, and Atomic Spectra
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
4. The rotating mean field. The mean field concept A nucleon moves in the mean field generated by all nucleons. The mean field is a functional of the.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Mean-Field Description of Heavy Neutron-Rich Nuclei P. D. Stevenson University of Surrey NUSTAR Neutron-Rich Minischool Surrey, 2005.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Molecular bonding. Molecular Bonding and Spectra The Coulomb force is the only one to bind atoms. The combination of attractive and repulsive forces creates.
1 Proton-neutron pairing by G-matrix in the deformed BCS Soongsil University, Korea Eun Ja Ha Myung-Ki Cheoun.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
Sevdalina S. Dimitrova Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Sofia, Bulgaria The Density Matrix Renormalization Group Method applied to Nuclear.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Drude weight and optical conductivity of doped graphene Giovanni Vignale, University of Missouri-Columbia, DMR The frequency of long wavelength.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Section 23.3: Coulomb’s Law
Anisotropic exactly solvable models in the cold atomic systems Jiang, Guan, Wang & Lin Junpeng Cao.
Coulomb’s Law Pg
On Solutions of the one-dimensional Holstein Model Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian China 23rd International Conference on.
Exactly Solvable gl(m/n) Bose-Fermi Systems Feng Pan, Lianrong Dai, and J. P. Draayer Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian China Recent Advances in Quantum.
Correlations in Structure among Observables and Enhanced Proton-Neutron Interactions R.Burcu ÇAKIRLI Istanbul University International Workshop "Shapes.
M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Feynmann Diagrams. M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Feynman Diagrams 
Gross Properties of Nuclei
Sizes. W. Udo Schröder, 2011 Nuclear Spins 2 Intrinsic Nuclear Spin Nuclei can be deformed  can rotate quantum mech.  collective spin and magnetic effects.
Variational Multiparticle-Multihole Configuration Mixing Method with the D1S Gogny force INPC2007, Tokyo, 06/06/2007 Nathalie Pillet (CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel,
Gogny-TDHFB calculation of nonlinear vibrations in 44,52 Ti Yukio Hashimoto Graduate school of pure and applied sciences, University of Tsukuba 1.Introduction.
Semi-Empirical Mass Formula part II Quantum Terms
Flat Band Nanostructures Vito Scarola
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Solid state physics is the study of how atoms arrange themselves into solids and what properties these solids have. Calculate the macroscopic properties.
Sandipan Dutta and James Dufty Department of Physics, University of Florida Classical Representation of Quantum Systems Work supported under US DOE Grants.
Electric Dipole Response, Neutron Skin, and Symmetry Energy
Nuclear Symmetry Energy in QCD degree of freedom Phys. Rev
Schrödinger Theory of the Electronic Structure of Matter from a ‘Newtonian’ Perspective Viraht Sahni.
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
Section 23.3: Coulomb’s Law
Sevdalina S. Dimitrova Institute for Nuclear Research & Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
The Color Charge & Bag Model
Parametrisation of Binding Energies
From Atoms, to Nucleons, to Quarks
Nuclear Energy Chapter 25 6/1/2019.
Representations of the Nuclear Potential
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Stuart Pittel Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA * Work carried out in collaboration with J. Dukelsky (CSIC, Madrid), G.G. Dussel (CNEA, Buenos Aires) and C. Esebbag (Alcala). Exactly-solvable Richardson-Gaudin models and their applications *

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Shown by Richardson in the 60s that the pure pairing model with constant g and non-degenerate single-particle energies is exactly solvable. Recently, a revival of work on exactly-solvable pairing models building on work of Richardson and related work of Gaudin. - Will summarize recent advances - Will then discuss one particular example of relevance to nuclear structure. Introductory Remarks and Outline

