Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, 2014 1 Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.

Advertisements

Ex Parte (EP) and Inter Partes (IP) Proceedings Fiscal Years Statistical Data Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences AIPLA S PRING M EETING 2012 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.

America Invents Act (AIA): Overview of Key Provisions SLA Annual Conference June 10, 2013 Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator and Associate Commissioner.

Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.

What Do In-House Counsel Need to Know? AIA Proceedings Molly Kocialski, Senior Patent Counsel, Oracle Dion Messer, General Counsel - IP, Limelight Networks.

An Inside Look at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Scott Boalick Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.

BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.

Administrative Trials

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.

Connecticut Intellectual Property Law Association Scott E. Kamholz, M.D., Ph.D. Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board September 25,

Standing Sentinel Over Innovation: The Importance of a Balanced and Effective IP System Andrew C. Byrnes Chief of Staff to the Under Secretary of Commerce.

Recent Court Decisions Impacting Review Proceedings Under The AIA J. Steven Baughman Ropes & Gray LLP Nancy J. Linck, Esq. Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck.

A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Michael R. Fleming Chief Administrative Patent Judge United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.

Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,

Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on Inter Partes Disputes and the PTAB _____ John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson.

Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.

Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.

1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Interplay between Litigation and the AIA __________ An Overview John B. Pegram Fish.

PTAB Trial Proceedings Tips from the Bench October 16, The Honorable Brian Murphy (PTAB) Louis W. Beardell, Jr. (Morgan Lewis & Bockius) Michael.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update Statistics based first three years of AIA filings 3,655 petitions –3,277 (89.7%) inter partes review (IPR) –368 (10%)

New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.

© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.

The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.

TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP IP in Japan Committee Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. October, 2015 USPTO Rule Changes and IPR Procedures.

Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.

Peter C. Schechter Vice-Chair, AIPPI-US Div. of AIPLA Partner, Osha Liang LLP Post-Issuance Review Proceedings: Update & Trends in IPR & PGR 1 © AIPLA.

Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.

McDermott Will & Emery Roundtable Updates from the PTAB February 25, 2013 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal.

Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.

Patent Reexamination: Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Reexamination and Litigation.

IEEE Region 6 Conference on Intellectual Property, Licensing, and Capital Flow Keith D. Grzelak, Chair IEEE-USA IPC Chair IEEE-USA IP Professionals Chair.

Appeals From AIA Trials 35 U.S.C. § 141 – Final Written Decision must be appealed to the Federal Circuit File a Notice of Appeal with the Director of the.

1 PPAC Patents Operations Update Peggy Focarino Deputy Commissioner for Patents July 8, 2010.

Using the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) for Post Grant Pilot Applications How to identify relevant information in AIA proceedings at the Patent.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 9 – Final Written Decision and Appeal 1.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.

Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.

Omer/LES International/

The America Invents Act: Five Years Later November 10, 2016 Jessica L

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure

TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD OVERVIEW

U. S. District Court Perspective on Patent Adjudication Barbara M. G

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons

Patent Practice in View Of PTAB AIA Proceedings

POST Grant RevieW UPDATES

CBM/PGR Differences Differences in time periods of availability, parties who have standing, grounds of challenge available, standards of review, and.

What Small Businesses Need to Know About Intellectual Property (IP)

Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge January 25, 2018

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Mark Wine June 6, 2014

Mark P. Wine Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP June 6, 2014

Inter Partes Review Best Practices 2018

Karl Renner Dorothy Whelan Chris Marchese

Prosecution Luncheon Patent February 2017

SCC Degrees & Certificates Awarded Academic Year to Academic Year

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics

Update and Practical Considerations

SAS Institute v. Iancu SAS appeals arguing § 318 requires deciding patentability of all claims challenged ComlimentSoft sues SAS for patent infringement.

IPRs: Coordination & Estoppel

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision

Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association

PTAB Bar Association Conference—March 2, 2017

Presentation transcript:

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark Office

PTAB Overview 2

USPTO Locations 3

Union of Board States 4

PTAB Office Location Demographics as of October 20, 2014

Allocation of Judges * As of October 20, 2014

Appeals Overview 7

PTAB Inventory – Pending Ex Parte Appeals (excluding appeals from reexamination proceedings )

Decisions by Type: FY2013

AIA Trials Overview 10

AIA Petitions (Cumulative Numbers as of October 16, 2014) 11

AIA Progress (as of October 16, 2014) AIA Monthly Filings Total2,157 IPR1,908 CBM 241 PGR2 DER6

AIA Progress (as of October 16, 2014) AIA Petition Technology Breakdown

AIA Progress (as of October 16, 2014) AIA Petition Dispositions Trials Instituted Joinders Percent Instituted Denials Total No. of Decisions on Institution IPR FY %26203 FY % FY %1074 CBM FY %317 FY %30122 FY154-80%15 DERFY14--0%33

AIA Progress (as of October 16, 2014) AIA Final Dispositions Settlements Adverse Judgments Final Written Decisions IPR FY FY FY CBM FY FY FY15 4-2

16 The Patent Trial and Appeal Board