The CCSS Reading/Writing Connection Lisa Shirley Camp, M.Ed., NBCT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

NJ ASK Family Night English Language Arts Presented By: Anne Scaffo, ELA Instructional Coach Ted Peters, Reutter School Principal.
Taking a Look at PARCC Deb Bellinger Elementary Curriculum Consultant Calcasieu Parish.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
THE ALLENDALE PARENTS AS PARTNERS SERIES PRESENTS: P A RCC AND THE COMMON CORE NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Conten t Skill s Reading: Literature Craft and Structure 4. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative.
Common Core State Standards English Language Arts Overview Liz Smith, ELA Coordinator Heather Love, Reading Coordinator.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
Close Reading Instruction
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Evidence Based Selected Response (EBSR) Items
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Supplemental Instructional Materials Aligned to the Common Core State Standards It will take a number of years to develop new curriculum frameworks and.
Session 1: Understanding the Organization Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Teachers.
Activity 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Instructional Shifts.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Literacy: Mastery Across Academic Disciplines Focus on Information Reading & Writing and Academic Vocabulary within Content Areas.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments
Samantha Reid Part-Time Instructor - 8 th Floor Technology Integration Specialist Tulsa Public Schools.
Common Core State Standards The New National Initiative West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Meeting March 19, 2013.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
PEARSON COMMON CORE LITERATURE GRADES 11 AND 12 (2015)
  Standards in Oregon  Oregon Department of Education  Standards elsewhere  You can search standards for other states  For a good compilation,
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Linking Disciplinary Literacies to the Common Core State Standards EDC 448 Dr. Julie Coiro.
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
ELA Common Core State Standards Overview of the Big Shifts in Common Core Standards for English Language Arts Overview of the Standards for Literacy in.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Capacities of Literate Individuals Literacy August 19, 2011 Cecil County Public Schools.
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
Introduction to Common Core State Standards and PARCC Assessment.
Writing Across the Curriculum Mrs. Shirley Delgado M.A. Literacy Coach James J. Ferris High School.
COMMON CORE OVERVIEW English Language Arts Content Area Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
CCSS outlines what students are expected to learn in K-12 ELA (English language arts) and math in order to be college and career ready.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
April 27, 2011 Design and Implement the Task.  Goals: 1. Address the Literacy Standards in the Common Core Standards for Social Studies and Science 2.
Common Core State Standards ELA and Literacy 2012 Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Publisher Meeting Today: Common Core State Standards Oregon Shifts 1 ODE.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
GCSE English Language 8700 GCSE English Literature 8702 A two year course focused on the development of skills in reading, writing and speaking and listening.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Understanding the PARCC Prepared for Hillcrest School February 11, 2015.
1. PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the Common Core State Standards, so the assessment is worthy of preparation rather than.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Reflecting on the Shifts in Assessment. English Language Arts.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
PARCC in New Jersey New Jersey Department of Education March 2013.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
The New Illinois Learning Standards
PARCC for ELA and Literacy
The PARCC Vision PARCC states have committed to building a K-12 assessment system that:
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Testing Schedule.
Presentation transcript:

The CCSS Reading/Writing Connection Lisa Shirley Camp, M.Ed., NBCT

A LOT! Recently released information includes:  A testing blueprint  Item specifications  Phase 1 items and task prototypes Stay informed by regularly checking the website:

1. Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2. Evidence: Reading and writing grounded in evidence from text, literary and informational. 3. Knowledge: Building knowledge through content rich nonfiction. prototypes 3

Nine Specific Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment Demanded by the Three Core Shifts... 5

1. PARCC builds a staircase of text complexity to ensure students are on track each year for college and career reading. 2. PARCC rewards careful, close reading rather than racing through passages. 3. PARCC systematically focuses on the words that matter most— not obscure vocabulary, but the academic language that pervades complex texts. 6

4. PARCC focuses on students rigorously citing evidence from texts throughout the assessment (including selected-response items). 5. PARCC includes questions with more than one right answer to allow students to generate a range of rich insights that are substantiated by evidence from text(s). 6. PARCC requires writing to sources rather than writing to de-contextualized expository prompts. 7. PARCC also includes rigorous expectations for narrative writing, including accuracy and precision in writing in later grades. 7

8. PARCC assesses not just ELA but a full range of reading and writing across the disciplines of science and social studies. 9. PARCC simulates research on the assessment, including the comparison and synthesis of ideas across a range of informational sources. 8

SO... Two standards are always in play—whether they be reading or writing items, selected- response or constructed-response items on any one of the four components of PARCC. They are:  Reading Standard One (Use of Evidence)  Reading Standard Ten (Complex Texts) 9

Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR)—Combines a traditional selected-response question with a second selected-response question that asks students to show evidence from the text that supports the answer they provided to the first question. Underscores the importance of Reading Anchor Standard 1 for implementation of the CCSS. Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR)—Uses technology to capture student comprehension of texts in authentic ways that have been difficult to score by machine for large scale assessments (e.g., drag and drop, cut and paste, shade text, move items to show relationships). Range of Prose Constructed Responses (PCR)—Elicits evidence that students have understood a text or texts they have read and can communicate that understanding well both in terms of written expression and knowledge of language and conventions. There are four of these items of varying types on each annual performance- based assessment. 10

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Students must grapple with works of exceptional craft and thought whose range extends across genres, cultures, and centuries.  Reading is critical to building knowledge in history/social studies as well as in science and technical subjects. College and career ready reading in these fields requires an appreciation of the norms and conventions of each discipline.