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Richardson’s exact solution revived and used to provide new insight into transition from superconducting regime to fluctuation- dominated regime in small metallic grains. [J. Dukelsky and G. Sierra, Phys. Rev. B61 (2000) 12302] Richardson’s solution of pure pairing model generalized to a much wider variety of exactly-solvable pairing hamiltonians, relevant to both fermion and bosons systems. [J. Dukelsky, C. Esebbag and P. Schuck, PRL 87 (2001) ] Extended models applied to system of bosons confined to an oscillator trap and interacting via a repulsive interaction. Showed that fragmentation of the ground condensate possible. [J. Dukelsky and P. Schuck, PRL 86 (2001) 4207] Models used to identify a new mechanism for enhancing s-d boson dominance in interacting boson models of nuclei, arising from repulsive interaction due to Pauli exchange of constituent nucleons. [J. Dukelsky and S. Pittel, PRL 86 (2001) 4791] Summary of Recent Developments

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Exactly-solvable nature of pure pairing model used to find a new pictorial representation of how superconductivity arises in a finite fermi system like the nucleus. [J. Dukelsky, C. Esebbag and S. Pittel, PRL 88 (2002) ] Review article on Richardson-Gaudin exactly-solvable models. [J. Dukelsky, S. Pittel and G. Sierra, RMP 76 (2004) 643.] Exactly-solvable models extended to describe coupling between an atomic system governed by pairing correlations and another bosonic mode. Used to model a system of bosonic atoms coupled to a molecular dimer. [ J. Dukelsky, G. G. Dussel, S. Pittel and C. Esebbag, PRL 93 (2004) ]

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Standard pure pairing hamiltonian: Richardson’s solution of pure pairing model (fermions) Richardson ansatz for ground state (N pairs): Richardson ansatz for ground state (N pairs): |Ψ> is an exact eigenstate of H if pair energies e α satisfy |Ψ> is an exact eigenstate of H if pair energies e α satisfy

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden These coupled eqns., one for each Cooper pair, called the Richardson equations. The ground state energy is a sum of the resulting pair energies, E α = Σ α e α Method can be used to get all eigenstates of H and all eigen- energies.

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Electrostatic analogy for pairing models There is an electrostatic analogy for such pairing models that emerges from the Richardson equations. Will focus on pure pairing for fermion systems. In this case, ground state solution governed by pair energies obtained from set of coupled Richardson equations:

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Consider energy functional If we differentiate U with respect to the e α and equate to zero, we recover precisely the Richardson equations. Question: What is the physical meaning of U ?

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden – A number of fixed charges (one for each active orbit) located at 2ε i and with charges Ω i /2. Called orbitons. – N free charges located at e α and with unit charge. Called pairons. – A Coulomb interaction between all charges. – A uniform electric field with strength 1/4g. Reminder: The Coulomb interaction between two point charges in 2D is: Thus: U represents the physics of a classical 2D electrostatic problem with the following ingredients:

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden For fermion systems, can show that - Orbitons are constrained to real axis, since s.p. energies all real. - Orbitons are constrained to real axis, since s.p. energies all real. - Pairons lie either on real axis or in complex conjugate pairs. - Pairons lie either on real axis or in complex conjugate pairs.

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden Application to Nuclear Pairing Will use electrostatic analogy to obtain pictorial representation of how “superconductivity” develops in nuclei. Typically hard to see effects of transition to superconductivity because of limited number of nucleons involved. Will use info on classical positions of pairons (from analogous 2D problem) to provide insight into quantum problem which otherwise was not readily evident. Will focus on even Sn isotopes, with closed Z=50 proton shell and N-50 active (valence) neutrons. Will do calculations as function of g.

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden The tin isotopes OrbitonPositionCharge d 5/ g 7/ s 1/ d 3/2 4.4 h 11/

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden 114 Sn, 7 pairons Lines drawn to connect each pairon with its nearest neighbor. For weak pairing, pairons organize themselves as artificial atoms around associated orbitons, subject to Pauli principle. Note: Physical g ≈ MeV

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden 114 Sn, Evolution with g As pairing strength grows, a transition takes place from a set of isolated “atoms” to a “cluster”, in which pairons have lost memory of the orbitons from which they came.

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden 116 Sn, 8 pairons

14-18 June 2005 International Conference on Finite Fermi Systems: Nilsson Model 50 years, Lund, Sweden 116 Sn, stronger pairing Two-stage transition to full superconductivity.