Calspan In-Flight Simulation Projects SAE Presentation Oct 2008 Learjet – Automated Aerial Refueling Learjet – Sense & Avoid Flight Test Flight Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Advertisements

Overview FEBRUARY 2010 TR-UK Defence Industry Day.
Air Traffic Management
1 DWC FLIGHT TEST EDUCATION AT UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL IN REALIZATION OF CDIO INITIATIVES 2009 International CDIO Conference June 7-10, 2009 Singapore Polytechnic.
We help the best buildings in the world get that way. Complete Building Solutions.
Melissa K. Rudinger Vice President Government Affairs Weather Decision Making/Priorities for Improvement Next Generation of Aviation Weather and GA Safety.
Introduction The Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) is an airborne system that interrogates transponders in other aircraft. From the replies.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Research Laboratories Automated Aerial Refueling: Extending the Effectiveness of Unmanned.
Omega Tanker (K-707) Air Refueling Procedures Brief
Omega KDC-10 Air-to-Air Refueling Procedures. KDC-10 Tanker Former Japan Airlines DC modified for air-to-air refueling (AAR) Flight Refueling Limited.
THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony Lab for Control and Automation Princeton University Princeton,
1 Compositional Verification of Hybrid Systems Using Simulation Relations Doctorate Defense Goran Frehse Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Oct. 10, 2005.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System TCAS
TCAS Basics Capt Craig Hinkley. 2 TCAS HISTORY  Two planes collided over the Grand Canyon  Alternative airborne version using transponders.
Omega Tanker (K-707) Air Refueling Procedures Brief
Interoperability of Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems Lixia Song James K. Kuchar Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
SpeedNews Aerospace & Defense Suppliers Conference Rich Baldwin Vice President, Military Sales 5/11/05.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Calspan Flight Research Recent Activities Lou Knotts SAE ACGSC Meeting Salt Lake City March 2-4, 2005.
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
Cirrus Transition Course
AIRSPACE What’s old –What’s new!.
Project Partners AUVSI North America 10 th - 14 th August 2009 Mr Reece Clothier Prof. Rodney Walker The Smart Skies Project.
Technology Maturation for the Automated Aerial Refueling (AAR) Project Carol Ventresca SynGenics Corporation Case Number: 88ABW , Distribution:
1 Carl B. Jezierski Manager, Airborne Technologies Group Ralph J. Yost Project Lead, Airborne Networks FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center SAE Aerospace.
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
20 In-Trail Climb experience and an airlines view of ASAS opportunities Captain Rocky Stone United Airlines Manager – Flight Systems Technology.
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations Safety % All US Accidents Efficiency --
The Robert A. Reisman Precision Armaments Laboratory
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT D ECISION- S UPPORT FOR E NHANCING A VIATION W EATHER I NFORMATION S YSTEMS AND S AFETY.
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS LC&P Applications in Radar Airspace: Operational Scenario Example and Fast-Time Simulation Results.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
Multiple UAV Collision Avoidance with Realistic UAV Models Joel George and Debasish Ghose Guidance, Control, and Decision Systems Laboratory (GCDSL) Department.
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
Rocky Mountain Section General Meeting December 10, 2009.
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
Symbiotic Simulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Pollution prevention preparedness and response Kristján Geirsson Environment Agency of Iceland EPPR-meeting 10 Nov
Ecological Interface Design in Aviation Domains Improving Pilot Trust in Automated Collision Detection and Avoidance Advanced Interface Design Laboratory.
NextGen & ADS-B Presentation to Aviation Accreditation Board International (AABI) Industry/Educator Forum July 18, 2013 Kansas City, MO.
Tim Myers – Metron Aviation August 26, Evaluate weather-related operational inefficiencies or safety hazards in remote, non-radar controlled airspace.
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, October 11-13, 2006 Williamsburg, VA Lou Knotts/Eric Ohmit.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
Air Systems Division GROUND ASAS EQUIPMENT Michel Procoudine Gorsky ASAS TN2 – Workshop 5 Toulouse 17th-20th September 2007.
UAV See & Avoid Employing Vision Sensors
UAV’s: Scenarios Smart bombs  no need to return to base Reconnaissance/surveillance  types of sensors used, mission specifics (e.g. round trip, refuel.
Issues and Challenges for Co-operative UAV Missions Chris Halliday and Tony Dodd.
© Copyright 2008 Rockwell Collins, Inc. All rights reserved. Proprietary Information Rockwell Collins SAE ACGSC Meeting 102 General Committee Briefing.
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, March 1-3, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV E. Ohmit.
ASAS TN2 Briefing Cyro Stone 15 April 2008.
Chapter 13 By devin walz QUIZ.
February 2007 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Boulder, CO February 2007 John Bosworth (661)
Discussions Summary ASSTAR - Crossing & Passing session.
Eurocontrol ACAS Programme ACTOR/wp3/SLID/D 03/08/01 - v1.0 Slide 1 ACAS II operations in the European RVSM environment ACAS II mandate in Europe (1/2)
© 2002 GMU SYST 495 AATMS Team Autonomous Air Traffic Management System (AATMS): The Management and Design of an Affordable Ground-Based Air Traffic Management.
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
Meeting #96 Brian Van Vliet Chief, Control Sciences Division AFRL/VAC; Air Force Research Laboratory AEROSPACE.
FAA Support for DoD’s UAS AI Joint Test Joint University Program (JUP) TIM Al Schwartz, Modeling and Simulation Branch, ANG-C55 January 21, 2016.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
1 DFRC SUAS Program Operations and Risk Management Approach for Small UAS Presented to the Certification Working Group 6/26/2008 Brad Flick/DFRC Chief.
ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES DISTRIBUTED AIR/GROUND-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 5 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar Budapest June 2003.
Collision Avoidance AIAA Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Systems, Technology, and Operations Conference Sense, Detect and Avoid Workshop.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
Brandon Maier, Project Manager
Artificial Intelligence in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
Presentation transcript:

