1 SEC Staff Briefing: The Roll-out of Interactive Data Reporting for US-listed Public Companies David M. Blaszkowsky, Director, Office of Interactive Disclosure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XBRL and the CSA Andrew Lowe Accountant, Corporate Finance Ontario Securities Commission November 5, 2009.
Advertisements

XBRL John Mania Director, Product Management. Slide # 2 CNW Group & XBRL  CNW Group - XBRL involvement on two fronts:  News Release dissemination 
Solutions Overview Keith Maler Director, Interactive Services, XBRL Specialist Bowne Strategic Marketing
NOTICE: Proprietary and Confidential This material is proprietary to EDGAR Online. It contains trade secrets and confidential information which is solely.
Taxmann’s XBRL Tool Purpose of XBRL Reporting  XBRL is a language for the electronic communication of business and financial data that has revolutionized.
© Copyright 2014 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Initiative and Electronic Municipal Market Access.
Taxonomy Review Jennifer S. Moriarty, FASB Yossef Newman, Deloitte Sharyn Kohen, Ernst & Young.
1 Past, Current and Future Auditor Involvement with SEC Registrant's XBRL Exhibits Paul Penler – Ernst & Young LLP The 6 th Univ. of Kansas International.
ELECTION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS Robert D. Strahota, Assistant Director * SEC Office of International Affairs Prepared for the panel on Improving.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Client AcceptancePlanningTesting & EvidenceEvaluation & Reporting 1.Acceptance 8.Using the work of an expert 9.Management representations 2.Terms of engagement.
The Securities and Exchange Commission: 21 st Century Disclosure Initiative September 9, 2008.
Current Developments at the PCAOB Ensuring Integrity: 3 rd Annual Auditing Conference at Baruch College December 4, 2008.
Pacific Rim Conference July 28, Pacific Rim Conference US-GAAP – US GAAP 2009 Taxonomies – Codification – Extension Taxonomy for 2010 Corporate.
1 8 th Annual Financial Reporting Conference Baruch College Paul Beswick Deputy Chief Accountant April 30, 2009.
1 Josh Jones Senior Associate Chief Accountant Office of the Chief Accountant U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission December 4, 2008 The Securities and.
Assurance on XBRL Instance Document: A Conceptual Framework of Assertions Rajendra P. Srivastava And Alexander Kogan 16th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting.
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASB or IFRS Foundation. International Financial Reporting.
 Mark & Sons Future Technology Co. (hereafter, MSFT) is a $40 billion public company that provides high-technology products and services.  Currently,
Bringing XBRL tax filing to the UK Jeff Smith, Customer Contact, Online Services,
Of Advancement Through Knowledge ▪ Interaction ▪ Information ▪ Influence ▪ Integrity ▪ XBRL eXtensible Business Reporting Language.
ACG 4401 Introduction to XBRL. What is a Supply Chain?
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
1 TOKYO STOCK EXCHANGE’s XBRL project AOSEF Market Data & Technology Collaboration Workshop 2007 Nov. Ver.1.0.
SAP’s XBRL Motivation SAP‘s XBRL Motivation Compliance
XBRL Business Language. What is XBRL?  XBRL, or eXtensible Business Reporting Language  An extension of XML, or eXtensible Markup Language  The goal.
XBRL Voluntary Program on the EDGAR System April 2005 Brigitte Lippmann Attorney Division of Corporation Finance Jeffrey Naumann Enabling Technologies.
IFRS Transition and Regulatory Compliance Kelly Gorman, Deputy Director Corporate Finance Branch NASAA 2011 Corporation Finance Training Seminar July 7-8,
The ABCs of XBRL. Vintage Filings files over 950 XBRL documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission each quarter We are number 2 in the industry.
Clarity Systems Briefing to FEI CFIT Mark NashmanPresident & CTO ext. 407 Louis MatherneDirector, XBRL Services.
XBRL Canada Fourth Annual Conference October 7, :30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. University of Waterloo Efrim Boritz Iowa State University Won Gyun No.