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Along with high- quality contemporary works, student texts should be chosen from among seminal U.S. documents, the classics of American literature, and the timeless dramas of Shakespeare.  The vast majority of reading in college and workforce training programs will be sophisticated nonfiction.

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Students gain a reservoir of literary and cultural knowledge, references, and images; the ability to evaluate intricate arguments; and the capacity to surmount the challenges posed by complex texts.  Students pay attention to precise details; they develop the capacity to evaluate intricate arguments, synthesize complex information, and follow detailed descriptions of events and concepts.

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Student writing is a key means of asserting and defending claims, showing what they know about a subject, and conveying what they have experienced, imagined, thought, and felt.

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Students must take task, purpose, and audience into careful consideration, choosing words, information, structures, and formats deliberately, combining elements of different kinds of writing to produce complex and nuanced writing.  Students must take task, purpose, and audience into careful consideration, choosing words, information, structures, and formats deliberately. They need to be able to use technology strategically when creating, refining, and collaborating on writing.

English Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and Technical Subjects  Students have to become adept at gathering information, evaluating sources, and citing material accurately, reporting findings from their research and analysis of sources in a clear and cogent manner.

In Reading:  building knowledge  ability to evaluate intricate arguments  the capacity to surmount the challenges posed by complex texts In Writing:  asserting and defending claims, showing what they know about a subject, and conveying what they have experienced, imagined, thought, and felt  take task, purpose, and audience into careful consideration, choosing words, information, structures, and formats deliberately  become adept at gathering information, evaluating sources, and citing material accurately, reporting findings from their research and analysis of sources in a clear and cogent manner

PARCC RUBRIC

 Using a highlighter, note the changes in scoring criteria from 4 to 0 for each writing trait.  Take a moment to compare this writing rubric to rubrics you may have used in the past to score student writing (a 6 traits rubric, etc.). Make a t-chart of similarities and differences in order to discuss your observations with your table group.  Choose a person to share your group’s observations with the whole group.

Those documents describe complex ideas with these words and phrases:  Quality, substance, critical, evaluative, self-directed  Diverse perspectives, multidimensional, multiple levels of meaning, multiple ideas that intersect, possibly from multiple texts  Ambiguous or considers ambiguity, not literal, nuanced, subtle, abstract  Depth/breadth, developed over the course of a text  Express new language/knowledge/mode of thought

Look at the passage “Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address,” part of a unit that uses Walden as its central text. In the unit Lincoln’s speech is paired with “Civil Disobedience.”  Examine the close reading questions for that text. Using three different colors, highlight questions that:  Probe for comprehension  Ask students to analyze ideas from the text  Ask students to analyze author’s craft and its impact on meaning and tone

24

PARCC Redefines the Narrative:  Includes weaving details from the source text accurately into an original narrative story (students must draw evidence from the text—character traits and the events of the story—and apply that understanding to create a story).  For students who struggle to create original stories, the source text provides ideas from which to begin; for those students who readily create imaginative experiences, the source provides a means to “jump off” and innovate.  Focuses on students applying their knowledge of language and conventions when writing (an expectation for both college and careers).

 RSI.2. Determine two or more central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another (in order) to provide a complex analysis; provide an objective summary of the text.  Make notes on how this text develops ideas related to:  The rightful role of government in society  The responsibility of man to address injustice

 Analyze Lincoln’s treatment of these two ideas: How are they developed separately? How do they interact and build on one another: are they interdependent?  Your essay should state and support a thesis that considers how Lincoln uses words and phrases to deliver a message about these two ideas. Be sure to support your ideas with evidence from the text, including noting places where the text leaves matters uncertain or unstated.

 Working with your table group, brainstorm ideas for a narrative prompt matched to this text: review the PARCC guidelines for narrative essays.  Working with your table group, brainstorm ideas for a research task matched to this text: what other sources might you pair with Lincoln’s speech?

Read the excerpt of “The Memory Place” by Barbara Kingsolver.  In your table groups, construct close reading questions that:  Probe for comprehension  Ask students to analyze ideas from the text  Ask students to analyze author’s craft and its impact on meaning and tone * Kingsolver, Barbara. “The Memory Place.” Of Woods and Waters: A Kentucky Outdoor Reader, edited by Ron Ellis. University Press of Kentucky (Lexington, KY), 2005.

 Using Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address and/or the Kingsolver excerpt, work in your table groups to create writing prompts of the three types:  Narrative  Literary analysis  Research-based analysis: what sources could you pair with one or the other of these texts?  Check your prompts against the PARCC Rubric and the CCSS for reading informational texts.  Write your prompts on chart paper and post them for a gallery walk.

 Using sticky notes, read the other groups’ prompts and provide feedback:  As you make your comments, consider these questions:  Does the prompt demand a deep understanding of the text?  Does the prompt give students a chance to meet the PARCC Rubric criteria? Does it require development of complex ideas requiring deep inferences?  Does the prompt appear to connect with at least ONE of the CCSS for reading informational texts?

 Take a moment to reflect on our session. Jot down your thoughts and prepare to share them. When making notes, consider:  Realizations  Plans to shift instruction  Celebrations of effective current practice  Unanswered questions