Calspan In-Flight Simulation Projects SAE Presentation Oct 2008 Learjet – Automated Aerial Refueling Learjet – Sense & Avoid Flight Test Flight Research

Learjet Automated Aerial Refueling (AAR) AAR Sponsored by AFRL Other Major Participating Organizations: –NAVAIR, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Rockwell Collins, Titan Utilizing Learjet as “surrogate” UAV to host sensors & control systems Objectives: Clear Learjet to operate in refueling position around KC-135 No actual hook-up Gather PGPS data Evaluate acceptability of sensors PGPS & Datalink (TTNT) Installed & Checkout Servo-Throttle in LJ Evaluate control laws for automated refueling - Station Keeping Hold relative Tanker-to-LJ positions at engage Straight & Level 30º Banked Turns & Racetracks Evaluate Autonomous trajectory control Between Observation, Pre-Contact, Contact, Breakaway Done 2004 Done 2005 Done 2006 Done 2007 Evaluate Redundancies & Contingencies In 2009

Learjet AAR Initial Test Flight Tests: –Sep 2004 –At Niagara Falls with 107 th ANG KC-135 –Cleared LJ to operate with KC-135 –Gathered data for PGPS & EO sensors –8 flights, 12 Flt-Hrs Second Flight Test: –Sep 2005 –At NAWCWD China Lake, CA –Datalink tests –Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT) –Checked out Servo -Throttle –7 Flights, 10 Flt-Hrs

Learjet AAR Third Flight Test: –Jul/Aug 2006 –At Niagara Falls with 107 th ANG KC-135 Very efficient operations Dedicated aircraft / crews / facilities –AUTONOMOUS Station-Keeping –Safety Pilot flew to various refueling positions, then engaged simulation –AAR GPS-based Control Laws in Boeing Flight Control Computer - FCC –FCC interfaced with Learjet VSS through sensors & commands to control elevator, aileron, rudder, throttle. Held relative Tanker-to-LJ engaged positions - VERY precise Straight & Level, 30º Banked Turns, & Racetrack patterns Light to Moderate Turbulence –Gathered IR Camera data for “Hybrid” system –Flew 20 Flights, 30 Flt-Hrs

Learjet AAR Fourth Flight Test: –Jul/Sep 2007 –At Niagara Falls with 107 th ANG KC-135 –AUTONOMOUS Transitions and Station-Keeping –Safety Pilot flew to Transition Point (1500 ft in trail), then engaged simulation for remainder of flight. –AAR Control Laws flew transitions between positions: Initiated by test engineer. Autonomous Transitions during: –Straight & Level, 30º Banked Turns, & Racetrack patterns Station Keeping at all positions –Flew 19 Flights, 32 Flt-Hrs: On one flight: stayed engaged 75 minutes, >20 minutes at Contact

Learjet AAR Fifth Flight Test: –July 2009 –At Forbes Field, KS with 190 th Kansas ANG KC-135 –Test of AAR RELNAV system redundancy and contingencies –Multiple TTNT datalinks in Tanker. –Multiple INS/GPS systems in Learjet Surrogate Receiver. –Safety Pilots will manually fly all refueling positions. –Fly ~ 10 Flights, 20 Flt-Hrs

Learjet AAR Positions Around Tanker

Learjet AAR LJ in Contact Position in Turn

Learjet AAR LJ Test Engineer Control/Display LJ Pilots’ View

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test UAV Sense & Avoid in National Air Space. Autonomously Detect and Avoid intruder aircraft in terminal environment. Cooperative & Non-Cooperative Intruders Equivalent Level-of-Safety as piloted operations. Equivalent Level-of-Behavior as piloted operations. COOPERATIVE TCAS or Mode-C Detectable Coordinated Collision Avoidance NON-COOPERATIVE Detect with Cameras

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test AFRL – Sponsor Northrop Grumman (NGC) – Prime contractor Calspan – Installations and Flight Test in Learjet –Simulate UAV (Global Hawk-like) dynamics –Backup Intruder (LJ3 & LJ4) Defense Research Associates (DRA) – Camera system, detector, tracker Bihrle – Provides avoidance software FAA – Provides “Intruders” (Convair-580 & King Air) & ADS-B ICx – Provides radar (AI-130 used in helos for tower & cable detection) Cooperative Intruder (TCAS-II and ADS-B Equipped) –Utilizes Resolution Advisory (RA) commands Non-Cooperative Intruder (No transponders, Uses only cameras) –EO 3-Camera System –Radar Intrusion Scenarios: –One & Two Intruder scenarios: Level head-on, cross-track, climb/descend head-on, overtake, cross-track.

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test Phase I –Oct ‘07 – Jan ‘07, 22 Flights – 39 Hours –Used EO cameras and IR cameras Phase II –Apr/May ‘08, Nov ‘08, Apr ‘09 –Using Radar data fused with EO Camera data. –Radar provides better range data than cameras. –Improved detection and false alarm rejection. Phase III –Later in 2009 –Will use a new prototype Global Hawk SAA radar to replace ICx AI-130.

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test  0.5 nm 0.2 nm Typical Multiple Intrusion Scenarios  0.5 nm 0.2 nm King Air is 0.2 nm beyond Learjet when Learjet crosses CPA Learjet: 150 KIAS King Air: 150 KIAS Convair: 150 KIAS

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test Modified LJ Radome with EO 3-Camera & ICx Radar Installation

Learjet Sense & Avoid Flight Test