ACG 6415 Introduction to XBRL. What is a Supply Chain?
Accounting Principles and Reporting Standards
XBRL Second Phase of Implementation. Background of XBRL Implementation MCA has taken a lead in the Implementation of XBRL by mandating the XBRL filing.
SEC Financial Reporting Issues NARUC Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Jackson Hole, Wyoming October 8, 2007.
1 Japan FSA's XBRL Project - Launch of New Public Disclosure System with Mandatory XBRL - May 2008 Toshinori Kobayashi Financial Services Agency, The Japanese.
© 2014 Equity Administration Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Four Fundamentals of Financial Reporting for Equity Compensation Kathy Biddle, CEP.
1 Conference on Accountants’ Liability ALI-ABA Zoe-Vonna Palmrose Deputy Chief Accountant Professional Practice Office of the Chief Accountant U.S. Securities.
1 XBRL from the Analyst-Investor Perspective XBRL US Conference, October 15, 2008 Tom Larsen, CFA Harding Loevner Management CFA Institute XBRL Working.
v2 Climate Change Disclosure for Canadian Public Companies Barbara Hendrickson Corporate Reporting: Climate Change & Related Environmental Disclosures.
Assurance on XBRL Instance Documents: The Case of United Technologies Corporation University of Waterloo Efrim Boritz Won Gyun No UWCISA - 5th Symposium.
11. Regulatory Reporting and Disclosure from Management's Perspective Pertemuan Matakuliah: Manajemen Kinerja Sistem Komputer Tahun: Feb
Scandals (in the public and private sector)  Enron  Worldcom  Livent  Nortel  HRDC  Sponsorship Scandal.
Pros and Cons Comparison By Justin Bost Olivia Bischoff.
Accounting for Loss Contingencies Alison T. Spivey Associate Chief Accountant Office of the Chief Accountant.
Taylor Hawes Controller – Global Platforms & Operations Microsoft Corporation SEC Voluntary Filing Program.
Regulation U. S. “Public Companies” must register with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC).
1 Assurance on XBRL Instance Document: A Conceptual Framework of Assertions Rajendra P. Srivastava & Alexander Kogan Symposium on Information Integrity.
Background on Developments Related to XBRL & Assurance Amy Pawlicki Director – Business Reporting, Assurance & Advisory Services and XBRL AICPA.
1 An Integrated Approach to Assurance on XBRL Instance Document: A Conceptual Framework Rajendra P. Srivastava Ernst & Young Professor and Director E&Y.
ACG 4401 Introduction to XBRL. What is a Supply Chain?
Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information C H A P T E R 5.
Presentation Audit Committee Institute Ireland Conrad Hotel, Dublin 2 7 September 2004.
Marietta-Westberg, SEC 1 PIPES: Public Investments in Private Equity Jennifer Marietta-Westberg U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission May 2, 2007 The.
XBRL Application in Listing Company Reporting In China Shanghai Stock Exchange Huang Hongbin
XBRL Implementation: A Field Investigation Diane Janvrin Associate Professor Won No Assistant Professor Information Systems Mid-Year Meeting January 9,
1 SEC Roadmap Herschel Mann Texas Tech University.
1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David.
ACG 4401 Introduction to XBRL. What is a Supply Chain?
Advanced Accounting Information Systems
. Financial Information supply chain Columbia Business School’s Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis  “An Evaluation of the.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Section 404 Audits of Internal Control and Control Risk Chapter 10.
Tagged Data Initiative (XBRL) Brigitte Lippmann Attorney Division of Corporation Finance Eric J. Schuppenhauer Senior Advisor to the Chief Accountant Office.
IFRS 1 First-Time Adoption of IFRS PwC. PricewaterhouseCoopers First time adoption session outline Overview Exemptions and exceptions Disclosure.
The Preparer’s Perspective of XBRL
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act
XBRL Voluntary Program on the EDGAR System
Whistleblower Program
Summary of financial results for the period 1-12/2016
ACG 6415 Introduction to XBRL.
Presentation transcript:

1 SEC Staff Briefing: The Roll-out of Interactive Data Reporting for US-listed Public Companies David M. Blaszkowsky, Director, Office of Interactive Disclosure XBRL Canada Conference Toronto 5 November 2009

2 Disclaimer As a matter of policy, the Securities and Exchange Commission disclaims responsibility for the private statements of SEC employees. The views I am expressing today are solely my own, and do not reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or of any employees other than myself.

3 Interactive Data / XBRL: “News From the Front” Mandate started 15 June – How is it working? v First Reporting period in XBRL went well u >500 filings, >10 percent are Phase II/III “early” filers u First detail-tagged, first 10K submissions u Includes Canadian, other foreign private issuers v Companies can tag successfully u Modest cost, modest time u Learning curve: Most frequent problems are the most basic, easiest u “Best practices” starting u Benefits of a large, comprehensive taxonomy v “User-side” awakening u Investor applications emerging u Investor interest increasing v Concerns about detailed footnote tagging v Staff are reviewing XBRL exhibits for technical quality, tag choice, etc.

4 “Interactive Data” Add Structure and Meaning to Filed Financial Disclosures Mapping Label:Net Sales Tag: NetSales Metadata:- Currency - Year - Amount - Scenario - Value Tagging OR: an “Extension” Footnotes (Block, Detailed) US-GAAP: List of Tags P&L B-S “Taxonomy” Footnotes Flows

5 Why is Interactive Data Important for Company Information? Filers/Corporations v Process improvements and savings v Easier/Faster compliance v Better communication, visibility to investors u Especially for mid/small- caps Buy-side v “Faster, cheaper, better” v As-reported, and complete v No introduced errors v More useful, more functionality v Higher analysis/analyst productivity v Improved comparability Improved Market Efficiency

6 Public Company Reporting Using Interactive Data v What will be required v Who and when v Important additional features

7 What Will Be Required v Content: u Primary financial statements (IS, BS, etc.) u Footnotes u Financial statement schedules. u Certain company identifier information (“DEI”) v Forms u Periodic Reports (10Q, 10K, 20F, 40F) u Transition Reports u Reports on Forms 8-K and 6-K with revised audited versions of financial statements u Securities Act registration statements (S-1, S-3, S-4, S-11, F-1, F-3, F-4, F-9, F-10) u Not IPOs v Interactive data requirements are provided as an exhibit v “Disclosure Neutrality” v Posting to the Filer’s website, if it has one, same business day, for at least 12 months

8 Year 1Year 2 Filer Group Domestic/Foreign Large Accelerated Filers Using US GAAP Public Float >$5 billion All other Large/Accelerated Filers All other Filers in US GAAP (including smaller reporting companies) All Issuers using IFRS as published by the IASB Phase-in Schedule Who? What? Face Financials: All facts Footnotes: Block tag each footnote Schedules: Block tag each schedule All from first year Footnotes: Each significant accounting policy Block tag each table Tag each amount Schedules: Tag each amount

9 Year 1Year 2 Filer Group Begin with the first 10Q (or annual, for 20F/40F filers) for periods ending after 15 June Domestic/Foreign Large Accelerated Filers Using US GAAP Public Float >$5 billion All other Large/Accelerated Filers All other Filers in US GAAP (including smaller reporting companies) All foreign private issuers using IFRS as published by the IASB Phase-in Schedule When? Who? 30 day grace period, from the filing date of the related report, for the initial submission (by amendment) of interactive data exhibit 30 day grace period, from the filing date of the related report, for the initial submission (by amendment) of interactive data exhibit

10 Data reliability and non-compliance v Data in the interactive data file submitted will be subject to a limited liability u Subject to specified anti-fraud provisions except in connection with a failure to comply with the tagging requirements that occurs despite a good faith attempt to comply and is corrected promptly after the filer becomes aware of the failure v Limited liability provision phase-out: u Over a two-year period for each company. u Provision would terminate completely on October 31, v Interactive data files will be excluded from the officer certification requirements under the Exchange Act rules v No requirement of auditor assurance on their interactive data exhibits v Filers that do not provide or post required interactive data on the date required will be deemed not current with their Exchange Act reports u “Curable” by providing/posting the interactive data file v SEC Interactive Data Previewer, and automated validations are helpful

11 Thank You! Part 1… Contact Information for Questions v v

12 Feedback and Findings From Filings to Date Extensions v Check to ensure against unnecessary extensions u Recheck the taxonomy to make sure that a tag doesn’t already exist u Don’t create a new tag if a standard tag exists l Tag choices could be questioned by staff or by the marketplace v If extending, include definition for monetary elements, and describe whether it has debit/credit attribute v Negative values vs. negated labels: understand the element and its definition u Taxonomy designed so that most elements have a positive value v Tags versus labels…

13 Feedback and Findings From Filings to Date(2) v Labels: Make sure the labels match those of the traditional (HTML) document exactly u “Sales” vs. “Turnover”: Same tag, different label u Labels can be extended without creating a new tag u Use the pre-viewer to compare and check! v Rendering aesthetics vs. tagging integrity u XBRL is dependent on the integrity of the tags u Focus on the accuracy of the tags, not the visual appearance of the rendering u Make sure element labels match line item captions u Some differences cannot be avoided, e.g. indenting, fonts, underlining, total/subtotal captions, brackets (on SSE)

14 Feedback and Findings From Filings to Date(3) v Management review is prudent u Senior management should have an opportunity to review u Even if tagging is outsourced, they are still your financials and tags v Remember: Voluntary Filing Program is closed for most public filers u Public companies can only submit required filings u VFP only open for Article 6 and for mutual funds v FPIs: IFRS filings cannot be provided yet

15 Feedback and Findings From Filings to Date(4) Finally – v Looking to make the Interactive Data roll-out effective and smooth u Check regularly for SEC staff comments and FAQs u Look for additional public information seminars l Archive of 10 June 2009 event l Reprise for the next phase of filers, and for footnotes u Communicating with companies: web, phone, podcasts, other media as appropriate u Best practices will emerge v Above all: Start early! Whether for phase 2, or for footnotes!

16 Thank You! Contact Information for Questions v v